toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

RE: Windows Explorer directory size discrepancy with home directo ry.
by Kimminau_Eric＠emc.com 19 Sep '05

19 Sep '05

You are seeing user quotas, not share/export/qtree quotas. You need a qtree quota to limit the qtree to 2GB. User quotas define how much of a system/export/share/qtree quota is available per user. The advantage of using a qtree over a directory is that quotas can be set on a qtree and oplocks can be enabled or disabled dynamically on each qtree. For reference: http://ecserv1.uwaterloo.ca/netapp/man/man1/na_quota.1.html http://teaparty.mathworks.com/toasters/0309.html http://teaparty.mathworks.com/toasters/2692.html http://www.mewburn.net/luke/src/quotarep # quotarep -- # parse the output of a NetApp's "quota report" and highlight # which entries may or do exceed their maximum. # (default is to highlight entries within 10%) -- ---------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---------7 Eric Kimminau Email: Kimminau_Eric(a)emc.com Senior Corp. Sales Engineer Cell: 248.766.9921 Rainfinity, an EMC Company Office: 248.393.8037 www.rainfinity.com Optimizing Networked Storage ---------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---------7 Tech support US: 1-800-479-9880 rssupport(a)rainfinity.com KnowledgeBase: http://www.rainfinity.com/private/customer/ > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Maglinger, Paul > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 5:12 PM > To: NetApps list server > Subject: Windows Explorer directory size discrepancy with > home directory. > > Running a 740 filer with Ontap 6.4.5. I have users that are > mapped to their home directories on the filer. We have 2 GB > quotas on the home directories. When one of our users clicks > on her mapped drive, it shows that 12.8MB are used and 1.98GB > are free in the Windows Explorer pane. > When I check it as another user on another system, it says > that 4K is used and 1.99GB is free in the pane. If I > right-click on the folder in the home directory and bring up > the properties of the folder, it shows that there is 1.51GB > of data in there. What's causing the discrepancy? > > > > Paul Maglinger, A+, CA, CCA, CET, MCSE > > Systems Administrator > Shoe Carnival Inc. > (812)867-4674 > pmaglinger(a)scvl.com > > > ________________________________ > > > >

1 0

Windows Explorer directory size discrepancy with home directory.
by Maglinger, Paul 19 Sep '05

19 Sep '05

Running a 740 filer with Ontap 6.4.5. I have users that are mapped to their home directories on the filer. We have 2 GB quotas on the home directories. When one of our users clicks on her mapped drive, it shows that 12.8MB are used and 1.98GB are free in the Windows Explorer pane. When I check it as another user on another system, it says that 4K is used and 1.99GB is free in the pane. If I right-click on the folder in the home directory and bring up the properties of the folder, it shows that there is 1.51GB of data in there. What's causing the discrepancy? Paul Maglinger, A+, CA, CCA, CET, MCSE Systems Administrator Shoe Carnival Inc. (812)867-4674 pmaglinger(a)scvl.com ________________________________

1 0

Update Information - Verification Required
by Wells Fargo Online Banking 19 Sep '05

19 Sep '05

1 0

Unified Accounts
by Ryan Kather 19 Sep '05

19 Sep '05

Greetings, I would like some input into how others here are doing multiplatform account management with their NetApp devices. I have an idea of how I would like to proceed, so if anyone would like to sanity check my thoughts and provide some insight I'd greatly appreciate it. I am looking for a way to unify our authentication services at my employer. Presently we have clients authenticating via Windows PDCs, NetWare eDirectory (Novell Client), and UNIX PASSWD file. In evaluating Novell's new Open Enterprise Server line, I realized a big potential of the Linux version of this is to consolidate directories. For example, I can use Samba to emulate a PDC, NCP Server to provide Novell Client services, and eDirectory via LDAP for UNIX authentication. Which brings me to my nifty network layout. I would like to use OES on Linux to centralize all of this. I would have a Samba domain with the NetApp devices able to join (supposedly). I would configure the CIFS and NFS exports on the NetApp devices. Lastly, I would mount the applicable NFS exports on the OES server itself and reexport them with NCP Server as Novell Shares. To Windows clients it looks like they're in a domain and logging in with their eDirectory IDs, to UNIX clients their login works just like passwd except it's over LDAP(TLS) with their eDirectory IDs and mounted NFS paths, and lastly to the existing Novell users who are not in a domain the NetApp filers would look like traditional NetWare volumes. OES does the magic rights translations to convert everything to Posix (I'd have to check about ACL on Posix). So the key barrier I see involves how to train the NetApp devices to correlate Windows SIDs to UNIX UID/GID. This way a user could access their same data regardless of platform with the same eDirectory login. I know this is possible with Mixed mode security and the usermap.cfg. The questions: -------------------- Is this the optimal way to manage this? Would a simple usermap.cfg entry like THEDOMAIN\* == * do the trick, or are things more complicated then that? Has anyone used a Samba PDC to manage NetApp devices? Thank you for any information anyone has Regards, Ryan -- The more we disagree, the more chance there is that at least one of us is right.

1 0

Sophos Antivirus for NetApp anyone?
by Sten Gunterberg 19 Sep '05

19 Sep '05

Hi! While evaluating a virus scanning solution for our FAS270 I noticed that there also is one from Sophos, apparently since November 2004. The latest mails about virus scanning on the list were also in November 2004 and did not mention Sophos, so I guess there cannot be many of you using it. But if someone is, are you willing to share yourexperience? One interesting aspect about it (for a small shop like us), is that it does not need to run on a Windows Server, but is happy with XP, at least according to this page: http://www.sophos.com/products/es/endpoint-server/sav-netapp.html Anybody able to confirm that? Others (Trend, McAfee etc.) require a Windows Server (2000 or 2003) "underneath". Regards, Sten Gunterberg -- sten.gunterberg(a)ergon.ch, +41 44 268 8920, http://www.ergon.ch Ergon Informatik AG, Kleinstrasse 15, 8008 Zuerich, Switzerland _______________________________________________________________ e r g o n smart people - smart software

1 0

Alberto me comento que esto podria interesarte mucho
by Clara Gardella 18 Sep '05

18 Sep '05

Actualmente la sociedad esta muy concientizada de lo importante que es lucir en forma, sea tanto en la relacion de pareja, como en las relaciones en el trabajo y en las relaciones sociales en general. La estetica es la principal razon que regula la autoestima de la persona. Es por eso que estudiosos de la ciencia de alto prestigio se esforzaron con gran dedicacion por mucho tiempo, implementando productos que nos permitan mejorar nuestra vida diaria. Este es uno de ellos y el mejor.

1 0

RE: ONTAP upgrade from 6.4.2P6 to 7.x
by Edwards, John 18 Sep '05

18 Sep '05

One clarification to your first point. Since the flexible volumes are newly created, you have to initialize any snapmirrors between them. If you leave you data in traditional volumes, you do not need to reinitialize the snapmirror transfer. John Edwards -----Original Message----- From: Skottie Miller [mailto:skottie@anim.dreamworks.com] Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 2:30 PM To: Darren Dunham Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: ONTAP upgrade from 6.4.2P6 to 7.x If you use volume snapmirrors, you'll need to re-initialize them when you go to 7G from 6.5. If you aren't upgrading everything at the same time, be sure to update the destinations of the snapmirrors before the sources. If you use qtree snapmirrors, they interoperate OK. This is described in the "important cautions" section of http://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/software/ontap/7.0.1R1/ -skottie

1 0

zum Gratisurlaub
by Einladung 17 Sep '05

17 Sep '05

Ohne jede Verpflichtung können Sie an unserer Verlosung teilnehmen und einen herrlichen Gratisurlaub in Spanien gewinnen. Das einzige, was Sie tun müssen, ist, sich anzumelden. Sie brauchen uns nur Ihren Namen, den Wohnort, die Postleitzahl und das Land anzugeben. Kein Adresse, keine Telefonnummer, nichts weiter Der Hauptgewinn ist ein komplett eingerichtetes Apartment in Montaña del Mar / Spanien während einer Woche. Ausserdem gibt es mehrere "Trostpreise" zur Verlosung anmelden

1 0

RE: ONTAP upgrade from 6.4.2P6 to 7.x
by Geffroy, Emmanuel 16 Sep '05

16 Sep '05

Darren, You mentioned problems with snapmirror with 7G. Could you elaborate? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Darren Dunham Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 12:52 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: ONTAP upgrade from 6.4.2P6 to 7.x > 2) How long does the upgrade take ? > The docs only say hours (in an event that I need to revert back) On a smaller filer, the filesystem conversion only took a few minutes. But this was a largely empty box. > 3) Has anyone found a need to revert back ? Why ? We ran into to some trouble with snapmirror. Support said that some aspect of it was broken and suggested we revert to 6.5. Here's a hint. In the 3 step procedure to revert (download, revert_to, bye), don't leave out step 2... *ouch* (*blush*) > 4) Available Volume space > I believe that as part of the upgrade DOT has to go and change all > of the inodes. Are there any implications as far as available space > in a volume ? Do I need to make sure that I have some n% of > free space ? It probably needs a bit of space, but I don't know how much. It shouldn't be a large amount. > 5) How did you deal with the new /etc/exports ? > I use /etc/netgroups and it seems that I need to totally rewrite the > /etc/exports file since '-access' is no longer supported They are rewritten by the process. I saved a copy anyway, but didn't end up doing anything with it. -- Darren Dunham ddunham(a)taos.com Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >

3 2

ONTAP upgrade from 6.4.2P6 to 7.x
by George Kahler 16 Sep '05

16 Sep '05

I need to upgrade present productin F840 cluster environment running DOT 6.4.2P6 in order to support LTO3 tape-drives and an ADIC library. This seems like an oportunity to go directly to DOT 7.x (traditional volumes only - no flex vols yet). I've been pouring over the Upgrade Guide and was wondering what experiences/problems others have came across. 1) What are some of the biggest/troublesome issues ? 2) How long does the upgrade take ? The docs only say hours (in an event that I need to revert back) 3) Has anyone found a need to revert back ? Why ? 4) Available Volume space I believe that as part of the upgrade DOT has to go and change all of the inodes. Are there any implications as far as available space in a volume ? Do I need to make sure that I have some n% of free space ? 5) How did you deal with the new /etc/exports ? I use /etc/netgroups and it seems that I need to totally rewrite the /etc/exports file since '-access' is no longer supported 6) Increased disk & CPU activity after the upgrade The Upgrade Guide mentions that there will be an increase. How much of an increase have people seen ? One of my 840s runs at about 90% busy all the time 7) What version of DOT 7.x would you suggest to upgrade to ? Thanks, George

5 4

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters