toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

quotas file
by Grey, Michael 18 Oct '01

18 Oct '01

Well I have figured out how to set quotas based on global groups in Windows NT, but I'm having a little problem with the quotas file once completed. My script checks to see if a user is a member of a global group for a quota alocation (200MB, 350MB, and 500MB) via the "Global" command. This script runs automatically when a change is made to a quota global group. If the user ID is not in any global group then they would receive the default quota. The users who are members of a global group for quotas are written to a scratch file in the format of the quotas file. Once the script is complete the quotas file is deleted and then this scratch file is renamed to the quotas file. Everything works excellent but quota changes are not applied until I perform a "quota resize" command. I need to know if the filer automatically recalculates the quotas based on this file and if so, under what conditions? or, is there any way to have the filer recalculate quotas based on the quota file other then via the "quota resize" command. I'm trying to do this from a batch script under NT. I'm not sure how to RSH to the box via a script from NT if at all possible. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

2 1

Ndmpcopy or vol copy (data migration)?
by Dawn Lovell 18 Oct '01

18 Oct '01

I know this very issue has been discussed previously, but I'm seeking some clarification. We have a 210 running 5.3.6R2 that we're replacing with an 820 running 6.1.1R1. The filers both have 100mb/full-duplex connections on the same subnet. Our initial plan was to vol copy the single 36GB volume on the 210 to a new volume on the 820. We've used vol copy to move roughly the same amount of data from a 210 to a 740 in the past, although both were running the same DOT version. After reading the archived discussion on the filesystem reversion necessary when migrating between 5.3.6R2 and 6.0.1R1, I opened a case with NetApp to ask about the time involved for reversion and if the filesystem would be upgraded after the vol copy completed. The support engineer pointed out that there are possible data safety issues with doing a vol copy from the older hardware/OS to the newer and strongly suggested avoiding vol copy and using ndmpcopy instead. I guess I'm just seeking some additional opinions, as vol copy has worked so well for us in the past. We can certainly use ndmpcopy with some variation of level0/incremental (or rsync), but I'm concerned the move will end up taking longer that way than if we just schedule several hours of downtime and vol copy once. I don't want to do something unsupported, but my impression (from the archived discussion) was that vol copy should work after the target filesystem was reverted. Is vol copy actually unsupported by NetApp in this scenario? Has anyone done this and had problems? Thanks very much for your time! Dawn Lovell dlovell(a)centurytel.net

1 0

RE: root volume
by Lane, Debbie 18 Oct '01

18 Oct '01

This list is great. I wanted to thank everyone for their replies. I was also impressed with NetApp Tech Support. They saw my question on the list server and gave me a call. Best Regards, --Debbie

1 0

RE: NetApp and EMC Comparisons
by Joe Luchtenberg 18 Oct '01

18 Oct '01

1. The article, while making some valid points about the industry in general with regards to FC SAN and TCP/IP NAS, misses a lot of significant points about Network Appliance. Furthermore, in making generalized statements about the NAS market (most platforms of which are tuned Win2K Advanced Server devices or some-flavor-of-Linux), these would mis-characterize filers if applied to them. When comparing NetApp filers to competing SANs the important comparisons to make are between WAFL and NTFS/xFS. For instance, when addressing the scalability requirements for large enterprises, The Clipper Group states, "[NAS] will likely require, over the long run, much more IT staff involvement than [SAN]," the argument being that it takes more resources to manage many small (their characterization) filers than fewer behemoth SANs. I think most on this list would refute that point for many reasons. 2. Without understanding the requirement you seek to address, it's hard to make pertinent comparisons between EMC's IP4700 and NetApp filers (I assume this is the comparison you're making, not Celerra vs NetApp). However, some general points to consider: - if you're doing anything other than home directories and general purpose file sharing, you should consider the level of application support for the two platforms (I believe you will find NetApp is more likely to have certified support on their filers, although in researching this I was surprised to find EMC had certified Oracle on IP4700; nonetheless, from my point of view EMC will want you to do anything other than home directories and file sharing on a Sym). - IP4700 RAID5 / NetApp RAID4 -- inherent dynamic RAID set expansion advantages to NetApp - IP4700 RAID set sizes are restricted to 5- or 10-disk multiples -- less user configurable - no competing offering to NetApp's SnapMirror from EMC for the IP4700 platform 3. Getting back to your specific question about admin... Generally speaking, EMC supports their own products. This support is surely world-class, but it also carries a world-class price tag. As an administrator you won't be adding storage capacity, loading patches or performing other typical tasks -- they will (unless you get and maintain expensive certification training). In today's bloody market (EMC lost over $1B last quarter) vendors are doing everything they can to move product. Getting demos should be easy from both (now that manufacturing has had time to catch up with the response to Sept 11 -- for a while all demos and stock from a number of h/w vendors were redirected to NYC and DC for disaster response). Get 'em both in your lab and try 'em out for yourself. Let us know what you find. Just my $.02. Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Johnson-Barbier [mailto:mjb@mj3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:02 PM > To: Toasters (E-mail) > Subject: Re: NetApp and EMC Comparisons > > > This is a good write-up about NAS vs. SAN in general. I got > the link from > EMC, but the recommendations seems to favor NetApp for the needs of my > company. > > http://www.clipper.com/bulletins/sanvnasfinal.pdf > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Killion, Brent (ZB7217)" <Brent.Killion(a)pinnaclewest.com> > To: "Toasters (E-mail)" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:12 AM > Subject: NetApp and EMC Comparisons > > > > Fellow Filer Admins- > > > > Can anyone point me to any white papers comparing the EMC > NAS products > with > > Network Appliance NAS solutions? Specifically, I'm looking > for comparisons > > of ease of use and ease of administration. > > > > Thanks. > > > > >

1 0

RE: remove
by Braunschweiger, Udo 18 Oct '01

18 Oct '01

please send a mail to majordomo(a)mathworks.com <mailto:majordomo@mathworks.com> with the only word in the message body unsubscribe toasters that's all! -----Original Message----- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:JMorgan@Trivergent.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2001 17:02 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: remove remove Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 331-7939 jmorgan(a)trivergent.com

1 0

Write permissions on CIFS share
by Ian F. Jarvis 18 Oct '01

18 Oct '01

NetApp gurus, I have a scenario where I am unable to gain write access to a CIFS share on our Filer for a local Filer account. I can map a drive, read and execute with no problems but cannot write to the share. Due to our security policy, our Windows NT boxes and Filer are in workgroup and not in a domain. The Filer is being used as a store of log data from servers and not for any 'user' data. PlainTextPasswords is enabled on the Windows NT machines. The user account in question has been added locally to the Filer and the share has a mixed security style. The share has 'everyone' access with full control. I have attempted to map the user account to pcuser and even root in usermap.cfg with no luck. I am able to write when mapping the drive as root. Although the user account shows up with the useradmin userlist command, it is not showing in /etc/passwd. I'm not sure if this is an issue or not. Hopefully there is something simple I am missing here. Data OnTap version: 6.0.1R3 Licenses: CIFS, NFS Thanks in advance!! Ian Jarvis NOC Systems Engineer Aether Systems Inc. 443-394-5029 <<...OLE_Obj...>>

1 0

remove
by Morgan, Joshua 18 Oct '01

18 Oct '01

remove Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 331-7939 jmorgan(a)trivergent.com

1 0

Re: ONTAP with RedHat linux
by Steve Losen 18 Oct '01

18 Oct '01

I am running RedHat 7.1 and NFS mounting a netapp F820 running 6.0.1R3. Things work pretty smoothly, but I have experienced the same problem as another poster (sorry, lost the message) where NFS writes occasionally delay and a "NFS server not responding" error is logged. I have not tried the rsize=1023,wsize=1023 work around. I have experienced the same problem with NFS servers other than Netapp, including a IBM RS6000 running AIX. Non Linux NFS clients are having no delay problems with the Netapp filers, so I'm pretty sure it is on the Linux end. For awhile I thought the NIC on my Linux box had botched the speed/duplex negotiation with the ethernet switch. Our network folks can tell me what speed the switch port has negotiated, but I don't know how to check my NIC from Linux. The network folks tell me they see no errors on my switch port when I experience NFS delays. I don't seem to have any other network problems, so I doubt this is the problem. I have been able to duplicate the problem on a second Linux box. However, on a third box, essentially identical to mine and also running RH 7.1, I could not duplicate it. A couple of things to be aware of with RedHat Linux and NFS. Prior to RedHat 7.0, only NFS v2 was supported. Furthermore, Linux only supported 16 bit uids and gids. We have a lot of files on our Netapp filers with uids greater than 65535. RedHat 7.1 supports NFS v3 and 32 bit uids and gids. 32 bit uids are critical in our environment. I administer our filers and when I was running RH 6.2, I could not get accurate file owner information with "ls" and I could not "chown" files to uids over 65535, so I had to use another unix box for filer administration. Now I can do it all from my Linux box. Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

1 0

ONTAP with RedHat linux
by Kunihiko Motoyoshi 18 Oct '01

18 Oct '01

Hello, Dose anyone had experience about filer with RedHat 7.1 or later ? I know RedHad 6.x working with ONTAP. Please let me know, If you had experience, What ONTAP version you use ? Thank you, -Motoyoshi -- Kunihiko Motoyoshi Phone:+81-3-3649-4937 / Fax:+81-3-3649-6425 Storage Group / Product Support Dept. CTC Technology

5 5

NIS groups not showing up
by Roman.Ustoyev＠chase.com 17 Oct '01

17 Oct '01

Hi Lance, Did you find a solution to this problem? We are running 6.1R1 and have the same issue. As of today there is no fix for this, the only workaround is to have the groups locally on the filer, but that defeats the whole purpose for NIS. The problem has to do with the way YP stores its maps using dbm format (I think NIS+ in yp compatibility mode emulates dbm for yp clients). As far as I know there is a limitation on a single entry in dbm file which can not exceed 1024. It would be nice if filers could read NIS+, but I don't think this will happen. Can anyone else comment on that? Roman. >Thanks to all for your help. As it turns out the problem is if a group line >on your NIS+ server exceeds 1024 chars the filer will stop processing the NIS >entry once it sees that line. So all groups after that are non-existant! > >I understand this is fixed in 6.0 but don't know for sure. If not there should >atleast be a warning in the log file that says you may have exceeded the 1024 >char limit in a particular NIS map. > >Hi Lance, > > When the group cache is created, if there are duplicate entries, a message will >be logged. Are there any such messages logged? > >Thanks, >-Devi > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Lance R. Mehle [mailto:mehlel001@hawaii.rr.com] >Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 3:13 PM >To: Toasters (E-mail) >Subject: NIS groups not showing up > > >Hi all, > >I have a problem that I was wondering if any of you have seen. > >We have a little over 2000 groups in our NIS+ environment. When I check the >nis_cache file on the filer about 399 are missing. A ypgroup also shows the >group(s) missing from the filer although a ypmatch can find the group(s). >It also appears that the same groups are effected all the time. > >The groups are fine on the UNIX side. > >Help! > >Lance

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters