toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

SNMP CPU queries suddenly returning zero
by Gavin Kelman 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Hi, I recently started graphing CPU busy time with SNMP and it worked fine for a few weeks, and then all of sudden one day, it always returned 0 and has done ever since. I suspect rebooting the filer would bring the SNMP CPU reading back to life, but I was wondering if anyone had a better idea... I'm running NetApp Release 6.5.2R1P9 on an F940 and using the following command to get the information: snmpget netapp public -m NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB.txt \ NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::cpuBusyTimePerCent.0 Telneting to the filer and running "sysstat" returns normal (non-zero) CPU usage information. Ideas? Cheers, Gavin. -- Gavin Kelman gavin(a)metahusky.net

2 2

RE: SnapLock Questions
by Merrick, Jeffrey 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

The man page for the vol command specifies that one can use suffixes of d/m/y for days/months/years when specifying the volume retention period parameters. A Snaplock Enterprise volume doesn't let an admin "expire the volume" but it does let an admin destroy it. >From a Linux system, you can see the atime (access time of a file, which is overloaded to keep the retention date if the file is on a WORM volume) by mounting the file system and running "stat <filename>" >From Solaris, mount the file system and run "ls -lu <filename>" Jeff -----Original Message----- From: aaron hirsch [mailto:aaronh@uptime.net] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 7:01 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: SnapLock Questions Rene, SnapLock comes in two versions, Compliance and Enterprise. I'm not sure if you can change either to day/hours/minutes, but the Enterprise version is MUCH more flexible and will allow you, as admin, to expire the volume at any given time you choose. As for the outside software I'm not sure... -----Original Message----- From: Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes [mailto:Rene.Koehnen-Wiesemes@morse.com] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: SnapLock Questions Hello, with the new ONTAP 7G (7.0RC5) release I've found new vol options parameters: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3y · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10y Is it possible to decrease these values for test purpose to month or days e.g.: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3d · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10d Additional I need to know if there is a software outside to set the "Last Access Date" metadata of files (the Retention Date for snaplock!) on Solaris or Windows based systems? Thanks for your help. René -- Dipl.-Ing. René Köhnen-Wiesemes Senior IT Specialist Morse GmbH Oskar-Messter-Straße 13 D-85737 Ismaning Tel: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-228 Mobil: +49 (0) 172 829 0367 Fax: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-110 mailto:rene.koehnen-wiesemes@morse-techsol.de <www.morse.de>

1 0

Online banking records confirmation
by WAMU Personal Online Banking 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

1 0

RE: SnapLock Questions
by aaron hirsch 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Rene, SnapLock comes in two versions, Compliance and Enterprise. I'm not sure if you can change either to day/hours/minutes, but the Enterprise version is MUCH more flexible and will allow you, as admin, to expire the volume at any given time you choose. As for the outside software I'm not sure... -----Original Message----- From: Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes [mailto:Rene.Koehnen-Wiesemes@morse.com] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: SnapLock Questions Hello, with the new ONTAP 7G (7.0RC5) release I've found new vol options parameters: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3y · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10y Is it possible to decrease these values for test purpose to month or days e.g.: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3d · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10d Additional I need to know if there is a software outside to set the "Last Access Date" metadata of files (the Retention Date for snaplock!) on Solaris or Windows based systems? Thanks for your help. René -- Dipl.-Ing. René Köhnen-Wiesemes Senior IT Specialist Morse GmbH Oskar-Messter-Straße 13 D-85737 Ismaning Tel: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-228 Mobil: +49 (0) 172 829 0367 Fax: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-110 mailto:rene.koehnen-wiesemes@morse-techsol.de <www.morse.de>

1 0

SnapLock Questions
by Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Hello, with the new ONTAP 7G (7.0RC5) release I've found new vol options parameters: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3y · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10y Is it possible to decrease these values for test purpose to month or days e.g.: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3d · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10d Additional I need to know if there is a software outside to set the "Last Access Date" metadata of files (the Retention Date for snaplock!) on Solaris or Windows based systems? Thanks for your help. René -- Dipl.-Ing. René Köhnen-Wiesemes Senior IT Specialist Morse GmbH Oskar-Messter-Straße 13 D-85737 Ismaning Tel: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-228 Mobil: +49 (0) 172 829 0367 Fax: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-110 mailto:rene.koehnen-wiesemes@morse-techsol.de <www.morse.de>

1 0

RE: DFM 3.1 Events
by Holland, William L 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Along this same vein, is there a way to turn off notification of saving of the CIFS audit log? -----Original Message----- From: Holland, William L Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:36 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: DFM 3.1 Events You're my hero! -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:stephane.bentebba@fps.fr] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:40 PM Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: DFM 3.1 Events if you want to disable the reminder of the autosupport benefit on your filer type the following telnet command : options autosupport.support.reminder off (or something like that, type options autosupport to find the exact name) this way, at the source (the filer), this anoying - pardon - warning message will be turned off and you should'nt see it on dfm Holland, William L schrieb: >Anyone found a way to stop DFM 3.1 from recording certain events? For >instance, we have AutoSupport turned off due to security configuration >policies. However, every few hours the filers dutifully report that >AutoSupport is turned off and try to cajole me with all the benefits of >turning it on. I know it's off, I purposefully turned it off, stop >notifying me about it. I don't want to see this event in my DFM events. >Another example is when CIFS event log is full and it creates another one - >I get LOTS of these every day. I don't care about them. Only tell me if >you couldn't create one. These two events alone spread across 3 filers, I >have gathered approximately 1700 events in the week I've had DFM running. I >don't want these events taking up space in my database, I don't want to >filter through them every day looking to see if there is some event worth my >paying attention to that I may not have yet established an alarm for. In >short, by being inundated with informational events that I don't care about, >the usefulness is being diluted. > > >

2 1

RE: DFM 3.1 Events
by Holland, William L 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

You're my hero! -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:stephane.bentebba@fps.fr] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:40 PM Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: DFM 3.1 Events if you want to disable the reminder of the autosupport benefit on your filer type the following telnet command : options autosupport.support.reminder off (or something like that, type options autosupport to find the exact name) this way, at the source (the filer), this anoying - pardon - warning message will be turned off and you should'nt see it on dfm Holland, William L schrieb: >Anyone found a way to stop DFM 3.1 from recording certain events? For >instance, we have AutoSupport turned off due to security configuration >policies. However, every few hours the filers dutifully report that >AutoSupport is turned off and try to cajole me with all the benefits of >turning it on. I know it's off, I purposefully turned it off, stop >notifying me about it. I don't want to see this event in my DFM events. >Another example is when CIFS event log is full and it creates another one - >I get LOTS of these every day. I don't care about them. Only tell me if >you couldn't create one. These two events alone spread across 3 filers, I >have gathered approximately 1700 events in the week I've had DFM running. I >don't want these events taking up space in my database, I don't want to >filter through them every day looking to see if there is some event worth my >paying attention to that I may not have yet established an alarm for. In >short, by being inundated with informational events that I don't care about, >the usefulness is being diluted. > > >

1 0

DFM 3.1 Events
by Holland, William L 26 Jan '05

26 Jan '05

Anyone found a way to stop DFM 3.1 from recording certain events? For instance, we have AutoSupport turned off due to security configuration policies. However, every few hours the filers dutifully report that AutoSupport is turned off and try to cajole me with all the benefits of turning it on. I know it's off, I purposefully turned it off, stop notifying me about it. I don't want to see this event in my DFM events. Another example is when CIFS event log is full and it creates another one - I get LOTS of these every day. I don't care about them. Only tell me if you couldn't create one. These two events alone spread across 3 filers, I have gathered approximately 1700 events in the week I've had DFM running. I don't want these events taking up space in my database, I don't want to filter through them every day looking to see if there is some event worth my paying attention to that I may not have yet established an alarm for. In short, by being inundated with informational events that I don't care about, the usefulness is being diluted.

2 1

RE: Windows explorer add-in
by Maglinger, Paul 26 Jan '05

26 Jan '05

If it was a snake, it would've bit me. I thought it was called something else. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Summers, John [mailto:John.Summers@netapp.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:56 To: Maglinger, Paul Subject: RE: Windows explorer add-in Secure Share Access http://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/ssaccess/ John Summers -----Original Message----- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:PMAGLINGER@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 10:17 AM To: 'NetApps list server' Subject: Windows explorer add-in There used to be a add-in for Windows Explorer that would add a tab on the explorer window allowing you to change the Unix permissions on a Unix qtree. I could've sworn I downloaded from NOW, but I can no longer find it. Anyone remember this and know where I can get it? A hammer is a great tool... but not for cutting glass. ________________________________ Paul Maglinger, A+, CA, CCA, CET, MCSE Systems Administrator Shoe Carnival Inc. (812)867-4674 pmaglinger(a)scvl.com ________________________________

1 0

Windows explorer add-in
by Maglinger, Paul 26 Jan '05

26 Jan '05

There used to be a add-in for Windows Explorer that would add a tab on the explorer window allowing you to change the Unix permissions on a Unix qtree. I could've sworn I downloaded from NOW, but I can no longer find it. Anyone remember this and know where I can get it? A hammer is a great tool... but not for cutting glass. ________________________________ Paul Maglinger, A+, CA, CCA, CET, MCSE Systems Administrator Shoe Carnival Inc. (812)867-4674 pmaglinger(a)scvl.com ________________________________

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters