toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

FS: NetApp 7x18gb Disk Shelves - $3,695.00
by ScottUCE＠aol.com 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

We are eager to reduce our 18gb drive inventory before year-end and are thus offering the following: Fully populated 7x18gb NetApp rack -- $3,695.00 - FC8 Shelf with dual power supplies (FC9 option available) - SEVEN 18gb FC-AL disk drives (125gb raw total) - FC cable and a/c power cords - ONE YEAR advance exchange warranty Complete used systems, including F720s, 740s and 760s -- with or without software licenses -- are also available, configured to suit. (Unlicensed heads are a superb alternative for backup machines and/or spare parts kits.) Regards, Scott Fischmann Union Computer Exchange, Inc. 6233 Idylwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55436 Phone: 952 935 7282 FAX: 952 935 5056 scott(a)unioncomputer.com

1 0

UWIN/chmod problem
by Mike Sphar 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

Has anyone ever heard of a problem like this? I couldn't find anything at NOW. Some build engineers are reporting that they're unable to change file permissions with the UWIN chmod command on my filers. (UWIN is a set of UNIX utilities for windows.) They're able to chmod files on another filer, and on samba shares, but when they try to chmod files on my filer they get permissions denied. Permissions and ownerships look right. They can create, edit, and delete the files via CIFS. They can do the chmod from a UNIX client and it works fine. The only difference I'm aware of with my filer is that all my qtrees are in UNIX mode, whereas the other filer in question is in mixed mode. My gut instinct is to consider this a UWIN problem, but I'd be curious to know if anyone else has had experience with this. -- Mike Sphar - Iron Chef UNIX - R&D Support Peregrine Systems, Inc.

1 0

Hyperion Enterprise on a NetApp
by Gifford, Josh 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

Hello Everyone, This might be a long shot, but I'm curious to know if anyone is running Hyperion Enterprise on a NetApp filer. I'm having a ton of issues with Hyperion running on a Windows 2000 box and I'm looking for alternatives. Thanks in advance! Best Regards, Josh J Gifford MCP NT Systems Engineer Siemens Power Transmission & Distribution 7000 Siemens Rd Wendell, NC 27591 Phone: (919) 365-2806; Fax: (919) 365-1080

1 0

Re: quota problem ?
by Rune Bakken 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

daniel <daniel(a)interq.or.jp> writes: > I have a user who can not upload any files to his home dir using ftp and > the error message he gets is "disk quota exceeded". > I checked his users quota from the filer and noticed that he is indeed > over the limit of his quota. Then you may need to increase his users quota as the filer counts all files owned by each user in each of the quota type, and hence a simple df -s will not work. From my own quotas file: #Quota Target type disk files rb user@/vol/users/home 8G 300K Any files I own on or below /vol/users/home will be counted in the quota. Even if they exists outside my designated $HOME. quota -v <user> on Solaris gives you the this output: kavringen(root) local 501# quota -v rb Disk quotas for rb (uid 392): Filesystem usage quota limit timeleft files quota limit timeleft /home/nfs/users 2522412 8388608 8388608 50844 307200 307200 I would suspect that other OS' has similar tools. >>>>>>>.rune -- Rune Bakken "I feel sorry for people who don't drink. System Administrator When they wake up in the morning, that's as Nextra, good as they're going to feel all day." - Telenor Company - Frank Sinatra

5 4

Re: quota problem ?
by Andrew Curry 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

On Fri 16 Nov 2001 at 16:39, daniel wrote: > I have a user who can not upload any files to his home dir using ftp and > the error message he gets is "disk quota exceeded". > > When I did du -sk on his home dir as root , I find that it is not even > close to his maximum quota limit. Quota is set as follows for this volume, > qtree, X disk limit and no limit on # of files. > > I checked his users quota from the filer and noticed that he is indeed > over the limit of his quota. > > Filer is F840 and Ontap version is 6.0.1R3. > > Any ideas? I imagine he must own some files which are not in his home directory. Do 'find <home dir> -user <uname>| wc -l' to count the number of files that he owns in his directory and compare that with the number of files that quota reports. Do 'find <disk> -user <uname>' to find all the files on the disk that he owns. Andrew Curry Faculty of Computing Sciences and Engineering De Montfort University, Leicester, UK

1 0

quota problem ?
by daniel 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

Hi all, I have a user who can not upload any files to his home dir using ftp and the error message he gets is "disk quota exceeded". When I did du -sk on his home dir as root , I find that it is not even close to his maximum quota limit. Quota is set as follows for this volume, qtree, X disk limit and no limit on # of files. I checked his users quota from the filer and noticed that he is indeed over the limit of his quota. Filer is F840 and Ontap version is 6.0.1R3. Any ideas? Thanks in advance. Daniel Jung System Administrator GMO inc

1 0

F840 or F880
by Jennifer Armenta 14 Nov '01

14 Nov '01

Do you see any point in upgrading from a F840 to a F880 or F880c, besides the clustering factor? Does anyone have any good advantage point to this type of upgrade that would justify the cost. Jennifer )

3 2

RE: F840 or F880
by Joe Luchtenberg 14 Nov '01

14 Nov '01

Yes, it dies. That's what I was referring to (earlier reply that you may not have seen posted yet) when I indicated that the 2nd CPU is for performance, not availability (see http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=ntapcs2897 <http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=ntapcs2897> ). I think one CPU is dedicated to indexing and other such processes. Joe -----Original Message----- From: Honeycutt, Michael [mailto:MichaelHoneycutt@NC.SLR.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:15 PM To: 'Jennifer Armenta'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: F840 or F880 Good quesiton. Does anyone know if the filer dies if a CPU fails? It would be nice if it paniced and came back up on 1 CPU while support was working to get it replaced. -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Armenta [mailto:ArmentaJ@mascorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:25 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: F840 or F880 Do you see any point in upgrading from a F840 to a F880 or F880c, besides the clustering factor? Does anyone have any good advantage point to this type of upgrade that would justify the cost. Jennifer )

1 0

RE: F840 or F880
by Honeycutt, Michael 14 Nov '01

14 Nov '01

Good quesiton. Does anyone know if the filer dies if a CPU fails? It would be nice if it paniced and came back up on 1 CPU while support was working to get it replaced. -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Armenta [mailto:ArmentaJ@mascorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:25 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: F840 or F880 Do you see any point in upgrading from a F840 to a F880 or F880c, besides the clustering factor? Does anyone have any good advantage point to this type of upgrade that would justify the cost. Jennifer )

1 0

RE: F840 or F880
by Joe Luchtenberg 14 Nov '01

14 Nov '01

F880 dual-CPU is for performance purposes only. It is not for redundancy and does not enhance availability. There are some other enhancements, such as the PC card boot. If you need clustering for high(er) availability, F840c or F880c both deliver. Considering you already have the F840, it would seem to me that an F840c is the better option from an investment protection perspective. I.e. you're not going to get full purchase price (by any stretch) back as trade in for your F840 if you go with the F880c. Joe -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Armenta [mailto:ArmentaJ@mascorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:25 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: F840 or F880 Do you see any point in upgrading from a F840 to a F880 or F880c, besides the clustering factor? Does anyone have any good advantage point to this type of upgrade that would justify the cost. Jennifer )

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters