toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

Acceesing Filer in Workgroup mode.
by Kale, Nandkishor 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Hi all, I am running Netapp F230 with Netapp Release 5.2.1, The Filer was a member of a domain, but the users were migrated to another domain, so I ran cifs setup & tried to join it to a new domain, it is throwing up an error, that a computer account has to be created for it to join the domain. Since creating a Computer account is going to take a long time (Dont ask me why..... there are so many issues to that. ). I tried to join it back to the old domain, to my bad luck the security information has been changed, & a new computer account cannot be created in that domain as it is being phased out. So I am stuck now. So I have made it as a member of a workgroup, but users are not able to access the filer, How do you create local users on the filer so that users can logon with that credentials. Or can somebody suggest me a better way of accessing the filer. Regards Manjunath HN

2 1

How to sell a netapp
by Professor Frink 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

I know this isn't a for-sale list, and I'm not trying to use it for this. But I would like to know what people think is the best way to sell a NetApp. I have three 1T-ish F740's that I am selling, and have tried putting them on eBay, as well as putting the shelves/heads separately on eBay, and the bids were just ridiculously low, so I ended up pulling the auctions. At one time I remember hearing about an ISP equipment mailing list. Is there any preferred list like this, or other common place for selling Network Appliance hardware? Any tips would be appreciated. Thanks.

2 1

RE: Acceesing Filer in Workgroup mode.
by Victor Olsen 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Hi, To join a NT4 domain you have to create a computeraccount for the filer in the domain first. If you are joining an AD "domain" you can create the account from the command line on the filer when you run cifs setup. The reason your users are not able to access the filer in workgroup mode is probably your old ONTAP release. In 5.x you have to connect with plain text passwords. If the clients connecting are NT4 or later they will try to use encrypted passwords. Victor To turn off encrypted passwords: NT4: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Rdr\Parameters On the Edit menu, click Add Value. Add the following: Value Name: EnablePlainTextPassword Data Type: REG_DWORD Data: 1 Click OK and then quit Registry Editor. Shut down and restart Windows NT. W2K: Click Start, point to Programs, point to Administrative Tools, and then click Local Security Policy. On the Security Setting folder, click to expand Local Policies, and then double-click Security Options. Double-click: Microsoft Network Client: Send unencrypted passwords to connect to third-party SMB servers , and then click the Enabled radio button. -----Original Message----- From: Kale, Nandkishor [mailto:Nandkishor_Kale@bmc.com] Sent: 18. desember 2003 06:02 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Acceesing Filer in Workgroup mode. Hi all, I am running Netapp F230 with Netapp Release 5.2.1, The Filer was a member of a domain, but the users were migrated to another domain, so I ran cifs setup & tried to join it to a new domain, it is throwing up an error, that a computer account has to be created for it to join the domain. Since creating a Computer account is going to take a long time (Dont ask me why..... there are so many issues to that. ). I tried to join it back to the old domain, to my bad luck the security information has been changed, & a new computer account cannot be created in that domain as it is being phased out. So I am stuck now. So I have made it as a member of a workgroup, but users are not able to access the filer, How do you create local users on the filer so that users can logon with that credentials. Or can somebody suggest me a better way of accessing the filer. Regards Manjunath HN

1 0

RE: NetBackup 4.5 ,NDMP backup failing for root volume
by manish.a.kinnerkar＠jpmorgan.com 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Thanks all for responding so fast, Timothy and Stephen were the one's harping on resolving the issue to be either at filer end or Veritas end. And this approach proved correct. As soon they asked me to check dump for root volume ... i remembered that i hadn't checked this for root, but done a dump for other volumes , just to ascertain whether the SCSI channel was the issue . I checked the same today, and bingo > dump 0uf nrst0a /vol/vol0 DUMP: creating "/vol/vol0/../snapshot_for_backup.26" snapshot. DUMP: could not create "backup" snapshot : No more snapshots available. Please delete one or more snapshots before trying backup again. DUMP: Dump failed to initialize. DUMP: DUMP IS ABORTED As any backup on our NAS is a Snapshot and backup, so if number of snapshots exceeds the limit allowed by OS , then we cant take any backup on that volume. My problem was some old snapshots lying around, and so the limit of 31 in 6.3.3D11 was reached. I have deleted the snapshots not required, and now all's well. Thanks & regards, Manish A Kinnerkar. stephen.j.darragh(a)baesystems.com 12/17/2003 11:00 PM To: manish.a.kinnerkar(a)jpmorgan.com cc: Subject: RE: NetBackup 4.5 ,NDMP backup failing for root volume Hi, I would try to do a netapp dump of /vol/vol0 and get Veritas out of the picture. If it fails, it's a problem with the tape or drive. If that works, then I would go to the filer and there are options ndmpd debug 50 and ndmpd debug screen (toggle to turn off all the messages to the screen) ndmpd debug by itself will let you check the values. This will create debug files in the etc directory of the filer. Also, create /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/ndmp so the backup attempt will get logged. Now try a backup with Veritas and you should have some data that you can post or log to either netapp or veritas. Good luck, the error 99s are generic and hard to track down. Stephen Darragh -----Original Message----- From: manish.a.kinnerkar(a)jpmorgan.com [mailto:manish.a.kinnerkar@jpmorgan.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:56 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: NetBackup 4.5 ,NDMP backup failing for root volume Hi All, We are having a setup of 2 filers with locally attached Tape drives - part of a Multihost Tape librbary . The scheduling & backup control is via a Netbackup 4.5 server via NDMP. The filers as well as the Backup server are a part of a Win2k domain . On one filer, the backup of /vol/vol0 fails specefically after initiation of the ndmp session with the filer. All other volumes can be backed up properly without any such issues. The ndmp session report on the filer is initiated , tape is opened and then it is displays as halted . In netbackup the error code is 99 , which asks you to check the backup file list for invalid entries. The other filer's backup goes well for all volumes including root. I have checked by trying /vol/vol0 or /etc or / as the paths , with no effect.All options seem same on both filers. Can someone suggest what would specefically need to checked in this case. regards, Manish This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates. This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates.

1 0

RE: backup question (Summary)
by Geoff Hardin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

First, let me say thanks to everyone who responded. Second, it appears that there are no stand alone FC drives on the market now. There are a couple of drives that have native FC support (LTO-2 and STK 9xxx), but they are available only as a part of a library configuration. So in our situation, it looks like we'll just attach the tape drives to the Sun server and back everything up via NFS (hope they don't want CIFS data on the filer!), or they'll have to open the pocket book a bit wider and buy a small autoloader or library. Thanks again for all the responses! Geoff Hardin geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > On Behalf Of Geoff Hardin > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:39 PM > To: toasters > Subject: backup question > > > I am getting a FAS270c for a small project. The users are concerned > > about the data security and do not want the data to cross the wire to > our current backup solution. So, we're limited to a couple of direct > attached tape drives on the FAS270 because the amount of data does not > justify a small library. Is there anyone else out there doing this? > What did you use? I can't find any stand alone FC (optical) tape > drives. > > Thanks for the help! > > Geoff Hardin > geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com > If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried.

3 2

NetBackup 4.5 ,NDMP backup failing for root volume
by manish.a.kinnerkar＠jpmorgan.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi All, We are having a setup of 2 filers with locally attached Tape drives - part of a Multihost Tape librbary . The scheduling & backup control is via a Netbackup 4.5 server via NDMP. The filers as well as the Backup server are a part of a Win2k domain . On one filer, the backup of /vol/vol0 fails specefically after initiation of the ndmp session with the filer. All other volumes can be backed up properly without any such issues. The ndmp session report on the filer is initiated , tape is opened and then it is displays as halted . In netbackup the error code is 99 , which asks you to check the backup file list for invalid entries. The other filer's backup goes well for all volumes including root. I have checked by trying /vol/vol0 or /etc or / as the paths , with no effect.All options seem same on both filers. Can someone suggest what would specefically need to checked in this case. regards, Manish This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates.

1 0

RE: Clearcase on Netapps
by Kumar, Rahul 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

No..Its Full Clearcase -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Bob Borowicz Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:46 AM To: toasters Subject: Re: Clearcase on Netapps Yes... Is it Clearcase LT or Full Clearcase? Clearcase LT does NOT support VOBS on NetApp.... -Rob Kumar, Rahul wrote: > Hi, > > We have our clearcase vobs on Netapps.. > > When a windows users tries to checkin a file, the windows explorer > crashes often.... Any ideas... > > F740- Ontap6.4.1 (clnt Windows 2000+sp3 with CC 4.2) > > Regards > Rahul >

1 0

Clearcase on Netapps
by Kumar, Rahul 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, We have our clearcase vobs on Netapps.. When a windows users tries to checkin a file, the windows explorer crashes often.... Any ideas... F740- Ontap6.4.1 (clnt Windows 2000+sp3 with CC 4.2) Regards Rahul

2 1

RE: Virus Protection ideas
by Uren, Jim 16 Dec '03

16 Dec '03

A clarification to Michel's excellent information. "...files are always written to disk, whenever they contain a virus or not." The filer will request a scan for viruses when there is a file extension match and the client request is one of: a) file open b) file rename c) file close (but only if the file was modified) When a file is created there is no scan. When the newly created file is written to, there is no scan. Scanning after each write would kill performance. However, when the file is closed, a scan will occur. As long as the anti-virus server has been set to clean/quarantine/delete if viruses are detected, any infection will be taken care of right then, not when a second client subsequently opens the file. -----Original Message----- From: Michel GELDENHUYS [mailto:michel.geldenhuys@danone.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:48 AM To: Toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Virus Protection ideas Hi Jon, I think you have two options: - the first one is to forget about virus scanning on your Filer and rely on antivirus software installed on your workstations and servers ;-) - the second one is to go with the virus protection for CIFS way implemented in Data Ontap. Extract from DPG: "CIFS virus protection is a Data ONTAP feature that allows a virus-scanning PC client running Network Appliance-compliant antivirus applications to provide on-access virus scanning of files on a filer. On-access virus scanning means that a file is scanned before a CIFS client is allowed to open it." So files are always written to disk, whenever they contain a virus or not. This is to keep the blasting performance of our Filers at the top. But when an "open file" request is issued, Data Ontap interacts with the antivirus server so that the second scans the file and eventually prevent access to it in case it's infected. You'll find all the story in DOT's Data Protection Guide (see following URL, requires NOW access: http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel642p6/html/ontap/dpg/vsca…) For compliant antivirus software, Symantec and Trend have one: Symantec: http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/products/products.cfm?ProductID=145 Trend Micro: http://www.trendmicro.com/en/products/file-server/sp-netapp/evaluate/overvi… Kind regards, Michel Geldenhuys Danone Belgium SA/NV +32 2 776 68 23 michel.geldenhuys(a)danone.com "Jon Kroff" <JKroff(a)hollandhart.com> Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com 16/12/2003 17:14 To: <Toasters(a)mathworks.com> cc: Subject: Virus Protection ideas I am about to consolidate all data storage on to a FAS940 using iSCSI LUNs and CIFS. I was wondering what kind of virus protection companies are using on their appliances for their simple CIF shares. We currently own the Trend Micro suite as well as Symantec suite, if either of those would work. Any input is greatly appreciated. Jon Kroff Network Engineer Holland & Hart LLP 555 17th Street, Suite 3200 Denver, CO 80202 Phone: 303.295.8308 E-mail: jkroff(a)hollandhart.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is confidential and may be privileged. If you believe that this email has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error; then please delete this e-mail. Thank you.

1 0

RE: Virus protection
by Hill, Aaron 16 Dec '03

16 Dec '03

We use Trendmicro Server Protect for Network Appliance across multiple filers for a few thousand users. - fairly straightforward setup - easy to administer and monitor. Incidents and outbreaks are well reported - Pattern updates and notification is solid - Our vendor support has been excellent Definitely worth considering against any of the other major vendors. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Jon Kroff [mailto:JKroff@hollandhart.com] Sent: Wednesday, 17 December 2003 2:41 AM To: Toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Virus protection I am about to consolidate all data storage on to a FAS940 using iSCSI LUNs and CIFS. I was wondering what kind of virus protection companies are using on their appliances for their simple CIF shares. We currently own the Trend Micro suite as well as Symantec suite, if either of those would work. Any input is greatly appreciated. Jon Kroff Network Engineer Holland & Hart LLP 555 17th Street, Suite 3200 Denver, CO 80202 Phone: 303.295.8308 E-mail: jkroff(a)hollandhart.com <http://www.hollandhart.com/> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is confidential and may be privileged. If you believe that this email has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error; then please delete this e-mail. Thank you. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. **************************************************

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters