toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

3 participants
13514 discussions

FAS200 iSCSI performance
by Amateur-FASadmin 16 Jul '08

16 Jul '08

Dear group What switch equipment should I use between my FAS and two ESX servers ? I'm having slight performance problems on my ERP system. FAS200 with two shelves and iSCSI 1gbit. Regards Jesper Harder ----- -I have a high Google IQ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FAS200-iSCSI-performance-tp18480142p18480142.html Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

3 4

cifs and umask?!?
by Willeke, Jochen 16 Jul '08

16 Jul '08

Hello toasters, we have several volumes with unix-sec style where there is a cifs share on that volume/qtree as well. For this reason we use the usermap.cfg and it works quite well so far. The only question i have is, when i create a new file on a volume/qtree with unix sec-style using the cifs share and a windows user the unix-permission is always 777. Is there something like "umask" which can be set on the filer to get another permission style?? I found a related bug in now but there is no solution :/ http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=29551 Regards Jochen -- WINCOR NIXDORF International GmbH Sitz der Gesellschaft: Paderborn Registergericht Paderborn HRB 3507 Gesch�ftsf�hrer: Eckard Heidloff (Vorsitzender), Stefan Auerbach, Dr. J�rgen Wunram Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Karl-Heinz Stiller Steuernummer: 339/5884/0020 - Ust-ID Nr.: DE812927716 - WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE44477193 Diese E-Mail enth�lt vertrauliche Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrt�mlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese E-Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser E-Mail ist nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.

6 9

Windows Services for Unix NFS Client
by John Legato 15 Jul '08

15 Jul '08

Has anyone had any luck mounting a filer using Window's Services for UNIX NFS Client? I've tried mounting it with mount \\filer\vol\volume and run into a problem with mount not supporting multi directory paths. I get an error message stating "The network path can not be found" with the above mount. I tried accessing it in Windows explorer but it doesn't show up there. I know it can see the filer because I ran into trouble with it using non reserved ports and saw the message in the logs, I've since fixed that issue. Is there a work around for the multi directory path limitation? Thanks John -- Contractor

2 3

Recall: Windows Services for Unix NFS Client
by Langdon, Laughlin T. (Lock) 15 Jul '08

15 Jul '08

Langdon, Laughlin T. (Lock) would like to recall the message, "Windows Services for Unix NFS Client".

1 0

Re: volume deswizzling
by Steve Rieger 15 Jul '08

15 Jul '08

I believe that you can set the wafl priority per volume ------Original Message------ From: Kappe, Michael Sender: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent: Jul 15, 2008 01:19 Subject: volume deswizzling Hello toasters, i have several volume deswizzling processes runing. This is ok, why i copy the volume with snapmirror from one aggr to another. This volume deswizzling processes now running for more than a month. Now the question: When i stop the deswizzling with "wafl scan abort", can i restart them one by one to finish them a bit faster? What is the command? Doing a reboot will restart deswizzling for all volumes. This is not an option ;-) Regards Michael Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

1 0

7.2.5.1 is out
by Hadrian Baron 15 Jul '08

15 Jul '08

Anyone running it yet? Or is everyone scared since they yanked 7.2.5 :) "Data ONTAP(r) 7.2.5 Please be aware that we are investigating a couple of issues with quotas in Data ONTAP 7.2.5. As a precautionary measure, we have removed Data ONTAP 7.2.5 from the NOW site as we investigate the issues. We will provide an update as soon as more information is available." - Hadrian

3 4

I: Snapmanager Oracle for Windows schedule, how to?
by Milazzo Giacomo 14 Jul '08

14 Jul '08

Nobody knows about SMO? J I can't believe it... Da: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] Per conto di Milazzo Giacomo Inviato: mercoledì 9 luglio 2008 10.04 A: NetApp Toasters List Oggetto: Snapmanager Oracle for Windows schedule, how to? Hi all Few days ago I had a chance to install (first time) a Snapmanager for Oracle 2.2 on a Windows 2K3 hosting Oracle 9.2 db instances. No great issues understanting repository and profile concepts or creating backup jobs both full or partial. The issues arrived when, also using the wizard I expected myself to have some items to create a procedure to be scheduled using the Windows scheduler, exactly as done lot of times with SMSQL or SME. I looked for docs or best practice to create some job and to schedule it with no luck. Also reading at command line options it seems quite complex to create and prepare some command rows and to put them in some batch to include in the scheduler. Another strange thing is that once created a backup job with its label you cannot reuse it and it has to be recreated from the beginning. Is there something like that also in SMO? Where is it? Or, alternatively, where I can find docs that can give me some sample to schedule/repeat and so on the job created with SMO? Thanks a lot

2 1

CIFS virus scan
by Neis, Mark 14 Jul '08

14 Jul '08

Hi guys, We have been using the Symantec scan engine for NetApp for several years now, but we've met more and more problems as of late. As the next license upgrade will be due in a couple of months, that might be a good opportunity to replace it by a different brand altogether. Hence my question to the list: Which antivirus product do you use and how satisfied are you with it? Kind regards, Mark Neis -- Mark Neis System Administrator GISA GmbH Chemnitztalstr. 13 D-09114 Chemnitz Tel. +49.(0)371.482.6737 Fax +49.(0)345.585.100.6737 GISA GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Michael Krüger; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Halle (Saale); Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stendal; Handelsregister-Nr. HRB 208414; UST-IdNr: DE 158253683 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Empfänger sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail oder des Inhalts dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. Diese Kommunikation per E-Mail ist nicht gegen den Zugriff durch Dritte geschützt. Die GISA GmbH haftet ausdrücklich nicht für den Inhalt und die Vollständigkeit von E-Mails und den gegebenenfalls daraus entsehenden Schaden. Sollte trotz der bestehenden Viren-Schutzprogramme durch diese E-Mail ein Virus in Ihr System gelangen, so haftet die GISA GmbH - soweit gesetzlich zulässig - nicht für die hieraus entstehenden Schäden.

8 9

multistore/vfiler and aggregate performance
by Roscoe P Coltraine 11 Jul '08

11 Jul '08

hi, i have a customer who will be using multistore/vfilers of random workloads all over nfs. my view for an overall performance perspective is two controllers and multiple raid groups per aggregate evenly spread. ie, if i had 5 FCAL shelves i could create 2 aggregates comprised of 2 16 disk raid groups spread across both controllers and all shelves however their budget can at max allow 4 shelves which would leave one aggregate with 2 raid groups, the other with one and more spares since i would not want to add a half sized raidgroup. the idea being that the vfilers would be split evenly across aggregates to better spread ops load across the drives but realistically will that gain better performance versus a single aggregate with 3 raidgroups spread across both controllers and all drives?

2 1

Re: CIFS virus scan
by Neis, Mark 11 Jul '08

11 Jul '08

Andreas, > What are your problems? There are some tweaks you need to do then > it should be running of. We've been running it for years. We got two Win2003 servers as AV servers for each NetApp cluster we have. The trouble is not with the filers, but with Symantec. Not too rarely, an unsuccessfull virus update has left a scan engine in a dysfunctional state. As it can still be reached from the filer, it still gets its share of scan requests, which it promptly anwers with a 0x05 error. Moreover we've had some installation problems lately with newer versions of the Symantec scanners (We use standard HP servers, so actually there should be no problem at all). Besides, Symantec's support has grown so bad during the last two or three years, they are absolutely no help at all. Because our license period is about to end, we were thinking about replacing the Symantec scanners by a different brand, that's why I wanted to hear about the experience others have made with the alternatives there are. Kind regards, Mark Neis -- Mark Neis System Administrator GISA GmbH Chemnitztalstr. 13 09114 Chemnitz Tel. +49.(0)371.482.6737 Fax +49.(0)345.585.100.6737 GISA GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Michael Krüger; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Halle (Saale); Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stendal; Handelsregister-Nr. HRB 208414; UST-IdNr: DE 158253683 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Empfänger sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail oder des Inhalts dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. Diese Kommunikation per E-Mail ist nicht gegen den Zugriff durch Dritte geschützt. Die GISA GmbH haftet ausdrücklich nicht für den Inhalt und die Vollständigkeit von E-Mails und den gegebenenfalls daraus entsehenden Schaden. Sollte trotz der bestehenden Viren-Schutzprogramme durch diese E-Mail ein Virus in Ihr System gelangen, so haftet die GISA GmbH - soweit gesetzlich zulässig - nicht für die hieraus entstehenden Schäden.

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters