toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap?
by mds＠gbnet.net 10 Jul '02

10 Jul '02

Strikes me that that *is* failing the hardware hisself. On Wed 10 Jul, 2002, "Eisler, Alex" <alex.eisler(a)intel.com> wrote: > Unscrew one of the fans, pull it out, wait for the light to turn orange, > push it back in. That should fire 4 snmp traps: > 1. FanFail > 2. Status critical > 3. FanRepaired > 4. Status normal > > Alex. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Allen [mailto:markallen@micron.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 19:29 > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? > > All: > > I set up some snmp traps via filer view and I would like to simulate or test > the > traps to make sure they works. I set up traps for a failed disk, failed pdu, > > failed fan, and cluster failover notification. The filer is in production > and I > would like to find a way to test this out without actually failing the > hardware > myself. Any ideas? > > -Mark >-- End of excerpt from "Eisler, Alex" -- -Mark ... an Englishman in London ...

1 0

RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap?
by Drew O'Donnell 10 Jul '02

10 Jul '02

I was interested in this as well, we want to run a scheduled snmp check which will verify our system is working. I would like to write some sort of RSH job to generate a generic trap which we could run weekly. Pulling out a fan is actually how we checked this, but it is not a preferable regular testing procedure. Any Ideas? Drew -----Original Message----- From: Eisler, Alex [mailto:alex.eisler@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:21 AM To: 'Mark Allen'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? Unscrew one of the fans, pull it out, wait for the light to turn orange, push it back in. That should fire 4 snmp traps: 1. FanFail 2. Status critical 3. FanRepaired 4. Status normal Alex. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Allen [mailto:markallen@micron.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 19:29 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? All: I set up some snmp traps via filer view and I would like to simulate or test the traps to make sure they works. I set up traps for a failed disk, failed pdu, failed fan, and cluster failover notification. The filer is in production and I would like to find a way to test this out without actually failing the hardware myself. Any ideas? -Mark

1 0

RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap?
by Eisler, Alex 10 Jul '02

10 Jul '02

Unscrew one of the fans, pull it out, wait for the light to turn orange, push it back in. That should fire 4 snmp traps: 1. FanFail 2. Status critical 3. FanRepaired 4. Status normal Alex. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Allen [mailto:markallen@micron.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 19:29 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? All: I set up some snmp traps via filer view and I would like to simulate or test the traps to make sure they works. I set up traps for a failed disk, failed pdu, failed fan, and cluster failover notification. The filer is in production and I would like to find a way to test this out without actually failing the hardware myself. Any ideas? -Mark

1 0

RE: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap?
by Pero, Eric P (ETSD, IT) 10 Jul '02

10 Jul '02

Mark (or anyone on Toasters), Where do you configure the "trip value"? Also, I have a normal trap setup to go to my SNMP host, but I am not getting alerts, especially when we have QTREES set up to alert us when a QTREE gets to 90%. I have had some QTREES exceed 90% and never was alerted. Thanks, Eric Pero The Hartford Intel Server Team Eric.Pero(a)thehartford.com (860)547-4073 -----Original Message----- From: Mark Allen [mailto:markallen@micron.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:21 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? Thanks for all the feedback. Immediately after I sent the email I figured out that I can change the trip value to the normal value. Once I did this the traps started cranking up on our traphost. I was then able to view the trap message on our traphost and create notification script by replacing normal values for the actual trip values. Thanks -Mark >Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:10:41 -0400 (EDT) >From: "Daniel H. Brown" <brown(a)brauhausdc.org> >To: Mark Allen <markallen(a)micron.com> >Subject: Re: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-MTFilter-%I%: jade >X-MTHubFilter-1.6: mail-srv1 > > >You might get the snmpd stuff off the net and send some "fake" traps using >that. They won't actually be from your filer, but, it should allow you to >test what happens when the traps arrive. > >here's the first bit of the "snmptrap" man page out of that package. > >SNMPTRAP(1) SNMPTRAP(1) > > > >NAME > snmptrap, snmpinform - sends an SNMP trap to a manager > >... > > >On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Mark Allen wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:28:52 -0600 (MDT) >> From: Mark Allen <markallen(a)micron.com> >> To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >> Subject: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? >> >> All: >> >> I set up some snmp traps via filer view and I would like to simulate or test the >> traps to make sure they works. I set up traps for a failed disk, failed pdu, >> failed fan, and cluster failover notification. The filer is in production and I >> would like to find a way to test this out without actually failing the hardware >> myself. Any ideas? >> >> -Mark >> >> > >-- >Dan Brown >brown(a)brauhausdc.org ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this communication and destroy all copies.

1 0

Re: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap?
by Mark Allen 09 Jul '02

09 Jul '02

Thanks for all the feedback. Immediately after I sent the email I figured out that I can change the trip value to the normal value. Once I did this the traps started cranking up on our traphost. I was then able to view the trap message on our traphost and create notification script by replacing normal values for the actual trip values. Thanks -Mark >Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:10:41 -0400 (EDT) >From: "Daniel H. Brown" <brown(a)brauhausdc.org> >To: Mark Allen <markallen(a)micron.com> >Subject: Re: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-MTFilter-%I%: jade >X-MTHubFilter-1.6: mail-srv1 > > >You might get the snmpd stuff off the net and send some "fake" traps using >that. They won't actually be from your filer, but, it should allow you to >test what happens when the traps arrive. > >here's the first bit of the "snmptrap" man page out of that package. > >SNMPTRAP(1) SNMPTRAP(1) > > > >NAME > snmptrap, snmpinform - sends an SNMP trap to a manager > >... > > >On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Mark Allen wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:28:52 -0600 (MDT) >> From: Mark Allen <markallen(a)micron.com> >> To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >> Subject: How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap? >> >> All: >> >> I set up some snmp traps via filer view and I would like to simulate or test the >> traps to make sure they works. I set up traps for a failed disk, failed pdu, >> failed fan, and cluster failover notification. The filer is in production and I >> would like to find a way to test this out without actually failing the hardware >> myself. Any ideas? >> >> -Mark >> >> > >-- >Dan Brown >brown(a)brauhausdc.org ------------- End Forwarded Message -------------

1 0

How can I test or simulate an SNMP trap?
by Mark Allen 09 Jul '02

09 Jul '02

All: I set up some snmp traps via filer view and I would like to simulate or test the traps to make sure they works. I set up traps for a failed disk, failed pdu, failed fan, and cluster failover notification. The filer is in production and I would like to find a way to test this out without actually failing the hardware myself. Any ideas? -Mark

1 0

Re: Where are they now? [was: Visiting Network Appliance (OT)]
by Chris Thompson 09 Jul '02

09 Jul '02

Earlier today I wrote: > > Brian Tao's request reminds me that we've seen almost nothing in toasters > from posters @netapp.com in the last two months. [There was one from > Charles Roufay on 30 May: before that I can find nothing since 3 May.] > > As there used to be quite a lot, I wonder what's behind this. Technical > problems posting to the list? Managerial edicts telling NetApp employees > to stop wasting time on us losers? > > Not that there's any obligation on NetApp's part to contribute, of course. I have had several responses from within NetApp, all saying much the same thing. Steven Yee specifically requested that I publish his response here, so I will do that: | I would appreciate if you would repost this to toasters for me. | | NetApp Employees (well, engineering at least ;) still read toasters, | and often privately reply as appropriate. However we are currently unable to | easily post replies due to our use of an "internal exploder"/dl forwarder. | With spam-preventing changes to list posting we cannot post unless | every employee individually joins the list (not highly recommended company wide). | | Even worse, if we do a reply, it will often go to the list instead of the poster | and we don't even see a bounced message, it just silently disappears | and never shows up on the list (so it could be days before we notice | that the answer was never received). | | Should you (or any lister) recieve an answer directly from NetApp, in most | cases the reply can be reposted to the list for the benefit of all, if in doubt | as to the appropriateness of the reply, please check with the originator of the | message. | | The list owner and maintainers were (as of 2 months ago) aware of the NetApp | posting problem but I have heard of no resolution as of yet. Believe me, this has | caused some concern in the engineering side of the house. | | steve. | -- | Steven Yee == sdy(a)netapp.com | System Management Software | Network Appliance Inc This doesn't seem to me to be at all a healthy situation. I understand the necessity to close the list in a hurry due to the spam situation, but problems like the above ought to have been ironed out by now. Most list management software I am aware of allows for the set of permitted posters and the (direct) list recipients to be different. Would fubar care to comment? Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

2 1

NetApp Filer administrators archive list
by SMAILBEGOVIC D ext OCISI 09 Jul '02

09 Jul '02

Many search engines point to a "NetApp Filer administrators archive list" at the URL http://teaparty.mathworks.com:1999/toasters/index.html. This URL seems to be unavailable. We can't find it elsewhere on the Web. Could you, please, send to us the correct URL to that document or the document itself ? We would appreciate very much. Regards, Deni Smailbegovic

2 1

NT/filer slowdown
by SMAILBEGOVIC D ext OCISI 09 Jul '02

09 Jul '02

Some of our users in a large NT/filer environment experience a huge sporadic slowdown (20 min OK, 5 min slow) when a filer or NT BDC work with distant DCs through the secure channels over WAN links. Symptoms: windows explorer frozen, save as... in Word frozen/slow, filer share mapping lost, logon impossible, etc. Please tell me if you have experienced the similar problems... Can it be related to the WINS, DFS or some other configuration? Regards, Deni Smailbegovic

1 0

Re: Where are they now? [was: Visiting Network Appliance (OT)]
by mds＠gbnet.net 08 Jul '02

08 Jul '02

Could be the growing pains of a company about to give birth to another major product line at variance from their prior philosophy.. Not that I know anything. Anyone know what SAN might stand for? -- -Mark ... an Englishman in London ...

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters