toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

Re: Deleting files from snapshots
by Fox, Adam 26 Jun '08

26 Jun '08

There is no approved or unapproved way to do this. It's not possible. The closest thing you can do is to put a Datafort in front of the controller and encrypt everything. Then you can shred the keys that encrypted the files in question. It doesn't delete them per se but it makes them unreadable. -- Adam Fox ------------------------ Typed with my thumbs on a very small keyboard. ----- Original Message ----- From: Francois Joubert <francois.joubert(a)imagination.com> To: NetApp Toasters List <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent: Thu Jun 26 11:00:46 2008 Subject: Deleting files from snapshots Hi Is it possible to delete a limited set of files from all snapshots without having to delete every snapshot in which those files appear? If the official line is, "No", is there an unapproved way of doing this? Thanks Francois

1 0

SNMP netapp mib question
by Corey Hart 25 Jun '08

25 Jun '08

Hey Guys, So I have used toasterview in the past without any issues, but today I installed it at my new job and I have a question. When running an snmpwalk against the filer, and running the command uptime I see the filer uptime as DISMAN-EVENT-MIB::sysUpTimeInstance = Timeticks: (1664185295) 192 days, 14:44:12.95 But when toastview runs it pulls cpuUpTime for the system uptime shows as 9:23:36:01.60 So my question is what is the difference between cpuUpTime and sysUpTimeInstance ? Thanks, ...corey This message and any attachments (the "Message") may contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged information and are only for their intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you should notify the sender and delete the Message. E-mail transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This Message is provided for information purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or financial instruments, or to provide investment advice in any jurisdiction where the sender is not properly licensed or permitted to do so. This Message is subject to additional conditions and restrictions. Please read them here: http://legal.dimensional.com/email/

2 1

RE: Is there somewhere a list with description/explanation of the /etc/ files?
by Mikkelsen Soren 24 Jun '08

24 Jun '08

Dear Regmi, it's for my own understanding, as well as for those NetApp customer's being die-hard *NIX oriented and desire to understand what's configured in which config file and how. Stephen C. Losen answered by pointing me in the direction of Chapter 5 of the man pages. Kind regards, Soren Soren Mikkelsen Senior System Engineer vcare Infosystems AG Täfernhof Mellingerstrasse 207 CH-5405 Baden-Dättwil Switzerland Tel: +41 56 483 41 00 Direct: +41 56 483 41 17 Mobile: +41 79 798 98 77 Fax: +41 56 483 40 90 E-mail: Soren.Mikkelsen(a)vcare-it.com Web: http://www.vcare-it.com -----Original Message----- From: Uddhav Regmi [mailto:uddhav.regmi@worldnet.att.net] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 8:53 PM To: Mikkelsen Soren; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Is there somewhere a list with description/explanation of the /etc/ files? why is this for ? what is the reason you wanted to know all the definitions inside /etc/*.* ?? Can you provide us some valid reason -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of slemmesmi Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 2:29 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Is there somewhere a list with description/explanation of the /etc/ files? Would like a list with a description/explanation of the /etc/ files - do you know if there is a such? What I'm looking for is something that would e.g. explain something like: *** /etc/rc - The /etc/rc file contains commands that the storage system executes at boot time to configure the system. Commands in the /etc/rc file configure the storage system to: - Communicate on your network - Use the NIS and DNS services - Save the core dump that might exist if the storage system panicked before it was booted *** I can of course begin to dig out the information from NOW, sysadmin guide etc., but would safe a LOT of time if such a list already exist. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-somewhere-a-list-with-description-explanation -of-the--etc--files--tp18075293p18075293.html Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

Is there somewhere a list with description/explanation of the /etc/ files?
by slemmesmi 24 Jun '08

24 Jun '08

Would like a list with a description/explanation of the /etc/ files - do you know if there is a such? What I'm looking for is something that would e.g. explain something like: *** /etc/rc - The /etc/rc file contains commands that the storage system executes at boot time to configure the system. Commands in the /etc/rc file configure the storage system to: - Communicate on your network - Use the NIS and DNS services - Save the core dump that might exist if the storage system panicked before it was booted *** I can of course begin to dig out the information from NOW, sysadmin guide etc., but would safe a LOT of time if such a list already exist. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-somewhere-a-list-with-description-explanatio… Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 2

Is there a way to destroy a plex with out killing the aggr on it?
by Page, Jeremy 23 Jun '08

23 Jun '08

I have enough free space, but when I built my aggregate I didn't have the raid size set properly, so now I have one plex with only 4 disks. Not a good thing when using DP. Is there a way I can blow this away and add those disks to other raid groups with out loosing all my data? Jeremy M. Page________________ Systems Architect Gilbarco Veeder-Root, a Danaher Company 7300 West Friendly Avenue Greensboro, NC 22087 * email:Jeremy.Page@gilbarco.com - * phone: 336.547.5399 - 6 fax: 336.547.5163 - * cell: 336.601.7274 This message (including any attachments) contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender immediately.

3 2

Qtree UGO permissions
by Robert K. Borowicz 20 Jun '08

20 Jun '08

When I create a qtree on my 7.2.4 filer the default permissions are 777. Is there an option to modify this default behavior? Thanks -Robert

1 1

Quota panic in 7.2.5
by JONES P.S. 20 Jun '08

20 Jun '08

We've just moved to Ontap 7.2.5 to solve a panic problem with our previous 7.2.2 release. However we've immediately been hit with another panic which appears related to quota initialisation. The bug number/title says :- 300385 / Quota doesn't seems to be prealloc while handling multiuser members But we have less than 1000 entries in our user quota file for this volume, although it is mixed mode and draws from a user population of around 25,000 across AD and NIS. Currently we are running without quotas; not good for an extended period because we have downstream repercussions related to snapvault replicas which are designed to be 'near limit'. Just a warning for anyone with similar user numbers to be aware of. ... Paul Paul Jones, B.Sc, M.Sc, Ph.D. - Head of Systems Services, Information Technology Service, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE Email: p.s.jones(a)durham.ac.uk, Phone/Fax: 0191 334 2749/2701

10 10

Flaw with SATA disks - not suitable for deduplication environment
by Chong, Jenson 13 Jun '08

13 Jun '08

Hi, Anybody have insights on this article? Does our ONTAP "Lost Write Protection" address this issue? Regards, Jenson A bit of a flaw with SATA disk drives June 03, 2008 By Jerome Wendt Network World Asia High-capacity serial ATA (SATA) disk drives are now a mainstay in many storage systems and make it feasible for almost any company to obtain a storage system with terabytes of capacity at a reasonable cost. Yet these systems reveal a specific, known deficiency of SATA disk drives that demand companies exercise caution as to what environments they deploy these systems into. A minor flaw with SATA disk drives that high capacity storage systems expose is their bit error rate. Bit errors occur infrequently - about once for every 100 trillion bits. However RAID technology, which is normally used by storage systems to protect against data loss, does not detect if a specific bit on a SATA drive becomes unreadable. While this is normally not a problem on smaller systems, as storage systems add more capacity, the issue becomes more acute. On systems with more than 10TB of capacity the probability of a specific bit of data becoming unreadable is a distinct possibility. On systems with over 100TB, it becomes almost a certainty. So the question becomes: Does losing access to one bit of data really matter? Often, it doesn't unless one stores deduplicated data on these systems which is now the fastest growing trend in data storage. When data is deduplicated, the storage system's need to read every bit of data becomes paramount. The inability to access even a bit of data can result in multiple files becoming unreadable since they all may depend on a specific bit of data to complete their reconstruction. High capacity SATA-based storage systems are the answer to many companies' archiving and backup problems. But SATA bits can bite and using SATA drives to store large amounts of deduplicated data is not always the match made in heaven that vendors make them out to be. Jerome Wendt is the president and lead analyst at DCIG Inc. You may read his blogs at www.dciginc.com <http://www.dciginc.com/> .

5 5

CIFS trace
by Steffen Kammerer 13 Jun '08

13 Jun '08

Hi all, i have enabled #options cifs.trace_login on #options cifs.trace_dc_connection on I have a share called BI on the filer which I try to mount with correct or wrong password and get always this message: Fri Jun 13 16:02:24 CEST [XXXXXXXX: auth.trace.authenticateUser.loginAccepted:info]: AUTH: Login by NULL user from 10.10.46.2 accepted. If I look at other shares like home shares I get a lot more log files: XXXXXXX> 16:19:50 CEST [xxxxxxx: auth.trace.mapNTToUnix:info]: AUTH: Mapping Windows user dewmew$ to Unix user pcuser. XXXXXXX> 16:19:50 CEST [xxxxxxx: auth.trace.authenticateUser.loginAccepted:info]: AUTH: Login by dewmew$ from 10.10.38.102 accepted. XXXXXXX> 16:19:50 CEST [xxxxxxx: auth.trace.authenticateUser.loginTraceIP:info]: AUTH: Login attempt by user dewmew$ of domain BRAINLAB f XXXXXXX> machine 10.10.38.102 (DEWMEW). xxxxxxx> 16:19:50 CEST [xxxxxxx: auth.trace.spnegoAuthentication.statusMsg:info]: AUTH: SPNEGO- Attempting to map PC user to UNIX user de Whats wrong with my BI share?? What means NULL user? Kind Regards, Steffen

2 1

RE: Another 7.2.5 quota bug
by Christopher Mende 12 Jun '08

12 Jun '08

You should be able to use the revert_to command in order to get to 7.2.3, but should check w/ support first. Christopher Mende Sr Solutions Architect Peak UpTime +1 913 523 4263 -----Original Message----- From: Conner, Neil <neil(a)mbari.org> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:31 To: Pascal Dukers <pascal.dukers(a)asml.com>; Toasters <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Subject: Re: Another 7.2.5 quota bug I downgraded to 7.2.4 last night and that solved the problem. It was a real show stopper for me because the only way to quiet the errors was to turn quotas off. On 6/11/08 11:20 PM, "Pascal Dukers" <pascal.dukers(a)asml.com> wrote: > > > > Conner, Neil wrote: >> >> Since upgrading from 7.2.3 to 7.2.5 on a pair of clustered 3020s, the >> consoles has been overrun with the following errors: >> >> [toaster: quota.softlimit.normal:notice]: Soft file limit returned to >> normal for tree 92 on volume vol0 >> >> The syslog buffers are getting overrun, messages are getting dropped, and >> the syslog is ready to fill the root volume. >> >> We don¹t set file quotas at all. Tried stopping and restarting quotas and >> disabling SNMP all to no avail. Support has no fix for this so they >> recommended I downrev to 7.2.4. I can¹t revert back to 7.2.3 because >> something changed in WAFL. >> >> Anyone else seen this? >> >> > > > I have hit exactly the same bug on multiple filers and also don't use (soft) > file limits. Hopefully support comes with a workaround in 7.2.5 and/or a > patch soon.

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters