toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13522 discussions

Archiving, R200 and SnapVault.
by Ngoh, Clarence 28 Jan '05

28 Jan '05

G'day toaster folks, Our backups in Lidcombe are having issues completing its backups - the cause is yet unknown. As a result of our EOM backups not completing successfully, it is eating into our snapshot space. We have raised a case with NetApp and we are trying to isolate the root case of the problem. I am not after suggestions to fix this at the moment. Rather ... We have just purchased a R200 for achiving purpose and we are thinking of utilising this to alleviate the issue we are having. We wish to dump some of the EOMs to this box and backup to tape when we resolve the backup issue. Our scenario is common ... A production site and a DR site. We backup our EOMs at the DR site. We are wondering if the process is as simple of copying over the EOM snapshots from the DR filer to the R200 via SnapVault and configuring our backups (Veritas NetBackup) to backup from the R200 to cassette. Question : From what I have read, backups to cassette can be done straight from the R200. Any real life experiences to share? Are they any caveats that we should be aware of? Sorry if this question seems somewhat simple -- I am still ploughing through a pile of whitepapers at the moment, but because this issue is somewhat urgent, any suggestions would be much appreciated. Cheers Clarence. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

TKO NOTICE: Compromised Account
by aw-confirm＠ebay.com 28 Jan '05

28 Jan '05

Dear (toasters(a)mathworks.com), In an effort to protect your eBay account security, we have suspended your account until such time that it can be safely restored to you. We have taken this action because your password may have been compromised. Although we cannot disclose our investigative procedures that led to this conclusion, please know that we took this action in order to maintain the safety of your account. However, your account is marked for too many successful logins last week (January, 20-28, 2005). It is more interesting that the hostnames are from different countries: United States (c-67-160-224-80.client.comcast.net) Canada (HSE-Toronto-ppp304429.sympatico.ca) Sweden (c213-100-93-27.swipnet.se) Russia (32.122-140-213.telenet.ru) Please authorize your registration information on or before February 3, 2005. Currently registration information will be screened when you login. Follow the link to make sure you are on a secure eBay webpage. https://signin.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SignIn Thank you for using eBay! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright © 1995-2005 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. eBay and the eBay logo are trademarks of eBay Inc.

1 0

SNMP CPU queries suddenly returning zero
by Gavin Kelman 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Hi, I recently started graphing CPU busy time with SNMP and it worked fine for a few weeks, and then all of sudden one day, it always returned 0 and has done ever since. I suspect rebooting the filer would bring the SNMP CPU reading back to life, but I was wondering if anyone had a better idea... I'm running NetApp Release 6.5.2R1P9 on an F940 and using the following command to get the information: snmpget netapp public -m NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB.txt \ NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::cpuBusyTimePerCent.0 Telneting to the filer and running "sysstat" returns normal (non-zero) CPU usage information. Ideas? Cheers, Gavin. -- Gavin Kelman gavin(a)metahusky.net

2 2

RE: SnapLock Questions
by Merrick, Jeffrey 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

The man page for the vol command specifies that one can use suffixes of d/m/y for days/months/years when specifying the volume retention period parameters. A Snaplock Enterprise volume doesn't let an admin "expire the volume" but it does let an admin destroy it. >From a Linux system, you can see the atime (access time of a file, which is overloaded to keep the retention date if the file is on a WORM volume) by mounting the file system and running "stat <filename>" >From Solaris, mount the file system and run "ls -lu <filename>" Jeff -----Original Message----- From: aaron hirsch [mailto:aaronh@uptime.net] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 7:01 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: SnapLock Questions Rene, SnapLock comes in two versions, Compliance and Enterprise. I'm not sure if you can change either to day/hours/minutes, but the Enterprise version is MUCH more flexible and will allow you, as admin, to expire the volume at any given time you choose. As for the outside software I'm not sure... -----Original Message----- From: Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes [mailto:Rene.Koehnen-Wiesemes@morse.com] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: SnapLock Questions Hello, with the new ONTAP 7G (7.0RC5) release I've found new vol options parameters: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3y · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10y Is it possible to decrease these values for test purpose to month or days e.g.: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3d · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10d Additional I need to know if there is a software outside to set the "Last Access Date" metadata of files (the Retention Date for snaplock!) on Solaris or Windows based systems? Thanks for your help. René -- Dipl.-Ing. René Köhnen-Wiesemes Senior IT Specialist Morse GmbH Oskar-Messter-Straße 13 D-85737 Ismaning Tel: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-228 Mobil: +49 (0) 172 829 0367 Fax: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-110 mailto:rene.koehnen-wiesemes@morse-techsol.de <www.morse.de>

1 0

Online banking records confirmation
by WAMU Personal Online Banking 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

1 0

RE: SnapLock Questions
by aaron hirsch 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Rene, SnapLock comes in two versions, Compliance and Enterprise. I'm not sure if you can change either to day/hours/minutes, but the Enterprise version is MUCH more flexible and will allow you, as admin, to expire the volume at any given time you choose. As for the outside software I'm not sure... -----Original Message----- From: Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes [mailto:Rene.Koehnen-Wiesemes@morse.com] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: SnapLock Questions Hello, with the new ONTAP 7G (7.0RC5) release I've found new vol options parameters: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3y · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10y Is it possible to decrease these values for test purpose to month or days e.g.: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3d · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10d Additional I need to know if there is a software outside to set the "Last Access Date" metadata of files (the Retention Date for snaplock!) on Solaris or Windows based systems? Thanks for your help. René -- Dipl.-Ing. René Köhnen-Wiesemes Senior IT Specialist Morse GmbH Oskar-Messter-Straße 13 D-85737 Ismaning Tel: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-228 Mobil: +49 (0) 172 829 0367 Fax: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-110 mailto:rene.koehnen-wiesemes@morse-techsol.de <www.morse.de>

1 0

SnapLock Questions
by Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Hello, with the new ONTAP 7G (7.0RC5) release I've found new vol options parameters: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3y · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10y Is it possible to decrease these values for test purpose to month or days e.g.: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3d · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10d Additional I need to know if there is a software outside to set the "Last Access Date" metadata of files (the Retention Date for snaplock!) on Solaris or Windows based systems? Thanks for your help. René -- Dipl.-Ing. René Köhnen-Wiesemes Senior IT Specialist Morse GmbH Oskar-Messter-Straße 13 D-85737 Ismaning Tel: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-228 Mobil: +49 (0) 172 829 0367 Fax: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-110 mailto:rene.koehnen-wiesemes@morse-techsol.de <www.morse.de>

1 0

RE: DFM 3.1 Events
by Holland, William L 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Along this same vein, is there a way to turn off notification of saving of the CIFS audit log? -----Original Message----- From: Holland, William L Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:36 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: DFM 3.1 Events You're my hero! -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:stephane.bentebba@fps.fr] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:40 PM Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: DFM 3.1 Events if you want to disable the reminder of the autosupport benefit on your filer type the following telnet command : options autosupport.support.reminder off (or something like that, type options autosupport to find the exact name) this way, at the source (the filer), this anoying - pardon - warning message will be turned off and you should'nt see it on dfm Holland, William L schrieb: >Anyone found a way to stop DFM 3.1 from recording certain events? For >instance, we have AutoSupport turned off due to security configuration >policies. However, every few hours the filers dutifully report that >AutoSupport is turned off and try to cajole me with all the benefits of >turning it on. I know it's off, I purposefully turned it off, stop >notifying me about it. I don't want to see this event in my DFM events. >Another example is when CIFS event log is full and it creates another one - >I get LOTS of these every day. I don't care about them. Only tell me if >you couldn't create one. These two events alone spread across 3 filers, I >have gathered approximately 1700 events in the week I've had DFM running. I >don't want these events taking up space in my database, I don't want to >filter through them every day looking to see if there is some event worth my >paying attention to that I may not have yet established an alarm for. In >short, by being inundated with informational events that I don't care about, >the usefulness is being diluted. > > >

2 1

RE: DFM 3.1 Events
by Holland, William L 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

You're my hero! -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:stephane.bentebba@fps.fr] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:40 PM Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: DFM 3.1 Events if you want to disable the reminder of the autosupport benefit on your filer type the following telnet command : options autosupport.support.reminder off (or something like that, type options autosupport to find the exact name) this way, at the source (the filer), this anoying - pardon - warning message will be turned off and you should'nt see it on dfm Holland, William L schrieb: >Anyone found a way to stop DFM 3.1 from recording certain events? For >instance, we have AutoSupport turned off due to security configuration >policies. However, every few hours the filers dutifully report that >AutoSupport is turned off and try to cajole me with all the benefits of >turning it on. I know it's off, I purposefully turned it off, stop >notifying me about it. I don't want to see this event in my DFM events. >Another example is when CIFS event log is full and it creates another one - >I get LOTS of these every day. I don't care about them. Only tell me if >you couldn't create one. These two events alone spread across 3 filers, I >have gathered approximately 1700 events in the week I've had DFM running. I >don't want these events taking up space in my database, I don't want to >filter through them every day looking to see if there is some event worth my >paying attention to that I may not have yet established an alarm for. In >short, by being inundated with informational events that I don't care about, >the usefulness is being diluted. > > >

1 0

DFM 3.1 Events
by Holland, William L 26 Jan '05

26 Jan '05

Anyone found a way to stop DFM 3.1 from recording certain events? For instance, we have AutoSupport turned off due to security configuration policies. However, every few hours the filers dutifully report that AutoSupport is turned off and try to cajole me with all the benefits of turning it on. I know it's off, I purposefully turned it off, stop notifying me about it. I don't want to see this event in my DFM events. Another example is when CIFS event log is full and it creates another one - I get LOTS of these every day. I don't care about them. Only tell me if you couldn't create one. These two events alone spread across 3 filers, I have gathered approximately 1700 events in the week I've had DFM running. I don't want these events taking up space in my database, I don't want to filter through them every day looking to see if there is some event worth my paying attention to that I may not have yet established an alarm for. In short, by being inundated with informational events that I don't care about, the usefulness is being diluted.

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters