toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

Joint Business Investment
by tt mm 05 Feb '04

05 Feb '04

ATTN: President/Ceo Dear Sir/Madam LETTER OF INQUIRY We are two officials under our National Aviation Industry, and we are writing to seek for an opportunity to make an off-shore investment in your province preferably in your company if you can guarantee abundant progeny and viable returns ,we shall invest and enlarge its scope. The funds for this investment accrued from the commissions we secured from the sale-off of our Aviation used Air Crafts and the procurement of about 5 New BOEING-747 in our Aviation industry. If you are willing to negotiate this business with us, please contact me urgently on email address: t_mac(a)macmail.com Treat as most urgent, for a handsome reward awaits our mutual partnership. Sincerely, Capt. Mac Thomas __________________________________________________________________________ http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup Webmail ISP - Cool Connection, Cool Price

1 0

Removal request
by Wiebke, Robert (Robert) 05 Feb '04

05 Feb '04

Remove please

1 0

netapp and berkely db optimization
by Kelsey Cummings 05 Feb '04

05 Feb '04

I've got some questions that I'm hoping people on this list may be able to help answer. Background first. We're working on an application that uses alot of Berkeley DB hash files, via DB_File in perl. Right now, we are looking at about 30k individual databases. Overall, the application currently hit's about 1000 of these databases a minute with a few hundred reads per use and potentially an equal number of writes. Occasionally the application does grooming on the databases, rebuilding them to reclaim space and expire unused entries. Each database will be around 5 megs. We're testing on a pair of clustered 760s with half of the anticipated load. Each filer has 2 shelves of 18s. The load generated by the application is enough to max the disks on both filers. CPU utilization is around 40% and ops are generally under 1000. Disk read's average about 12mb/s, net out, around 5mb/s per filer. Now, here's the question. Under berkeley db you can control the hash bucket size which will default to the filesystem block unless other wise specified. Does anyone know what the optimum bucket size would be on a NetApp? Any help offered in tuning the application to best use the resources is greatly appreciated. -- Kelsey Cummings - kgc(a)sonic.net sonic.net, inc. System Administrator 2260 Apollo Way 707.522.1000 (Voice) Santa Rosa, CA 95407 707.547.2199 (Fax) http://www.sonic.net/ Fingerprint = D5F9 667F 5D32 7347 0B79 8DB7 2B42 86B6 4E2C 3896

2 1

happy new year
by Arno Kumpel Kumpel 05 Feb '04

05 Feb '04

Greetings! As you read this, I don't want you to feel sorry for me, because, I believe everyone will die someday. My name is Kumpe Arno 72yrsold a gold merchant in Spain.I have been diagnosed with cancer . It has defiled all forms of medical treatment, and right now I have only about a few months to live, according to medical experts. I have not particularly lived my life so well, as I never really cared for anyone(not even myself)but my business. Though I am very rich, I was never generous, I was always hostile to people and only focused on my business as that was the only thing I cared for. But now I regret all this as I now know that there is more to life than just wanting to have or make all the money in the world. I believe when God gives me a second chance to come to this world I would live my life a different way from how I have lived it. Now that God has called me, I have willed and given most of my property and assets to my immediate and extended family members as well as a few close friends. I want God to be merciful to me and accept my soul so, I have decided to give alms to charity organizations, as I want this to be one of the last good deeds I do on earth. So far, I have distributed money to some charity organizations in Spain, Algeria and Malaysia. Now that my health has deteriorated so badly, I cannot do this myself anymore. I once asked members of my family to close one of my accounts and distribute the money which I have there to charity organization in Bulgaria and Pakistan, they refused and kept the money to themselves. Hence, I do not trust them anymore, as they seem not to be contended with what I have left for them. Now, I am writing you from my laptop computer in my hospital bed where I await my time to come. I pray and hope that you understand my intentions and purpose and do not read my message for wrong reasons. I will want you to help me collect this deposit and dispatched it to charity organizations. Kumpel Arno.

1 0

known problems with linux 2.4.21 kernels?
by Stefan Funke 04 Feb '04

04 Feb '04

Hi all, we've found some odd failure messages at all linux machines running 2.4.21 here. Those machines report "NFS: server filerX-vif1 not responding, timed out" over the whole day again and again. All machines are either some DELL 2650 or HP Proliant DL360/DL380. All machines have a "Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme" Gigbit NIC. It seems that the same type of machines with linux kernel 2.4.18 have no NFS problems. Has anyone seen the same problems and if so - is it a kernel problem? Is 2.4.23 more stable with NFS or should I downgrade everything to 2.4.18? Someone from netapp here with linux customers? ;-) Greetings, -- Stefan Funke eMail : bundy(a)arcor-ip.de Arcor AG & Co. KG Otto-Volger-Strasse 19 fax : ++49-(0)6196 587-705 D-65843 Sulzbach PGP Key : http://tbd.arcor.de/keys/bundy.asc

4 4

RE: Poor man's redundant storage
by Jason Truong 03 Feb '04

03 Feb '04

Hey, I was in your position not too long ago. a) we don't have the money to buy another netapp b) Engineering has been hounding IT for more space c) needed a cheap solution We ended buying this : http://www.promise.com/product/product_detail_eng.asp?productId=109&familyI… There is also the new one VTrak 15100. The UltraTrak RM15000 we purchased ran about $7K with all 15 drives included. (160gb each) It's not a bad device as we have it plugged into a Dell Poweredge 2450 running windows 2000. Though I would rather have it plugged into a Linux machine...that might be further down the road. You might wanna look into windows 2003 server with shadow copy though I don't know much about it at all. Maybe someone who has played with that feature will shed some light on this. Of course it would be better to have another NetApp but I couldn't get this into our IT budget. Jason T. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of devnull(a)adc.idt.com Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 11:14 AM To: NetApp Toasters List Subject: OT: Poor man's redundant storage Dear Toasters, I would like to poll all the poor people on the list who cant afford/justify the need for clusters and instead use other cheap solution to provide redundancy of their data. Even a simple IDE-RAID solution, with some kind of heartbeat system... I have a couple of netapp's here on-site and in the event of a disaster, where the RAID array's are lost and i need to rebuild from scratch, i would like to have someother system serving the data i need, albeit at much lower performance. I do have a spares kit to help me recover from events like MoBo/Processor dying etc. Thanks for your time, -- /dev/null devnull(a)adc.idt.com

4 3

OT: Poor man's redundant storage
by devnull＠adc.idt.com 03 Feb '04

03 Feb '04

Dear Toasters, I would like to poll all the poor people on the list who cant afford/justify the need for clusters and instead use other cheap solution to provide redundancy of their data. Even a simple IDE-RAID solution, with some kind of heartbeat system... I have a couple of netapp's here on-site and in the event of a disaster, where the RAID array's are lost and i need to rebuild from scratch, i would like to have someother system serving the data i need, albeit at much lower performance. I do have a spares kit to help me recover from events like MoBo/Processor dying etc. Thanks for your time, -- /dev/null devnull(a)adc.idt.com

2 1

SPAM:Your Email Just Won a Car. (fwd)
by Maren S. Leizaola 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

Hey, someone should control or limit who can post on this list... It is not a good idea for this list to become a spam distribution channel... -------------------------------------------------------------- HKdotCOM Ltd AIM: MarenHKdotCOM Tel: 852 2865-4865 ext 888 leizaola(a)hk.com ICQ: 39905706 Fax: 852 2865-4100 -------------------------------------------------------------- HK's largest supplier of used Cisco and Sun. Join our liquidations list : http://www.lists.hk.com/lists/listinfo/liquidations ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Return-Path: <owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com> X-Original-To: leizaola(a)poseidon.hkdotcom.com Delivered-To: leizaola(a)poseidon.hkdotcom.com Received: from hk.com (ip-2-8-104-152.rev.dyxnet.com [152.104.8.2]) by poseidon.hkdotcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB51AD049 for <leizaola(a)poseidon.hkdotcom.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 20:01:24 +0800 (HKT) Received: by hk.com (Postfix) id CE36F1A6D84; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 20:01:23 +0800 (CST) Delivered-To: leizaola(a)hk.com Received: from smtp2.mathworks.com (smtp2.mathworks.com [144.212.95.218]) by hk.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D441A6875 for <leizaola(a)hk.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 20:01:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail-vif.mathworks.com (fred-ce0.mathworks.com [144.212.95.18]) by smtp2.mathworks.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i12BxCB10692; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 06:59:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from fred-ce0.mathworks.com (mail-vif [144.212.95.101]) by mail-vif.mathworks.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i12BnO822605; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 06:49:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by fred-ce0.mathworks.com (8.11.7/8.11.6) id i12BnOi22601; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 06:49:24 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: fred.mathworks.com: majordom set sender to owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com using -f Received: from smtp.mathworks.com (ginger [144.212.95.28]) by mail-vif.mathworks.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i12BnN822593 for <toasters(a)mathworks.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 06:49:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from mta04ps.bigpond.com (mta04ps.bigpond.com [144.135.25.158]) by smtp.mathworks.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with SMTP id i12BnJ909659 for <toasters(a)mathworks.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 06:49:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from lerc-daemon.mta04ps.email.bigpond.com by mta04ps.email.bigpond.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) id <0HSG00HIPGS57S(a)mta04ps.email.bigpond.com> for toasters(a)mathworks.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 21:48:07 +1000 (EST) Received: from email.bigpond.com ([172.26.103.17]) by mta04ps.email.bigpond.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HSG002LFGRXE1(a)mta04ps.email.bigpond.com>; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 21:47:57 +1000 (EST) Received: from [192.168.115.149] by mailms8aps.email.bigpond.com (mshttpd) ; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 03:47:57 -0800 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 03:47:57 -0800 From: philipsmith1 <philipsmith1(a)telstra.com> Subject: Your Email Just Won a Car. Message-id: <f949c790.c790f949(a)email.bigpond.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Oct 29 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en X-PMX-Version: 4.1.1.86173 X-PMX-SpamFlag: FALSE X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, X_ACCEPT_LANG 0, MISSING_HEADERS 0.000, TO_MALFORMED 0.000' Sender: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com Precedence: bulk To: undisclosed-recipients:; VINTAGE CARS PROMOTION, 35 WEST FIFTH STREET, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLAND. WE ARE CONTACTING YOU AS A RESULT OF OUR PROMOTION PROGRAMME HELD ON THE 12TH OF JANUARY 2004. Good day, >From the desk of the co-coordinator of VINTAGE CARS PROMOTION NETHERLAND, we are delighted to bring to your notice that you are one of our winners. Congratulations, we are pleased to inform you that your email address attached to SECURITY PROCESSING CODE No.: HMCP/50030/0567 won the promo in the first category along with two others. You are therefore approved to claim your price, which is a BMW Z8 with the specifications below; 2003 BMW Z8 General Info Price: $139,000 Miles Per Gallon: 14/23 mpg Curb Weight: 3600 lbs Layout: Front-Engine/RWD Transmission: 6-Speed Manual Engine Type: V8 Displacement: 4941 cc Horsepower: 394 bhp @ 6600 rpm Torque: 369 lb-ft @ 3800 rpm Redline: 7000 rpm Performance 0-60 mph: 4.2 sec 0-100 mph: 10.2 sec Quarter Mile: 12.6 sec @ 112 mph Skidpad: .92g Top Speed: 155 mph Braking, 60-0 mph: 116 ft Slalom Speed: 61.3 mph Please note that our three winners emails were drawn from the entire WWW (World Wide Web) using a quantitative technique of random sampling. As such only three email addresses were collected and awarded our winners, so you should consider yourself a very lucky person. Furthermore, note this promotion is held once every five years, just to give people around the world the opportunity to win and drive the most powerful cars in the world. You are advised to contact the programme co-ordinator with your security processing code number to claim your car; Name: Fredrick Teller Email: fredrickteller(a)indiatimes.com Congratulations once more and please be informed that you have to claim your car within 14 days from the date of receipt of this mail. Yours Sincerely, Mr. Philip Smith. Promotion Manager. ---------------- Powered by telstra.com

1 0

Your Email Just Won a Car.
by philipsmith1 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

VINTAGE CARS PROMOTION, 35 WEST FIFTH STREET, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLAND. WE ARE CONTACTING YOU AS A RESULT OF OUR PROMOTION PROGRAMME HELD ON THE 12TH OF JANUARY 2004. Good day, From the desk of the co-coordinator of VINTAGE CARS PROMOTION NETHERLAND, we are delighted to bring to your notice that you are one of our winners. Congratulations, we are pleased to inform you that your email address attached to SECURITY PROCESSING CODE No.: HMCP/50030/0567 won the promo in the first category along with two others. You are therefore approved to claim your price, which is a BMW Z8 with the specifications below; 2003 BMW Z8 General Info Price: $139,000 Miles Per Gallon: 14/23 mpg Curb Weight: 3600 lbs Layout: Front-Engine/RWD Transmission: 6-Speed Manual Engine Type: V8 Displacement: 4941 cc Horsepower: 394 bhp @ 6600 rpm Torque: 369 lb-ft @ 3800 rpm Redline: 7000 rpm Performance 0-60 mph: 4.2 sec 0-100 mph: 10.2 sec Quarter Mile: 12.6 sec @ 112 mph Skidpad: .92g Top Speed: 155 mph Braking, 60-0 mph: 116 ft Slalom Speed: 61.3 mph Please note that our three winners emails were drawn from the entire WWW (World Wide Web) using a quantitative technique of random sampling. As such only three email addresses were collected and awarded our winners, so you should consider yourself a very lucky person. Furthermore, note this promotion is held once every five years, just to give people around the world the opportunity to win and drive the most powerful cars in the world. You are advised to contact the programme co-ordinator with your security processing code number to claim your car; Name: Fredrick Teller Email: fredrickteller(a)indiatimes.com Congratulations once more and please be informed that you have to claim your car within 14 days from the date of receipt of this mail. Yours Sincerely, Mr. Philip Smith. Promotion Manager. ---------------- Powered by telstra.com

1 0

Migrating from NetApp to EMC Celera
by Bruce Arden 30 Jan '04

30 Jan '04

I have been asked what the problems would be migrating from NetApp filers to EMC Celerra. Has anyone had any experience of doing this. What features would I loose? - Bruce -- Bruce Arden arden(a)nortelnetworks.com barden2(a)csc.com CSC, Nortel, London Rd, Harlow, England +44 1279 40 2877

9 12

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters