toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13523 discussions

HOW-TO Unsubscribe yourselves..
by Geoff Mohler 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

send a message to: majordomo(a)mathworks.com with a body of: unsubscribe toasters Thats it..same ol majordomo you subscribed with.

1 0

RE: Please remove me from mail-list
by Taylor, Bryant 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

please remove -----Original Message----- From: Hall, John L [mailto:HallJL@MapleLeaf.ca] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:23 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Please remove me from mail-list Remove -----Original Message----- From: Bart Vermeersch [mailto:Bart.Vermeersch@simac.be] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 5:04 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Please remove me from mail-list Please remove me from mail-list Thx, best reagrgds, bart Vermeersch > Bart Vermeersch > Sales Support Manager > Domain Manager Data Solutions > > Simac Netbuilding nv/sa > Zone Guldendelle > A. De Coninckstraat 5 > B-3070 KORTENBERG > Tel.: +32(2)755 15 11 > Fax: +32(2)755 17 00 > Dir : +32(2)755 16 87 > > E-mail : bart.vermeersch(a)simac.be > > UPCOMING SEMINARS: > "The key to your backdoor" - Security Seminar > 17 October 2001, Kasteel van Ham, Steenokkerzeel > > "Profiling, Predicting and Troubleshooting Business Application > Performance" > 18 October 2001, Kortenberg > > http://www.simac.be/html/events.htm > > >

1 0

RE: Please remove me from mail-list
by Hall, John L 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

Remove -----Original Message----- From: Bart Vermeersch [mailto:Bart.Vermeersch@simac.be] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 5:04 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Please remove me from mail-list Please remove me from mail-list Thx, best reagrgds, bart Vermeersch > Bart Vermeersch > Sales Support Manager > Domain Manager Data Solutions > > Simac Netbuilding nv/sa > Zone Guldendelle > A. De Coninckstraat 5 > B-3070 KORTENBERG > Tel.: +32(2)755 15 11 > Fax: +32(2)755 17 00 > Dir : +32(2)755 16 87 > > E-mail : bart.vermeersch(a)simac.be > > UPCOMING SEMINARS: > "The key to your backdoor" - Security Seminar > 17 October 2001, Kasteel van Ham, Steenokkerzeel > > "Profiling, Predicting and Troubleshooting Business Application > Performance" > 18 October 2001, Kortenberg > > http://www.simac.be/html/events.htm > > >

1 0

Please remove me from mail-list
by Bart Vermeersch 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

Please remove me from mail-list Thx, best reagrgds, bart Vermeersch > Bart Vermeersch > Sales Support Manager > Domain Manager Data Solutions > > Simac Netbuilding nv/sa > Zone Guldendelle > A. De Coninckstraat 5 > B-3070 KORTENBERG > Tel.: +32(2)755 15 11 > Fax: +32(2)755 17 00 > Dir : +32(2)755 16 87 > > E-mail : bart.vermeersch(a)simac.be > > UPCOMING SEMINARS: > "The key to your backdoor" - Security Seminar > 17 October 2001, Kasteel van Ham, Steenokkerzeel > > "Profiling, Predicting and Troubleshooting Business Application > Performance" > 18 October 2001, Kortenberg > > http://www.simac.be/html/events.htm > > >

1 0

drive mapping issues
by neil lehrer 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

we are ontap 6.01r3d3, nfs and cifs. clients are winnt 4.0 sp5 using sun nfs client sw and native winnt cifs. filer dns name = file1 filer wins name = joe users is the nt share if i do net use * \\joe\users i get a cifs connection if i do net use * \\file1\users i get an nfs connection if i try to map a drive from the explorer gui to \\file1\users i get network path not found. our normal syntax to map drives using nfs is net use H: sunbox:/usr/local/h is there anyway to get a cifs connection using the dns name on a client that has both nfs and cifs on it?? we want to migrate from nfs to cifs. we want to use the dns names, and we can't [easily] remove the nfs client. thanks. -- regards

4 7

remove
by Bryan Avdyli 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

Please remove me from this alias. Thanks

1 0

DLT 8000 support on F85 ?
by Frank Bonnet 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

Hi We have connected a HP (Quantum) DLT8000 to our F85 but I am unable to access it see the error message below ( it is the same one with every device I tried to use ... ) sysconfig -a give the following result for the concerned device slot 6: SCSI Host Adapter 6 (Qlogic ISP 1080) Ultra2/Wide, Low Voltage Differential Firmware Version 8.09 Clock Rate 100MHz. Bios Version 1.33 11: Tape: Quantum DLT8000 0233 I/O base 0xbf00, size 0x100 memory mapped I/O base 0xfdefe000, size 0x1000 I've tried to use the cloned_tapes file without success Ontap release is : NetApp Release 6.1.1R1: Wed Aug 15 17:58:35 PDT 2001 here is the result of the mt -t xxx status command ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ yfiler> mt -t rst0l status Tue Oct 16 13:41:05 CES [isp_main:error]: hba_error_proc: Unexpected bus free on 6.11 (0x8000 0xf00 0x0). Reset host adapter. Tue Oct 16 13:41:05 CES [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 6.11: Check Condition: CDB 0x1a: Sense Data aborted command - (0xb - 0x4b 0x0 0x0). Tue Oct 16 13:41:06 CES [isp_timeout:warning]: Resetting SCSI adapter 6 (ha #0) Tue Oct 16 13:41:06 CES [isp_timeout:warning]: Resetting SCSI bus 6 (ha #0) to clear outstanding I/O. Tue Oct 16 13:41:12 CES [isp_main:error]: hba_error_proc: Unexpected bus free on 6.11 (0x8000 0xf00 0x0). Reset host adapter. Tape drive: Quantum DLT8000 Status: ready, write enabled Format: 85937 bpi 35 GB fileno = 0 blockno = 0 resid = 0 yfiler> yfiler> Tue Oct 16 13:41:12 CES [isp_timeout:warning]: Resetting SCSI adapter 6 (ha #0) Tue Oct 16 13:41:12 CES [isp_timeout:warning]: Resetting SCSI bus 6 (ha #0) to clear outstanding I/O. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Any help welcome ( NetApp newbie ) Thanks. -- Frank Bonnet

1 0

RE: F85 series
by Jamey Maze 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

Filer volumes must have at least one data and one parity drive. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of john(a)takedapharm.com Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 10:32 PM To: tmerrill(a)mathworks.com; listsarch-toasters(a)enteract.com Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: F85 series >[0] I know there are a lot of "configurations" (1 shelf, 2 shelves, >etc.) but what I mean is if you buy one shelf, most people will, and >NetApp recommends, keeping 1 disk as a parity drive and 1 as a hot >spare. Sure, one could create a RAID group with 7 data drives and no >parity and hot spare, but I doubt that is "common." Is it possible with ONTAP to create a volume without a parity disk? I've got a bunch o' data that would function fine on a RAID-0 type volume... (SAS Tempfiles, holding tank for data transfers, etc...) I didn't think it was possible... If it is, I've got a use for it. -john John Witham Senior Data Networking Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. V://847.383.3304 F://847.383.3205 mailto://jwitham@takedapharm.com -----Original Message----- From: Todd C. Merrill [ mailto:tmerrill@mathworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 2:44 PM To: listsarch-toasters(a)enteract.com Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: F85 series On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, White, Lance wrote: > performance...so, I ask again (hypothetically, that is), realistically, how > SHOULD a vendor quote storage capacity?!? ...with the most common configuration [0], accepting the default numbers and vendor's recommended operating configurations. In NetApp's case, filers with shelves should be quoted retaining a parity and hot spare drive with the default WAFL overheads and 20% snapshot reserve. Think of it this way: when a typical customer orders a filer he opens it up, plugs it in, gives it a name and a few network numbers, and <poof> how much space does he see? *That* should be the number in the quoted literature. Specifically, if we were considering the case of the self-contained F85, this would be (6 drives minus 1 parity minus 1 hot spare) 4 x 36 GB drives, minus ~10% filesystem minus ~20% snapshot reserve, for a total usable space of roughly 100 GB. In this way, there is no suprise to the customer; management isn't upset that the "216 GB" file server (36x6) they paid for is only giving them half of that to use; etc. Vendors can say also there is a "maximum usable" configuration available; "however, some important features may not be available in this configuration. Your SE can help you decide what is right for your installation." For instance, you could quote a "maximum usable" capacity of 162 GB, which is 5 drives (sacrificing the hot spare) and no snapshot reserve (5x36x0.9). All IMHO of course. I've got a small spreadsheet which takes the disk capacity and number of drives and calculates this for me, 'cause I know the marketing capacities are useless. [0] I know there are a lot of "configurations" (1 shelf, 2 shelves, etc.) but what I mean is if you buy one shelf, most people will, and NetApp recommends, keeping 1 disk as a parity drive and 1 as a hot spare. Sure, one could create a RAID group with 7 data drives and no parity and hot spare, but I doubt that is "common." Until next time... The Mathworks, Inc. 508-647-7000 x7792 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098 508-647-7001 FAX tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com ---

2 1

E2K on netapp
by Jennifer Armenta 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

Anyone with experience running E2K on netapp filers? (looking for pitfalls)

2 1

RE: F85 series
by john＠takedapharm.com 14 Oct '01

14 Oct '01

>[0] I know there are a lot of "configurations" (1 shelf, 2 shelves, >etc.) but what I mean is if you buy one shelf, most people will, and >NetApp recommends, keeping 1 disk as a parity drive and 1 as a hot >spare. Sure, one could create a RAID group with 7 data drives and no >parity and hot spare, but I doubt that is "common." Is it possible with ONTAP to create a volume without a parity disk? I've got a bunch o' data that would function fine on a RAID-0 type volume... (SAS Tempfiles, holding tank for data transfers, etc...) I didn't think it was possible... If it is, I've got a use for it. -john John Witham Senior Data Networking Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. V://847.383.3304 F://847.383.3205 mailto://jwitham@takedapharm.com -----Original Message----- From: Todd C. Merrill [mailto:tmerrill@mathworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 2:44 PM To: listsarch-toasters(a)enteract.com Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: F85 series On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, White, Lance wrote: > performance...so, I ask again (hypothetically, that is), realistically, how > SHOULD a vendor quote storage capacity?!? ...with the most common configuration [0], accepting the default numbers and vendor's recommended operating configurations. In NetApp's case, filers with shelves should be quoted retaining a parity and hot spare drive with the default WAFL overheads and 20% snapshot reserve. Think of it this way: when a typical customer orders a filer he opens it up, plugs it in, gives it a name and a few network numbers, and <poof> how much space does he see? *That* should be the number in the quoted literature. Specifically, if we were considering the case of the self-contained F85, this would be (6 drives minus 1 parity minus 1 hot spare) 4 x 36 GB drives, minus ~10% filesystem minus ~20% snapshot reserve, for a total usable space of roughly 100 GB. In this way, there is no suprise to the customer; management isn't upset that the "216 GB" file server (36x6) they paid for is only giving them half of that to use; etc. Vendors can say also there is a "maximum usable" configuration available; "however, some important features may not be available in this configuration. Your SE can help you decide what is right for your installation." For instance, you could quote a "maximum usable" capacity of 162 GB, which is 5 drives (sacrificing the hot spare) and no snapshot reserve (5x36x0.9). All IMHO of course. I've got a small spreadsheet which takes the disk capacity and number of drives and calculates this for me, 'cause I know the marketing capacities are useless. [0] I know there are a lot of "configurations" (1 shelf, 2 shelves, etc.) but what I mean is if you buy one shelf, most people will, and NetApp recommends, keeping 1 disk as a parity drive and 1 as a hot spare. Sure, one could create a RAID group with 7 data drives and no parity and hot spare, but I doubt that is "common." Until next time... The Mathworks, Inc. 508-647-7000 x7792 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098 508-647-7001 FAX tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com ---

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters