toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13532 discussions

Issue with CIFS shares and .temp files
by Mark Saunders 03 Feb '17

03 Feb '17

Hi I am the administrator of a c mode filer for one of my companies customers and the customers are having some issues with CIFS shares. This issue is that they are getting .temp files left in all folders of the share regardless of the application used which they think are creating a mess and are manually removing. Is there anything that can be checked or changed on the storage end to change this behavior or is it more likely to be an issue somewhere else ? Regards Mark Data Centre Sysadmin Team Managed Services The Sysadmin Team promoting PCMS Values ~Integrity~Respect~Commitment~ ~Continuous Improvement~ The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, the use of this information or any disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The views expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be the views of the PCMS Group plc and should not be taken as authority to carry out any instruction contained. The PCMS Group reserves the right to monitor and examine the content of all e-mails. The PCMS Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1459419 whose registered office is at PCMS House, Torwood Close, Westwood Business Park, Coventry CV4 8HX, United Kingdom. VAT No: GB 705338743

1 0

super secret flags
by Peter D. Gray 03 Feb '17

03 Feb '17

Hi people Just out of idle curiosity, am I the only netapp admin who does not know about the super secret flags to allow snapmirror to actually work at reasonable speed? We were running 8.3.2 cluster mode, and spent weeks looking into why our snapmirrors to our remote site ran so slowly. We were often 2 days behind over 40G networks. Obviously, we focussed on network issues. And we wasted a lot of time. We could make no sense of the problem at all since sometimes it appears to work ok, the later the transfers slowed to a crawl. We eventually opened a case and it did not take to long for a reply which basically said "why don't you just disable the global snapmirror throttle." I had already looked into such a beast, but found nothing. As you may or may not know, it turns out to be a per node setting. The name of the flag is repl_throttle_enable. Of course, you can only see such flags or change them on the node, in privileged mode. Setting the flag to 0 immediately (and I do mean immediately) allowed our snapmirrors to run at the speed you might expect over 40G. Instead of taking 2 days, snapmirror updates now took 2 hours. We have since upgraded to 9.1. The flags reverted to on, but again can be set to off. I think there is a documented global snapmirror throttle option in 9.1, but I have not looked into that yet. Are we the only site in the world to have seen this issue? We use snapmirror DR for all our mirrors which may be a factor. As I said, just idle curiousity and maybe helping someone avoid the time wasting we had. Regards, pdg Peter Gray Ph (direct): +61 2 4221 3770 Information Management & Technology Services Ph (switch): +61 2 4221 3555 University of Wollongong Fax: +61 2 4229 1958 Wollongong NSW 2522 Email: pdg(a)uow.edu.au Australia URL: http://pdg.uow.edu.au

7 21

Dell SCv2020 supported disks type
by Camillo Gornati 03 Feb '17

03 Feb '17

Hi all, quick question regarding the DELL SCv2020. Does it support SATA disks ? or only SAS and NL SAS? Thanks in advance, C.

1 0

IBM nSeries autosupport not working over HTTPS
by Rhodes, Richard L. 01 Feb '17

01 Feb '17

We just had a disk failure on a nSeries box. No big deal. Usually when a problem come up, autosuport gets sent, and IBM nSeries support shoots us an email back within minutes to work on the problem. This time I had nothing from them for hours. So I ran a manual autosupport and opened a case. IBM responded almost immediately. He said they had my manually sent autosupport but said it was corrupt and unusable. Hmmmmmmm We use HTTPS for autosupport since SMTP failed due to attachments being too big for our email setup. He asked me to change to SMTP and run autosupport again, which I did, and he got it and it was good. Interesting, the attachments must have made it through. Now, the fun . . . He said they hadn't received a autosupport since 12/19/2016. It's a known problem within IBM and they haven't been able to fix. My impression is that anyone using HTTPS autosupport is affected. He thinks changing to HTTP will fix it if we don't want SMTP. I have to open another case to get more info. So, autosupports haven't been working for over a month, the problem is within IBM, and nothing was said!!!! Can I say that we are just a little upset? Rick ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

4 3

Ontap Select-a couple of questions
by Milazzo Giacomo 01 Feb '17

01 Feb '17

Hello everybody, I'm planning to setup a 9.1 Ontap Select single node for demo and tests. I've read that prerequisites are almost strict. They ask for at least 8 HDDs and 2 TB + 266 GB hd space on the internal VMFS datastore where to put the Select vmdk. For demo I don't have such a server, there's enough RAM and cores but just few hdds Raid 5 protected. Do you think I could set up Select with no issues or there's some soft/hard lock that avoid to do it if less than 8 hdds are found? The secondo question is this. Times ago I was reading somewhere that Select could be supported on a VSAN datastore too. Do you have some news about this? Regards,

1 0

System attention LED
by Alexander Griesser 01 Feb '17

01 Feb '17

Hi there, I have two filers (1x FAS2240 and 1x FAS2650) and both have the system attention LED lit and I have no idea why. `System health status show` as well as config advisor are both A-OK and there are no visible indicators why this LED is still lit. Any idea how to find out the root cause of this LED on the front bezel or how I can check or maybe reset the status of the LED through CLI? Thanks, Alexander Griesser Head of Systems Operations ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

6 22

X1144A - No link
by Alexander Griesser 30 Jan '17

30 Jan '17

Hi, I've just installed those fancy X1144A cards in one of our AFF300 systems and it seems they're getting recognized properly, but I'm not able to get a link on them. sysconfig says: slot 2: 40 Gigabit Ethernet Controller XL710 QSFP+ e2a MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c8 (auto-unknown-down) e2e MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c9 (auto-unknown-down) SAN01::> net port show -port e2* (network port show) Node: SAN01-01 Speed(Mbps) Health Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status --------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- -------- e2a Default - down 1500 auto/10 - e2e Default - down 1500 auto/10 - Node: SAN01-02 Speed(Mbps) Health Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status --------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- -------- e2a Default - down 1500 auto/10 - e2e Default - down 1500 auto/10 - 4 entries were displayed. For testing purposes, I did connect e2a on node1 to e2a on node 2 and I already tried exchanging the QSFPs and cables, but still no dice. Any idea what could be wrong here? According to HWU, the minimum required OS version is 9.1RC2, which is exactly what is installed currently: SAN01::> version NetApp Release 9.1RC2: Thu Nov 24 08:59:46 UTC 2016 Best, Alexander Griesser Head of Systems Operations ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

3 7

AW: X1144A - No link
by Alexander Griesser 27 Jan '17

27 Jan '17

Yes, already tried that. Here’s the –instance output of those ports: SAN01::*> net port show -port e2* -instance (network port show) Node: SAN01-01 Port: e2a Link: down MTU: 1500 Auto-Negotiation Administrative: true Auto-Negotiation Operational: true Duplex Mode Administrative: auto Duplex Mode Operational: half Speed Administrative: auto Speed Operational: 10 Flow Control Administrative: full Flow Control Operational: none MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c8 Up Administrative: true Autorevert Delay: - Port Type: physical Interface Group Parent Node: - Interface Group Parent Port: - Distribution Function: - Create Policy: - Parent VLAN Node: - Parent VLAN Port: - VLAN Tag: - Remote Device ID: - IPspace Name: Default DCB State: incapable Broadcast Domain: - MTU Administrative: 1500 Port Health Status: - Ignore Port Health Status: false Port Health Degraded Reasons: - […] Node: SAN01-02 Port: e2a Link: down MTU: 1500 Auto-Negotiation Administrative: true Auto-Negotiation Operational: true Duplex Mode Administrative: auto Duplex Mode Operational: half Speed Administrative: auto Speed Operational: 10 Flow Control Administrative: full Flow Control Operational: none MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:8f:a0 Up Administrative: true Autorevert Delay: - Port Type: physical Interface Group Parent Node: - Interface Group Parent Port: - Distribution Function: - Create Policy: - Parent VLAN Node: - Parent VLAN Port: - VLAN Tag: - Remote Device ID: - IPspace Name: Default DCB State: incapable Broadcast Domain: - MTU Administrative: 1500 Port Health Status: - Ignore Port Health Status: false Port Health Degraded Reasons: - Best, Alexander Griesser Head of Systems Operations ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601 Von: CPO [mailto:cavinoquin@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Januar 2017 14:18 An: Alexander Griesser <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com> Betreff: Re: X1144A - No link Did you try to status-admin-up the interface? On Jan 27, 2017 4:20 AM, "Alexander Griesser" <AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>> wrote: Hi, I’ve just installed those fancy X1144A cards in one of our AFF300 systems and it seems they’re getting recognized properly, but I’m not able to get a link on them. sysconfig says: slot 2: 40 Gigabit Ethernet Controller XL710 QSFP+ e2a MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c8 (auto-unknown-down) e2e MAC Address: 3c:fd:fe:a2:90:c9 (auto-unknown-down) SAN01::> net port show -port e2* (network port show) Node: SAN01-01 Speed(Mbps) Health Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status --------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- -------- e2a Default - down 1500 auto/10 - e2e Default - down 1500 auto/10 - Node: SAN01-02 Speed(Mbps) Health Port IPspace Broadcast Domain Link MTU Admin/Oper Status --------- ------------ ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- -------- e2a Default - down 1500 auto/10 - e2e Default - down 1500 auto/10 - 4 entries were displayed. For testing purposes, I did connect e2a on node1 to e2a on node 2 and I already tried exchanging the QSFPs and cables, but still no dice. Any idea what could be wrong here? According to HWU, the minimum required OS version is 9.1RC2, which is exactly what is installed currently: SAN01::> version NetApp Release 9.1RC2: Thu Nov 24 08:59:46 UTC 2016 Best, Alexander Griesser Head of Systems Operations ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601 _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:Toasters@teaparty.net> http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters

1 0

Dell compellent
by Camillo Gornati 27 Jan '17

27 Jan '17

Good morning all! Does the dell compellent scv2020 has any similarities with netapp storage? Thanks. Sent from my iPhone

3 2

MIgration from Isilon with XCP
by Jeffrey Mohler 26 Jan '17

26 Jan '17

Has anyone here used XCP for Isilon migration, any experiences you can share? Thanks! _________________________________Jeff MohlerTech Yahoo, Storage Architect, Principal

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters