Hello Jim!
Yes, at Ericsson in Stockholm we use this setup for disaster/recovery reasons.
But we also use the replicated data to take our backups from.
I.e we dont have to load our "Frontend Filers" with backup traffic.
We have 10 F760's in 5 clusters replicating there volumes to 5 other F760's
on another location. 5-6TB of data.
We do this twice an hour and see 10-20sec bursts of data going over.
Anders Ljungberg
Ericsson Business Consulting
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Klun 7183 [mailto:jklun@stercomm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 1:37 PM
To: Jim Klun 7183
Cc: Toaster Mailing List
Subject: Re: Netapp examples - replication for disaster recovery?
Thanks for responses - I noted that there was little mention of
replication. Does anyone out there use replication filer-to-filer
for disaster recovery or fail-over?
I would like filers at sister sites replicating to one another to
allow faster disaster recovery.
Does anyone do this?
* James A. Klun Sterling Commerce 4600 Lakehurst Ct. Dublin, Oh 43016 *
* jklun(a)stercomm.com 614-793-7183 voice 614-793-7092 fax *
* ---- "very like a whale" ---- *
* ---- Hamlet, Act 2, Scene 2 ---- *
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Jim Klun 7183 wrote:
>
>
> I want to explain the NAS concept as implemented via Netapps in an
> upcoming meeting.
>
> I am looking for real world examples where snapshot saved someones lunch.
> Also uses of volume replication for 7X24 and DR.
>
> Finally - advantages - if they exist - in running Microsoft Exchange mail
> off a netatpp.
>
> Thanks - meetings tomorrow.
>
>
>
>
> * James A. Klun Sterling Commerce 4600 Lakehurst Ct. Dublin, Oh 43016 *
> * jklun(a)stercomm.com 614-793-7183 voice 614-793-7092 fax *
> * ---- "very like a whale" ---- *
> * ---- Hamlet, Act 2, Scene 2 ---- *
>
>