toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13514 discussions

RE: New Simplified Monitoring Tool
by Simon Ferrett 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Hey Folks, I'm new to the list - "hello" - and have been a netapp user since about 1999. Anyhow just a comment/suggestion on the toasterview stuff, which looks quite interesting, btw: One thing which could be good to show is the % complete for the reconstruction progress. Currently I'm looking after an 840c, 940c, 840, 880, R100, R150-24 and a R200. I had a shelf hang on the R100 and R150 this week resulting in about 10 failed drives, so the reconstruction is taking forever - hence my interest in keeping an eye on the reconstruction progress. It seems like the systems can only do two reconstructs at a time, so I've had raid groups waiting for a drive reconstruction for about 24 hours so far... If you know of a way to increase the number of parrallel reconstructions I'd be interested to hear it. Cheers, and it's good to have finally found a group of other netapp users. Simon. -----Original Message----- From: McCarthy, Tim [mailto:timothy.mccarthy@netapp.com] Subject: RE: New Simplified Monitoring Tool Hey, you have a failed disk. Better call NGS ;) -----Original Message----- From: Ben Rockwood [mailto:BRockwood@homestead-inc.com] Subject: New Simplified Monitoring Tool I'd see if anyone else was interested in it or could propose suggestions for it. --- This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or his/her representative, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

2 1

RE: New Simplified Monitoring Tool
by Barrette, Paul A PENC:EX 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Ben, I like it, how about calling it ToasterIZE :-) Anyway, can I take it for a test drive? Paul Barrette Senior SysAdmin BC Pension Corp -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Ben Rockwood Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 4:57 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: New Simplified Monitoring Tool Hello Toasters. Some may have noticed my search for a simplified monitoring tool awhile back. Alas, I never found such a tool. So I finally broke down and just wrote my own. So far I've only got about 2 hours worth of developement into it, but it's mostly what I want already. I thought I'd see if anyone else was interested in it or could propose suggestions for it. It's called "Toasterview" (I wanted to call it ToasterVision, but that seemed to silly) and you can see an example output page here: http://www.cuddletech.com/code/toasterview/europa.html Some notes about this sample page. Firstly, the Head image you see at top does, you'll notice, match the model of the filer so you can "see" what the head looks like reguarless of which model it is; right now F7x0, F8x0, F940 and F9x60 are handled. The logo image in the top right is, of course, intended to be changed to your company logo so that your boss is impressed. The global status box changes from green to red based on status. But, the most interesting and important part for me is the DF output. Using the DF SNMP table I can parse it up and display how I like, so I display volumes in nice round numbers (using 1024 insteal of 1000) for easy reading and a little bar graph that lets you see volume usage in an instant. Also, the last line of the DF table is a "Total" line. This simply adds up the data from all the non-snapshot volumes and displays this information like anything else. It's kinda nifty to be able to take 1 look and confidently say "We're using X% of! the filers capacity" rather than just approximating off the top of your head. Anyway, this is the kind of tool I want. I need to clean up the source so it's pretty and then I'll GPL it. Anyone interested or what to make suggestions? I should note that I'm actually supplimenting this page you see with extra data at the bottom as supplied by RRD graphs and such... however that stuff is all system specific whereas my current script as demostrated works on any NetApp Filer (I guess NetCache too). The colors and stuff need tweeking, but you get the general idea. benr.

1 0

RE: Raid reconstruct speed & simultaneous reconstructs
by Derek Lai 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Simon, You should definitely set it to high on the command line to increase the speed of reconstruction. That is provided that your system is not being used very heavily. If there are lots of other disk traffic and you set it to high it will probably slows down the other activities. I did not know that filerview sets it to the inverse so that's good to know. Derek -----Original Message----- From: Simon Ferrett [mailto:simon@musicmatch.com] Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 10:25 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Raid reconstruct speed & simultaneous reconstructs Interesting you mention the raid.reconstruct.perf_impact setting - I was a little confused about its real meaning... I thought (as you mentioned) that setting it to 'high' would increase the reconstruct speed. I then used the filerview web interface to go in and change the raid reconstruct speed to 'high' and it actually set this value to 'low' - the web tool seems to set it to the inverse of what you'd expect. (setting 'low' on the web interface sets this option to 'high' etc.) So I was a little curious as to if the setting had a different meaning than the one you (and I) initially thought it meant. (eg: perhaps it's meaning impact on reconstruct speed rather than system performance, so 'low' means the least affect on reconstruct speed and therefore the most impact on system performance) I left it at 'low' since I figured the web interface probably knew the meaning of the option a little more than I did... Simon. -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Aaron [mailto:aaron.hill@cba.com.au] Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 1:53 AM To: Simon Ferrett; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: New Simplified Monitoring Tool Simon, I don't know if you can directly increase the no. of simultaneous reconstructs. However, you may be able to improve the speed marginally by using the raid.reconstruct.perf_impact option and setting to high. However, if your cpu's are already maxxed it probably won't make a lick of difference. --- This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or his/her representative, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

1 0

RE: availtime command
by John Clear 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

`availtime full` is what you want. Unfortunately, on some DOT upgrades, the data gets reset. John -----Original Message----- From: jeff.mery(a)ni.com [mailto:jeff.mery@ni.com] Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 10:40 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: availtime command Would someone please refresh my memory as to the options for the availtime command (DOT 6.5.2)? It used to have an option for displaying the output on the console of the filer in a user-friendly format. This is much more useful to me than the cryptic data it normally returns. Uptime is great for telling you how long the filer has been up, but availtime can tell you how much uptime you have at a CIFS and NFS service level. Jeff Mery, MCP National Instruments ------------------------------------------------------------------- "Allow me to extol the virtues of the Net Fairy, and of all the fantastic dorks that make the nice packets go from here to there. Amen." TB - Penny Arcade -------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

availtime command
by jeff.mery＠ni.com 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Would someone please refresh my memory as to the options for the availtime command (DOT 6.5.2)? It used to have an option for displaying the output on the console of the filer in a user-friendly format. This is much more useful to me than the cryptic data it normally returns. Uptime is great for telling you how long the filer has been up, but availtime can tell you how much uptime you have at a CIFS and NFS service level. Jeff Mery, MCP National Instruments ------------------------------------------------------------------- "Allow me to extol the virtues of the Net Fairy, and of all the fantastic dorks that make the nice packets go from here to there. Amen." TB - Penny Arcade -------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

RE: Raid reconstruct speed & simultaneous reconstructs
by Simon Ferrett 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Interesting you mention the raid.reconstruct.perf_impact setting - I was a little confused about its real meaning... I thought (as you mentioned) that setting it to 'high' would increase the reconstruct speed. I then used the filerview web interface to go in and change the raid reconstruct speed to 'high' and it actually set this value to 'low' - the web tool seems to set it to the inverse of what you'd expect. (setting 'low' on the web interface sets this option to 'high' etc.) So I was a little curious as to if the setting had a different meaning than the one you (and I) initially thought it meant. (eg: perhaps it's meaning impact on reconstruct speed rather than system performance, so 'low' means the least affect on reconstruct speed and therefore the most impact on system performance) I left it at 'low' since I figured the web interface probably knew the meaning of the option a little more than I did... Simon. -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Aaron [mailto:aaron.hill@cba.com.au] Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 1:53 AM To: Simon Ferrett; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: New Simplified Monitoring Tool Simon, I don't know if you can directly increase the no. of simultaneous reconstructs. However, you may be able to improve the speed marginally by using the raid.reconstruct.perf_impact option and setting to high. However, if your cpu's are already maxxed it probably won't make a lick of difference. --- This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or his/her representative, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

1 0

RE: [Fwd: More than one Admin machine for Netapps ???]
by Muhlestein, Mark 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

If you want to stay with UNIX, you can use the "smbcacls" program that is part of the Samba suite. That allows you to set Windows permissions from a UNIX client. Mark -----Original Message----- From: ken middleton [mailto:ken.middleton@durham.ac.uk] Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 7:49 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: [Fwd: More than one Admin machine for Netapps ???] Anyone got any ideas about this one? I have a need to write a script to create qtrees on a Netapps Server. I have a UNIX Bourne shell script which does the job, however I need to set up windows permissions on them, specifically administrator = Full Access everyone = Read Access The default permissions are not appropriate when looked at from a Windows environment, so ideally I'd like to rewrite the script (it's not rocket science) to run from a windows environment and for it to carry on and do cacls operations on the qtree created. We've got Services for UNIX installed and have installed the Unix Tools but when I try to do an rsh to the Netapps, I get "permission denied" and "can't establish connection" messages. Anyone know how I can get around this? Can I somehow specify a second admin machine which is allowed to rsh? At the moment, the admin machine is a UNIX box. Ken Middleton Senior System Programmer Information Technology Service University of Durham

1 0

RE: Ontap 6.5 ?
by Ratliff, Charlotte M 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

I just downloaded the 6.5.1R1, since I'm running the Hitachi GF940. I went to the download page on the now site, and at the bottom of the list of software is a small section to enter the specific software you want. Good Luck!!! Charlee -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Hill, Aaron Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 6:03 PM To: 'Rohan Durrant'; Frank Bonnet Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Ontap 6.5 ? I think 6.5.2P6 is the latest. If you can, go straight to it. We have had many, many problems with 6.5. -----Original Message----- From: Rohan Durrant [mailto:rohan@cs.rmit.edu.au] Sent: Thursday, 9 September 2004 10:01 PM To: Frank Bonnet Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Ontap 6.5 ? Hi Frank, 6.5.1R1 has now become the GA release 6.5.2 :) Currently there are no releases of OnTap classed as FCS. If you reallly need 6.5.1R1, click on 6.5.2 to download, and modify the URL to show the version you require. I think there is somewhere on the Now site to enter a specific version of OnTap to download as well. Cheers On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 18:26, Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hi > > I've check now.netapp.com for new 6.5.x version > and notice that FCS releases disapeared from this page > is there a new page for it ? > > I run 6.5.1R1 on two filers > > Thanks -- ********************************************************************* Rohan Durrant Phone: +61 3 992 53210 Unix Systems Administrator Fax: +61 3 966 21617 RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia Work: rohan.at.cs.rmit.edu.au School of Computer Science & Info Tech. Play: noddy.at.toytown.org SAGE-AU National Exec http://www.sage-au.org.au ********************************************************************* ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

3 2

RE: New Simplified Monitoring Tool
by Maglinger, Paul 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

I'm not a programmer, but would be willing to test! -----Original Message----- From: Julian A. Zottl [mailto:jzottl@hq.nasa.gov] Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 5:21 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: New Simplified Monitoring Tool Hey Ben, Congrats, it looks great! If you need any help or beta testers, feel free to let me know! Julian Ben Rockwood wrote: > Hello Toasters. > > Some may have noticed my search for a simplified monitoring tool awhile back. Alas, I never found such a tool. So I finally broke down and just wrote my own. So far I've only got about 2 hours worth of developement into it, but it's mostly what I want already. I thought I'd see if anyone else was interested in it or could propose suggestions for it. > > It's called "Toasterview" (I wanted to call it ToasterVision, but that seemed to silly) and you can see an example output page here: > > http://www.cuddletech.com/code/toasterview/europa.html > > Some notes about this sample page. Firstly, the Head image you see at top does, you'll notice, match the model of the filer so you can "see" what the head looks like reguarless of which model it is; right now F7x0, F8x0, F940 and F9x60 are handled. The logo image in the top right is, of course, intended to be changed to your company logo so that your boss is impressed. The global status box changes from green to red based on status. But, the most interesting and important part for me is the DF output. Using the DF SNMP table I can parse it up and display how I like, so I display volumes in nice round numbers (using 1024 insteal of 1000) for easy reading and a little bar graph that lets you see volume usage in an instant. Also, the last line of the DF table is a "Total" line. This simply adds up the data from all the non-snapshot volumes and displays this information like anything else. It's kinda nifty to be able to take 1 look and confidently say "We're using X% of! > the filers capacity" rather than just approximating off the top of your head. > > Anyway, this is the kind of tool I want. I need to clean up the source so it's pretty and then I'll GPL it. Anyone interested or what to make suggestions? > > I should note that I'm actually supplimenting this page you see with extra data at the bottom as supplied by RRD graphs and such... however that stuff is all system specific whereas my current script as demostrated works on any NetApp Filer (I guess NetCache too). The colors and stuff need tweeking, but you get the general idea. > > benr.

1 0

New Simplified Monitoring Tool
by Ben Rockwood 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Hello Toasters. Some may have noticed my search for a simplified monitoring tool awhile back. Alas, I never found such a tool. So I finally broke down and just wrote my own. So far I've only got about 2 hours worth of developement into it, but it's mostly what I want already. I thought I'd see if anyone else was interested in it or could propose suggestions for it. It's called "Toasterview" (I wanted to call it ToasterVision, but that seemed to silly) and you can see an example output page here: http://www.cuddletech.com/code/toasterview/europa.html Some notes about this sample page. Firstly, the Head image you see at top does, you'll notice, match the model of the filer so you can "see" what the head looks like reguarless of which model it is; right now F7x0, F8x0, F940 and F9x60 are handled. The logo image in the top right is, of course, intended to be changed to your company logo so that your boss is impressed. The global status box changes from green to red based on status. But, the most interesting and important part for me is the DF output. Using the DF SNMP table I can parse it up and display how I like, so I display volumes in nice round numbers (using 1024 insteal of 1000) for easy reading and a little bar graph that lets you see volume usage in an instant. Also, the last line of the DF table is a "Total" line. This simply adds up the data from all the non-snapshot volumes and displays this information like anything else. It's kinda nifty to be able to take 1 look and confidently say "We're using X% of the filers capacity" rather than just approximating off the top of your head. Anyway, this is the kind of tool I want. I need to clean up the source so it's pretty and then I'll GPL it. Anyone interested or what to make suggestions? I should note that I'm actually supplimenting this page you see with extra data at the bottom as supplied by RRD graphs and such... however that stuff is all system specific whereas my current script as demostrated works on any NetApp Filer (I guess NetCache too). The colors and stuff need tweeking, but you get the general idea. benr.

4 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters