toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

RE: Purging classified files from F840
by Joe Luchtenberg 28 Nov '01

28 Nov '01

Not a direct answer, but a related subject... If your environment is subject to DoD restrictions related to data classification, then you may wish to ensure you have the warranty uplift for non-returnable disks. NetApp cannot accept returned disks under warranty that have been degaused or otherwise modified to purge data to satisfy classification requirements, as this will nullify their warranty with the OEM manufacturer (it is well known that NetApp is a software company and their disks are - or at least were - all Seagate or IBM). You will be charged for replacement disks, if you do not purchase this uplift. Hope this is useful, even if it does not directly address your question. Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. 757-858-0600 joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com -----Original Message----- From: pkeim(contr-ird) [mailto:pkeim@snap.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:23 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Purging classified files from F840 I need some assistance in tracking down a specific question concerning our new F840 with release 6.1.1R2. When it's introduced into our production environment next month, it will operate in an unclassified (but sensitive) environment. If a user inadvertently saved a document classified "secret" to the filer, what is the DoD-approved method to completely wipe the file from the volume? Thanks in advance for the help!

1 0

RE: Performance issue
by Craig Slack 27 Nov '01

27 Nov '01

We too have experienced similar performance issues on the same OS version. However, our users are using Trend OfficeScan for virus scanning, not NAV. We have an open case with NetApp, but so far they have provided us with no information. If this is a widespread problem with this OS version, I would like to know when a patch is expected, if anyone knows. Thank you. Craig Slack -----Original Message----- From: Kitch, David [mailto:dkitch@ti.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:32 AM To: 'Drew O'Donnell'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Performance issue We've had the same issue in isolated cases on our filers running 6.1R1P1. Our clients are running NAV CE. What have you found out about Norton Antivirus Corporate edition in this combination? Regards, Dave -----Original Message----- From: Drew O'Donnell [mailto:drew@cooperneff.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:43 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Performance issue Yes, We are having a very similar issue, Netapp Engineering thinks there may be a bug with this release, we are currently working with them to resolve this. If you disable oplocks on the qtrees which are experiencing the problem, then this should temporarily resolve your problem. I forwarded your email to engineering and they should be contacting you. Are you by any chance running Norton Antivirus Corporate edition on any of you clients? Thanks Drew -----Original Message----- From: Haber, David J. [mailto:David.Haber@vtmednet.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:11 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Performance issue Has anyone seen intermittent problems when users try to save Excel or Powerpoint files to a share on the filer? Also, what are some of the strategies for dealing with oplock break timeout issues? I've been working with NetApp support on these issues but I'd like other opinions. I'm running an 820 filer, DATAOntap 6.1.1r1, and I have a 4-port, 10/100 full duplex vif.

1 0

Re: Performance issue
by MCope＠isisph.com 27 Nov '01

27 Nov '01

David, Exactly what kind of issues are you seeing. I have the exact same setup except I have Gigabit instead of 100Mb. The issue primarily seems to be opening Office files from a share can take 30+ seconds. Other files types don't seem to be such an issue although I've personally seen a tiny text file take 20 seconds to open in Notepad. I've been the lone voice in the wilderness claiming it's not a Filer problem although it sounds like that might not be entirely true. We did see that running NAV with network drive checking enabled significantly made file access slower. We've done extensive testing and trouble shooting with the local NetApp folks. They discovered the NAV problem. The biggest reason I've not been looking at the Filer as a source of the problem is we've experienced the exact same behavior when accessing files from a share on an NT server. That in conjunction with some packet captures we've done seem to point to a problem with NT's TCP/IP stack. The stack starts out using very small packets and takes forever to ramp up to a decent packet size (Win2K is much faster - in tests a Win2K box on 100Mb ran laps around an NT server using Gigabit). We also use NIS as our primary means of authentication on the Filer and we still haven't ruled this out as an issue. I'm certainly interested in learning more about your problem and everything you learn/hear. This has been made a "top priority" for me to resolve and it's been frustrating because there doesn't seem to be a "smoking gun" and in the meanwhile management and users are cursing the good name of NetApp. Michael Cope Unix Systems Administrator Isis Pharmaceuticals mcope(a)isisph.com

1 0

RE: Performance issue
by Kitch, David 27 Nov '01

27 Nov '01

We've had the same issue in isolated cases on our filers running 6.1R1P1. Our clients are running NAV CE. What have you found out about Norton Antivirus Corporate edition in this combination? Regards, Dave -----Original Message----- From: Drew O'Donnell [mailto:drew@cooperneff.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:43 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Performance issue Yes, We are having a very similar issue, Netapp Engineering thinks there may be a bug with this release, we are currently working with them to resolve this. If you disable oplocks on the qtrees which are experiencing the problem, then this should temporarily resolve your problem. I forwarded your email to engineering and they should be contacting you. Are you by any chance running Norton Antivirus Corporate edition on any of you clients? Thanks Drew -----Original Message----- From: Haber, David J. [mailto:David.Haber@vtmednet.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:11 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Performance issue Has anyone seen intermittent problems when users try to save Excel or Powerpoint files to a share on the filer? Also, what are some of the strategies for dealing with oplock break timeout issues? I've been working with NetApp support on these issues but I'd like other opinions. I'm running an 820 filer, DATAOntap 6.1.1r1, and I have a 4-port, 10/100 full duplex vif.

1 0

RE: Performance issue
by Drew O'Donnell 27 Nov '01

27 Nov '01

Yes, We are having a very similar issue, Netapp Engineering thinks there may be a bug with this release, we are currently working with them to resolve this. If you disable oplocks on the qtrees which are experiencing the problem, then this should temporarily resolve your problem. I forwarded your email to engineering and they should be contacting you. Are you by any chance running Norton Antivirus Corporate edition on any of you clients? Thanks Drew -----Original Message----- From: Haber, David J. [mailto:David.Haber@vtmednet.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:11 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Performance issue Has anyone seen intermittent problems when users try to save Excel or Powerpoint files to a share on the filer? Also, what are some of the strategies for dealing with oplock break timeout issues? I've been working with NetApp support on these issues but I'd like other opinions. I'm running an 820 filer, DATAOntap 6.1.1r1, and I have a 4-port, 10/100 full duplex vif.

1 0

Performance issue
by Haber, David J. 27 Nov '01

27 Nov '01

Has anyone seen intermittent problems when users try to save Excel or Powerpoint files to a share on the filer? Also, what are some of the strategies for dealing with oplock break timeout issues? I've been working with NetApp support on these issues but I'd like other opinions. I'm running an 820 filer, DATAOntap 6.1.1r1, and I have a 4-port, 10/100 full duplex vif.

1 0

Re: NIS group trouble
by Audry Peterson 27 Nov '01

27 Nov '01

Nixon - By default the filer updates the NIS group cache once a day. To verify the option switch enter the following at the console: filer> options nis.group_update_schedule nis.group_update_schedule 24 To manually force an update run the following: filer> options nis.group_update_schedule now To automate the process you can add a command to your NIS servers Makefile as such : rsh <filer> options nis.group_update_schedule now The NIS cache option began with ONTAP release 5.3 Hope this is helpful, Regards, audryp > X-Authentication-Warning: freddie.softlab.se: leif set sender to nixon(a)softlab.ericsson.se using -f > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: NIS group trouble > From: Leif Nixon <nixon(a)softlab.se> > Date: 23 Nov 2001 14:32:23 +0100 > User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > It seems my filer (F720, ONTAP 5.3.6R2) caches NIS group lookups even > if nis.group_update.enable is set to off. > > This is what happens when I add the user "testuser" to the group > "rally": > > Initially both a Unix NIS client and the filer agree that the user > isn't in the group: > > UNIX: % ypmatch rally group > UNIX: rally:*:31042:jfrid,leif > > FILER: jar> ypgroup testuser > FILER: User "testuser" belongs to the following group(s): > FILER: name: testproj gid: 31038 > FILER: name: testprod gid: 31039 > > Then I add the user to the group and do a ypmake. The Unix client > immediately picks up the change: > > UNIX: % ypmatch rally group > UNIX: rally:*:31042:jfrid,leif,testuser > > But the filer doesn't: > > FILER: jar> ypgroup testuser > FILER: User "testuser" belongs to the following group(s): > FILER: name: testproj gid: 31038 > FILER: name: testprod gid: 31039 > > The filer is supposed to not cache group lookups: > > FILER: jar> options nis.group_update.enable > FILER: nis.group_update.enable off > > In this state, the user can access the group's files just fine from an > NFS Unix client, but gets "permission denied" when attempting the same > from a CIFS client. > > Clearing the WCC cache with "wcc -x" doesn't help. Trying to > manually force a group cache update doesn't work: > > FILER: jar> options nis.group_update_schedule now > FILER: Local NIS group update failed now. NIS group caching is not enabled. > > The only way out of this state I've found is to enable group caching > and then disabling it again. This forces a group update. > > FILER: jar> options nis.group_update.enable on > FILER: Fri Nov 23 14:24:21 MET [rc]: NIS: Group Caching has been enabled > FILER: Fri Nov 23 14:24:21 MET [nis_grp_updater]: Local NIS group update successful. > FILER: jar> options nis.group_update.enable off > FILER: Fri Nov 23 14:24:27 MET [rc]: NIS: Group Caching has been disabled > > Now the ypgroup command stops working: > > FILER: jar> ypgroup testuser > FILER: NIS Group cache not yet updated. > > But at least the credential mapping is correct: > > FILER: jar> wcc -u testuser > FILER: (NT - UNIX) account name(s): (SOFTLAB.LIN\testuser - testuser) > FILER: *************** > FILER: UNIX uid = 31028 > FILER: user is a member of group softlab (30100) > FILER: user is a member of group rally (31042) > FILER: user is a member of group testproj (31038) > FILER: user is a member of group testprod (31039) > FILER: > FILER: NT membership > FILER: SOFTLAB.LIN\testuser > FILER: SOFTLAB.LIN\Domain Users > FILER: SOFTLAB.LIN\Gemini > FILER: BUILTIN\Users > FILER: User is also a member of Everyone, Network Users, > FILER: Authenticated Users > FILER: *************** > > Now the user can access the group's files over both NFS and CIFS. Can > anyone make head or tail of this? > > /Leif Nixon -- Audry Peterson mailto:audry.peterson@fnc.fujitsu.com Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. Phone : (972) 479-2137 2801 Telecom Parkway FAX : (972) 479-6989 Richardson, TX 75082 --

4 3

Bug in /etc/sysconfigtab (ONTAP 6.1.1R1)
by Rune Bakken 27 Nov '01

27 Nov '01

Hmm, just noticed (after returning home after a service window) that the filer I just installed another FC card (X2030B) in slot 2, didn't like the card in that position. The error message in the autosupport mail was: sysconfig: QLogic ISP 2100 32-bit Fibre Channel card (PN X2030B) in slot 2 must be in one of these slots: 8,7,6,3,3,1. It didn't hit me untill I spent 10 minutes talking to someone at the frontline of NetApp Support, that I did install the card in the correct slot (I did verify with the system configuration tool in NOW before installing). I blame the time of night, but as more time spent looking at the error message, I still could not shake the thought that something was wrong with the pattern "8,7,6,3,3,1" According to the lady, (and BUG 54796) the work-around was to ignore the error (slot 2 is supported) or move the card and wait for the next release of ONTAP. I edited the sysconfig instead to read allow F740 X2030B 3 8,7,6,3,2,1 1 and 'voila', sysconfig -c did not complain anymore. I felt better, atleast - even without NetApp support. >>>>>>>>>.rune -- Rune Bakken "I feel sorry for people who don't drink. System Administrator When they wake up in the morning, that's as Nextra, good as they're going to feel all day." - Telenor Company - Frank Sinatra

1 0

RE: Upgrade from F740 to F840
by Todd Phillips 27 Nov '01

27 Nov '01

Fairly straight forward. There is documentation out there if you search the NOW site. I have it but, it's on my other PC. I'll send it to you when I get a chance. Basically, all you do is an OnTap upgrade. Just unzip the new system files, not the boot disks, in the /etc directory, enter "download", halt the Filer. Swap heads and boot up. Be careful about things like NIC slot numbers, hostnames, netbios names, ip addresses, DNS, NIS and things like that. Other words, if you're using the onboard ethernet on your 740, its name is 'hostname'-e0. If you go to Gb-E or even another 10/100 port on the 840, your host name will change to 'hostname'-e8 or something.... This may screw up your DNS and possibly NIS. So, my point is, review the entire config and think about what may change and the possible ramifications. Hope that helps. -----Original Message----- From: Uros Lampret To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent: 10/26/2001 5:05 AM Subject: Upgrade from F740 to F840 Hi! I intend to upgrade from F740 to F840. I will only swap heads and keep the disks. I can't seem to find document describing this procedure. Any body done that? How do you change ONTAP from Alpha to Intel version? Regards, Uros

4 4

RE: Advanced Revelation on Netapp
by Hawley, Rob 25 Nov '01

25 Nov '01

I suggest you contact NetApp customer support. They can help you gather the information required to diagnose the problem. mailto: hawleyr(a)netapp.com US Mail: Network Appliance Inc. Windows Networking Engineering 495 E Java Dr Phone/pager: 408-822-6661 Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Cell 408 893 8342 http://www.netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Zekeriya Eskiocak [mailto:zeskiocak@pro-link.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:14 AM To: neil lehrer Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Advanced Revelation on Netapp Hi, Thanks to all friends who responded to my question. I think I could not explain my problem exactly. The application which is called "advanced revelation" is working on winnt 4.0 server and uses its resources-that is a service running on the server. what I have tried is that I mapped the filer volume to the server as F drive and copied all files regarding the application, then tried to run it. It gave a message that it could not find the data files even thet was there on the F drive. This is my problem. Thanks Zek -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of neil lehrer Sent: 19 Kasym 2001 Pazartesi 23:34 To: MCope(a)isisph.com Cc: Zekeriya Eskiocak; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Advanced Revelation on Netapp if you are running from a dos machine you should be able to use the dos smb drivers from microsoft - the ones that came from lanmanager. if you are using any windows based machine the drivers should be there. MCope(a)isisph.com wrote: > > Zekeriya, > > I would definately be interested in hearing if you get this to work. My > company has a few DOS based lab workstations that I would like to connect > to our Filers. The problem is that there is no utility/driver to provide > the SMB protocol to DOS. You can get the IPX protocol for DOS but the > Filers do not support IPX. We have not tried to build a NetWare server to > act as a gateway though. In theory the DOS system could connect to the > NetWare server using IPX. The NetWare server would have the NFS.nlm > running to connect it to a Filer. I do something similar for our Macintosh > users. I have a Linux box that uses NFS to connect to the Filers and then > it runs the AppleShare protocol as a gateway for the Macs. I do not know > if IPX restricts sharing a share like SMB and NFS do (e.g., an SMB/NFS > client - server or workstation - can not then make that share available to > clients of its own) > > Michael Cope > Unix Systems Administrator > Isis Pharmaceuticals > > > "Zekeriya > Eskiocak" To: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > <zeskiocak@pro-lin cc: > k.net> Subject: Advanced Revelation on Netapp > Sent by: > owner-toasters@mat > hworks.com > > > 11/19/01 12:49 PM > > > > Hi All, > > I tried to run on my Netapp F820 an old DOS based 16 bit application called > "advanced revelation" uses a flat file database. Unfortunately I am not > successful. The application does not recognize the mapped network drive. Is > there any way/trick to make it working on the filer? > Has anybody tried such applications on Netapp Filers or remote drives? > > Thanks in advance > > Zekeriya Eskiocak > System Engineer > > Prolink Services > > Istanbul/TURKEY -- regards +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Neil Lehrer + + United States International Broadcasting Bureau + System Development Division + + voice 202 619-2524 + fax 202 619-3576 + nlehrer(a)ibb.gov + + " is this crisis an opportunity or just + another grab the fire extinguisher moment?" + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters