toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13532 discussions

Volume Encryption Hardware
by Stephen Stocke 26 Jan '17

26 Jan '17

Hello I'm trying to find an official list of which hardware supports the new 9.1 Netapp Volume Encryption (NVE) feature. I've checked HWU and can't see anything that shows NVE compatibility. I've also tried IMT but I've never been able to get along with that tool. Specifically, I'm trying to find out if the FAS2500 series or new FAS2650 platforms support this feature. I've listened to TechOnTap podcast #59 in which the speakers discuss NVE but I'm now looking for the "official" documentation on hardware support. Any pointers to the right docs would be greatly appreciated! Kind regards Steve

6 6

cDOT 9.0: inodes not growing with respective volume growth
by Momonth 26 Jan '17

26 Jan '17

Hi All, I've noticed the following on cDOT 9.0 production cluster: na201::> df -h vol_imgstore03 Filesystem total used avail capacity Mounted on Vserver /vol/vol_imgstore03/ 90TB 60TB 29TB 67% /vol_imgstore03 na201svm-nfs10g-02 /vol/vol_imgstore03/.snapshot 0B 0B 0B 0% /vol_imgstore03/.snapshot na201svm-nfs10g-02 2 entries were displayed. na201::> vol show vol_imgstore03 -fields files vserver volume files ------------------ -------------- -------- na201svm-nfs10g-02 vol_imgstore03 59999998 So, volume's size is 90TB and its current max inodes possible is ~ 60M na201::> vol size vol_imgstore03 +10g -vserver na201svm-nfs10g-02 vol size: Volume "na201svm-nfs10g-02:vol_imgstore03" size set to 90.01t. Now, I just added 10G to the volume, expecting it's going to increase the "files" value respectively: na201::> vol show vol_imgstore03 -fields files vserver volume files ------------------ -------------- -------- na201svm-nfs10g-02 vol_imgstore03 59999998 However it's not the case. Anyone knows what I'm missing here? Cheers, Vladimir

1 1

VSERIES LUN MISSED CAUSES GENERAL PANIC AFTER TAKEOVER
by Milazzo Giacomo 25 Jan '17

25 Jan '17

Hi, o a V6000 with Ontap 8.2 7Mode a series of LUNs have been configured from an EMC CX4 system. It happened that randomly a couple of LUN fail on the same raid group of the CX4. The controller loose its aggregate that goes in degraded mode and a takeover start to the other node. The other node after takeover attempt to put this aggregate online but if fails because one of its lun is still missed. This panic all the systems and this should be avoided. There are other third party arrays virtualized that should continue to work. Is it possible to exclude from takeover actions only one aggregate (I think no), why the remaining node panic? regards

1 0

Re: Bug 1057844
by s.eno 25 Jan '17

25 Jan '17

Thanks guys! This one took us by surprise this weekend. > On Jan 24, 2017, at 7:14 PM, Krzesinski, John <John.Krzesinski(a)netapp.com> wrote: > > Upgrade to 8.3.2P9 - it has the fix. If you see the problem on 8.2.x upgrade to 8.2.4P6 (which also has the fix). > > -----Original Message----- > From: toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Scott Eno > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 4:08 PM > To: Toasters <toasters(a)teaparty.net> > Subject: Re: Bug 1057844 > > Sorry, we’re running 8.3.2P5 on all our storage systems. > > >> On Jan 24, 2017, at 7:01 PM, Scott Eno <s.eno(a)me.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Anyone running into this “Previous Versions” bug? I can’t see any snapshots taken since 1/1/2017 on a variety of CIFS shares. >> >> — >> Scott Eno >> s.eno(a)cooley.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Toasters mailing list >> Toasters(a)teaparty.net >> http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > > > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > Toasters(a)teaparty.net > http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters

1 0

Bug 1057844
by Scott Eno 25 Jan '17

25 Jan '17

Hi, Anyone running into this “Previous Versions” bug? I can’t see any snapshots taken since 1/1/2017 on a variety of CIFS shares. — Scott Eno s.eno(a)cooley.com

2 2

Job for Netapp admin
by Yuvaraja Shivaram 22 Jan '17

22 Jan '17

Hi team, Please let us know if you come across Netapp openings in any of the company Yuvaraja.kishan(a)gmail.com Regards Yuvaraja

6 6

Issue moving large snapmirror destination
by BERNTSEN Basil 19 Jan '17

19 Jan '17

Hi folks, I'm managing a 7-mode system (8.1) with a snapmirror destination of 35TB. I need to move it to a new aggregate on the same head. I really want avoid rebaselining from prod... I've tried a snapmirror cascaded off the normal destination, however it will likely take 4 days to complete using the internal loopback. While this is running, snapmirror scheduled updates to the normal destination volume don't run. I also tried a vol copy, but that seems to require you to keep a CLI session online for the whole transfer. Once it is copied with snapshots to the new aggregate, I'm going to change the source in the snapmirror.conf file. Does anyone have any ideas about how I could move this? Thanks! Basil ************************************************************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential, intended solely for the addressee(s), and may contain legally privileged information. Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. Please visit http://sgasdisclosure.com for important information regarding SG Americas Securities, LLC (“SGAS”). Please visit http://swapdisclosure.sgcib.com for important information regarding swap transactions with SOCIETE GENERALE. *************************************************************************

4 4

Snapvault including old Snapshots?
by Alexander Griesser 12 Jan '17

12 Jan '17

Hi, I'm not sure if this is possible with SnapVault, but I would need to snapvault an existing volume which does currently have old sv_daily Snapshots on it, here's the output of "snap list": %/used %/total date name ---------- ---------- ------------ -------- 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jan 09 10:00 hourly.0 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jan 09 06:00 hourly.1 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jan 09 00:00 nightly.0 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jan 08 22:00 hourly.2 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jan 08 18:00 hourly.3 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jan 08 00:00 nightly.1 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Jan 07 00:00 nightly.2 99% (99%) 55% (55%) Jun 17 17:00 sv_daily.0 99% ( 0%) 55% ( 0%) Jun 16 17:00 sv_daily.1 99% ( 0%) 55% ( 0%) Jun 15 17:00 sv_daily.2 In fact, I would only be interested in sv_daily.2. Any chance to do that with SnapVault or maybe SnapMirror or would I have to clone the snapshot on the source volume into a new volume and transfer the volume created out of sv_daily.2 then? Best, Alexander Griesser Head of Systems Operations ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

2 4

prototyping opportunity - NetApp with Service-Now
by Weihs, Yossi 11 Jan '17

11 Jan '17

Hello As you may know, our own NetApp IT uses Service-Now extensively to maintain its large number of FAS / ONTAP systems ( see the following marketing message at http://www.servicenow.com/customers/netapp.html ). One of the NetApp engineering teams is now working on a prototype integration with Service-Now which will automate the creation of support action tickets (such as replacing a failed power supply) - the goal being to automate more work by syncing up NetApp ASUP cases with the customers Service-Now system. No commitment to having a production product - we are exploring market demand. Please respond directly to my email if you are interested in helping us by participating in (1) providing feedback to the concepts, 30-60 minutes webex (2) have Service-Now and want to experiment with ticket automation (scope TBD ) Happy new year, Joseph "Yossi" Weihs Sr. Manager, Product Management Data Fabric and Manageability Group NetApp

1 0

re-purposing older NetApps?
by Patrick Giagnocavo 11 Jan '17

11 Jan '17

Curious, what happens with older NetApps - is there a way to re-purpose them that makes sense? I have been told that the DS14MK2-AT shelves can be used as JBOD disk shelves with regular non-Netapp-firmwared drives - is this true? If so, would it support the >2TB drives that are out these days? (I have access to a 6 or 7 shelf 3070 with 56x1TB drives and some 500GB's ; what scares me is not the size of the rack, but the size of the likely power bill! ) Cheers Patrick

3 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters