toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

Re: windows data migration tool(s)
by Pou Lee 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

Daniel, You might want to consider using SnapVault and Open Systems Snap Vault agent for Windows in addition to the other option of using NDMP Windows Java client to do the migration. http://netapp.com/products/software/snapvault.html http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/software We have used NDMP Windows 2K Java client running, of course, on a W2K AS server to migrate around 1 TB of data from a F760 to a FAS250 with no problem. This requires scripting and batch file to automate the procedure. Snapshots are not migrated in this manner. There is a minimum Data ONTAP version requirement related to either inclusion or version of NDMP server needed I recall. If you can work with your Net App Sales account execution, you might be able to get a temporary SnapVault license and the OSSV agent for Windows to carry out data migration from Windows 2K servers to a Net App filer/near-store unit. We have used OSSV in different occasion to migrate/consolidate from half to 1+ TB of data each time from DAS (direct attached storage) in W2K AS servers to a different R200 each time with no problem. Pou RE: >Hi, > >We are currently undergoing a large migration to netapp filers across >the company and our windows IS team has hit some snags. Basically they >have a number of various standalone arrays and need to transfer large >amounts of files/data to the new netapp volumes but their manual copy >methods have always failed especially when encountering corrupt files >that may be in various users directories. > >Is there a windows NDMP client or similar they could use to directly >transfer files to the filer without going through the smb/cifs layer? > >Forgive me if its obvious, I live on the Unix side of the house :) > >Thanks in advance

1 0

windows data migration tool(s)
by Leeds, Daniel 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

Hi, We are currently undergoing a large migration to netapp filers across the company and our windows IS team has hit some snags. Basically they have a number of various standalone arrays and need to transfer large amounts of files/data to the new netapp volumes but their manual copy methods have always failed especially when encountering corrupt files that may be in various users directories. Is there a windows NDMP client or similar they could use to directly transfer files to the filer without going through the smb/cifs layer? Forgive me if its obvious, I live on the Unix side of the house :) Thanks in advance

1 0

Message subject
by Frankie Boykin 05 Jun '05

05 Jun '05

Would you REFINANCE if you knew you'd save THOUSANDZ? Or get a Loan of 405,000.00, you already qualified. We'll get you the lowest possible rate. Don't believe me? Fill out our small online questionaire and we'll show you how. Get the home/house or car you always wanted, it only takes 35 seconds of your time. Click this link: %URL Best Regards, Frankie Boykin %TEXT[2-4] %TEXT[2-4] http://%DOMAINS/rem.php

1 0

Is burt 155441 a show-stopper?
by Chris Thompson 05 Jun '05

05 Jun '05

It's a real pain not having a spare filer to test things on ... I was hoping that all the quota-related nasties (153377, 154530) were well and truely fixed now and that I wouild be able to upgrade from 6.5.4 to 7.0.1R1(maybe P<something>) later this month. But then this appears on NOW: Bug ID 155441 Title: cp -p, chown, chgrp may erroneously fail due to "Disk quota exceeded" Description: If the default user or group quota for a volume or qtree is set lower than the size of the file whose permissions are being set, the command will fail due to an incorrect assertion that it would put the user over quota. This problem does not manifest when the command is executed by root. I am assuming that this is Yet Another Bug new in ONTAP 7.x, as AFAIK we have never seen the effect, and it seems to me we would surely be liable to. Specifically, we have a zero default quota in our /home qtree: * user@/home 0 0 101 user@/home 80M 8000 102 user@/home 210M 8000 ... specifically intended to lock out unallocated uids, special uids that aren't meant to be using /home, cancelled accounts, and so on. It works very well. Has anytoaster suffered the effect described in the bug report? -- Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

2 2

j a REVOLUTION in Online Gambling ! ID: NOdFR7
by Dominique Ladd 05 Jun '05

05 Jun '05

b[3

1 0

Quality Loans with ease
by Jacques Bishop 04 Jun '05

04 Jun '05

Thanks to a nomination by an associate of yours, you can refinance or buy your home at rates as low as 3%. Notice - past credit history is NOT a factor for this promotion as long as you still have own a home and we recieve word from you within 24 hours. ________Detailed_Loan_Summary___________ Rate: As low as 3% Ammount: Up to 800,000 Closing Date: 30 days In accordance with our terms please click here to verify your information on our secure, private site to ensure our records are accurate. http://www.warefi.net/?id=p11

1 0

Amazing thing I found out today
by Sheila 04 Jun '05

04 Jun '05

Hey There! This is Julie :) I cant believe this online cam website worked for me! You don't even need a webcam to participate! After i joined the community i made so many new friends :) If you would like to chat with me, my profile is "miacamgrl" STATUS: I'M ONLINE I have to say this was perfect for me, why dont you try it out, its free! Click on the link below http://webcamsz.active.ws/

1 0

Application approval for toasters@mathworks.com Sat, 04 Jun 2005 05:37:48 -0800
by Jei.Weiss＠comcast.net 04 Jun '05

04 Jun '05

Hello, We sent you an email a while ago, because you now qualify for a much lower rate based on the biggest rate drop in years. You can now get $327,000 for as little as $617 a month! Bad credit? Doesn't matter, ^low rates are fixed no matter what! Follow this link to process your application and a 24 hour approval: http://www.srefi.net Best Regards, Isaiah Kennedy http://www.srefi.net/book.php

1 0

RE: NDMP with TSM on Solaris
by Warkentin, Grant 03 Jun '05

03 Jun '05

We're using NDMP to backup from a nearstore device. Our legato software was / is having problems when backing up the volumes that I have CIFS stuff on. Legato would time out and not complete a full. Legato did not have problems doing an incremental on those volumes. Turns out our problem was a timeout on catalogue creation. Legato would pause for a good hour before starting to transfer data to tape. The problem got worse when we added more and more users to the volume. We had to modify the time out values in legato to allow it to finish creating the catalogue. As far as I know legato still behaves this way. I don't have current figures on how long legato is now taking to create the catalogue currently. We finally tracked this down to the thousands of small files that our windows users keep in their home folders. Our UNIX files take up more room but they are fewer and bigger than the windows files so we don't have the legato issue on the volume we use for NFS. NOTICE - This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and cooperation. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of markallen(a)micron.com Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 8:30 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Cc: bbullock(a)micron.com Subject: NDMP with TSM on Solaris All: We recently started backing up data from an R200 using NDMP and TSM running on Solaris. The Solaris system is a V240 with 2CPU's and 4GB of memory. Everything is connected via a fabric. Backups seem to perform reasonably well when we are not getting a table of contents. Since we need a table of contents for individual file restores it is must to have this. When creating a table of contents backup's slow down by a factor of 5X. Has anyone else experienced this issue? Any help or direction would be greatly appreciated. -Mark

2 1

NDMP with TSM on Solaris
by markallen＠micron.com 03 Jun '05

03 Jun '05

All: We recently started backing up data from an R200 using NDMP and TSM running on Solaris. The Solaris system is a V240 with 2CPU's and 4GB of memory. Everything is connected via a fabric. Backups seem to perform reasonably well when we are not getting a table of contents. Since we need a table of contents for individual file restores it is must to have this. When creating a table of contents backup's slow down by a factor of 5X. Has anyone else experienced this issue? Any help or direction would be greatly appreciated. -Mark

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters