toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13523 discussions

ISCSI boot problems.
by Jeff Mohler 28 May '05

28 May '05

Ive got the Qlogic 4010c card, and so far NO problems at all, except I cannot transfer an existing HDD partition to it, and boot from it. Ive created the LUN, windows mode, and using Ghost I can see it, and do a disk to disk transfer of the old C: drive to the LUN. Then it wont boot, I get the PC error that it cant find anything to boot from. The Qlogic card during boot sees the Lun, and there is even a few moments of activity to the LUN before the PC says it cant. Ive even re-ghosted with the 'copy boot sectors' option no to avail. I can start an XP install from the CD, using the driver floppy, and it will install files, and boot just fine, fast too I might say. If I let XP restart for the disk based install from the LUN, it runs fine, so I reboot again into ghost off a floppy, and go to Xfer the HDD image to the LUN. Same error as the first try..cant boot. Any idears?? I need to work up a plan to migrate from HDD to LUN, and it cant be a dynamic LUN either..so I cant do a simple mirror operation.

1 0

Qlogic 4010c Feedback
by Jeff Mohler 27 May '05

27 May '05

Other than I had up update the BIOS and Firmware to the latest levels (and that the BIOS in the card when I got it reported corrupted), I found the instasllation and configuration of booting via iscsi on the netapp to be pretty painless. Thumbs up from my end.

1 0

RE: amd / netapp issue?
by Leeds, Daniel 26 May '05

26 May '05

hrm, i am also seeing odd cpu issues with 7.0.0.1 on some new deployments. with only a few systems we are constantly over 75% cpu and alot of times well into the 90's steadily on cpu usage. i havnt seen anything related on NOW yet. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com on behalf of Langborg Tom Sent: Thu 5/26/2005 6:10 AM To: 'Jay(a)Williamsons.org'; toasters(a)mathworks.com; am-utils(a)am-utils.org Subject: SV: amd / netapp issue? There were some problem with redhat7.3 and nfs. That bug on redhat break down my tru64 fileserver. For that bug you need to update the kernel. We run now 2.4.20-28 on the old rehat7.3. I have also a problem with ontapp 7.0 with 100% cpu. We think it was nfs logical problem who crashed my netapp. So we upgraded now to 7.0.1R1 and hope it works. /tom -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Jay Williamson [mailto:jay_williamson@yahoo.com] Skickat: den 26 maj 2005 14:20 Till: toasters(a)mathworks.com; am-utils(a)am-utils.org Ämne: amd / netapp issue? Hi. I'm sending this to am-utils and toasters since I'm not entirely sure where the problem is. These systems (redhat73-1, redhat73-2, etc.) are in a cluster. These errors all occur around the same time on all the clients (freqently different jobs) but sometimes spread out across 10-30 minutes. My first guess is simply that the netapps are to busy to answer the clients. *If* that's the case, then what can I change on the netapp or the client-end to mitigate this problem? What other options are there? From the /var/log/amd on clients: redhat73-1: May 25 13:48:01 redhat73-1 amd[965]/error: get_nfs_version: failed to contact portmapper on host "netapp1": RPC: Timed out redhat73-2: May 25 13:48:07 redhat73-2 amd[965]/error: get_nfs_version: failed to contact portmapper on host "netapp2": RPC: Timed out clients are dual Xeons running redhat 7.3 am-utils-6.0.7-4 2.4.20-28.7smp mount options=(rw,hard,intr,grpid,retrans=30,timeo=30,retry=10,dev=00000010,vers=3,proto=tcp) # Interesting note: We actually set retry=10000 but the rh7.3 systems use 10 instead netapps are 960/980 class systems ontap=6.5.2R1P13 They are typically very busy (100%) when the errors occur Network switches show no errors NIC cards on client and netapps show nothing Nothing in the messages file in clients nor on the netapps. Thanks in advance and I'll summarize if I get some good input. - Jay __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

SV: amd / netapp issue?
by Langborg Tom 26 May '05

26 May '05

There were some problem with redhat7.3 and nfs. That bug on redhat break down my tru64 fileserver. For that bug you need to update the kernel. We run now 2.4.20-28 on the old rehat7.3. I have also a problem with ontapp 7.0 with 100% cpu. We think it was nfs logical problem who crashed my netapp. So we upgraded now to 7.0.1R1 and hope it works. /tom -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Jay Williamson [mailto:jay_williamson@yahoo.com] Skickat: den 26 maj 2005 14:20 Till: toasters(a)mathworks.com; am-utils(a)am-utils.org Ämne: amd / netapp issue? Hi. I'm sending this to am-utils and toasters since I'm not entirely sure where the problem is. These systems (redhat73-1, redhat73-2, etc.) are in a cluster. These errors all occur around the same time on all the clients (freqently different jobs) but sometimes spread out across 10-30 minutes. My first guess is simply that the netapps are to busy to answer the clients. *If* that's the case, then what can I change on the netapp or the client-end to mitigate this problem? What other options are there? From the /var/log/amd on clients: redhat73-1: May 25 13:48:01 redhat73-1 amd[965]/error: get_nfs_version: failed to contact portmapper on host "netapp1": RPC: Timed out redhat73-2: May 25 13:48:07 redhat73-2 amd[965]/error: get_nfs_version: failed to contact portmapper on host "netapp2": RPC: Timed out clients are dual Xeons running redhat 7.3 am-utils-6.0.7-4 2.4.20-28.7smp mount options=(rw,hard,intr,grpid,retrans=30,timeo=30,retry=10,dev=00000010,vers=3,proto=tcp) # Interesting note: We actually set retry=10000 but the rh7.3 systems use 10 instead netapps are 960/980 class systems ontap=6.5.2R1P13 They are typically very busy (100%) when the errors occur Network switches show no errors NIC cards on client and netapps show nothing Nothing in the messages file in clients nor on the netapps. Thanks in advance and I'll summarize if I get some good input. - Jay __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

amd / netapp issue?
by Jay Williamson 26 May '05

26 May '05

Hi. I'm sending this to am-utils and toasters since I'm not entirely sure where the problem is. These systems (redhat73-1, redhat73-2, etc.) are in a cluster. These errors all occur around the same time on all the clients (freqently different jobs) but sometimes spread out across 10-30 minutes. My first guess is simply that the netapps are to busy to answer the clients. *If* that's the case, then what can I change on the netapp or the client-end to mitigate this problem? What other options are there? From the /var/log/amd on clients: redhat73-1: May 25 13:48:01 redhat73-1 amd[965]/error: get_nfs_version: failed to contact portmapper on host "netapp1": RPC: Timed out redhat73-2: May 25 13:48:07 redhat73-2 amd[965]/error: get_nfs_version: failed to contact portmapper on host "netapp2": RPC: Timed out clients are dual Xeons running redhat 7.3 am-utils-6.0.7-4 2.4.20-28.7smp mount options=(rw,hard,intr,grpid,retrans=30,timeo=30,retry=10,dev=00000010,vers=3,proto=tcp) # Interesting note: We actually set retry=10000 but the rh7.3 systems use 10 instead netapps are 960/980 class systems ontap=6.5.2R1P13 They are typically very busy (100%) when the errors occur Network switches show no errors NIC cards on client and netapps show nothing Nothing in the messages file in clients nor on the netapps. Thanks in advance and I'll summarize if I get some good input. - Jay __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

RE: Snapshot usage breakdown
by Venkat Appineni 25 May '05

25 May '05

You can go to the advanced mode Filer > priv set advanced Filer > snap status The output is in number of Blocks.. -Ven -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of P.S.Jones Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:33 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Snapshot usage breakdown Sorry to be a nuisance but could someone remind what the command is that shows how much space each snapshot really takes up. I don't mean 'snap list' but another, possibly privileged command, which was mentioned on this list several months back. Unfortunately I failed to file the reference. Thanks. -- Paul Jones, Head of Systems Services, Information Technology Service, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE Email: p.s.jones(a)durham.ac.uk Phone/Fax: 0191 334 2749/2701

1 0

Snapshot usage breakdown
by P.S.Jones 25 May '05

25 May '05

Sorry to be a nuisance but could someone remind what the command is that shows how much space each snapshot really takes up. I don't mean 'snap list' but another, possibly privileged command, which was mentioned on this list several months back. Unfortunately I failed to file the reference. Thanks. -- Paul Jones, Head of Systems Services, Information Technology Service, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE Email: p.s.jones(a)durham.ac.uk Phone/Fax: 0191 334 2749/2701

1 0

RE: NDMP and IBM Tivoli
by Bui, Marcus 24 May '05

24 May '05

Mark, You can accomplish the same by 'zoning' the tape to the Filer. Connect the Filer to a SAN switch with the tape library. On the SAN switch, you zone the number of tape drives you want dedicated to the Filer. The Filer will essentially see the tape as local attached. I'm not familiar with the 349x but I would think you can 'zone' out some tape drives in the library. Good luck, Marcus Bui _____ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Crawford, Mark (CBC) Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 10:39 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: NDMP and IBM Tivoli Does anyone backup their filers' CIFS data to IBM Tivoli (TSM) using NDMP? We have a 349x tape library connected to our Tivoli server using fiber channel. Based upon the IBM docs, we have to connect the NetApp filers directly to the 349x library. I can physically accomplish this. My question is with respect to the tape drives within the library. Our local TSM support staff are telling me that I must be physically connected to a tape drive within the library. That is not the way I am interpreting the IBM docs. Any configuration help would be appreciated. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or disclosure of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete the original message. Your compliance is appreciated. ----------------------------------------- Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this message, and any attachments, may contain confidential and/or privileged material. It is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

1 0

NDMP and IBM Tivoli
by Crawford, Mark (CBC) 24 May '05

24 May '05

Does anyone backup their filers' CIFS data to IBM Tivoli (TSM) using NDMP? We have a 349x tape library connected to our Tivoli server using fiber channel. Based upon the IBM docs, we have to connect the NetApp filers directly to the 349x library. I can physically accomplish this. My question is with respect to the tape drives within the library. Our local TSM support staff are telling me that I must be physically connected to a tape drive within the library. That is not the way I am interpreting the IBM docs. Any configuration help would be appreciated. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or disclosure of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete the original message. Your compliance is appreciated.

1 0

I can see your internet is slow
by Jeffry Johnson 23 May '05

23 May '05

black peach purple grapefruit AUDIENCE: Yes. EDWARDS: They are doing all they can to take the campaign for the highest office in the land down the lowest possible road. orange peachbrown banana

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters