toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

Start a nNew thread

RE: Cluster bug
by admin＠berkcom.net 15 Jan '08

15 Jan '08

1 0

Cluster bug
by admin＠berkcom.net 15 Jan '08

15 Jan '08

2 1

Restricing Protocol Access
by Bill Holland 15 Jan '08

15 Jan '08

Is it possible to restrict NAS protocol access to specific interfaces? Something akin to: options iscsi.options.access if!=e0b This prevents iSCSI access on interface e0b. I would like to do something similar for CIFS and NFS.

1 0

Does Snapdrive require CIFS?
by Hadrian Baron 15 Jan '08

15 Jan '08

Hi Toasters, We have a filer we'd like to make full SAN only but weren't sure if Snapdrive would work after pulling off the CIFS license. I know there's been some talk about a limited CIFS license, and am pretty sure Snapdrive only uses CIFS to make the initial connection, but once the LUN is mapped you can bounce CIFS or Snapdrive and the LUN stays mapped... It just feels crazy to renew CIFS on a SAN only filer. Thanks for your input, Hadrian

2 1

convert from plain link to vif with minimal downtime?
by John Stoffel 10 Jan '08

10 Jan '08

Guys, I've got to convert some filers from single links to VIFs to my cisco switches. I know I can do this with some edit to the rc file and a reboot. Can I do it with the system up and with minimal disruption to NFS traffic? Or should I just look for some downtime and reboot? Basically, I've got a single link on e11a now. I'd like to vif e11a and e11d. So, from the console could I do: ifconfig e11a down vif create multi v1 -b ip e11a e11d ifconfig v1 <hostname> And be done with it? I assume I might have to make some changes on the Cisco side as well, but I'd like to minimize my outage if possible. Thanks, John John Stoffel - Senior Staff Systems Administrator - System LSI Group Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. - http://www.toshiba.com/taec john.stoffel(a)taec.toshiba.com - 508-486-1087

6 6

AS/400 data on NetApp storage?
by Kevin Parker 08 Jan '08

08 Jan '08

Toasters: Are any of you (or know of anyone) running AS/400 system with storage on NetApp? If so, how is the configuration? What is your experience? I haven't found much support for it both off NOW and searching publicly... Best regards, Kevin M. Parker [cid:315502814@08012008-341B]<http://www.nwnit.com/> [cid:315502814@08012008-3422] Storage Solutions Engineer l 919.830.5819 mobile l 919.653.4489 office l 860 Aviation Pkwy., Ste. 1000, Morrisville, NC 27560 ________________________________ Note: This message and any attachments is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, legally privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the original sender immediately by telephone or return email and destroy or delete this message along with any attachments immediately.

8 8

Incredible shrinking volume
by Stephen C. Losen 03 Jan '08

03 Jan '08

I have a fas270 with a volume named "san" containing one qtree and one LUN within the qtree. There is only one aggregate and it contains volumes "san" and "vol0" (root). The san volume is being synchronously snapmirrored to another fas270. Here are the sizes of everything: df -A Aggregate kbytes used avail capacity aggr0 1253187072 1200347772 52839300 96% aggr0/.snapshot 0 0 0 ---% df Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on /vol/vol0/ 16777216 349732 16427484 2% /vol/vol0/ /vol/vol0/.snapshot 4194304 64892 4129412 2% /vol/vol0/.snapshot /vol/san/ 1119669456 1048001824 71667632 94% /vol/san/ /vol/san/.snapshot 58929968 102176 58827792 0% /vol/san/.snapshot lun show /vol/san/vmail/lun0 900.1g (966503301120) (r/w, online, mapped) I got an autosupport email saying that the san volume had run out of space, and it was indeed 100% full. I grew the san volume a little bit and I also reduced the snap reserve to 5%. Now as I watch the "df" output the san volume continues to slowly consume space. As I understand it, the LUN is a fixed length file, so it cannot be growing. I can only conclude that WAFL metadata files in the volume must be growing, perhaps as a result of the LUN being populated with data, or the snapmirror, or both. I'm concerned that I'll run out of space again in the volume, at which point I am just about out of options for enlarging it. Does anyone know what's going on here? As I have written this email, the space available in "san" has gone from 71667632 down to 71245556 and it's been dropping slowly and steadily for hours. Does anyone know what's going on here? Will I hit bottom before running out of space again? Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

6 5

R200 aggregate reallocation
by Eino Tuominen 02 Jan '08

02 Jan '08

Hi, I had to add just 2 disk to an existing aggregate. I suspect those disks will end up being a performance bottleneck, so I tried to start reallocation of the aggregate: toaster> reallocate start -A aggr0 Unable to start reallocation scan on 'aggr0': Aggregate created on older version of ONTAP What's the best way to proceed? -- Eino Tuominen

4 4

Expand LUN for Exch data
by Kevin Parker 24 Dec '07

24 Dec '07

I'm off network so I can't research this, but want to ensure that I can expand a LUN for Exchange on the fly, no downtime. Plan to use SnapDrive 5.0. Volume is already large enough in capacity. Thanks!! Best regards, Kevin M. Parker Note: This message and any attachments is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, legally privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the original sender immediately by telephone or return email and destroy or delete this message along with any attachments immediately.

8 7

Weird sysstat output
by Christian Mikovits 21 Dec '07

21 Dec '07

a systat -s -u 1 gives me the following output: tigershark> sysstat -s -u 1 CPU Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk ops/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util 49% 2255 70895 2009 3306 20734 0 0 47 100% 78% : 22% 37% 2329 74366 2150 76 0 0 0 47 99% 0% - 12% 38% 2642 74641 2460 100 24 0 0 47 97% 0% - 3% 39% 2880 67314 3378 920 0 0 0 47 96% 0% - 13% 54% 3730 61661 3252 4645 8 0 0 47 95% 0% - 31% 48% 5236 70522 3813 541 24 0 0 47 97% 0% - 6% 47% 4534 73570 3512 350 0 0 0 47 98% 0% - 4% 48% 5146 75076 3949 381 0 0 0 47 97% 0% - 4% 48% 4896 73286 3505 465 24 0 0 47 98% 0% - 6% 44% 3996 74177 3050 254 8 0 0 47 99% 0% - 5% 51% 3580 66122 2863 9770 1391 0 0 47 100% 26% T 11% 57% 5194 69234 3855 4230 23416 0 0 47 99% 100% : 23% 44% 3128 73071 3734 905 1428 0 0 47 98% 17% : 10% 46% 4474 74810 3876 392 0 0 0 47 99% 0% - 4% 41% 3437 76071 2899 60 32 0 0 47 99% 0% - 2% -- Summary Statistics ( 15 samples 1 secs/sample) CPU Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk ops/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util Min 37% 2255 61661 2009 60 0 0 0 47 95% 0% * 2% Avg 46% 3830 71654 3220 1759 3139 0 0 47 98% 14% * 10% Max 57% 5236 76071 3949 9770 23416 0 0 47 100% 100% * 31% does anybody now why the net input is incredibly high compared to the written disk data? thx, christian

8 10

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters