toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13514 discussions

RE: automatic drive mapping from a cifs client to the filer...
by jwitham＠takedapharm.com 12 Apr '02

12 Apr '02

Is the 'administrators' account you mention a domain account, or a local account? The service has to start as a domain account. Unless the local W2K account (admin or otherwise) exists on the Filer w/ the same username and password, you're hosed. The 'system' account has full rights on the local box, but absolutely NO rights on the network (by design) HTH, -john John Witham Sr. Data Networking Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. e://jwitham@takedapharm.com -----Original Message----- From: sdolive(a)ngco.com [mailto:sdolive@ngco.com] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:22 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: automatic drive mapping from a cifs client to the filer... I created a share on an F740 (Ontap 6.0.1R3) and am trying to map a drive from a CIFS client (Windows 2000) automatically at logon point. I have no problems mapping the drive once I am logged on but would like it so that when a user logs onto the 2000 machine the drive gets mapped automatically. I have followed the microsoft suggestion which is copying the autoexnt, instexnt and servmess.dll files to the winnt/system32 root. I have also created a batch file whcih contains the following line 'net use j: \\filer\x03. I have tried the starting the service with the local account and also the administrators account but still nothing. I have also added another command to the batch file (md test) and when the service is started it creates the directory test but does not map the drive. Is their anyone out there who has experienced the same problem? Thanks, Shaun Technical Services 416-235-2122 sdolive(a)ngco.com This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

1 0

RE: automatic drive mapping from a cifs client to the filer...
by Maglinger, Paul 12 Apr '02

12 Apr '02

You didn't say what you were trying to map it for, but you could set it up in User Manager for Domains as the home directory and have it map that way. If you plan on having more than 1 mapping now or down the road, I might suggest you look at s product called Scriptlogic. It does more than just map drives. -----Original Message----- From: sdolive(a)ngco.com [mailto:sdolive@ngco.com] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 09:22 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: automatic drive mapping from a cifs client to the filer... I created a share on an F740 (Ontap 6.0.1R3) and am trying to map a drive from a CIFS client (Windows 2000) automatically at logon point. I have no problems mapping the drive once I am logged on but would like it so that when a user logs onto the 2000 machine the drive gets mapped automatically. I have followed the microsoft suggestion which is copying the autoexnt, instexnt and servmess.dll files to the winnt/system32 root. I have also created a batch file whcih contains the following line 'net use j: \\filer\x03. I have tried the starting the service with the local account and also the administrators account but still nothing. I have also added another command to the batch file (md test) and when the service is started it creates the directory test but does not map the drive. Is their anyone out there who has experienced the same problem? Thanks, Shaun Technical Services 416-235-2122 sdolive(a)ngco.com

1 0

RE: local netgroup ?
by Mike Carroll 12 Apr '02

12 Apr '02

I would love to see this fixed, or changed to function like this as well.... -----Original Message----- From: Chris Blackmor [mailto:chris.blackmor@amd.com] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:55 AM To: Frank Bonnet Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: local netgroup ? Frank, I don't know about local netgroups anymore (got away from those a very long time ago). We do use NIS netgroups in our exports for the access= however we are still specifying hosts in the root= and the rw=. Does anyone know if the root= and rw= will be accepting netgroups? We tried to get this to work a few months ago and it didn't. Last night I spent quite some time auditing the exports file on all 22 of our filers (each with more than 10 lines) and the root=/rw= were what took the bulk of the time. C- On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:36:36AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hi > > Is it possible to use a local netgroup file instead of > the NIS netgroup map on a filer ( ontap 6.1.2R2 ). > I have too much hosts to put in /etc/exports file > > > -- > Frank Bonnet -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - * Chris Blackmor _______ | * * Advanced Micro Devices \____ | | A good horse never comes * * Phone: (512) 602-1608 /| | | | in a bad color! * * Fax: (512) 602-5155 | |___| | | * * Email: chris.blackmor(a)amd.com |____/ \| | Author Unknown* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - * My comments are mine, and mine alone. * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------------------------------------- (on Chiaro SMTP Relay) This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of Chiaro Networks, Ltd., and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s), or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies from your system. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. ---------------------------------------------------------

2 1

RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout
by Adrian Phillips 12 Apr '02

12 Apr '02

Hello; Check out Microsoft QArticle 250267, which talks about using some resource kit utilities; getsid and subinacl. Using these utilities, there isn't a problem migrating local security group ACLs from one server to another. We utilized this procedure when migrating data to our filer, and worked well - though it can take a long time, depending on the amount of data. Is a good idea to run one process per group at the same time, and not do them one after the other. Cheers, -Adrian -----Original Message----- From: Nail, Larry [mailto:lnail@ti.com] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:14 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout Only problem with ROBOCOPY comes to bear when migrating data where LOCAL groups are used in file level ACL's because the SID is different across filers. SecureCopy properly handles this, by creating a new group and then migrating the ACL to the new SID. -----Original Message----- From: Seth Moskowitz [mailto:sethmoskowitz@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:07 PM To: Puckyt(a)timken.com; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout We have never had a problem with Robocopy and have migrated over 2 TB of data. Make sure you get the latest version and use the /SEC option >From: "Pucky, Todd M." <Puckyt(a)timken.com> >To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout >Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:49:20 -0400 > >I am a rookie on NetApp filers so this may be an easy one for some. I >have an F840 filer with mapped NT 4 drives. I used ROBOCOPY.EXE to >copy the data to the NetApp box so that file permissions would be >maintained. I then went >back to my NT box and mapped a drive to the NetApp box. Everything >appeared >to be fine. I then logged out of the NT box and logged in under a new user >ID and all of the NT file permissions were lost. Does anyone have any >suggestions on how to maintain these permissions when admins log out. >Any suggestions would be appreciated. > >Thanks. > >Todd M. Pucky >The Timken Company >Global Information Systems >Programmer/Analyst >330.471.4583 >puckyt(a)timken.com > > > >********************************************************************** >This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or >entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do >not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to >others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and >then delete it from your system. > >The Timken Company >********************************************************************** > _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

1 0

RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout
by Nail, Larry 12 Apr '02

12 Apr '02

Only problem with ROBOCOPY comes to bear when migrating data where LOCAL groups are used in file level ACL's because the SID is different across filers. SecureCopy properly handles this, by creating a new group and then migrating the ACL to the new SID. -----Original Message----- From: Seth Moskowitz [mailto:sethmoskowitz@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:07 PM To: Puckyt(a)timken.com; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout We have never had a problem with Robocopy and have migrated over 2 TB of data. Make sure you get the latest version and use the /SEC option >From: "Pucky, Todd M." <Puckyt(a)timken.com> >To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout >Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:49:20 -0400 > >I am a rookie on NetApp filers so this may be an easy one for some. I >have an F840 filer with mapped NT 4 drives. I used ROBOCOPY.EXE to >copy the data to the NetApp box so that file permissions would be >maintained. I then went >back to my NT box and mapped a drive to the NetApp box. Everything >appeared >to be fine. I then logged out of the NT box and logged in under a new user >ID and all of the NT file permissions were lost. Does anyone have any >suggestions on how to maintain these permissions when admins log out. >Any suggestions would be appreciated. > >Thanks. > >Todd M. Pucky >The Timken Company >Global Information Systems >Programmer/Analyst >330.471.4583 >puckyt(a)timken.com > > > >********************************************************************** >This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or >entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do >not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to >others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and >then delete it from your system. > >The Timken Company >********************************************************************** > _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

1 0

NetApp User Group for the UK
by Robinson, Ashley 12 Apr '02

12 Apr '02

This is just a quick note to clear up any confusion about an e-mail many of you may have received from Linda Symons of LS Consulting Services. Linda is working with me to explore the requirement of our users for an Independent NetApp user group in the UK. The process so far has been to meet and discuss with 8-10 customers who expressed an interest in being involved in an Independent group. From this it was agreed to survey broader customer base to determine broader interest. And dependent on results to build a user event to kick-off User group. The event would be built upon the issues that the users wanted to discuss. The e-mail you may have received is the survey step and is 100% endorsed by the NetApp UK Management team. I hope this clears up any confusion and I look forward to your responses. Ashley Robinson Marketing Manager, Northern Europe Network Appliance The evolution of storage.(tm) Direct: +44 (0) 208 756 6411 Mobile: +44 (0) 7730 437942

1 0

Cluster failover and SIGLOST
by Edward Hibbert 12 Apr '02

12 Apr '02

When failing over between machines in a cluster, how transparent will this be in the area of NFS locks? Does the NetApp notify the client machines and ask them to reclaim the locks (potentially generating SIGLOST), or is the locking info synchronised between machines in the cluster so that it doesn't need to do that? Thanks, Edward.

1 0

[linda@lscs.uk.com: UK NetApp User Group - UK Network Appliance User Group]
by Gavin Kelman 12 Apr '02

12 Apr '02

Just received the following mail. Thought it a little odd. Anyway else received something similar? ----- Forwarded message from linda <linda(a)lscs.uk.com> ----- From: "linda" <linda(a)lscs.uk.com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:49:27 +0100 (BST) Subject: UK NetApp User Group - UK Network Appliance User Group To: <gavin(a)webtop.com> Dear Gavin My company was recently approached by Network Appliance UK Limited to look into the viability of establishing a UK User Group for its customers. With over five years' experience creating and running Independent User Groups within the IT industry we believe NetApp customers would benefit from such a forum today. (I will be delighted to send you a copy of our membership overview document for the proposed User Group, to be known as UK NetApp User Group on request.) To date we have randomly selected and engaged with a number of NetApp customers to gauge their reaction to the concept of UKNetAppUG and initial feedback has been extremely positive! One recurring recommendation from these customers has been that we survey NetApp's entire customer base to gain a true reflection of their collective views on some of the more important issues. In line with this objective, we have developed a short survey form (below) designed to give us an indication of whether NetApp customers' would prefer to see either an independent structure or a vendor led approach. This survey will also help us to create an agenda for an inaugural UKNetAppUG meeting (planned for May) that will reflect prospective members' priorities. Please take a few moments to complete the survey form below and email it back to me. (If you prefer, I can send you a Word document that can be conveniently completed on screen or on paper. This can then be emailed, faxed or posted back to me.) To compensate you for the few minutes of your time it will take to complete the survey, I've managed to secure from NetApp some "goodies". All completed responses received will be entered into a prize draw and the first 15 responses drawn will receive : - A four piece wine/champagne set consisting of a bottle stopper, champagne stopper, corkscrew and oyster knife. All in stainless steel and enclosed in a smart black wooden presentation box. So please send back your completed forms today. I look forward to hearing from you. Best wishes, Linda Symons LSCS Ltd. 07770 420937 01344 481267 once you have completed the survey please email back to me at Linda(a)lscs.uk.com UKNETAPP User Group Survey Please take a moment to complete this questionnaire - your comments and suggestions are essential for shaping the future of this group. Once you have completed your form please email your reply to Linda(a)lscs.uk.com. All entries will be entered into a prize draw giving you the opportunity to win User Group Prizes Please indicate by ticking your choice 1. User Group Membership I feel my organisation would benefit from joining a UKNetApp User group. YES [ ] NO [ ] 2. Independence I want an independently run user group YES [ ] NO [ ] I am happy to pay an independent membership fee YES [ ] NO [ ] I want a user group run by NetApp YES [ ] NO [ ] I am happy to pay NetApp a membership fee YES [ ] NO [ ] 3. To assist in setting the agenda for our inaugural meeting please indicate on a scale of 1-5 the priority of the topics you would like to see covered on the agenda and how long you have been using them and the approx number of boxes you have. Product Scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being the highest Less than 6months & no of boxes 6 to 18 months & no of boxes More than 18 months & no of boxes Storage Windows/NT consolidation Storage UNIX consolidation Storage Oracle Storage Microsoft Exchange R100 Nearline Storage Device NetCache as a forward Proxy NetCache as a reverse proxy NetCache Streaming media & Video on Demand Prize draw please print your name, company, country, telephone no, and email address and add any additional comments ================================================================ Title (Mr., Ms., etc.): Forename: Surname: Job title: Company/Organisation: Street address 1: Street address 2: City/County: Post Code: Country: Phone: Fax: Email: ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Gavin Kelman Phone : 07967 360 822 Systems Administrator Email : gavin(a)metahusky.net

4 3

RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout
by jeff.mery＠ni.com 11 Apr '02

11 Apr '02

Try SecureCopy from Small Wonders. Hasn't failed us yet... J- --------------------------------------------------- "Allow me to extol the virtues of the Net Fairy, and of the fantastic dorks that make the nice packets go from here to there. Amen." TB (www.penny-arcade.com) --------------------------------------------------- |---------+----------------------------> | | "Kitch, David" | | | <dkitch(a)ti.com> | | | Sent by: | | | owner-toasters@ma| | | thworks.com | | | | | | | | | 04/11/2002 01:33 | | | PM | | | | |---------+----------------------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: "'Seth Moskowitz'" <sethmoskowitz(a)hotmail.com>, Puckyt(a)timken.com, toasters(a)mathworks.com | | cc: | | Subject: RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| We've had problems migrating Windows 2000 ACLs with Robocopy, even with the version from the Win2K resource kit. -----Original Message----- From: Seth Moskowitz [mailto:sethmoskowitz@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:07 PM To: Puckyt(a)timken.com; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout We have never had a problem with Robocopy and have migrated over 2 TB of data. Make sure you get the latest version and use the /SEC option >From: "Pucky, Todd M." <Puckyt(a)timken.com> >To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout >Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:49:20 -0400 > >I am a rookie on NetApp filers so this may be an easy one for some. I >have an F840 filer with mapped NT 4 drives. I used ROBOCOPY.EXE to >copy the data to the NetApp box so that file permissions would be >maintained. I then went >back to my NT box and mapped a drive to the NetApp box. Everything >appeared >to be fine. I then logged out of the NT box and logged in under a new user >ID and all of the NT file permissions were lost. Does anyone have any >suggestions on how to maintain these permissions when admins log out. >Any suggestions would be appreciated. > >Thanks. > >Todd M. Pucky >The Timken Company >Global Information Systems >Programmer/Analyst >330.471.4583 >puckyt(a)timken.com > > > >********************************************************************** >This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or >entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do >not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to >others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and >then delete it from your system. > >The Timken Company >********************************************************************** > _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

1 0

RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout
by Kitch, David 11 Apr '02

11 Apr '02

We've had problems migrating Windows 2000 ACLs with Robocopy, even with the version from the Win2K resource kit. -----Original Message----- From: Seth Moskowitz [mailto:sethmoskowitz@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:07 PM To: Puckyt(a)timken.com; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout We have never had a problem with Robocopy and have migrated over 2 TB of data. Make sure you get the latest version and use the /SEC option >From: "Pucky, Todd M." <Puckyt(a)timken.com> >To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout >Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:49:20 -0400 > >I am a rookie on NetApp filers so this may be an easy one for some. I >have an F840 filer with mapped NT 4 drives. I used ROBOCOPY.EXE to >copy the data to the NetApp box so that file permissions would be >maintained. I then went >back to my NT box and mapped a drive to the NetApp box. Everything >appeared >to be fine. I then logged out of the NT box and logged in under a new user >ID and all of the NT file permissions were lost. Does anyone have any >suggestions on how to maintain these permissions when admins log out. >Any suggestions would be appreciated. > >Thanks. > >Todd M. Pucky >The Timken Company >Global Information Systems >Programmer/Analyst >330.471.4583 >puckyt(a)timken.com > > > >********************************************************************** >This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or >entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do >not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to >others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and >then delete it from your system. > >The Timken Company >********************************************************************** > _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters