toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Cumshots to scare girls away!
by bradleymcnamara＠myplace.net.au 24 Jan '05

24 Jan '05

Heya! jcnjei

5 5

AW: Experiences: ILM with Nuview FLM
by Scholz Wolfgang 24 Jan '05

24 Jan '05

hi aaron, of course you may ;-) we have only one offline share configured and only one rule for migration. i agree, 411 mb in 56 hours is not satisfieing at all. have you talked with the tech support of nuview about this issue ? i heard from our nuview tech consultant here in germany that version 3.0 is on the way with many new features. maybe they fixed this issue in that release. wolfgang -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Hill, Aaron [mailto:aaron.hill@cba.com.au] Gesendet: Montag, 24. Januar 2005 07:12 An: Scholz Wolfgang; Hill, Aaron; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Betreff: RE: Experiences: ILM with Nuview FLM Thanks Wolfgang, If I may, can I ask a few more questions. How many offline storage shares do you have configured? How many rules do you have defined for each primary storage policy? Your network infrastructure is similar in throughput to what we have configured. Hardware being FAS960c's migrating to R150's. My initial pilot involved scanning ~300Gb, of which we migrated around 60-70 Gb in about 12-20 hours. For our first stage production run we scaled this up to scanning 2Tb and migrating around 900Gb. There were 160 rules with 160 offline storage's configured. Of the 900Gb marked for transfer, we saw only 411mb transferred in 56 hours. Not good, not good at all. Especially since we are looking at scanning up to 4x this amount of data (~20-25 million files) at the end point. It seems that the increased # rules and offline storage's is causing some problems with the application throughput. It also seems to transfer files in serial fashion. i.e. Waits for one file to complete transfer before starting the next. It would seem logical to me that the most efficient way would be to open multiple threads to manage the transfer. Aaron _____ From: Scholz Wolfgang [mailto:Wolfgang.Scholz@fja.com] Sent: Monday, 24 January 2005 4:36 PM To: 'Hill, Aaron'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: AW: Experiences: ILM with Nuview FLM hi aaron, we are using flm quite a while here but not with your amount of data. our total storage capacity is around 2 tb´s . used space on our cifs volume is 335gb with over 4,5 million files on it. we scheduled our policy to run once every week. in the last policy run we migrated 65624 files, alltogether 7GB of data. it took 3 hours and 13 minutes to complete the policy run. we have here an f825 filer wich is connected to the network over a vif with 2 gb. our secondary storage is a hp storageworks 1200s nas appliance which is connected at 100/mbps to the network. hope that helps wolfgang _________________________ Wolfgang Scholz FJA Feilmeier & Junker GmbH Leonhard-Moll-Bogen 10 81373 Muenchen Tel. : ++49 89 76901 7470 Fax : ++49 89 76901 9500 email: wolfgang.scholz(a)fja.com Hey there, I am interested in hearing from other Filer admins that are using the Nuview File Lifecycle Manager (FLM) software for data archiving or Information Lifecycle Management (ILM). I am in the process of rolling this product out in a large environment with the aim of migrating TB of data. At the moment I am seeing extremely slow migration rates. Has anyone else experienced this or in contrast has had very fast or even acceptable transfer rates? Thanks, Aaron ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

RE: Experiences: ILM with Nuview FLM
by Hill, Aaron 24 Jan '05

24 Jan '05

Thanks Wolfgang, If I may, can I ask a few more questions. How many offline storage shares do you have configured? How many rules do you have defined for each primary storage policy? Your network infrastructure is similar in throughput to what we have configured. Hardware being FAS960c's migrating to R150's. My initial pilot involved scanning ~300Gb, of which we migrated around 60-70 Gb in about 12-20 hours. For our first stage production run we scaled this up to scanning 2Tb and migrating around 900Gb. There were 160 rules with 160 offline storage's configured. Of the 900Gb marked for transfer, we saw only 411mb transferred in 56 hours. Not good, not good at all. Especially since we are looking at scanning up to 4x this amount of data (~20-25 million files) at the end point. It seems that the increased # rules and offline storage's is causing some problems with the application throughput. It also seems to transfer files in serial fashion. i.e. Waits for one file to complete transfer before starting the next. It would seem logical to me that the most efficient way would be to open multiple threads to manage the transfer. Aaron _____ From: Scholz Wolfgang [mailto:Wolfgang.Scholz@fja.com] Sent: Monday, 24 January 2005 4:36 PM To: 'Hill, Aaron'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: AW: Experiences: ILM with Nuview FLM hi aaron, we are using flm quite a while here but not with your amount of data. our total storage capacity is around 2 tb´s . used space on our cifs volume is 335gb with over 4,5 million files on it. we scheduled our policy to run once every week. in the last policy run we migrated 65624 files, alltogether 7GB of data. it took 3 hours and 13 minutes to complete the policy run. we have here an f825 filer wich is connected to the network over a vif with 2 gb. our secondary storage is a hp storageworks 1200s nas appliance which is connected at 100/mbps to the network. hope that helps wolfgang _________________________ Wolfgang Scholz FJA Feilmeier & Junker GmbH Leonhard-Moll-Bogen 10 81373 Muenchen Tel. : ++49 89 76901 7470 Fax : ++49 89 76901 9500 email: wolfgang.scholz(a)fja.com Hey there, I am interested in hearing from other Filer admins that are using the Nuview File Lifecycle Manager (FLM) software for data archiving or Information Lifecycle Management (ILM). I am in the process of rolling this product out in a large environment with the aim of migrating TB of data. At the moment I am seeing extremely slow migration rates. Has anyone else experienced this or in contrast has had very fast or even acceptable transfer rates? Thanks, Aaron ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

Online banking records confirmation
by WAMU Personal Online Banking 24 Jan '05

24 Jan '05

1 0

AW: Experiences: ILM with Nuview FLM
by Scholz Wolfgang 24 Jan '05

24 Jan '05

hi aaron, we are using flm quite a while here but not with your amount of data. our total storage capacity is around 2 tb´s . used space on our cifs volume is 335gb with over 4,5 million files on it. we scheduled our policy to run once every week. in the last policy run we migrated 65624 files, alltogether 7GB of data. it took 3 hours and 13 minutes to complete the policy run. we have here an f825 filer wich is connected to the network over a vif with 2 gb. our secondary storage is a hp storageworks 1200s nas appliance which is connected at 100/mbps to the network. hope that helps wolfgang _________________________ Wolfgang Scholz FJA Feilmeier & Junker GmbH Leonhard-Moll-Bogen 10 81373 Muenchen Tel. : ++49 89 76901 7470 Fax : ++49 89 76901 9500 email: wolfgang.scholz(a)fja.com Hey there, I am interested in hearing from other Filer admins that are using the Nuview File Lifecycle Manager (FLM) software for data archiving or Information Lifecycle Management (ILM). I am in the process of rolling this product out in a large environment with the aim of migrating TB of data. At the moment I am seeing extremely slow migration rates. Has anyone else experienced this or in contrast has had very fast or even acceptable transfer rates? Thanks, Aaron ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

Experiences: ILM with Nuview FLM
by Hill, Aaron 23 Jan '05

23 Jan '05

Hey there, I am interested in hearing from other Filer admins that are using the Nuview File Lifecycle Manager (FLM) software for data archiving or Information Lifecycle Management (ILM). I am in the process of rolling this product out in a large environment with the aim of migrating TB of data. At the moment I am seeing extremely slow migration rates. Has anyone else experienced this or in contrast has had very fast or even acceptable transfer rates? Thanks, Aaron ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

SecureAdmin after Upgrade
by Bill Holland 23 Jan '05

23 Jan '05

Upgraded a FAS940 and an F825 from OnTap 6.4.4 to 6.5.2R1. Since doing so, clicking the Secure FilerView link doesn't work with SSL enabled. If I disable SSL then I am able to access FilerView. I even tried creating a self-generated certificate and re-enabling SSL -- same result, the Secure FilerView window returns and http error (can't remember the specific error off the top of my head).

2 1

RE: wafle scan measure layout
by Michael Schipp 23 Jan '05

23 Jan '05

wafle scan measure layout will check the amount of defragmention in a volume. It will return a value (lowest the better). A high number is indicative of defragmentation. If high then a walf iron we defrag the raid group/s in the volume. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Alfred Lim Sent: Sunday, 23 January 2005 3:32 AM To: SKIP HOFMANN; 'Michael Christian'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: wafle scan measure layout Hi. How much does it help with that command? ----- Original Message ----- From: SKIP HOFMANN <mailto:SKIP.HOFMANN@ttisg.com> To: 'Michael Christian' <mailto:mchristi@yahoo-inc.com> ; toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 5:10 AM Subject: RE: wafle scan measure layout Cool thanks to all. I think I got around 50 emails from this newsgroup on how to do this. I sure won't forget how to do this again. ________________________________ From: Michael Christian [mailto:mchristi@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 12:59 PM To: SKIP HOFMANN; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: wafle scan measure layout priv set advanced ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of SKIP HOFMANN Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 11:42 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: wafle scan measure layout Hi all How do I get into the advanced mode so I can run this command? Skip Hofmann Senior Network Administrator MCSE 2000 NT MCP+I TetraTech Skip.Hofmann(a)ttisg.com 949 500 5286 cell 949 608 5801 office

1 0

RE: wafle scan measure layout
by SKIP HOFMANN 22 Jan '05

22 Jan '05

Cool thanks to all. I think I got around 50 emails from this newsgroup on how to do this. I sure won't forget how to do this again. _____ From: Michael Christian [mailto:mchristi@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 12:59 PM To: SKIP HOFMANN; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: wafle scan measure layout priv set advanced _____ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of SKIP HOFMANN Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 11:42 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: wafle scan measure layout Hi all How do I get into the advanced mode so I can run this command? Skip Hofmann Senior Network Administrator MCSE 2000 NT MCP+I TetraTech Skip.Hofmann(a)ttisg.com <mailto:Skip.Hofmann@ttisg.com> 949 500 5286 cell 949 608 5801 office

2 1

High OctaneSt0ck VCSC counterbalance
by Medina Wayling 22 Jan '05

22 Jan '05

MarketMakers Profit Guide 2005 With Over 97% Winning Trades! Featured Company Is: Vocalscape Inc, Breaking News released by the company on Friday after the close - this is an inside tip to our subscribers to get it immediately since the company is planning on a massive marketing campaign starting tuesday for the entire week. So do not miss out on it our advice is get it monday at the opening or tuesday morning the latest. This is a great company with great gains to be expected. Ticker:VCSC Current Price:.15 Price in 5 days:.62 Price in 15 days:.85 VocalScape Networks Inc. is building a company that's revolutionizing the telecommunications industry with the most affordable phone systems, hardware, online software, and rates in Canada and the US. VocalScape, a company with global reach, is receiving international attention for the development of Voice over IP (VoIP) application solutions, including the award-winning EyefonTM, a softphone for real-time PC-to-phone. We are an advanced implementer of PBX systems for companies, call centers, ITSPs and service providers. Breaking News - Partnership with VBS Telecom! KATONAH, N.Y., Jan. 21 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ Vocalscape Inc. "VCSC", announces that the company has entered into a partnership agreement with VBS Telecom to represent Vocalscape's proprietary Eyefon, an award winning VoIP soft phone and Vocalscape's pre-paid calling card solution to their clients. Don't Sleep On This One, It will produce unreal profits all week. So get in early on Monday morning. Legal-Information: Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements." Forward looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates," "believes," "understands" "will," "part of: "anticipates," or that by statements indicating certain actions "may," "could," or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. Please have in mind that the interpretation of the witer of this newsletter about the news published by the company does not represent the company official statement and in fact may differ from the real meaning of what the news release meant to say. Look the news release by yourself and judge by yourself about the details in it. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holding of VCSC shares prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest 36893129xL83)062E9wJ6L resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. Since we own shares, there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. Please be advised that nothing within this email shall constitute a solicitation or an invitation to get position in or sell any security mentioned herein. This newsletter is neither a registered investment advisor nor affiliated with any broker or dealer. This newsletter was paid 49000 from third party to send this report. All statements made are our express opinion only and should be treated as such. We may own, take position and sell any securities mentioned at any time. This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may include terms as " Projected Speculative Price" "expect", "believe", "may", "will", " Soar" "move", "undervalued" and "intend" or similar terms heartsick complaisance

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters