toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13523 discussions

qtree show different files on different servers
by Linux Admin 18 Dec '07

18 Dec '07

server 1: 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/tree2 /test123 server 2: 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/tree2 /test123 ls -al show same set of files and dir 1. touch 1. Seen both on server 1 and server 2 2. CD in existing DIR "test" different set of files are seen from server 1 and 2. on server 1 touch aaa, not seen on server 2. on server 2 touch bbb, not seen on server1. behaviour I am speechless! What can this be?

1 0

Tracking Space Trends on NetApp Filers
by Daniel Keisling 17 Dec '07

17 Dec '07

Hello, Are there any utilities/scripts out there that will keep track of storage trends on NetApp volumes? I'm in need of something that will show how much volumes have increased in space utilization over time. My first guess was just simply do 'df' RSH commands and parse/store the data, but I'd like to know if there was anything more robust before I began. TIA, Daniel ______________________________________________________________________ This email transmission and any documents, files or previous email messages attached to it may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return email and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.

10 12

Oracle on Netapp
by Page, Jeremy 16 Dec '07

16 Dec '07

Looking for someone out there with some experience with pSeries + Oracle. Is SnapVault, SnapMirror, Snapshot used as common replication tools for Oracle in the General Public versus native Oracle Replication or Snapshots? Long ago we also looked at Native clustering / replication tools at the P-Series level. Just curious on how many companies use the SAN replication tools for Oracle. I'd appreciate any insight you might have and I'll try and do some research on this. From a storage admin side I was assuming it's as simple as creating a shell script that quiesces Oracle, takes a snapshot and then lets Oracle move on with it's life, am I missing something? -Jeremy This message (including any attachments) contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender immediately.

6 8

RE: Snapmirror initialization aborts consistently
by Mike Partyka 14 Dec '07

14 Dec '07

Yes, although it from the source logs you can see it doesn't hang in the "exact" same place it's always around 83G transferred. I reconfigured the VSM to a QSM this morning since it's really just qtree tree1 in the flexvol and it hung even sooner, at the 65G mark. I'm trying to get downtime to run wafl_iron at this point. I just don't know what else to do. -----Original Message----- From: Mailing Lists [mailto:mlists@uyema.net] Sent: Wed 11/7/2007 12:06 PM To: Mike Partyka Cc: NetApp Toasters List Subject: Re: Snapmirror initialization aborts consistently It isn't clear whether you tried initializing again where it left off. Does it abort without continuing past 83gb? On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:50 PM, "Mike Partyka" <mpartyka(a)acmn.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having a problem with Async SnapMirror where i have a 500G > flexvol on both source and destination. When i initialize it fails > at 83G consistently, I've destroyed the volume and rebuilt it > several times but the problem reoccurs each time. I've run the > source snapmirror logs relating to the failure through the syslog > translator and all it really says is that "this is a generic > snapmirror error on source", which just isn't very helpful. > > Here are the logs from the source: > Tue Nov 6 16:04:46 CST [pipeline_3:notice]: snapmirror: Network > communication error > Tue Nov 6 16:04:46 CST [snapmirror.src.err:error]: SnapMirror > source transfer from data to hci2:rcv_data : transfer failed. > Tue Nov 6 16:26:36 CST [pipeline_3:notice]: snapmirror: Network > communication error > Tue Nov 6 16:26:36 CST [snapmirror.src.err:error]: SnapMirror > source transfer from data to hci2:rcv_data : transfer failed. > > The source 3050a is running DOT 7.0.5 and the destination is running > DOT 7.0.6 > > The volume options are identical as far as i can tell based on the > "vol options -v data_vol" command. > > The filers sites are connected via a GbE MAN, so bandwidth isn't the > problem. > > I've checked for errors on the ethernet interfaces on both ends and > none of the bad counter are not incrementing. > > Has anyone on the list experienced something like this? Or have any > troubleshooting advice? > > Thx > > Mike Partyka >

3 4

Aggregate shows need check
by Bryano 14 Dec '07

14 Dec '07

Hi, We have recently upgraded to 7.2.3 and have created an aggregate containing 2 flex volumes however I have recently noticed that the status of the aggregate shows 'need check'. According to the manuals this means that i need to run a wafl consistency check ran on it (Wafl_check), can I do this while the filer is online and serving data or do i have to boot the filer in to maintenance mode?. If i was to delete the aggregate and start again would I take it that would negate the need to run the wafl_check? reason I ask is that the volumes only contain test data and this is more feasable than bringing the whole filer down for several hours (its an R200) Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Aggregate-shows-need-check-tf4942880.html#a14149910 Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

5 4

traditional SnapVault destination vol to flex vol convertion question
by Bob Doho 11 Dec '07

11 Dec '07

Hi guys, We need to convert traditional SnapVault destination volume (2TB) on a R200 to flex volume. We want to keep the snapvault snapshot to avoid doing another base transfer from source located in another data center. VSM is not possible. QSM will not copy the snapshots. We have heard that there is a procedure with snapmirror –s options that do the trick. Can someone help us with that procedure? Many thanks in advance. Thanks,

7 10

GbE card for F840
by Scott Lowe 10 Dec '07

10 Dec '07

8 11

Data Ontap "downgrade"
by Milazzo Giacomo 10 Dec '07

10 Dec '07

Hi All Maybe is a simple question for most of you but I've never done before and I want to be sure J I'm going to revert a 6030HA from 7.2.3 to 7.2.2 for Snapmirror (bidirectional) compliance to another 6030HA system already running 7.2.2 I've seen times ago a similar operation performed from a 7.2 to a 7.1 and I remember some special command to apply after the unzip/download phase of the preceding Data Ontap release. Is it so? I mean, there are special commands on cli or should I simply unzip the 7.2.2, living them the "download" command and a reboot as an "upgrade"? Or is there something other. My 6030HA is a NEW system, no volumes or other aggregate other that the aggr0/vol0 for the os Regards

5 7

Re: Data Ontap "downgrade"
by Davin Milun 10 Dec '07

10 Dec '07

But you don't need that to just go from 7.2.3 to 7.2.2. Simply download and reboot will do it. Davin. At 15:20, on Dec 10, 2007, "Nils Vogels" wrote: > > Hi Milazzo, > > The command you are looking for is revert_to, which downgrades WAFL. > > It's part of the upgrade guide, you should be able to find tons of info > there. > > Kind regards, > > Nils > > On Dec 10, 2007 2:39 PM, Milazzo Giacomo <G.Milazzo(a)sinergy.it> wrote: > > > Hi All > > > > > > > > Maybe is a simple question for most of you but I've never done before and > > I want to be sure J > > > > I'm going to revert a 6030HA from 7.2.3 to 7.2.2 for Snapmirror > > (bidirectional) compliance to another 6030HA system already running 7.2.2 > > > > > > > > I've seen times ago a similar operation performed from a 7.2 to a 7.1 and > > I remember some special command to apply after the unzip/download phase of > > the preceding Data Ontap release. > > > > > > > > Is it so? I mean, there are special commands on cli or should I simply > > unzip the 7.2.2, living them the "download" command and a reboot as an > > "upgrade"? Or is there something other. > > > > > > > > My 6030HA is a NEW system, no volumes or other aggregate other that the > > aggr0/vol0 for the os

1 0

httpd.access -- number of entries
by Willeke, Jochen 10 Dec '07

10 Dec '07

Hi Toaster, we currently have a problem with API access to the filers. We use options httpd.access and httpd.admin.access for enabling hosts for filer's API-control. We now use the API for several issues e.g. the save of our databases. Sadly we found out that there is a limit for these options as it is for trusted.hosts. You can only add a fixed number of entries to these options. I know that we are able to activate a whole subnet for accessing, but this is some how a security problem in my opinion. Has anyone a good idea how to deal with that situation?? Or has anybody knowledge if this restriction will be gone in future ontap releases?? Best regards and a nice weekend to the list Jochen

3 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters