toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13514 discussions

Re: Has anyone seen
by ScottUCE＠aol.com 15 Jul '02

15 Jul '02

For those of you running older NetApps that might not be under NetApp service contract, remember to keep in mind that -- in addition to newer NetApp stuff -- we will always have a complete assortment of old F200, 300, 500, 600 motherboards, parts, add-ons, etc. ready to ship at low prices. Scott Scott Fischmann Union Computer Exchange, Inc. 6233 Idylwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55436 email: scott(a)unioncomputer.com phone: 952 935 7282 | fax: 952 935 5056 > Subj:Re: Has anyone seen > Date:7/15/2002 10:27:15 AM Central Daylight Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:cerda@motown.cc.utexas.edu">cerda(a)motown.cc.utexas.edu</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:PBryant@burallplastec.com">PBryant(a)burallplastec.com</A> > CC:<A HREF="mailto:toasters@mathworks.com">toasters(a)mathworks.com</A> > Sent from the Internet > > > > The old LCD problem:-) Here's my story... > > We had an F220 with an LCD problem. The LCD went completely out. The filer > would crash and we would get a watchdog reset on reboot, it didn't reboot. > We > solved the problem temporally by disconnecting the LCD. We replaced the LCD > and > the machine ran for about a year before the LCD went out again. The problem > was > fixed by replacing the motherboard. > > -Michael Cerda > University of Texas > Austin, Texas >

1 0

Has anyone seen
by Peter Bryant 15 Jul '02

15 Jul '02

*** Before acting on this e-mail or opening any attachment you are advised to read the disclaimer at the end of this e-mail *** The LCD display on the filer shift one character to the left. Thus reading "otal ops/second" We've cleared it by restarting, just wondered if anyone else had a clue (as NA seem unsure) Peter ******************************* Disclaimer ***************************** Confidentiality: This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. ********************** http://www.burallplastec.com ********************

2 1

Urgent Assistance Please
by cecilia mark aku 14 Jul '02

14 Jul '02

DEAR SIR, REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE. I AM MRS CECILIA MARK AKU, WIDOW OF LATE ISHAYA MARK AKU,MINISTER FOR YOUTHS AND SPORTS IN NIGERIA, WHO DIED ON 4TH APIRL,2002, IN A PLANE CRASH . I HAVE BEEN INFORMED BY MY FAMILY ATTORNEY, BARRISTER JAMES MOSES, THAT MY LATE HUSBAND DEPOSITED TWO TRUNK BOXES CONTAINING MONEY AMOUNTING TO THE SUM OF THIRTY-FIVE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS ($35,500,000=).THE MONEY WAS DEPOSITED AND CREDITED IN THE NAME OF A FOREIGN PARTNER WHO WILL RETRIEVE THE MONEY FROM THE SAFE KEEPING COMPANY. IN VIEW OF THIS, THE ATTORNEY NOW ADVISED ME TO SEEK THE CONFIDENCE OF A FOREIGN PARTNER WHO CAN VOLUNTEER THE RETRIEVAL OF THE TWO TRUNK BOXES FROM THE SECURITY COMPANY, FOR ONWARD DISBURSEMENT AND INVESTMENT, BASED ON THE FOREIGN PARTNER'S DIRECT SUPERVISION AS DIRECTED IN MY LATE HUSBAND'S WILL. TO ENSURE A REWARD FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE, YOU WILL BE COMPENSATED WITH 30% OF THE TOTAL SUM OF $35.5M.SIMILARLY,5%OF THE FUND HAS BEEN SET ASIDE FOR EXPENSES THAT MAY BE INCURRED IN THE PROCESS OF RETRIEVING THE TRUNK BOXES.LASTLY,MY OWN SHARE WILL BE 65% OF THE TOTAL SUM. AS EARLIER STATED,HIS WILL HAD INSTRUCTED THAT FOREIGN SHARES,BONDS AND STOCKS SHOULD BE BOUGHT AFTER THE FUNDS HAVE BEEN RETRIEVED FROM THE SECURITY COMPANY,AS WELL AS INVEST IN THE PARTNER'S COUNTRY WITH HIS ASSISTANCE. THIS IS AIMED AT SECURING THE FUTURE OF OUR CHILDREN. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THIS PROPOSAL, THEREFORE,KINDLY FORWARD YOUR RESPONSE BY EMAIL TO ME URGENTLY. YOU CAN ALSO SEND YOUR PRIVATE TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBERS FOR FURTHER EASE OF COMMUNICATION. TO THIS END,NOTE THAT I HAVE BEEN ASSURED THAT THE TRANSACTION WILL BE CONCLUDED WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF RECEIVING YOUR RESPONSE. ON HEARING FROM YOU ALSO,I SHALL IMMEDIATELY COMMENCE THE PROCESS OF RETIRIEVING THE WILL.MAY I AT THIS POINT EMPHASIZE THE NEED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY IN THIS TRANSACTION, WHICH IS TO PREVENT THE UNNECESSARY INTRUSION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF MY COUNTRY. I SINCERELY DO HOPE THAT YOU WILL NOT BETRAY THE CONFIDENCE I REPOSE ON YOU.THIS, YOU WILL ACHIEVE, BY GIVING ME ASSURANCE THAT YOU WILL NOT SIT ON THE FUNDS WHEN YOU RETRIEVE IT FROM THE SAFE KEEPING COMPANY. MRS.CECILIA MARK AKU

1 0

Do You Need THE Second Income???
by igor051＠themail.com 13 Jul '02

13 Jul '02

CONGRATULATIONS!! You've Been Selected! CLICK HERE to Sign Up For FREE Membership!! http://igor051.5u.com/eng.htm We are looking for SERIOUS people wanting to make SERIOUS MONEY! How would you like to earn Full-Time Income working Part-Time? Better yet, how would you like to do the work once and keep getting paid for your previous efforts? So, if you need a second income.... CHECK IT OUT! JOIN US FOR FREE! CLICK HERE to Sign Up For FREE Membership!! http://igor051.5u.com/eng.htm Now you can see why we are taking the Internet by Storm! It's no wonder why we have over 1 million members in JUST 3 YEARS! What do you have to lose? Put aside your doubts and you'll be amazed like our past skeptics! Please CLICK HERE to Sign Up For FREE Membership!! http://igor051.5u.com/eng.htm NO OBLIGATION. You can cancel your FREE MEMBERSHIP AT ANY TIME! This message is not intended for residents in the states of CA, NC, NV, RI, TN, VA & WA. Screening of addresses has been done to the best of our technical ability. If you have received this email in error, or do not wish to receive any future emails pertaining to this topic CLICK HERE <mailto:club@bendin-cds.com?subject=remove>. A REMOVE address to be permanently removed from our list has been provided at no cost to you. Mail bombing, hacking, or any interference with this REMOVE address will result in our inability to process remove requests. Please allow others that wish to be removed the ability to do so. Simply type remove in the subject line and press send. Please allow 24-48 hours for your request to be processed. We honor all removal requests. We honor ALL REMOVE REQUESTS. Thank you! </B Please type remove in the subject line and allow 48 hours for your request to be processed. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By submitting this request for a FREE DHSC Membership, I agree to accept email from The DHS Club about their Consumer and Business Opportunities". -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shopping Spree Win a $100 shopping spree with your FREE membership to DHSC.Drawing held monthly. Enjoy fantastic online savings every time you shop.

1 0

filer CPU usage - getting warmer
by Ambrose_Earle＠shamrockfoods.com 13 Jul '02

13 Jul '02

Armed with the above information, the next step was to perform some packet traces to see what I could find. Thankfully (?) the problem is continuous, so I could time my traces to only capture the spikes and I could wait until late in the night to limit the extraneous packets as much as possible. Doing this a bunch of times I was able to isolate what seems to be the problem. However, correlation does not imply causation, it merely points a finger in its direction. I won't really know until Monday when I'm able to stop the process to see if the spikes disappear. Because the traffic flows over a vif, I can only capture the entire vif and not an individual interface. I also do not know how our 6509 was configured, so I can't attempt to calculate over which port the traffic from this client would be directed, but the amount and type of traffic leads me to believe that I have found the culprit. This particular application server runs a program within a DOS on a Windows 98 PC. It sends hundreds of search requests at exactly the same time as the CPU spikes. Researching this shows some related bugs - 35047 or 40348. If this is the problem, then I'll see what can be done about the application. If nothing, then I'll be opening a case. Thanks to the personal replies I received from NetApps.

2 1

filer CPU usage - more information?
by Ambrose_Earle＠shamrockfoods.com 13 Jul '02

13 Jul '02

After digging deeper, it seems that the spikes correlate perfectly with the "driver" process for e3c. e3c is part of a four-way trunk group running to a Cisco 6509. Any thoughts about what might make one NIC need so much attention? I have interleaved the ps commands about where they occurred while a sysstat was running. I hope this is clear F840C*> ps -z CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk in out read write read write age hit time ty util 1% 88 52 0 140 237 40 24 76 0 0 27 100% 7% : 4% 6% 49 202 0 251 57 408 3173 0 0 0 27 98% 0% - 38% 3% 33 253 0 286 205 1030 684 16 0 0 27 99% 0% - 9% 4% 89 188 0 277 152 506 4188 0 0 0 27 95% 0% - 41% 2% 127 144 0 271 151 948 837 0 0 0 27 99% 0% - 14% 3% 119 2 0 121 102 32 32 16 0 0 27 100% 0% - 1% 0% 24 0 0 24 123 28 0 0 0 0 27 100% 0% - 0% 1% 28 0 0 28 18 2 0 0 0 0 27 100% 0% - 0% 3% 116 137 0 253 98 250 2664 16 0 0 27 96% 0% - 20% 3% 35 160 0 195 184 1991 2300 0 0 0 27 98% 0% - 28% F840C*> ps -h Process statistics over 9.799 seconds... ID State Domain %CPU StackUsed %StackUsed Name 1 RR i 97% 276 6% idle_thread0 F840C*> ps -z 6% 25 114 0 139 14 58 1976 2240 0 0 27 98% 27% T 35% 3% 33 82 0 115 106 967 3916 16 0 0 27 95% 0% - 44% 4% 141 78 0 219 137 1005 4392 0 0 0 27 92% 0% - 42% 7% 105 74 0 179 53 700 5220 0 0 0 27 96% 0% - 51% 5% 56 148 0 204 317 1515 4292 16 0 0 27 97% 0% - 45% 6% 82 217 0 299 451 1408 4888 0 0 0 27 97% 0% - 39% 4% 164 163 0 327 86 2053 3628 0 0 0 27 98% 0% - 36% 1% 62 5 0 67 107 148 32 16 0 0 27 100% 0% - 1% F840C*> ps -h Process statistics over 7.586 seconds... ID State Domain %CPU StackUsed %StackUsed Name 1 RR i 98% 276 6% idle_thread0 0% 17 0 0 17 107 4 0 0 0 0 27 100% 0% - 0% 0% 20 0 0 20 1 1 0 0 0 0 27 100% 0% - 0% 1% 110 1 0 111 70 11 32 16 0 0 27 100% 0% - 1% 6% 39 165 0 204 107 78 1740 2128 0 0 27 98% 21% T 27% 8% 22 409 0 431 177 1691 5345 0 0 0 27 97% 0% - 35% F840C*> ps -z 4% 75 320 0 395 136 2526 2828 16 0 0 27 98% 0% - 20% 46% 104 404 0 508 179 432 0 0 0 0 27 100% 0% - 0% 94% 360 313 0 673 143 157 0 0 0 0 27 100% 0% - 0% 92% 34 311 0 345 131 86 40 16 0 0 27 100% 0% - 2% 48% 14 589 0 603 366 815 0 0 0 0 27 100% 0% - 0% 5% 209 633 0 842 205 1985 732 0 0 0 27 100% 0% - 15% F840C*> ps -h Process statistics over 5.988 seconds... ID State Domain %CPU StackUsed %StackUsed Name 1 RR i 51% 276 6% idle_thread0 17 BR k 18% 9060 27% FastEnet-10/100/e3c 8% 134 184 0 318 369 696 4463 16 0 0 27 97% 0% - 28% 1% 143 58 0 201 272 1871 156 0 0 0 27 97% 0% - 1% F840C*> ps -h Process statistics over 386.288 seconds... ID State Domain %CPU StackUsed %StackUsed Name 1 RR i 84% 276 6% idle_thread0 17 BR k 5% 9060 27% FastEnet-10/100/e3c

1 0

filer CPU usage
by Ambrose_Earle＠shamrockfoods.com 12 Jul '02

12 Jul '02

I'm trying to track down a repeated CPU spike on one of my filers. About every 30 seconds, sysstat will show the CPU usage at or near 100%. There is no pattern to this other than the length of time between spikes. What are some common things I should look for? What commands might help me track down the culprit? Here's an example: 96% 86 733 0 819 378 1054 36 0 0 0 30 100% 0% - 2% 95% 62 609 0 671 357 819 1106 16 0 0 30 100% 0% - 15% 32% 80 597 0 677 532 363 1352 0 0 0 30 100% 0% - 17% 9% 47 750 0 797 1209 715 2960 0 0 0 30 96% 0% - 37% 11% 36 777 0 813 1310 1597 5564 16 0 0 30 97% 0% - 55% 5% 102 876 0 978 940 1837 296 0 0 0 30 99% 0% - 11% 2% 59 165 0 224 370 403 16 0 0 0 30 100% 0% - 1% 15% 27 504 0 531 53 228 744 7108 0 0 30 100% 29% T 25% 11% 45 827 0 872 1222 559 56 68 0 0 30 100% 7% : 4% 1% 81 102 0 183 367 764 0 0 0 0 30 100% 0% - 0% 1% 39 79 0 118 38 166 32 16 0 0 30 100% 0% - 2% 3% 32 345 0 377 128 216 768 0 0 0 30 96% 0% - 15% 9% 159 756 0 915 310 1122 6048 0 0 0 30 98% 0% - 72% 10% 371 543 0 914 1764 2896 2660 16 0 0 30 98% 0% - 34% 1% 127 85 0 212 1122 729 16 0 0 0 30 99% 0% - 1% 1% 24 67 0 91 183 179 4 0 0 0 30 100% 0% - 1% 2% 248 101 0 349 69 177 56 16 0 0 30 100% 0% - 2% 2% 144 104 0 248 100 476 0 0 0 0 30 100% 0% - 0% 18% 18 156 0 174 383 297 2345 5569 0 0 30 100% 30% T 29% 5% 38 350 0 388 102 239 1376 2300 0 0 30 100% 18% : 21% 6% 374 262 0 636 148 582 3504 0 0 0 30 94% 0% - 39% 5% 80 236 0 316 231 1251 4724 0 0 0 30 94% 0% - 41% 4% 0 266 0 266 396 2253 3128 16 0 0 30 97% 0% - 27% 1% 37 97 0 134 245 609 0 0 0 0 30 100% 0% - 0% 1% 53 83 0 136 155 275 0 0 0 0 30 100% 0% - 0% 1% 76 82 0 158 57 151 48 16 0 0 30 100% 0% - 1% 2% 57 169 0 226 38 343 8 0 0 0 30 100% 0% - 1% 2% 179 167 0 346 170 311 28 0 0 0 30 99% 0% - 3% 8% 50 310 0 360 205 670 6068 16 0 0 30 97% 0% - 54% 11% 130 406 0 536 530 1192 4612 3260 0 0 30 98% 31% T 60% 8% 27 768 0 795 184 1086 3748 92 0 0 30 98% 10% : 35% 43% 64 500 0 564 190 949 3836 16 0 0 30 100% 0% - 21% 92% 46 677 0 723 1178 1455 3383 0 0 0 30 100% 0% - 21%

1 0

SNMP Support for Filers
by Ben Rockwood 11 Jul '02

11 Jul '02

Hello Toasters, I am working on some new apps for monitoring and reporting on my Filers, however I'm running into a roadblock because I'm only using SNMPv1. Does OnTap support SNMPv2c? If so, how do I enable it? I can't seem to find any options for it. Thank You. Ben Rockwood

1 0

RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap?
by Pero, Eric P (ETSD, IT) 10 Jul '02

10 Jul '02

Thanks for the feedback. I am running 6.1.3R1. Since the 6.2 solution is out, how do I parse my logs and forward the events to a SNMP host? Eric -----Original Message----- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:51 PM To: Drew(a)cooperneff.com; Eric.Pero(a)thehartford.com Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? Eric.Pero(a)thehartford.com (Eric Pero) wrote: > > How do you enable the trap for QTREE quotas (or is this already on when you > do the "snmp init 1" with the other factory traps)? Drew(a)cooperneff.com (Drew O'Donnell) replies: < < Traps are only generated when the volume is full, not the qtree. We parse < our logs because messages picks up a qtree error when the quota is exceeded, < then we forward this to openview. If you are running ONTAP 6.2 or above, you should be able to set a soft quota for a qtree (or user, or group, for that matter) that will among other things trigger an SNMP trap when exceeded. Or so the documentation says: I haven't actually tried this. Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this communication and destroy all copies.

1 0

RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap?
by Drew O'Donnell 10 Jul '02

10 Jul '02

Traps are only generated when the volume is full, not the qtree. We parse our logs because messages picks up a qtree error when the quota is exceeded, then we forward this to openview. -----Original Message----- From: Pero, Eric P (ETSD, IT) [mailto:Eric.Pero@thehartford.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:06 AM To: 'Eisler, Alex'; 'markallen'; 'Drew O'Donnell'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? How do you enable the trap for QTREE quotas (or is this already on when you do the "snmp init 1" with the other factory traps)? Eric -----Original Message----- From: Eisler, Alex [mailto:alex.eisler@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:30 AM To: 'markallen'; 'Drew O'Donnell'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? The easier way is just to enable the snmp traps (with 'snmp traps enable' and 'snmp init 1'). This will cause all the factory set traps (like fan failures, disk failures, power supply, temp etc.) to be enabled automatically. (The list is in the MIB, at the end, titled "NetApp trap definitions", on MIB versions 1.5 and up) Alex. -----Original Message----- From: markallen [mailto:markallen@micron.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 16:53 To: 'Drew O'Donnell'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? Drew, I went into filerview and created a snmp trap for a failed fan. I new what the normal values were and I knew what the abnormal values were. I found out this information by viewing the two files found in /etc/mib. I inverted the values in the SNMP trap by using a normal value to send the trap on. Once it sent the traps and I was finished testing I changed the trip value back to normal so I'm watching for a failed fan or cpu. For example if the normal state of a fan is value=0 and the failed state value=1 I changed the trip value for testing purposes to 0 and then once the testing was over I changed it back to watch for 1. I hope this helps. -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Drew O'Donnell [mailto:Drew@cooperneff.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 7:22 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? I was interested in this as well, we want to run a scheduled snmp check which will verify our system is working. I would like to write some sort of RSH job to generate a generic trap which we could run weekly. Pulling out a fan is actually how we checked this, but it is not a preferable regular testing procedure. Any Ideas? Drew -----Original Message----- From: Eisler, Alex [mailto:alex.eisler@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:21 AM To: 'Mark Allen'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? Unscrew one of the fans, pull it out, wait for the light to turn orange, push it back in. That should fire 4 snmp traps: 1. FanFail 2. Status critical 3. FanRepaired 4. Status normal Alex. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Allen [mailto:markallen@micron.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 19:29 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? All: I set up some snmp traps via filer view and I would like to simulate or test the traps to make sure they works. I set up traps for a failed disk, failed pdu, failed fan, and cluster failover notification. The filer is in production and I would like to find a way to test this out without actually failing the hardware myself. Any ideas? -Mark This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this communication and destroy all copies.

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters