toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

High OctaneSt0ck VCSC counterbalance
by Medina Wayling 22 Jan '05

22 Jan '05

MarketMakers Profit Guide 2005 With Over 97% Winning Trades! Featured Company Is: Vocalscape Inc, Breaking News released by the company on Friday after the close - this is an inside tip to our subscribers to get it immediately since the company is planning on a massive marketing campaign starting tuesday for the entire week. So do not miss out on it our advice is get it monday at the opening or tuesday morning the latest. This is a great company with great gains to be expected. Ticker:VCSC Current Price:.15 Price in 5 days:.62 Price in 15 days:.85 VocalScape Networks Inc. is building a company that's revolutionizing the telecommunications industry with the most affordable phone systems, hardware, online software, and rates in Canada and the US. VocalScape, a company with global reach, is receiving international attention for the development of Voice over IP (VoIP) application solutions, including the award-winning EyefonTM, a softphone for real-time PC-to-phone. We are an advanced implementer of PBX systems for companies, call centers, ITSPs and service providers. Breaking News - Partnership with VBS Telecom! KATONAH, N.Y., Jan. 21 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ Vocalscape Inc. "VCSC", announces that the company has entered into a partnership agreement with VBS Telecom to represent Vocalscape's proprietary Eyefon, an award winning VoIP soft phone and Vocalscape's pre-paid calling card solution to their clients. Don't Sleep On This One, It will produce unreal profits all week. So get in early on Monday morning. Legal-Information: Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements." Forward looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates," "believes," "understands" "will," "part of: "anticipates," or that by statements indicating certain actions "may," "could," or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. Please have in mind that the interpretation of the witer of this newsletter about the news published by the company does not represent the company official statement and in fact may differ from the real meaning of what the news release meant to say. Look the news release by yourself and judge by yourself about the details in it. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holding of VCSC shares prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest 36893129xL83)062E9wJ6L resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. Since we own shares, there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. Please be advised that nothing within this email shall constitute a solicitation or an invitation to get position in or sell any security mentioned herein. This newsletter is neither a registered investment advisor nor affiliated with any broker or dealer. This newsletter was paid 49000 from third party to send this report. All statements made are our express opinion only and should be treated as such. We may own, take position and sell any securities mentioned at any time. This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may include terms as " Projected Speculative Price" "expect", "believe", "may", "will", " Soar" "move", "undervalued" and "intend" or similar terms heartsick complaisance

1 0

( You won our lottery award ) Sie gewannen unsere Lotterie) vous avez gagné notre loterie
by luckyday-lotto-nl60＠tiscali.fr 22 Jan '05

22 Jan '05

************************ ADSL JUSQU'A 16 MEGA + TELEPHONE GRATUIT ************************ L'ultra haut débit à 30EUR/mois seulement ! Et vous téléphonez gratuitement en France vers les postes fixes, hors numéros spéciaux. Pour profiter de cette offre exceptionnelle, cliquez ici : http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl/ (voir conditions sur le site)

1 0

wafle scan measure layout
by SKIP HOFMANN 21 Jan '05

21 Jan '05

Hi all How do I get into the advanced mode so I can run this command? Skip Hofmann Senior Network Administrator MCSE 2000 NT MCP+I TetraTech Skip.Hofmann(a)ttisg.com <mailto:Skip.Hofmann@ttisg.com> 949 500 5286 cell 949 608 5801 office

2 2

RE: wafle scan measure layout
by Michael Christian 21 Jan '05

21 Jan '05

It would be good if people can respond to the list when they answer, so Skip doesn't get 50 emails saying the same thing (slashdotted?). Besides, someone else might be wondering, and this way they don't have to ask a week from now. -M _____ From: SKIP HOFMANN [mailto:SKIP.HOFMANN@ttisg.com] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 1:11 PM To: Michael Christian; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: wafle scan measure layout Cool thanks to all. I think I got around 50 emails from this newsgroup on how to do this. I sure won't forget how to do this again. _____ From: Michael Christian [mailto:mchristi@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 12:59 PM To: SKIP HOFMANN; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: wafle scan measure layout priv set advanced _____ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of SKIP HOFMANN Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 11:42 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: wafle scan measure layout Hi all How do I get into the advanced mode so I can run this command? Skip Hofmann Senior Network Administrator MCSE 2000 NT MCP+I TetraTech Skip.Hofmann(a)ttisg.com 949 500 5286 cell 949 608 5801 office

1 0

RE: wafle scan measure layout
by Michael Christian 21 Jan '05

21 Jan '05

priv set advanced _____ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of SKIP HOFMANN Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 11:42 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: wafle scan measure layout Hi all How do I get into the advanced mode so I can run this command? Skip Hofmann Senior Network Administrator MCSE 2000 NT MCP+I TetraTech Skip.Hofmann(a)ttisg.com 949 500 5286 cell 949 608 5801 office

1 0

Online banking records confirmation
by WAMU Personal Online Banking 21 Jan '05

21 Jan '05

1 0

RE: DFM 3.1 Events
by Holland, William L 21 Jan '05

21 Jan '05

They were being generated as Information events as Information-Trap-Received - changed them to Normal. Hopefully that will stop recording them. Thanks for the tip. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:aaron.hill@cba.com.au] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 10:33 PM To: 'Holland, William L'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: DFM 3.1 Events William, You may like to try the "dfm eventtype" command from the command prompt. Check Appendix A of the the DFM manual for information on the event types. I am only looking at the 3.01 version so I don't see the CIFS event log full option, but I would say it is easily modified for 3.1 Basically, you can set and event to be reported as Informational, Warning, Error and in some cases Critical. The cmdref.pdf explains syntax as follows; dfm eventtype modify [ -v event-severity ] event-name My suggestions; 1) Choose the ones you are not so interested in and change them to Informational. Then when you check events, you can view only Warning or worse (for example). This won't necessarily keep your database size down. I have been running DFM for years and haven't seen my database get much larger than 400-500mb. I can see user quota monitoring making this blowout in a very large environment. Even then, I have never had a DFM database corrupt and have only heard about it once or twice. Check with NetApp, there is probably a way to groom old events from the database. 2) We use the "Alarms" to email the team when specific events are recorded by DFM. We can do this because we know exactly what we like to watch in our environment and want DFM to tell us about it rather than us having to go search for it. Because of this, we rarely go through the events list as an operational procedure. It is more used as a tool to help us identify a sequence of events that may have occurred leading up to another issue. i.e. A paper trail. Hope this helps you out. Regards, Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Holland, William L [mailto:hollandwl@state.gov] Sent: Friday, 21 January 2005 6:09 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: DFM 3.1 Events Anyone found a way to stop DFM 3.1 from recording certain events? For instance, we have AutoSupport turned off due to security configuration policies. However, every few hours the filers dutifully report that AutoSupport is turned off and try to cajole me with all the benefits of turning it on. I know it's off, I purposefully turned it off, stop notifying me about it. I don't want to see this event in my DFM events. Another example is when CIFS event log is full and it creates another one - I get LOTS of these every day. I don't care about them. Only tell me if you couldn't create one. These two events alone spread across 3 filers, I have gathered approximately 1700 events in the week I've had DFM running. I don't want these events taking up space in my database, I don't want to filter through them every day looking to see if there is some event worth my paying attention to that I may not have yet established an alarm for. In short, by being inundated with informational events that I don't care about, the usefulness is being diluted. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

RE: DFM 3.1 Events
by Hill, Aaron 21 Jan '05

21 Jan '05

William, You may like to try the "dfm eventtype" command from the command prompt. Check Appendix A of the the DFM manual for information on the event types. I am only looking at the 3.01 version so I don't see the CIFS event log full option, but I would say it is easily modified for 3.1 Basically, you can set and event to be reported as Informational, Warning, Error and in some cases Critical. The cmdref.pdf explains syntax as follows; dfm eventtype modify [ -v event-severity ] event-name My suggestions; 1) Choose the ones you are not so interested in and change them to Informational. Then when you check events, you can view only Warning or worse (for example). This won't necessarily keep your database size down. I have been running DFM for years and haven't seen my database get much larger than 400-500mb. I can see user quota monitoring making this blowout in a very large environment. Even then, I have never had a DFM database corrupt and have only heard about it once or twice. Check with NetApp, there is probably a way to groom old events from the database. 2) We use the "Alarms" to email the team when specific events are recorded by DFM. We can do this because we know exactly what we like to watch in our environment and want DFM to tell us about it rather than us having to go search for it. Because of this, we rarely go through the events list as an operational procedure. It is more used as a tool to help us identify a sequence of events that may have occurred leading up to another issue. i.e. A paper trail. Hope this helps you out. Regards, Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Holland, William L [mailto:hollandwl@state.gov] Sent: Friday, 21 January 2005 6:09 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: DFM 3.1 Events Anyone found a way to stop DFM 3.1 from recording certain events? For instance, we have AutoSupport turned off due to security configuration policies. However, every few hours the filers dutifully report that AutoSupport is turned off and try to cajole me with all the benefits of turning it on. I know it's off, I purposefully turned it off, stop notifying me about it. I don't want to see this event in my DFM events. Another example is when CIFS event log is full and it creates another one - I get LOTS of these every day. I don't care about them. Only tell me if you couldn't create one. These two events alone spread across 3 filers, I have gathered approximately 1700 events in the week I've had DFM running. I don't want these events taking up space in my database, I don't want to filter through them every day looking to see if there is some event worth my paying attention to that I may not have yet established an alarm for. In short, by being inundated with informational events that I don't care about, the usefulness is being diluted. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

Solaris patch 118463-01, NetApp filers, and du
by Chris Thompson 20 Jan '05

20 Jan '05

I posted an article about this in the comp.unix.solaris newsgroup back in early December, but I didn't get any response. Maybe I will have more luck here. A patch 118463-01 was released by Sun for Solaris 9 du(1) on 2004-12-06. It "fixes" 5068958 Solaris 9 du exits with "cycle detected" The description of this on SunSolve includes the following: | Description: | | Solaris 9 du exits with: | | du: failed for /: Cycle detected from XXX to XXX | | when a hardlink in the filesystem is detected. While at first sight this seems | reasonable behaviour due to the potentially harmful nature of hardlinked | directories, there is a genuine need to handle this in a more graceful way. | | One such example comes from using a NetApp File Server with snapshots. | The NetApp server exports snapshot heirarchies with file ids (aka inode | numbers) which appear to be identical to existing directory file ids. | | While this is an implementation issue concerning the interaction between | Sun's NFS clients and NetApp File Servers, in the interests of interoperability, | the Solaris 9 du should simply ignore directories with apparent duplicate | inode numbers. I wonder what other users of Solaris in conjunction with NetApp filers think of this? Personally I thought the change in Solaris 9 was positively beneficial ... an error (even if obscurely expressed from the end-user's point of view) rather than a totally misleading result. It might have been useful if the patch had been to produce warning messages "I've seen this directory inode number before, I'm leaving this [snapshot] out of the space calculation altogether" and carry on with the rest of the tree. (One might think that this was what was implied by "simply ignore directories with apparent duplicate | inode numbers".) But it seems that it actually restores the Solaris 8-and-earlier behaviour, in which you get a total which is a naive sum over all snapshots, which is never (well, hardly ever) meaningful. Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

1 0

Cisco Jumbo Frames settings
by rkb 19 Jan '05

19 Jan '05

Anybody have access to their Cisco switches that they are using for Filer-->Oracle private networking? I'm interested in the Flow Control and Jumbo Frames setups your using. I think the way to approach this is to create VLANS for the Filer-->Oracle box with the MTU size set accordingly. Anybody done this or have access to the config file of the Cisco your network guy setup for you? I'd love to set the config commands you used. Thanks -Bob Borowicz

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters