toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

Re: Upgrade
by Bryan_West＠shamrockfoods.com 16 Jul '02

16 Jul '02

Sounds to me like your problem lies in the fact that your filer is not in a true Windows 2000 Mode. I believe that 6.1 adds full support for Windows 2000 Domains, but don't quote me on that. To solve you problem do the following: In your windows 2000 DNS server add a new alias or CNAME: MESIROWFINANCIA CNAME MESIROWFINANCIAL.NET This is for backwards compatibility for your old clients and servers. After the upgrade of the filer re-run CIFS SETUP Make sure you delete the computer account for the filer in your domain and have it re-created. Once completed you should be able to run CIFS DOMAININFO and get the following: DNS Domain Name: MESIROWFINANCIAL.NET Type: Windows 2000 You are also having a problem because your Domain name is longer than 15 Characters: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q226144 Windows 9x machines and any other Netbios based systems will not be able to access it using the full name. Good luck. Bryan. |---------+-----------------------------> | | "Sayla, Mustafa" | | | <MSAYLA@mesirowfin| | | ancial.com> | | | Sent by: | | | owner-toasters@mat| | | hworks.com | | | | | | | | | 07/16/2002 10:36 | | | AM | | | | |---------+-----------------------------> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: "'toasters(a)mathworks.com'" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> | | cc: | | Subject: Upgrade | >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Yesterday we tried to upgrade our F760 filer running 6.0.1r3 to 6.1.2r3. After the upgrade our NFS environment worked fine but cifs environment would not work. I can go to filer view and everything looked fine, I can see my shares, qtree and snapshots fine. All configurations as far as domain, DNS server, WINS and other networking is also fine. Yet when I try to access a share it will ask me for a login name and password. Same behavior when I try to access filer through network neighborhood even though I am logged in as administrator. We have a windows 2000 domain and a Windows NT 4.0 domain and there is a two way trust between them. Filer is in Windows 2000 domain and it was there even before the upgrade and been working fine. Talked to NetApp support and they made me try different things but could not be able to solve the issue. According to them they have never seen this kind of problem before. After the upgrade when it did not work I ran the cifs setup it gave me an error: "DNS does not appear to be configured correctly for proper windows 2000 operation in this domain. The filer could not resolve simple domain name 'MESIROWFINANCIA' to DNS form 'MESIROWFINANCIAL.NET' If I use a filer view setup wizard it would give me an error that domain name is illegal. What is confusing here is filer had been working fine for over two years in the same w2k domain with the same name without any problem. Netapp tech support had me run setup quite a few times and I also came across an error CIFS - Domain name not legal in the root volume language. After trying to fix this problem for 5 hours I finally decided to roll back so that filer is up and functioning. Once I rolled back to 6.0.1r3 cifs started to work but now NFS works fine, access from NT 4.0 domain works fine but if you are logged in to windows 2000 domain you cannot access the filer even though filer is also in windows 2000 domain. When you try to access it will give you an error "The account is not authorized to log in from this station". The case is still open with Netapp and we are trying different things but so far no luck. Any suggestion and help from you guys will be highly appreciated. Mustafa Sayla Sr. Network Administrator Mesirow Financial 312-595-6388

1 0

Upgrade
by Sayla, Mustafa 16 Jul '02

16 Jul '02

Yesterday we tried to upgrade our F760 filer running 6.0.1r3 to 6.1.2r3. After the upgrade our NFS environment worked fine but cifs environment would not work. I can go to filer view and everything looked fine, I can see my shares, qtree and snapshots fine. All configurations as far as domain, DNS server, WINS and other networking is also fine. Yet when I try to access a share it will ask me for a login name and password. Same behavior when I try to access filer through network neighborhood even though I am logged in as administrator. We have a windows 2000 domain and a Windows NT 4.0 domain and there is a two way trust between them. Filer is in Windows 2000 domain and it was there even before the upgrade and been working fine. Talked to NetApp support and they made me try different things but could not be able to solve the issue. According to them they have never seen this kind of problem before. After the upgrade when it did not work I ran the cifs setup it gave me an error: "DNS does not appear to be configured correctly for proper windows 2000 operation in this domain. The filer could not resolve simple domain name 'MESIROWFINANCIA' to DNS form 'MESIROWFINANCIAL.NET' If I use a filer view setup wizard it would give me an error that domain name is illegal. What is confusing here is filer had been working fine for over two years in the same w2k domain with the same name without any problem. Netapp tech support had me run setup quite a few times and I also came across an error CIFS - Domain name not legal in the root volume language. After trying to fix this problem for 5 hours I finally decided to roll back so that filer is up and functioning. Once I rolled back to 6.0.1r3 cifs started to work but now NFS works fine, access from NT 4.0 domain works fine but if you are logged in to windows 2000 domain you cannot access the filer even though filer is also in windows 2000 domain. When you try to access it will give you an error "The account is not authorized to log in from this station". The case is still open with Netapp and we are trying different things but so far no luck. Any suggestion and help from you guys will be highly appreciated. Mustafa Sayla Sr. Network Administrator Mesirow Financial 312-595-6388

1 0

rename across qtrees?
by David Lee 16 Jul '02

16 Jul '02

Executive summary of question: Is there a fast, efficient way to move a directory tree from one qtree to another? (Can a rename/mv simply relink across qtrees?) Detail: (We are new to NetApp, so this might be a FAQ: if so, just point me in the right direction.) We soon need to move the home directories of a few thousand users from a couple of Sun/Solaris NFS/Samba fileservers onto a NetApp. On the old Sun fileservers, these users are subgrouped using one scheme (into about 100 subgroups); on the new NetApp they'll be redistributed into about five qtrees. Ideally, we would simply pull them across the network (a long evening's work!) dumping them into one qtree on the NetApp. The second step would be to redistribute them into their new qtrees and, for us, conceptually straightforward because the homedirectory names can be pattern-matched into corresponding qtrees. In UNIX-speak, the equivalent of: mv qtree_tmp/<...>/dir_pattern_1 qtree_a mv qtree_tmp/<...>/dir_pattern_2 qtree_b (about five commands, one per qtree). In UNIX-land, a "mv" within a volume is a fast operation, simply relinking from one parent directory into another; whereas an "mv" across volumes is (of necessity, of course) a much larger data-copying operation. On the NetApp/WAFL is such a move across qtrees a simple relink or is it a data-copying operation? Is there a NetApp command to move/rename a directory-tree? If so, what? Not having found a NetApp command, I experimented with an "mv" from a UNIX box which had the volume NFS-mounted. But this took a long time so, I presume, was doing a data-copy, rather than relink. (Hope I explained that reasonably clearly!) -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : University of Durham : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham : : Phone: +44 191 374 2882 U.K. :

3 3

filer CPU usage - resolution?
by Ambrose_Earle＠shamrockfoods.com 16 Jul '02

16 Jul '02

That was it. The DOS program was performing "search"es of hundreds of files in one directory. The problem became noticeable because the purge of the filers in that directory has been failing, allowing the files to accumulate. Again, the filers still have an issue handling search and the problem still occurs, but it is much less noticeable now that there are only a few dozen instead of a few hundred files involved.

1 0

CIFS Open Files
by Drew O'Donnell 15 Jul '02

15 Jul '02

We have an issue with open CIFS files on one of our filers. I would like an easy way see who has a specific file open and how to kick them out. Currently I use lock_dump command, but for some reason this will not run through RSH, so I can not redirect the results to a text file that I can search. Help, Please.... Drew

3 3

Re: Has anyone seen
by ScottUCE＠aol.com 15 Jul '02

15 Jul '02

For those of you running older NetApps that might not be under NetApp service contract, remember to keep in mind that -- in addition to newer NetApp stuff -- we will always have a complete assortment of old F200, 300, 500, 600 motherboards, parts, add-ons, etc. ready to ship at low prices. Scott Scott Fischmann Union Computer Exchange, Inc. 6233 Idylwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55436 email: scott(a)unioncomputer.com phone: 952 935 7282 | fax: 952 935 5056 > Subj:Re: Has anyone seen > Date:7/15/2002 10:27:15 AM Central Daylight Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:cerda@motown.cc.utexas.edu">cerda(a)motown.cc.utexas.edu</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:PBryant@burallplastec.com">PBryant(a)burallplastec.com</A> > CC:<A HREF="mailto:toasters@mathworks.com">toasters(a)mathworks.com</A> > Sent from the Internet > > > > The old LCD problem:-) Here's my story... > > We had an F220 with an LCD problem. The LCD went completely out. The filer > would crash and we would get a watchdog reset on reboot, it didn't reboot. > We > solved the problem temporally by disconnecting the LCD. We replaced the LCD > and > the machine ran for about a year before the LCD went out again. The problem > was > fixed by replacing the motherboard. > > -Michael Cerda > University of Texas > Austin, Texas >

1 0

Has anyone seen
by Peter Bryant 15 Jul '02

15 Jul '02

*** Before acting on this e-mail or opening any attachment you are advised to read the disclaimer at the end of this e-mail *** The LCD display on the filer shift one character to the left. Thus reading "otal ops/second" We've cleared it by restarting, just wondered if anyone else had a clue (as NA seem unsure) Peter ******************************* Disclaimer ***************************** Confidentiality: This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. ********************** http://www.burallplastec.com ********************

2 1

Urgent Assistance Please
by cecilia mark aku 14 Jul '02

14 Jul '02

DEAR SIR, REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE. I AM MRS CECILIA MARK AKU, WIDOW OF LATE ISHAYA MARK AKU,MINISTER FOR YOUTHS AND SPORTS IN NIGERIA, WHO DIED ON 4TH APIRL,2002, IN A PLANE CRASH . I HAVE BEEN INFORMED BY MY FAMILY ATTORNEY, BARRISTER JAMES MOSES, THAT MY LATE HUSBAND DEPOSITED TWO TRUNK BOXES CONTAINING MONEY AMOUNTING TO THE SUM OF THIRTY-FIVE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS ($35,500,000=).THE MONEY WAS DEPOSITED AND CREDITED IN THE NAME OF A FOREIGN PARTNER WHO WILL RETRIEVE THE MONEY FROM THE SAFE KEEPING COMPANY. IN VIEW OF THIS, THE ATTORNEY NOW ADVISED ME TO SEEK THE CONFIDENCE OF A FOREIGN PARTNER WHO CAN VOLUNTEER THE RETRIEVAL OF THE TWO TRUNK BOXES FROM THE SECURITY COMPANY, FOR ONWARD DISBURSEMENT AND INVESTMENT, BASED ON THE FOREIGN PARTNER'S DIRECT SUPERVISION AS DIRECTED IN MY LATE HUSBAND'S WILL. TO ENSURE A REWARD FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE, YOU WILL BE COMPENSATED WITH 30% OF THE TOTAL SUM OF $35.5M.SIMILARLY,5%OF THE FUND HAS BEEN SET ASIDE FOR EXPENSES THAT MAY BE INCURRED IN THE PROCESS OF RETRIEVING THE TRUNK BOXES.LASTLY,MY OWN SHARE WILL BE 65% OF THE TOTAL SUM. AS EARLIER STATED,HIS WILL HAD INSTRUCTED THAT FOREIGN SHARES,BONDS AND STOCKS SHOULD BE BOUGHT AFTER THE FUNDS HAVE BEEN RETRIEVED FROM THE SECURITY COMPANY,AS WELL AS INVEST IN THE PARTNER'S COUNTRY WITH HIS ASSISTANCE. THIS IS AIMED AT SECURING THE FUTURE OF OUR CHILDREN. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THIS PROPOSAL, THEREFORE,KINDLY FORWARD YOUR RESPONSE BY EMAIL TO ME URGENTLY. YOU CAN ALSO SEND YOUR PRIVATE TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBERS FOR FURTHER EASE OF COMMUNICATION. TO THIS END,NOTE THAT I HAVE BEEN ASSURED THAT THE TRANSACTION WILL BE CONCLUDED WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF RECEIVING YOUR RESPONSE. ON HEARING FROM YOU ALSO,I SHALL IMMEDIATELY COMMENCE THE PROCESS OF RETIRIEVING THE WILL.MAY I AT THIS POINT EMPHASIZE THE NEED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY IN THIS TRANSACTION, WHICH IS TO PREVENT THE UNNECESSARY INTRUSION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF MY COUNTRY. I SINCERELY DO HOPE THAT YOU WILL NOT BETRAY THE CONFIDENCE I REPOSE ON YOU.THIS, YOU WILL ACHIEVE, BY GIVING ME ASSURANCE THAT YOU WILL NOT SIT ON THE FUNDS WHEN YOU RETRIEVE IT FROM THE SAFE KEEPING COMPANY. MRS.CECILIA MARK AKU

1 0

Do You Need THE Second Income???
by igor051＠themail.com 14 Jul '02

14 Jul '02

CONGRATULATIONS!! You've Been Selected! CLICK HERE to Sign Up For FREE Membership!! http://igor051.5u.com/eng.htm We are looking for SERIOUS people wanting to make SERIOUS MONEY! How would you like to earn Full-Time Income working Part-Time? Better yet, how would you like to do the work once and keep getting paid for your previous efforts? So, if you need a second income.... CHECK IT OUT! JOIN US FOR FREE! CLICK HERE to Sign Up For FREE Membership!! http://igor051.5u.com/eng.htm Now you can see why we are taking the Internet by Storm! It's no wonder why we have over 1 million members in JUST 3 YEARS! What do you have to lose? Put aside your doubts and you'll be amazed like our past skeptics! Please CLICK HERE to Sign Up For FREE Membership!! http://igor051.5u.com/eng.htm NO OBLIGATION. You can cancel your FREE MEMBERSHIP AT ANY TIME! This message is not intended for residents in the states of CA, NC, NV, RI, TN, VA & WA. Screening of addresses has been done to the best of our technical ability. If you have received this email in error, or do not wish to receive any future emails pertaining to this topic CLICK HERE <mailto:club@bendin-cds.com?subject=remove>. A REMOVE address to be permanently removed from our list has been provided at no cost to you. Mail bombing, hacking, or any interference with this REMOVE address will result in our inability to process remove requests. Please allow others that wish to be removed the ability to do so. Simply type remove in the subject line and press send. Please allow 24-48 hours for your request to be processed. We honor all removal requests. We honor ALL REMOVE REQUESTS. Thank you! </B Please type remove in the subject line and allow 48 hours for your request to be processed. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By submitting this request for a FREE DHSC Membership, I agree to accept email from The DHS Club about their Consumer and Business Opportunities". -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shopping Spree Win a $100 shopping spree with your FREE membership to DHSC.Drawing held monthly. Enjoy fantastic online savings every time you shop.

1 0

filer CPU usage - getting warmer
by Ambrose_Earle＠shamrockfoods.com 13 Jul '02

13 Jul '02

Armed with the above information, the next step was to perform some packet traces to see what I could find. Thankfully (?) the problem is continuous, so I could time my traces to only capture the spikes and I could wait until late in the night to limit the extraneous packets as much as possible. Doing this a bunch of times I was able to isolate what seems to be the problem. However, correlation does not imply causation, it merely points a finger in its direction. I won't really know until Monday when I'm able to stop the process to see if the spikes disappear. Because the traffic flows over a vif, I can only capture the entire vif and not an individual interface. I also do not know how our 6509 was configured, so I can't attempt to calculate over which port the traffic from this client would be directed, but the amount and type of traffic leads me to believe that I have found the culprit. This particular application server runs a program within a DOS on a Windows 98 PC. It sends hundreds of search requests at exactly the same time as the CPU spikes. Researching this shows some related bugs - 35047 or 40348. If this is the problem, then I'll see what can be done about the application. If nothing, then I'll be opening a case. Thanks to the personal replies I received from NetApps.

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters