toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13523 discussions

Unbreaking a disk
by Professor Frink 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Trying to get a few netapps ready for putting them up for sale, and one of them I had lost the password. I booted from floppy, but used a wrong version of OnTap (or something else went horribly wrong, not sure which), and the system complains about "no data or parity disks" and lists every drive as broken. I somehow doubt all 28 drives suddenly broke, so I'm wondering how I flag a drive as not broken again, so I can zero out the array and start over. (I remember knowing this at one point, on some hidden maintenance menu.) Any tips would be appreciated. And note to self: disable "return receipts" before posting to the mailing list. Sorry if I caused any inconvenience to folks, but I promise you, I paid for it. There sure are a lot of you out there :-). (I would have thought the mailing list software would have stripped return receipt requests, but oh well.) Thanks folks.

2 1

RE: Re: How to sell a netapp
by Borders, Rich 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Good [mailto:chris@g2.nu] > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:19 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: How to sell a netapp > > "Professor Frink" wrote: > > I have three 1T-ish F740's that I am selling, and have > tried putting > > them on eBay, as well as putting the shelves/heads > separately on eBay, > > and the bids were just ridiculously low, so I ended up pulling the > > auctions. > > Used values are very low on old used gear and really don't > reflect original purchase prices at all. Unless you > negotiated to have transferable licences when you purchased > them then realistically they're only going to fetch a few > thousand dollars. Some of the best intrinsic value is transferable support of Network Appliance. The licenses are a costly big deal also. The hardware is not as expensive. As an employee, I can buy one of the top newest filers personally but the hardware cost is a fraction than the licensing. The fact is, without the technical support and the keys to license the software, you are really bound as to what these devices can do. Rich

1 0

RE: Acceesing Filer in Workgroup mode.
by Kale, Nandkishor 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Hi, Thanks for the reply, I did not find any option of creating a machine account while running Cifs setup, can u help me in this. Regards Manjunath -----Original Message----- From: Victor Olsen [mailto:victor.olsen@proact.no] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 12:24 PM To: 'Kale, Nandkishor'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Acceesing Filer in Workgroup mode. Hi, To join a NT4 domain you have to create a computeraccount for the filer in the domain first. If you are joining an AD "domain" you can create the account from the command line on the filer when you run cifs setup. The reason your users are not able to access the filer in workgroup mode is probably your old ONTAP release. In 5.x you have to connect with plain text passwords. If the clients connecting are NT4 or later they will try to use encrypted passwords. Victor To turn off encrypted passwords: NT4: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Rdr\Parameters On the Edit menu, click Add Value. Add the following: Value Name: EnablePlainTextPassword Data Type: REG_DWORD Data: 1 Click OK and then quit Registry Editor. Shut down and restart Windows NT. W2K: Click Start, point to Programs, point to Administrative Tools, and then click Local Security Policy. On the Security Setting folder, click to expand Local Policies, and then double-click Security Options. Double-click: Microsoft Network Client: Send unencrypted passwords to connect to third-party SMB servers , and then click the Enabled radio button. -----Original Message----- From: Kale, Nandkishor [mailto:Nandkishor_Kale@bmc.com] Sent: 18. desember 2003 06:02 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Acceesing Filer in Workgroup mode. Hi all, I am running Netapp F230 with Netapp Release 5.2.1, The Filer was a member of a domain, but the users were migrated to another domain, so I ran cifs setup & tried to join it to a new domain, it is throwing up an error, that a computer account has to be created for it to join the domain. Since creating a Computer account is going to take a long time (Dont ask me why..... there are so many issues to that. ). I tried to join it back to the old domain, to my bad luck the security information has been changed, & a new computer account cannot be created in that domain as it is being phased out. So I am stuck now. So I have made it as a member of a workgroup, but users are not able to access the filer, How do you create local users on the filer so that users can logon with that credentials. Or can somebody suggest me a better way of accessing the filer. Regards Manjunath HN

1 0

Factory mode in F800 diagnostics
by Joseph Gerbino 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Hello, Does anyone know how to enter the Factory mode in F800 diagnostics? I have figured out how to enter Manufacturing mode but not Factory mode. I am trying to change the model information on a replacement backplane. Thank you in advance for any help! Joe jgerbino483(a)hotmail.com _________________________________________________________________ Have fun customizing MSN Messenger learn how here! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_customize

1 0

Acceesing Filer in Workgroup mode.
by Kale, Nandkishor 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Hi all, I am running Netapp F230 with Netapp Release 5.2.1, The Filer was a member of a domain, but the users were migrated to another domain, so I ran cifs setup & tried to join it to a new domain, it is throwing up an error, that a computer account has to be created for it to join the domain. Since creating a Computer account is going to take a long time (Dont ask me why..... there are so many issues to that. ). I tried to join it back to the old domain, to my bad luck the security information has been changed, & a new computer account cannot be created in that domain as it is being phased out. So I am stuck now. So I have made it as a member of a workgroup, but users are not able to access the filer, How do you create local users on the filer so that users can logon with that credentials. Or can somebody suggest me a better way of accessing the filer. Regards Manjunath HN

2 1

How to sell a netapp
by Professor Frink 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

I know this isn't a for-sale list, and I'm not trying to use it for this. But I would like to know what people think is the best way to sell a NetApp. I have three 1T-ish F740's that I am selling, and have tried putting them on eBay, as well as putting the shelves/heads separately on eBay, and the bids were just ridiculously low, so I ended up pulling the auctions. At one time I remember hearing about an ISP equipment mailing list. Is there any preferred list like this, or other common place for selling Network Appliance hardware? Any tips would be appreciated. Thanks.

2 1

RE: Acceesing Filer in Workgroup mode.
by Victor Olsen 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Hi, To join a NT4 domain you have to create a computeraccount for the filer in the domain first. If you are joining an AD "domain" you can create the account from the command line on the filer when you run cifs setup. The reason your users are not able to access the filer in workgroup mode is probably your old ONTAP release. In 5.x you have to connect with plain text passwords. If the clients connecting are NT4 or later they will try to use encrypted passwords. Victor To turn off encrypted passwords: NT4: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Rdr\Parameters On the Edit menu, click Add Value. Add the following: Value Name: EnablePlainTextPassword Data Type: REG_DWORD Data: 1 Click OK and then quit Registry Editor. Shut down and restart Windows NT. W2K: Click Start, point to Programs, point to Administrative Tools, and then click Local Security Policy. On the Security Setting folder, click to expand Local Policies, and then double-click Security Options. Double-click: Microsoft Network Client: Send unencrypted passwords to connect to third-party SMB servers , and then click the Enabled radio button. -----Original Message----- From: Kale, Nandkishor [mailto:Nandkishor_Kale@bmc.com] Sent: 18. desember 2003 06:02 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Acceesing Filer in Workgroup mode. Hi all, I am running Netapp F230 with Netapp Release 5.2.1, The Filer was a member of a domain, but the users were migrated to another domain, so I ran cifs setup & tried to join it to a new domain, it is throwing up an error, that a computer account has to be created for it to join the domain. Since creating a Computer account is going to take a long time (Dont ask me why..... there are so many issues to that. ). I tried to join it back to the old domain, to my bad luck the security information has been changed, & a new computer account cannot be created in that domain as it is being phased out. So I am stuck now. So I have made it as a member of a workgroup, but users are not able to access the filer, How do you create local users on the filer so that users can logon with that credentials. Or can somebody suggest me a better way of accessing the filer. Regards Manjunath HN

1 0

RE: NetBackup 4.5 ,NDMP backup failing for root volume
by manish.a.kinnerkar＠jpmorgan.com 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Thanks all for responding so fast, Timothy and Stephen were the one's harping on resolving the issue to be either at filer end or Veritas end. And this approach proved correct. As soon they asked me to check dump for root volume ... i remembered that i hadn't checked this for root, but done a dump for other volumes , just to ascertain whether the SCSI channel was the issue . I checked the same today, and bingo > dump 0uf nrst0a /vol/vol0 DUMP: creating "/vol/vol0/../snapshot_for_backup.26" snapshot. DUMP: could not create "backup" snapshot : No more snapshots available. Please delete one or more snapshots before trying backup again. DUMP: Dump failed to initialize. DUMP: DUMP IS ABORTED As any backup on our NAS is a Snapshot and backup, so if number of snapshots exceeds the limit allowed by OS , then we cant take any backup on that volume. My problem was some old snapshots lying around, and so the limit of 31 in 6.3.3D11 was reached. I have deleted the snapshots not required, and now all's well. Thanks & regards, Manish A Kinnerkar. stephen.j.darragh(a)baesystems.com 12/17/2003 11:00 PM To: manish.a.kinnerkar(a)jpmorgan.com cc: Subject: RE: NetBackup 4.5 ,NDMP backup failing for root volume Hi, I would try to do a netapp dump of /vol/vol0 and get Veritas out of the picture. If it fails, it's a problem with the tape or drive. If that works, then I would go to the filer and there are options ndmpd debug 50 and ndmpd debug screen (toggle to turn off all the messages to the screen) ndmpd debug by itself will let you check the values. This will create debug files in the etc directory of the filer. Also, create /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/ndmp so the backup attempt will get logged. Now try a backup with Veritas and you should have some data that you can post or log to either netapp or veritas. Good luck, the error 99s are generic and hard to track down. Stephen Darragh -----Original Message----- From: manish.a.kinnerkar(a)jpmorgan.com [mailto:manish.a.kinnerkar@jpmorgan.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:56 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: NetBackup 4.5 ,NDMP backup failing for root volume Hi All, We are having a setup of 2 filers with locally attached Tape drives - part of a Multihost Tape librbary . The scheduling & backup control is via a Netbackup 4.5 server via NDMP. The filers as well as the Backup server are a part of a Win2k domain . On one filer, the backup of /vol/vol0 fails specefically after initiation of the ndmp session with the filer. All other volumes can be backed up properly without any such issues. The ndmp session report on the filer is initiated , tape is opened and then it is displays as halted . In netbackup the error code is 99 , which asks you to check the backup file list for invalid entries. The other filer's backup goes well for all volumes including root. I have checked by trying /vol/vol0 or /etc or / as the paths , with no effect.All options seem same on both filers. Can someone suggest what would specefically need to checked in this case. regards, Manish This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates. This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates.

1 0

RE: backup question (Summary)
by Geoff Hardin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

First, let me say thanks to everyone who responded. Second, it appears that there are no stand alone FC drives on the market now. There are a couple of drives that have native FC support (LTO-2 and STK 9xxx), but they are available only as a part of a library configuration. So in our situation, it looks like we'll just attach the tape drives to the Sun server and back everything up via NFS (hope they don't want CIFS data on the filer!), or they'll have to open the pocket book a bit wider and buy a small autoloader or library. Thanks again for all the responses! Geoff Hardin geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > On Behalf Of Geoff Hardin > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:39 PM > To: toasters > Subject: backup question > > > I am getting a FAS270c for a small project. The users are concerned > > about the data security and do not want the data to cross the wire to > our current backup solution. So, we're limited to a couple of direct > attached tape drives on the FAS270 because the amount of data does not > justify a small library. Is there anyone else out there doing this? > What did you use? I can't find any stand alone FC (optical) tape > drives. > > Thanks for the help! > > Geoff Hardin > geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com > If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried.

3 2

NetBackup 4.5 ,NDMP backup failing for root volume
by manish.a.kinnerkar＠jpmorgan.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi All, We are having a setup of 2 filers with locally attached Tape drives - part of a Multihost Tape librbary . The scheduling & backup control is via a Netbackup 4.5 server via NDMP. The filers as well as the Backup server are a part of a Win2k domain . On one filer, the backup of /vol/vol0 fails specefically after initiation of the ndmp session with the filer. All other volumes can be backed up properly without any such issues. The ndmp session report on the filer is initiated , tape is opened and then it is displays as halted . In netbackup the error code is 99 , which asks you to check the backup file list for invalid entries. The other filer's backup goes well for all volumes including root. I have checked by trying /vol/vol0 or /etc or / as the paths , with no effect.All options seem same on both filers. Can someone suggest what would specefically need to checked in this case. regards, Manish This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters