toasters July 2000

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

111 participants
130 discussions

Files being deleted
by bhaskar.g＠philips.com 18 Jul '00

18 Jul '00

Hi All, Strange things are happening on the Filer. We have a F720, with Ontap version 5.3.5R2P2. Users are editing a file, once they quit the editor and look at the file size it is of zero bytes. This is happening quite often. Any solution for this problem. Thanks for snapshots we could retrieve the file back. Though the snapshots are there this is not good. kind regards Bhaskar G Philips Semiconductors, #3, Sterling Square,Madras Bank Road, Off St Mark's Road,BANGALORE-560 001. Voice : +91 80 222 9200 Ext 5060 Fax: +91 80 2229700

2 1

Re: Files being deleted
by mds＠gbnet.net 18 Jul '00

18 Jul '00

On Tue 18 Jul, 2000, bhaskar.g(a)philips.com wrote: > Strange things are happening on the Filer. We have a F720, with Ontap version 5.3.5R2P2. > > Users are editing a file, once they quit the editor and look at the file size it is of zero bytes. > This is happening quite often. Any solution for this problem. Just a thought - have you placed (a) quota(s) that apply to the area where the users are editing the files? If the quota space limit is maxed but the file limit isn't, then you might see this sort of problem. How long has the problem been going on and have you made any changes to the clients or the filer (including mount-point options, patching, etc. on the clients and the usual sort of filer config changes) in a period that might correlate with the start of the problem? > Thanks for snapshots we could retrieve the file back. Though the snapshots are there this is > not good. Until you fix the problem it might be an idea to rename at least one of those snapshots so they don't expire and force you to use backup tapes. >-- End of excerpt from bhaskar.g(a)philips.com -- -Mark ... an Englishman in London ...

1 0

getting back "broken" disk
by Abu Ihsan 18 Jul '00

18 Jul '00

Hi, I've mistakenly runned "disk fail" to a disk and it is now marked "broken". How do I get the disk back to operation ? thanks, --ihsanna __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail � Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/

1 0

RE: filer Olympics
by mds＠gbnet.net 17 Jul '00

17 Jul '00

On Fri 14 Jul, 2000, Jay Orr <orrjl(a)stl.nexen.com> wrote: > > For my griping - everything BUT the motherboard is designed for easy > swap-out. Why can't they make the motherboard just as easy? Let's face it, > if best-case is 15 minutes on a mission critical system, that's not > right. ever taken apart a Sparc or HPUX system? They're designed to be > modular so it's just pop-out, pop-in, back in service. A design idea > Netapp should follow... Well, the nearest comparable component in the Suns etc. I think you're talking about would be the back-planes or centre-planes, and they take a very long time to replace indeed. If you're talking about more NetApp-scale machines like E420R's, rather than Exy00's, I think you'll find the motherboard's are real pains requiring a second torque-adjusted screwdriver (you need one for the CPU modules). Suns etc. are very variable IMHO - ever tried to put a heatsink back on one of the ASICS or UltraSPARC modules on an Exy00 CPU-board when you catch it accidently sliding it into the chassis? Not easy to do, and often a cause for further FRU shipments. SGI's are tricky to pull apart in the field too, but they, at least, were intending to lever off the node/module design. Starfires, IBM S80's and other big boxes, well sometimes they can be serviced online, sometimes they need a day's downtime. A really rapid mobo swap can be accomplished (in a NetApp, Netra, etc.) by doing a full head-swap if it's *that* important to you. I have to say that compared to the old 1400's the F540, F630 etc. generation was a substantial improvement in Serviceability, and it looked like the designers had spent some time as field engineers taking notes about how things can be done. > But otherwise, sounds like fun ;) Aye. I do think points should be awarded for style as well as the final time. Calm, unflapped, neatly executed work by one or two guys may take a hair longer than a biff-bang-bosh job slapped together by three or four adrenaline addicts but I know which I'd rather have serving my data afterward. >-- End of excerpt from Jay Orr -- -Mark ... an Englishman in London ...

5 4

Filer Labling. (was: RE: filer Olympics)
by MBrookes＠netapp.com 17 Jul '00

17 Jul '00

Hi Lance, If you have 700 series machines, there's a slot for labling below the LCD, accessible from behind (ie. you have to pull the front panel off to access it.) "And not many people know that" (think nasal cockney ala Michael Caine :) Matt. ________________________________________________________________ Matthew Brookes mailto:mbrookes@netapp.com Systems Engineer http://www.netapp.com Network Appliance (Sales) Ltd. Tel: +353 1 4064600 Unit 36, Rathfarnham Gate Fax: +353 1 4064601 Dublin 14, IRELAND Mob: +353 86 8575127 -----Original Message----- From: Lance R. Mehle [mailto:mehlel001@hawaii.rr.com] Sent: 14 July 2000 22:31 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: filer Olympics For the "Design Improvements" I would like to nominate the following: A panel on the front, ala Sun's e series, with a removable clear panel that you can put in labels for names and IP's. We have over 40 of these machines and wind up having to put stick labels on the front so we can tell which machine is which. If/when we rename or assign a new IP you have to scrap off the old label which scratches the front or leaves a sticky residue on the bezel. This way you could jus pop of the clear plate and stick a new piece of paper in there with the new info! > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of Stephen J. Wilcox > Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 9:51 AM > To: Todd C. Merrill > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: RE: filer Olympics > > > Maybe we have some new design improvements for Netapp then! > > Sounds like we need more edge connectors so that the board > slips in and > out with the cables etc plugging into an external bus or something? > > And for the motherboard reduce the number of screws and what > about some > sort of easy release system? I'm thinking bicycle wheels here > but I'm sure > the same applies for motherboard screws! > > 2 Questions on a slightly different thread tho; what is the life > expectancy of a drive, what is the life expectancy of a motherboard? > > Steve > > -- > Stephen J. Wilcox > Internet Manager, Opal Telecom > http://www.opaltelecom.co.uk/ > Tel: 0161 222 2000 > Fax: 0161 222 2008 > > On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Todd C. Merrill wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Mark Simmons wrote: > > > > > time. Calm, unflapped, neatly executed work by one or two guys may > > > take a hair longer than a biff-bang-bosh job slapped > together by three > > > or four adrenaline addicts but I know which I'd rather > have serving my > > > data afterward. > > > > Indeed. Though posted in jest, I did not rush the whole > > affair. I wanted to do this once, and I wanted it to be > clean so that > > our local NetApp engineer wouldn't notice anything sloppy if he were > > the next person to open the filer. > > > > As hinted at, I unscrewed what I could beforehand, broke the > > torque or loosened other screws/nuts, had the new > motherboard lined up > > on a table, had static bags lined up for the PCI cards, etc. After > > halting, it was a matter of just unplugging all the wires, finger > > unscrewing the hex bolts, etc. The longest segment of time > indeed came > > from the motherboard screws. Installation was the reverse of > > removal--slide case closed, finger tight all hex bolts, connect all > > wires, and power up. Final tightening happened during and > after boot. > > Not kosher with the hardware field guide, I'm sure! > > > > Call it cheating or what you will, but being "prepared" does > > shave off a valuable 5-10 minutes. And, due to lots of swaps in the > > recent future, practice helps. (Previous times were > something like 32 > > and 25 minutes.) I would not suggest someone try this if > they haven't > > done it a few times before. > > > > Until next time... > > > > The Mathworks, Inc. 508-647-7000 x7792 > > 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098 508-647-7001 FAX > > tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com > --- > >

1 0

RE: filer Olympics
by Jeff Innis 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:02:42 PDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed I've got a great idea, how about a "Special Olymics" for filer admins, who are so endowed with time and creativity to persist in continuing this dead horse thread. Just make sure the sharp objects are all safely put away. I guess it's a case of put too many propeller heads in one room, and you can achive critical mass from all the expelled air. When do you say enough is enough already? Well I've said it, is there a second? Or does this continue thru the weekend? I've got my asbestos undies on for any of you so inclined flameaholics. J ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

2 1

Re: filer Olympics -Reply
by Timothy Cook 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

fubar, I'm not sure which of us is more confused, as I didn't email anything about Power Tools! However, to reword my post script, when I chose "reply to all" in order to have mathworks included in the receipients, I accidentally removed mathworks rather than scw, thus accomplishing the same thing as a "reply to sender". feel better now fubar? My these computer people are touchy! >>> Kendall Libby <fubar(a)mathworks.com> 07/14/00 12:09pm >>> >>>>> "TCOOK" == Timothy Cook <TCOOK(a)joy.com> writes: Power tools should only be used for chassis or shelf swaps, unless we want an Unlimited Class where power tools are allowed in all cases. Air tools are right out. :-P TCOOK> p.s. yes scw, I did accidentally delete mathworks from the TCOOK> mailing list instead of you. Hey! No fair taking us off our own mailing list !! K.

1 0

RE: filer Olympics
by Mike Sphar 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

Leatherman? Feh. Cordless drill with adjustable torque. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Engineering Support Services, BOFH, GWP, MCP, MCP+I, MCSE, BFD -----Original Message----- From: Todd C. Merrill [mailto:tmerrill@mathworks.com] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 11:57 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: filer Olympics On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Bruce Sterling Woodcock wrote: > > But do you loosen the screws before or after the clock starts... :) > > A better question is - do you actually screw the PCI cards into the slot? > You can skip that step and save lotsa time (although you are more > vulnerable to a bad connection caused by someone bumping the filer). > > I assume power tools are allowed.... The only tools you are allowed are a grounding strap and a Leatherman. *All* screws *inside* the box are unsecured and secured in the timed interval. <hint,hint> The ones inside your head should definitely be loose, all the time. No connections outside the box, redundant or otherwise, can be broken until the console port shows an "ok" prompt after a proper shutdown. Depending on what pieces are being changed, you don't want to loose any data potentially on the NVRAM card! Hmmm...if these Olympics get international recognition, there are going to have to be classes of events. It's no fair to people who have multiple FCAL cards, with cluster failover cards, gig and quad ethernets cards, etc. There can be a 3 PCI card event, etc. ;) First prize? How about an F8xx? ;) A T-shirt for the gold, silver, and bronze winners at least. Until next time... The Mathworks, Inc. 508-647-7000 x7792 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098 508-647-7001 FAX tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com ---

7 7

Re: NTAP UNSUBSCRIBE PLEASE
by Stephen C. Woods 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

>"carrnakk(a)msn.com" wrote: >> >> I CANT STAND IT NO MORE >I believe you employed a double negative. He might be Russian, double negatives add in Russian. nichevo means nothing Nichivo ne zniaou. Nothing not know (I). Is an Absoulte denial of knowledge. "I know nothingz!, I see nothingz!". Think Sgt. Schultz. ----- Stephen C. Woods; UCLA SEASnet; 2567 Boelter hall; LA CA 90095; (310)-825-8614 Finger for public key scw(a)kinross.seas.ucla.edu,Internet mail:scw@SEAS.UCLA.EDU

1 0

NTAP UNSUBSCRIBE PLEASE
by carrnakk＠msn.com 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

I CANT STAND IT NO MORE

3 2

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters July 2000