toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

A dead f840 ???
by Constantin Bogomolnyi 10 Jun '05

10 Jun '05

Hi, i just tried to power up an f840 , it freeze approx 45 sec after the powerup , i tried to remove all cards , and replugged the ram but it still freeze exactly after 45 sec . it look like some "timer" freeze it after N sec . maybe the watchdog ?? any ideas ? thanks cb

1 0

RE: > Subject: Common Questions about Piano Tuning
by Sphar, Mike 08 Jun '05

08 Jun '05

You don't need to tuna fish. They're already attuned for the High C. -- Michael W. Sphar - IS&T - Lead Systems Administrator SMBU Engineering Support Services, BMC Software -----Original Message----- From: Colm Buckley [mailto:colm@tuatha.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 4:02 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: > Subject: Common Questions about Piano Tuning > You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tune a fish. As has been pointed out elsewhere, you can tuna fish. In a tuna fish cannery. Colm (the old ones are the... oldest) -- Colm Buckley / colm(a)tuatha.org / +353 87 2469146

2 1

> Subject: Common Questions about Piano Tuning
by ferdberfl＠netzero.net 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

You can take a fish to water but you can't make it drink. Filesystems don't do well in water at all. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Coxe [mailto:mcoxe@opsware.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:29 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Common Questions about Piano Tuning > Subject: Common Questions about Piano Tuning from man page for tunefs(8) BUGS You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tune a fish. - michael

4 3

Common Questions about Piano Tuning
by Doug Freeze 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

3 of the most commonly asked questions about Piano Tuning are: 1) How often should I have my piano tuned? The two main factors that drive a piano out of tune are weather change and how much the piano is played, but the age of the piano has an effect also. Pianos newer than 5 years go out of tune much faster than older pianos and may need to be tuned as much as 4 times a year for the first few years. Pianos older than 30 years may not have such great action or tone, but often hold their tune very well. If you practice more than an hour a day, you'll probably need to have it tuned at least twice a year to keep it sounding good. I would say that unless your piano is just another piece of furniture, you should have it tuned at least once a year. If it's used every day, twice a year will keep your piano sounding good anytime you or a guest sits down to play it. If you are a vocalist, string player, or that rare pianist with a very sensitive ear, 3-4 times a year will keep it at concert pitch at all times. 2) My piano isn't being used. Do I still need to have it tuned? Although it might seem unnecessary, it's important to keep a piano at least close to concert pitch, even if it's not being used. When your piano is in tune, a combined string tension of about 20 tons is exerted on the piano's structure. As the piano goes out of tune, the tension of the strings changes to varying degrees in different parts of the piano. If the tension becomes too uneven from one section to another, undue stress is exerted on the piano's frame. Also, a piano is much more difficult, and sometimes impossible to tune well after a period of neglect. For these reasons every piano should be tuned at least annually. 3) How much is it going to cost me to tune my piano? Many people ask me this question in hopes of getting a rough estimate of what they would expect to pay for a professional piano tuning. "Pay what you can afford" is my motto. I care more about getting your valuable musical instrument in tune than I do the money. I've found that tuners charge between $75 & $120 here in the Los Angeles area, my average is about $100.00. I would ask that you at least cover my travel expenses with gas prices the way they are. You will not insult me by paying less than the going rate. I have so much fun tuning pianos, meeting and talking to you that it makes it all worth while. If you would like to know the year your piano was born, send me the name of the piano along with the serial number and I'll get back to you as soon as possible with your information. Doug Freeze 626 290-0908 Glendora California http://MasterTuner.com Tuning pianos all over Southern California. See my calendar and schedule a piano tuning appointment here: http://DougFreeze.com/calendar.html Unsubscribe by replying to this message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the SUBJECT field, NOT in the body of the message. This is a real unsubscribe request. Not some way of getting you to respond to me so that I know your email address is valid allowing me to sell it to unscrupulous advertisers. I will never give away or sell your email address. Please feel safe replying to me here. I'm sorry I bothered you, I didn't mean to.

4 3

760 SCSI port hung
by Alan Sparks 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

I had to unplug my SCSI cable from the onboard port in one of my 760's... I powered off the tape drive at the opposite end of the cable before unplugging and replugging the cable. Made sure twice I didn't bend pins etc. Unfortunately, the attached drive seems no longer to work, trying to access it gives me syslog entries like: netapp1: scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 0b.4: request failed after retry #0: cdb 0x00. In anyone's experience, is this likely a hung port, that a reboot is likely to clear? Or does this sound more like a hardware issue (bullet hole in foot)? Thanks for any comments. -Alan =========== Alan Sparks, UNIX/Linux Systems Administrator <asparks(a)doublesparks.net>

2 2

RE: 760 SCSI port hung
by Palmer, Jason 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

Just like with SCSI devices on any other system, if you change, power cycle or unplug any target on a SCSI bus you will need to rescan the SCSI bus again. In this case, I believe the only way to achieve this on a filer is to reboot the appliance, and the rescan will occur on boot. Once rebooted (assuming everything is connected OK and configured) you will be able to see the devices again. I hope this helps, Jason DrKW Storage Team -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Alan Sparks Sent: 07 June 2005 15:42 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: 760 SCSI port hung I had to unplug my SCSI cable from the onboard port in one of my 760's... I powered off the tape drive at the opposite end of the cable before unplugging and replugging the cable. Made sure twice I didn't bend pins etc. Unfortunately, the attached drive seems no longer to work, trying to access it gives me syslog entries like: netapp1: scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 0b.4: request failed after retry #0: cdb 0x00. In anyone's experience, is this likely a hung port, that a reboot is likely to clear? Or does this sound more like a hardware issue (bullet hole in foot)? Thanks for any comments. -Alan =========== Alan Sparks, UNIX/Linux Systems Administrator <asparks(a)doublesparks.net> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. 3166 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

6.4->6.5: exports changes?
by David Lee 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

We need to consider upgrading Ontap from 6.4.5 to 6.5.x (where "x" is the latest GA at upgrade time). We might consider moving to 7.x . We have fairly extensive NFS "exports" files, several entries of which have a mix of "ro" and "rw" clauses. I have some sort of recollection that the 6.4->6.5 upgrade has some sort of interaction with (requires some change to?) the exports file. If so, are there any recommendations, gotchas, etc. for handling this transition. (The systems are a live clustered pair; downtime must be kept to a minimum; the transition must be smooth, predictable and reliable.) Would migrating directly to 7.x be any different? Pointers to existing documents (whether technically descriptive, or "our good/bad experience of...") would be welcome. Thanks in advance. -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : University of Durham : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham : : Phone: +44 191 334 2752 U.K. :

2 1

NetApp 760 SCSI - SE?
by Alan Sparks 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

Anyone know whether the built-in SCSI adapter on NetApp 760's are SE or HVD? Assuming for the age, probably SE, but wanted to be sure... From sysconfig -a: slot 0: SCSI Host Adapter 0b (Qlogic ISP 1040B) Fast/Wide, Differential Thanks. -Alan -- Alan Sparks, UNIX/Linux Systems Integration and Administration <asparks(a)doublesparks.net>

3 3

Re: NetApp 760 SCSI - SE?
by Kevin H. Schoener 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

Yes. I concur. The onboard is HVD. Kevin H. Schoener Lynx Technologies Inc. Pocket PC -----Original Message----- From: "jonathan"<jonathan(a)zerowait.com> Sent: 6/6/05 8:32:02 PM To: "Jeff Mohler"<jeff.mohler(a)signasys.com>, "Alan Sparks"<asparks(a)doublesparks.net>, "Toasters List"<toasters(a)mathworks.com> Subject: Re: NetApp 760 SCSI - SE? Nope, The onboard is HVD. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Mohler" <jeff.mohler(a)signasys.com> To: "Alan Sparks" <asparks(a)doublesparks.net>; "Toasters List" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:10 PM Subject: Re: NetApp 760 SCSI - SE? > SE > > > On 6/6/05 2:45 PM, "Alan Sparks" <asparks(a)doublesparks.net> wrote: > > > Anyone know whether the built-in SCSI adapter on NetApp 760's are SE or > > HVD? Assuming for the age, probably SE, but wanted to be sure... > > > >> From sysconfig -a: > > slot 0: SCSI Host Adapter 0b (Qlogic ISP 1040B) > > Fast/Wide, Differential > > > > Thanks. > > -Alan > > [Message truncated. Tap Edit->Mark for Download to get remaining portion.]

1 0

Re: windows data migration tool(s)
by Pou Lee 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

Daniel, You might want to consider using SnapVault and Open Systems Snap Vault agent for Windows in addition to the other option of using NDMP Windows Java client to do the migration. http://netapp.com/products/software/snapvault.html http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/software We have used NDMP Windows 2K Java client running, of course, on a W2K AS server to migrate around 1 TB of data from a F760 to a FAS250 with no problem. This requires scripting and batch file to automate the procedure. Snapshots are not migrated in this manner. There is a minimum Data ONTAP version requirement related to either inclusion or version of NDMP server needed I recall. If you can work with your Net App Sales account execution, you might be able to get a temporary SnapVault license and the OSSV agent for Windows to carry out data migration from Windows 2K servers to a Net App filer/near-store unit. We have used OSSV in different occasion to migrate/consolidate from half to 1+ TB of data each time from DAS (direct attached storage) in W2K AS servers to a different R200 each time with no problem. Pou RE: >Hi, > >We are currently undergoing a large migration to netapp filers across >the company and our windows IS team has hit some snags. Basically they >have a number of various standalone arrays and need to transfer large >amounts of files/data to the new netapp volumes but their manual copy >methods have always failed especially when encountering corrupt files >that may be in various users directories. > >Is there a windows NDMP client or similar they could use to directly >transfer files to the filer without going through the smb/cifs layer? > >Forgive me if its obvious, I live on the Unix side of the house :) > >Thanks in advance

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters