toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

Re-exporting your /etc/exports - how do I get a change in order of shares to take effect?
by Page, Jeremy 05 May '09

05 May '09

I have several NFS mount points that also have child directories also exported and I've been told that you should export the parent directories first, then the children. I've updated my /etc/exports file and ran exportfs -r on the filer but it does not look like it's taking effect if I do an exportfs to see what's currently exported. How do I get the exports in the correct order? Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or re-transmit this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone (call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance. In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment to this email.

3 3

DPM and A-SIS
by Halton, Robert 01 May '09

01 May '09

Is anyone using de-dupe on a volume that does Microsoft Data Protection Manager? If so is it worth it? Thanks This message is intended only for the person(s) to which it is addressed and may contain privileged, confidential and/or insider information. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this message and any attachment(s) by anyone other than the named recipient(s) is strictly prohibited.

1 0

Re: Warning for people doing a head upgrade from a 3050 to a 3170
by Romeo Theriault 01 May '09

01 May '09

> > I dont think the issue here, is that netapp doesnt document where to > download the PROPER version of ONTAP. Agreed. I think my biggest issue is that I misinterpreted the documentation. In the docs when it say's : Go to the NOW site at http://now.netapp.com/NOW/main/software.shtml and > download the version of Data ONTAP for your existing system that matches the > version installed on the FAS31xx system. > I interpreted this as meaning download the version for your existing system (3050 in my case) that matches the version installed on the FAS3170, which I assumed meant the version number (7.2.6.1) in my case. But..ya think you're reading "upgrade version" a little too...narrowly? Yes, I guess I was. How can Netapp prevent this chain of errors? I would say by doing what you and I have both suggested. Amending the documentation to unambiguously state what they really want to happen. -- Romeo Theriault System Administrator Information Technology Services

2 1

Re: Warning for people doing a head upgrade from a 3050 to a 3170
by Romeo Theriault 30 Apr '09

30 Apr '09

I stated in the original message: The documentation states that you need to bring the 3050 heads up-to the > same software level as the 3170 heads. If you read the rest of the doc it says this: *If your FAS3020 or FAS3050 system has... * *Then...* The same version of Data ONTAP as the FAS31xx system Go to Step 3. A version of Data ONTAP different from the one on the FAS31xx system Go to Step 2. Step 3 is to continue with the install, Step 2 is to upgrade the *version*of OnTap to the level of the FAS3170. To me version says software level, not different binaries for the different arch. Besides, step 3 is to continue with the install. Under what case would you have a 3170 build of OnTap on your filers before you start an upgrade? All of this tilted towards making me believe that they were concerned with the software version on the heads. If this is not the case it needs to be made clear. Romeo On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Kevin M. Parker <kevin(a)theparkerz.com>wrote: > Top of the document…. > > > > - Data ONTAP® 7.2.5.1 or later software or the FAS3020 or FAS3050 > system. During the upgrade, you need to download and install on the FAS3020 > or FAS3050 system the same version of Data ONTAP that is on the FAS31xx > system. > > Did I miss something, or has it been changed already? Seems like it’s good > to go. > > > > Best regards, > > > > -/- > > Kevin Parker > > 919.521.8413 > > http://theparkerz.com > > Blackle.com <http://www.blackle.com/> - Saving energy one search at a > time. > > > > *From:* owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > *On Behalf Of *Romeo Theriault > *Sent:* Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:56 AM > *To:* Miller, Michael CTR USTRANSCOM J2; toasters(a)mathworks.com > *Subject:* Re: Warning for people doing a head upgrade from a 3050 to a > 3170 > > > > Thanks for the note. It's good to know that you didn't have any kernel > panics or such. I'll have to take a look at the OnTap download matrix. But > if anyone at Netapp is listening this, the doc that could really could use > the updating to say something about this is: > > > http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/hardware/NetApp/cs_migration/FAS3x… > > This doc is called "Upgrading from a FAS3020 or FAS3050 System in an > Active/Active Configuration to a FAS31xx System in an Active/Active > Configuration" so you would think that is would say something about this > wouldn't you? > > Romeo > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Miller, Michael CTR USTRANSCOM J2 < > michael.miller.ctr(a)ustranscom.mil> wrote: > > I had a similar problem when I upgraded a 960 to a 3040. I didn’t see the > info in the OnTap download matrix that showed the heads required a different > build version. It was there, just not obvious. Never had any problems other > than lots of the mapfile log entries. Once I loaded the correct version (q > or e versus m, I also have a 3020) all was well. > > > > Mike Miller > Site Lead > General Dynamics Information Technology > Michael.Miller.ctr(a)ustranscom.mil > Michael.Miller(a)gdit.com > > > > *From:* owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > *On Behalf Of *Romeo Theriault > *Sent:* Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:43 AM > *To:* toasters(a)mathworks.com > *Subject:* Warning for people doing a head upgrade from a 3050 to a 3170 > > > > Here is a warning for people that might be doing a head upgrade from a 3050 > to a 3170 (and possibly other heads). The documentation states that you need > to bring the 3050 heads up-to the same software level as the 3170 heads. > This may very well be the case but they fail to mention that the 3170 uses a > different build of OnTap and that you need to upgrade OnTap on the 3170's > immediately after the upgrade with the build for the 3170's. > > So right now we are running 3170's with a build of OnTap 7.2.6.1 built for > the 3050's and getting these errors in syslog: > > na1-u-e0a [na1-u: mgr.stack.openFail:warning]: Unable to open function > name/address mapping file /etc/boot/mapfile_7.2.6.1.2O: No such file or > directory > > Netapp Supports response is: "Upgrade or you'll probably get Kernel > Panics." and "We'll try to update the documentation." Needless to say I'm > not impressed. > > -- > Romeo Theriault > System Administrator > Information Technology Services > > > > > -- > Romeo Theriault > System Administrator > Information Technology Services > -- Romeo Theriault System Administrator Information Technology Services

1 0

Warning for people doing a head upgrade from a 3050 to a 3170
by Romeo Theriault 30 Apr '09

30 Apr '09

Here is a warning for people that might be doing a head upgrade from a 3050 to a 3170 (and possibly other heads). The documentation states that you need to bring the 3050 heads up-to the same software level as the 3170 heads. This may very well be the case but they fail to mention that the 3170 uses a different build of OnTap and that you need to upgrade OnTap on the 3170's immediately after the upgrade with the build for the 3170's. So right now we are running 3170's with a build of OnTap 7.2.6.1 built for the 3050's and getting these errors in syslog: na1-u-e0a [na1-u: mgr.stack.openFail:warning]: Unable to open function name/address mapping file /etc/boot/mapfile_7.2.6.1.2O: No such file or directory Netapp Supports response is: "Upgrade or you'll probably get Kernel Panics." and "We'll try to update the documentation." Needless to say I'm not impressed. -- Romeo Theriault System Administrator Information Technology Services

4 6

Encryption of data at rest
by Paul Letta 28 Apr '09

28 Apr '09

Hi Everyone, I am looking for suggestions for encryption of data at rest on a NetApp. We use both NFS and CIFS, but no iSCSI. The clients are Linux, Windows, and Mac. Suggestions ? Experiences ? Thanks, Paul

3 2

Protection Manager
by steve klise 27 Apr '09

27 Apr '09

I have an issue with protection manager 3.7. I have a primary filer (6030 ontap 7.24) that I have backups running to another filer (3070 7.3P5D1). I have manually created the resource volumes on the 3070, and DPM creates the qtree snapmirrror relationship with no issues between filers. The backup happens at 8pm (default policy), and everything is hunky dory. Over time, the GUI has an overall status of normal, then goes to lag warning, then lag error. The snapmirror status is current, and I have removed all the alerts per kb (https://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb42558), but still stays with a status of error. What is strange is if I do a manual backup, it goes from error to normal. All the jobs that run at 8pm are completed, and succeded. This is not in prod yet, but would save the backup guys about 26 hours on the weekend, so they are interested it getting this resolved. I dont want to upgrade the filers to 7.3.1. I am waiting for 7.3.2 to come out, and most likely will not go live on DPM until 3.8 comes out. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Protection-Manager-tp23262914p23262914.html Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

Snapvault option ignore_atime
by Page, Jeremy 27 Apr '09

27 Apr '09

If you are NOT using OSSV clients does this option matter (or any of them actually)? Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or re-transmit this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone (call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance. In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment to this email.

1 0

FYI, online netapp classes available
by Nicholas Bernstein 20 Apr '09

20 Apr '09

Hi all, Sorry for the spam, but I thought it might be useful for some folks - Instructor lead online netapp courses are available now. Fundamentals, NCDA Bootcamp, Performance Analysis, etc, pretty much all the standard netapp courses. This is actually a pretty nice way to take a class, typically some of the classes like performance analysis are only taught by a few instructors (myself, two others) outside of netapp, so it's hard to get a physical class for some of the more advanced stuff. Anyone who's interested can either book through http://www.netapp.com/us/services/university/learning.html or http://www.fastlaneus.com/courses/netapp/NetApp (authorized parter) or email info(a)fastlaneus.com -Nick Ps: this was a one time email, I'm not in sales, sorry to anyone who considers this spam.

1 0

Size of installations ?
by James Beal 20 Apr '09

20 Apr '09

I was wondering how much storage people are putting behind their storage heads ? I can see that a 3170 nominally goes up to 840TB or 420 per head but do people actually put that much storage on a single unit ? I can see that the V series supports SVC, how common is this configuration ? We need to be aiming for about a half Petabyte per rack, I can see how I could do this with a DDN S2A9900 behind an SVC, I would be interested to hear peoples opinion.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters