toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13523 discussions

RE: etc/log/snapmirror.log parsing
by Yee, Steven 05 Mar '03

05 Mar '03

there is a snapmirror log parsing tool available on the tools section of NOW, if it doesn't do what you want it should be easily extendable (its in perl) from the NOW page blurb: SnapMirror Log Parser (parse_smlog) This Perl script is an example of how the SnapMirror log file can be parsed so that they can be more easily understood. This script runs under Perl5 and should run on most Unix based systems. steve. -----Original Message----- From: Todd C. Merrill [mailto:tmerrill@mathworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:08 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: etc/log/snapmirror.log parsing Has anyone written anything to parse the snapmirror logs to convert: dst Wed Mar 5 03:00:00 EST xxxxx:/vol/vol0/- yyyyy:/vol/vol1/xxxxx_vol0 Request (Scheduled) dst Wed Mar 5 03:00:04 EST xxxxx:/vol/vol0/- yyyyy:/vol/vol1/xxxxx_vol0 Start dst Wed Mar 5 03:51:58 EST xxxxx:/vol/vol0/- yyyyy:/vol/vol1/xxxxx_vol0 End (28215980 KB) into something a bit more useful, like: dst Wed Mar 5 03:51:58 EST bat07:/vol/vol0/- bat00bak:/vol/vol1/bat07_vol0 End (28215980 kB, 00:51:54, 530 MB/min)? which adds elapsed time and transfer rate? Or, something further that completely parses the log and reports: Source Size Elapsed Rate ------------------------------------------------------------------ xxxxx:/vol/vol0/- 28215980 kB 00:51:54 530 MB/min zzzzz:/vol/vol0/qtree 4345164 kB 00:16:13 262 MB/min [...] for all my snapmirror transfers for the night? Until next time... The MathWorks, Inc. 508-647-7000 x7792 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098 508-647-7001 FAX tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com ---

1 0

NetApp Logs
by Steve Evans 05 Mar '03

05 Mar '03

Are there any products out there that parse NetApp logs and will just show me/e-mail me/etc the interesting stuff. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation (619) 594-0653

1 0

swapping heads
by Peter D. Gray 05 Mar '03

05 Mar '03

Does anybody know if it safe to simply swap heads between a F720 and a F740 filer? Since the OS and configuration is on the disks I assume this will work ok as long as the OS and/or configuration is not specific to either of these 2 models? Regards, pdg -- See mail headers for contact information.

3 3

RE: swapping heads
by Alan McLachlan 05 Mar '03

05 Mar '03

Hi Peter, How's everything down Wollongong way? Thanswer to your question is yes, bearing in mind that the F720 won't [officially] support as much storage as an F740. They both run alphas so you don't even need to reload OnTap. You must halt the filer properly to make sure NVRAM is flushed. Then power down, swap the heads and boot it up. To go to in Intel based filer head (800 series) you would need to run through the regular OnTap upgrade procedure, including the "download" console instruction, with an Intel version of OnTap first. Then simply halt, power down and swap the heads just as you would normally. regards, Alan. -----Original Message----- From: Peter D. Gray [mailto:pdg@uow.edu.au] Sent: Wednesday, 5 March 2003 9:14 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: swapping heads Does anybody know if it safe to simply swap heads between a F720 and a F740 filer? Since the OS and configuration is on the disks I assume this will work ok as long as the OS and/or configuration is not specific to either of these 2 models? Regards, pdg -- See mail headers for contact information. **** ASI Solutions Disclaimer **** The material transmitted may contain confidential and/or privileged material and is intended only for the addressee. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender and destroy any copies of the material immediately. ASI will protect your Privacy according to the 10 Privacy Principles outlined under the new Privacy Act, Dec 2001. This email is also subject to copyright. Any use of or reliance upon this material by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. E-mails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects. Under no circumstances do we accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message or any attachments. **** END OF MESSAGE ****

2 1

Adding RAM
by David Schairer 05 Mar '03

05 Mar '03

We were told recently by someone who's now left Netapp that it's "routine" inside Netapp to to put more RAM (dynamic, not NVRAM) in 7x0 and 8x0-class boxes than the published maximum. I assume this is with higher-density memory. Has anyone outside netapp seen or heard this done? I'd like to know if it's been observed in the wild before I go try to get this rumor confirmed through our sales channels. --DRS

1 0

��@�P�S�ˁi��Q�j
by ririka＠email.it 03 Mar '03

03 Mar '03

�ʐ^��ς�� O�ɑ��āI http://ririka80.muvc.net/ http://ririka.6server.com/ http://www.sultryserver.com/teen/ririka/ http://www.royalfreehost.com/teen/ririka/ http://www.pornhostz.com/users/ririka/ ��É��c�n�Ƃ��̓��Ƃ��m��Ă�H http://book-i.net/ririka80/ http://host.deluxnetwork.com/~ririka/ http://www.free-xxx-server.com/sites/asians/ririka/

1 0

re-install a F87 ?
by Frank Bonnet 03 Mar '03

03 Mar '03

Hi Due to several install problem I would like to re-install completely a F87 , erase all data and install Ontap how is it possible as there are no boot diskettes ? Thanks -- Frank Bonnet

2 1

Snapvault and 6.4
by Frank Gilmurray 28 Feb '03

28 Feb '03

Anyone using snapvault w/ 6.4? We use snapvault to update a R100 and it was working fine until we upgraded to 6.4 yesterday. We upgraded to get the 255 snapshot limit. I've opened a case on this but was wondering if anyone else has any ideas on what could be going wrong. The client snapshot is fine but the server snapshot has yesterday's contents even though it says it was xfered this morning at 2:05. A directory I created yesterday shows up in the client snapshot but not in the server snapshot. None of the qtrees were updated last night. Thanks, Frank -- Frank Gilmurray Release Engineer Nokia, Inc. phone: (650) 625-2179 313 Fairchild Drive, Blgd. A cell: (650) 892-4029 Mountain View, CA 94043 email: Frank.Gilmurray(a)nokia.com

1 0

R100 vol config for performance
by Mark Bentley 28 Feb '03

28 Feb '03

I'm already spreading disks in a volume across the 7 SCSI controllers, but I'm wondering if there is also a performance advantage/disadvantage to spreading out the disks in a volume across the three IDE-to-SCSI bridges in each R100 disk shelf? For example, if I wanted to create a volume with 3 disks, would it be better to pick three disks on the same bridge (like 3.0, 3.1, and 3.2) or would it be better to pick three across three bridges (like 3.0, 3.8, and 3.12) ? Or doesn't it make a difference? Thanks, Mark -- Mark Bentley TDG Unix Lab Ops AT&T Wireless Services Phone: 425-580-1667

2 3

RE: Filer's security information
by Kumar, Rahul 28 Feb '03

28 Feb '03

Please sync the time on netapp to the match it to the Samba Machines time. This should solve the error. Rahul Kumar, Infrastructure Analyst, EDS PLM Solutions, Pune, India. Tele: +91-20-2930812 Cell: +00-91-9422087523 Email: rahul.kumar(a)eds.com -----Original Message----- From: Frank Bonnet [mailto:bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:18 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Filer's security information Hi I'm STILL trying to use a Samba server 3.0 as a PDC at this point I have the following error message Fri Feb 28 11:42:00 CET [rc:CRITICAL]: CIFS - Filer's security information differs from domain controller. thanks for any infos -- Frank Bonnet

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters