toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

3 participants
13514 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Indus Pencil Industries (pvt) Ltd. presents new product.
by Indus Pencil Industries (pvt) Ltd. 03 Sep '05

03 Sep '05

For Queries contact: email: sales(a)induspencil.com Phone: 0092-21-111-910-910, 2573214 Fax 0092-21-2564931, 2566096

1 0

RE: Mail System Error - Returned Mail
by Zabetakis, George 01 Sep '05

01 Sep '05

Df -----Original Message----- From: toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:toasters@mathworks.com] Sent: Thu Sep 01 00:57:18 2005 To: marc.romero(a)ibpc.fr Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail Français : Ce message a été vérifié par un filtre sur le serveur de courrier. L'original du message a été remplacé pour la raison suivante : English : This message was verified by the filtering system of our mail server. The original message was replaced for this one by the following reason : Deutsch: Diese Nachricht wurde durch den Filter unseres Mail-Servers überprüft. Die Ursprungsnachricht wurde aus folgendem Grund ausgetauscht : Italiano: Questo messaggio e' stato verificato dal sistema di filtraggio del nostro mail server. Il messaggio originale e' stato sostituito da questo per la seguente ragione : Polski : Ta wiadomoæ zosta³a sprawdzona prze system filtruj¹cy naszego serwera pocztowego. Wiadomoæ oryginalna zosta³a zast¹piona z natêpuj¹cych powodów : Turque: Bu e-posta dagiticimiz tarafindan kontrol edilmistir. Orijinal e-posta bu mesaj ile degistirilmistir. Degisrtirilme nedeni: *** A suspicious file (executable code) was found in the message ! Le message original possédait un fichier attaché : Original message had the following attached files : Die Ursprungsnachricht besass folgende Attachments : Il messaggio originale possiede i seguenti file allegati : Wiadomoæ oryginalna zawiera³a nastêpuj¹ce za³¹czniki Orijinal e-postada asagidaki ek vardi: **** (X-FILE ??? ) : Message.scr TYPE : application/octet-stream **** SUSPECT FILES : 1 Il était envoyé par Original message was sent by Sie wurde gesendet von Messaggio originale mandato da Wiadomoæ zosta³a przes³ana przez Orijinal e-posta asagidaki kisi tarafindan gonderilmistir: **** From : <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Si vous pensez que c'est une erreur et que le message n'aurait pas du être remplacé par le filtre du serveur, merci de prendre contact avec l'administrateur système. If you think this is an error and the message should not be rejected by the filtering system, you may contact your system administrator for instructions. Falls Sie der Meinung sind, es handelt sich um einen Fehler, und diese Nachricht hätte nicht durch das Filtersystem des Servers ausgetauscht werden sollen, wenden Sie sich bitte an den Systemadministrator. Se pensate che questo sia un errore e che il messaggio non dovrebbe essere respinto dal sistema di filtraggio, puo' contattare l'amministratore sistema per istruzioni. Jeli uwa¿a Pan/Pani, ¿e pope³niono b³¹d i wiadomoæ nie powinna byæ odrzucona proszê skontaktowaæ siê z Administratorem. Orijinal e-postanin reddedilmesinin bir yanlislik oldugunu dusunuyorsaniz, ne yapilmasi gerektigi hakkinda sistem yoneticisiyle baglanti kurunuz. Si vous avez des questions vous pouvez contacter : If you have any questions, you can contact us : Bei weiteren Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an : Inviare quesiti eventuali a : Jeli ma Pan/Pani pytania mo¿e Pan/Pani skontaktowaæ siê z : Sorulariniz icin Marc.Romero(a)ibpc.fr ile baglanti kurabilirsiniz. Marc.Romero(a)ibpc.fr Cordialement, Sincerely, Mit freundlichen Grüssen, Cordiali saluti, Z powa¿aniem Saygilarimla, Marc ROMERO ---------------------------------------------------------------- j-chkmail - (c) Ecole des Mines de Paris 2002, 2003

1 0

Mail System Error - Returned Mail
by toasters＠mathworks.com 01 Sep '05

01 Sep '05

Fran�ais : Ce message a �t� v�rifi� par un filtre sur le serveur de courrier. L'original du message a �t� remplac� pour la raison suivante : English : This message was verified by the filtering system of our mail server. The original message was replaced for this one by the following reason : Deutsch: Diese Nachricht wurde durch den Filter unseres Mail-Servers �berpr�ft. Die Ursprungsnachricht wurde aus folgendem Grund ausgetauscht : Italiano: Questo messaggio e' stato verificato dal sistema di filtraggio del nostro mail server. Il messaggio originale e' stato sostituito da questo per la seguente ragione : Polski : Ta wiadomo� zosta�a sprawdzona prze system filtruj�cy naszego serwera pocztowego. Wiadomo� oryginalna zosta�a zast�piona z nat�puj�cych powod�w : Turque: Bu e-posta dagiticimiz tarafindan kontrol edilmistir. Orijinal e-posta bu mesaj ile degistirilmistir. Degisrtirilme nedeni: *** A suspicious file (executable code) was found in the message ! Le message original poss�dait un fichier attach� : Original message had the following attached files : Die Ursprungsnachricht besass folgende Attachments : Il messaggio originale possiede i seguenti file allegati : Wiadomo� oryginalna zawiera�a nast�puj�ce za��czniki Orijinal e-postada asagidaki ek vardi: **** (X-FILE ??? ) : Message.scr TYPE : application/octet-stream **** SUSPECT FILES : 1 Il �tait envoy� par Original message was sent by Sie wurde gesendet von Messaggio originale mandato da Wiadomo� zosta�a przes�ana przez Orijinal e-posta asagidaki kisi tarafindan gonderilmistir: **** From : <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Si vous pensez que c'est une erreur et que le message n'aurait pas du �tre remplac� par le filtre du serveur, merci de prendre contact avec l'administrateur syst�me. If you think this is an error and the message should not be rejected by the filtering system, you may contact your system administrator for instructions. Falls Sie der Meinung sind, es handelt sich um einen Fehler, und diese Nachricht h�tte nicht durch das Filtersystem des Servers ausgetauscht werden sollen, wenden Sie sich bitte an den Systemadministrator. Se pensate che questo sia un errore e che il messaggio non dovrebbe essere respinto dal sistema di filtraggio, puo' contattare l'amministratore sistema per istruzioni. Jeli uwa�a Pan/Pani, �e pope�niono b��d i wiadomo� nie powinna by� odrzucona prosz� skontaktowa� si� z Administratorem. Orijinal e-postanin reddedilmesinin bir yanlislik oldugunu dusunuyorsaniz, ne yapilmasi gerektigi hakkinda sistem yoneticisiyle baglanti kurunuz. Si vous avez des questions vous pouvez contacter : If you have any questions, you can contact us : Bei weiteren Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an : Inviare quesiti eventuali a : Jeli ma Pan/Pani pytania mo�e Pan/Pani skontaktowa� si� z : Sorulariniz icin Marc.Romero(a)ibpc.fr ile baglanti kurabilirsiniz. Marc.Romero(a)ibpc.fr Cordialement, Sincerely, Mit freundlichen Gr�ssen, Cordiali saluti, Z powa�aniem Saygilarimla, Marc ROMERO ---------------------------------------------------------------- j-chkmail - (c) Ecole des Mines de Paris 2002, 2003

1 0

CIFS vs NFS performance.
by Jerry 31 Aug '05

31 Aug '05

Here's the story... Lately I've been getting a lot of requests for CIFS services on my filer. Until recently I have been able to avoid a lot of windows interaction but that time is coming close to an end. Does anyone have any major issues with CIFS, does it kill CPU and how reliable is it in general? Basically I'm looking for an overall feeling. The reason I ask is I'm unimpressed with the HTTP daemon built into the filer and I'm not confident in it's abilities to do other things besides NFS without personal experience with it. Jerry __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

4 3

RE: CIFS vs NFS performance.
by Luke Howard 31 Aug '05

31 Aug '05

>I run some CIFS sessions, probably not enough to judge performance vs. a >server / LUN config but there's two reasons why I limit my CIFS services >- Group Policies and security. NetApp CIFS doesn't support GPO's and >Kerberos security. ONTAP does support Kerberos security. And I expect that it's possible to serve the filesystem component of a GPO from a filer (I've never tried, but if it works with Samba it likely works with ONTAP). -- Luke --

1 0

RE: CIFS vs NFS performance.
by Haber, David J. 30 Aug '05

30 Aug '05

Jerry: I have two filers running nothing but CIFS. We have about 4,000 user home directories and 3 TB of Group Shares on an 840, and about 2TB of Group Shareson an 820. Performance is excellent; I/O's run between 2500-4,000 max; CPU usaage is generally under 50%. It's higher (sometimes 100%) when a snap mirror is taking place. It is very reliable. Our only downtime over the past 4 years has been to do OnTap upgrades. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 1:27 PM To: list toasters Subject: CIFS vs NFS performance. Here's the story... Lately I've been getting a lot of requests for CIFS services on my filer. Until recently I have been able to avoid a lot of windows interaction but that time is coming close to an end. Does anyone have any major issues with CIFS, does it kill CPU and how reliable is it in general? Basically I'm looking for an overall feeling. The reason I ask is I'm unimpressed with the HTTP daemon built into the filer and I'm not confident in it's abilities to do other things besides NFS without personal experience with it. Jerry __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Confidentiality Notice: This message, and any attachments, may contain information that is confidential, privileged, and/or protected from disclosure under state and federal laws that deal with the privacy and security of medical information. If you received this message in error or through inappropriate means, please reply to this message to notify the Sender that the message was received by you in error, and then permanently delete this message from all storage media, without forwarding or retaining a copy.

1 0

RE: CIFS vs NFS performance.
by Johnson, John T. 30 Aug '05

30 Aug '05

I run some CIFS sessions, probably not enough to judge performance vs. a server / LUN config but there's two reasons why I limit my CIFS services - Group Policies and security. NetApp CIFS doesn't support GPO's and Kerberos security. This may not pose an issue in your environment but we use GPO's to secure certain areas of our servers and deploy software so we can only use it for a limited set of circumstances. Another side-effect I've noticed is that it seems that any changes made to a CIFS session requires the CIFS service to be restarted. But with my limited exposure to CIFS, there may be some work-a-rounds I'm not familiar with. Good luck, John. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:27 PM To: list toasters Subject: CIFS vs NFS performance. Here's the story... Lately I've been getting a lot of requests for CIFS services on my filer. Until recently I have been able to avoid a lot of windows interaction but that time is coming close to an end. Does anyone have any major issues with CIFS, does it kill CPU and how reliable is it in general? Basically I'm looking for an overall feeling. The reason I ask is I'm unimpressed with the HTTP daemon built into the filer and I'm not confident in it's abilities to do other things besides NFS without personal experience with it. Jerry __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

RE: CIFS vs NFS performance.
by Sphar, Mike 30 Aug '05

30 Aug '05

I've been using NFS and CIFS on filers for years now and I've never noticed any significant problems with CIFS performance. Honestly, the main reason we went with netapps initially is we needed an appliance that could simultaneously serve files over NFS and CIFS with some support for cross-platform file-locking. One caveat is I personally would not recommend using Mixed Mode for security, personally, but that may be just me. -- Michael W. Sphar - IS&T - Lead Systems Administrator SMBU Engineering Support Services, BMC Software -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:27 PM To: list toasters Subject: CIFS vs NFS performance. Here's the story... Lately I've been getting a lot of requests for CIFS services on my filer. Until recently I have been able to avoid a lot of windows interaction but that time is coming close to an end. Does anyone have any major issues with CIFS, does it kill CPU and how reliable is it in general? Basically I'm looking for an overall feeling. The reason I ask is I'm unimpressed with the HTTP daemon built into the filer and I'm not confident in it's abilities to do other things besides NFS without personal experience with it. Jerry __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

RE: CIFS vs NFS performance.
by Callaway, Michael 30 Aug '05

30 Aug '05

In our shop, we are all windows and started with CIFS, so it's old hat to us. We picked up http for image grabs on a web based app about a year ago or so. As far as performance and usage, we have had little to no problems with cifs. The only "issue" I can think of is one time when we had a temp need for space, we dropped an oracle DB on cifs and a drive was failed during that period of time and cifs hiccupped for a few seconds, which oracle did not like. This was on an R200(sata) filer. I don't personally feel that cifs has a lot of overhead and performance issues that will slow down your environment, "just because it's cifs and it's scary". I could speak to more specific questions, if you have any. Thanks, Michael NTTA/IT http://www.ntta.org 214.461.2033 -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:27 PM To: list toasters Subject: CIFS vs NFS performance. Here's the story... Lately I've been getting a lot of requests for CIFS services on my filer. Until recently I have been able to avoid a lot of windows interaction but that time is coming close to an end. Does anyone have any major issues with CIFS, does it kill CPU and how reliable is it in general? Basically I'm looking for an overall feeling. The reason I ask is I'm unimpressed with the HTTP daemon built into the filer and I'm not confident in it's abilities to do other things besides NFS without personal experience with it. Jerry __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

Income Tax Lawyers. Special Package submitting Annual Returns (Karachi).
by Classified＠Karachi.com 30 Aug '05

30 Aug '05

Classified@Karachi --- Free Internet Classified - Get member today Income Tax Lawyers. Special Package submitting Annual Returns (Only for Karachi) We are Income Tax Lawyers for new Income Tax Payees. We Provide Free NTN We Charge Rs.1500 for filing of Annual Return. For Furthur Information Contact as following: Company Name: Abdul Ali & Co. Phone: 2760634 & 2751110 Timing: 11 AM to 6 PM. Contact us for placing Ads (For property, vacancies, automobiles or other promotionals). This email is covering database of 800,000 Pakistani email addresses, get the Ads sponsered at very cheap rates. call at 0321-2102628 / 0321-2102629 or email at sreza_pk(a)yahoo.com

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters