toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

Re: SQL luns
by Jody Martin 23 Jun '09

23 Jun '09

Thanks guys! Found an article in the knowledgebase as well ( https://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb36108) On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Klise, Steve <klises(a)pamf.org> wrote: > If you are using snapdrive, the luns are properly aligned. > > > > You can read this TR about lun alignment. > > > > http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3747.pdf > > > > > > *From:* owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > *On Behalf Of *Jody Martin > *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 8:12 AM > *To:* toasters(a)mathworks.com > *Subject:* SQL luns > > > > Hey all, > > Anyone have the Netapp document on block alignment for SQL 2005? > > jody >

1 0

Errors every second in my audit log after starting to monitor with Catcti/SDK
by Page, Jeremy 22 Jun '09

22 Jun '09

We've recently started using Cacti and the Ontap SDK to monitor our filer's performance but something is not working properly, I see the following line 2-3 times a second in the Audit Log: Mon Jun 22 12:25:51 EDT [array02: HTTPPool04:debug]: root:AUTH:error:Login failed for user root from IP 10.1.17.8. reason "User not authenticated" Currently it's configured to use the root account, once we figure out what's wrong we'll create a service acount before moving the monitoring to production. Any suggestions on what's going wrong? Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or re-transmit this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone (call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance. In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment to this email.

1 0

SQL luns
by Jody Martin 22 Jun '09

22 Jun '09

Hey all, Anyone have the Netapp document on block alignment for SQL 2005? jody

1 0

Re: Unable to open function name/address mapping file
by LOhit 10 Jun '09

10 Jun '09

Thanks Olaf, I appreciate all the help. I think the information provided by you will help others as well. However, my only question is, why this message started appearing on my console all of a sudden? even though the filer was upgraded to its current version of ONTAP almost an year ago. Regards, -LOhit On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Leimann, Olaf <olaf(a)netapp.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been spying in the group, and thought you could use a bit of expertise > here (feel free to forward the info back into toasters, though). > > It's not specifically a missing file - this happens when the wrong ONTAP > Archive was used for the type of Head you have. > > This mistake is often made when you swap the head for a newer model, or get > a P-release and only get a list of archive files with no description of the > head linked to which archive. When you get a full release (select your > Filer from the download page, then the ONTAP version), the download table > will show you properly which archives belong to which series. > > There are three types of partially compatible processors in use: a) > intel, b) amd, c) multi-core AMD > You can run the lesser on the more recent, since the processors are > compatible, but will get that error. > > For example, FAS3020 and FAS3050 use the _e archive (ELF, AMD), while > FAS3040, FAS3070 and > the FAS3100 and FAS6000 series use the _q archive (AMD multi-core), > the _i archive (Intel) is only for old Filers (FAS900 series, F800 series), > the _a archive (older versions, Alpha F700 series), and > The _m archive for FAS250/FAS270 (MIPS processor). > > The latter two will never run on other processors, of course. > > Fix: > Just get the right .exe archive into /etc/software (create the directory if > you don't already have it), > then run "software install <archive_name>", "download" and "reboot" to get > the kernel on the > CF Card refreshed as well and boot into the right one. > In a cluster you do the stuff until the reboot on both heads, then do a > takeover and giveback in > both directions (this is essential for SAN environments). If your clsuter > is CIFS only, then two > reboots under "cf disable" causes less interruptions, though. > Since you keep the same ONTAP version (just a different processor kernel), > you should have a > quick reboot (no ESH/AT-FCX updates). > > Kind regards, > -- > Olaf Leimann > Escalation Engineer, EMEA Technical Support Center > Toll Free Technical Support (EMEA): 00800-44-638277 > My working hours are: 10:30h to 19:00h CET > > Get answers NOW! - NetApp On the Web: http://now.netapp.com > Want to speed up case resolution? > Download the new Remote Support Diagnostics Tool. > Learn how at: http://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/rsa/ > > Everyone at NetApp is committed to the highest level of customer > satisfaction. > If at any time you feel that you are less than very satisfied with our > support, > please contact my manager Tola Soyode (tolas(a)netapp.com) at > +31-6-46375165. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* LOhit [mailto:lohit.b@gmail.com] > *Sent:* maandag 8 juni 2009 20:20 > *To:* Learmonth, Peter > *Cc:* toasters(a)mathworks.com > *Subject:* Re: Unable to open function name/address mapping file > > Thanks all for the replies, however, I had checked my oldest (2 weeks old) > snapshot before posting here, I couldn't see that directory in the snapshot > either. > The filer is due for an upgrade in about 2 weeks time, just want to know > whether this(missing file/directory) will affect the normal functioning of > the system, so far nobody complained. > I am the only one who manages the filers here and I have not made any > changes except for setting "nfs.mountd.trace" to "on" for a brief period > last week. > > The system seems to be working fine and the commands ndmpd,ndmpcopy are > available, though I don't use them currently. > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Learmonth, Peter < > Peter.Learmonth(a)netapp.com> wrote: > >> Hi LOhit >> Sounds like the filer was zeroed and set up without extracting all the >> supporting files, or booted from a new kernel that doesn't match the ONTAP >> files installed, or somebody deleted some stuff under /etc. You can check >> /etc/.snapshot to see if/when /etc/boot last existed. You need to refer to >> the upgrade docs and do a "software install" or use NFS or CIFS to extract >> the appropriate setup.exe / tarball. >> >> You may also notice certain commands are missing, like ndmpd, ndmcopy and >> a handful of others (do ? from the command line and see if those commands >> are there). >> >> Make sure the version of ONTAP you extract matches the current running >> version. Do a version and version -b and make sure they all match. >> >> Share and enjoy! >> >> Peter >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* LOhit [mailto:lohit.b@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Monday, June 08, 2009 10:07 AM >> *To:* toasters(a)mathworks.com >> *Subject:* Unable to open function name/address mapping file >> >> Hello All, >> >> I have been getting this warning message on the console since past 4 days. >> Have you seen this before by any chance? >> >> I am running 7.2.3 on a 3020 and no changes were made in the recent past, >> this message starting appearing all of a sudden. BTW, there is no directory >> called "boot" in "/etc". >> >> *Thu Jun 4 23:50:00 GMT [mgr.stack.openFail:warning]: Unable to open >> function name/address mapping file /etc/boot/mapfile_7.2.3.L: No such file >> or directory* >> >> -- >> LOhit >> > > > > -- > LOhit > -- LOhit

2 1

Unable to open function name/address mapping file
by LOhit 08 Jun '09

08 Jun '09

Hello All, I have been getting this warning message on the console since past 4 days. Have you seen this before by any chance? I am running 7.2.3 on a 3020 and no changes were made in the recent past, this message starting appearing all of a sudden. BTW, there is no directory called "boot" in "/etc". *Thu Jun 4 23:50:00 GMT [mgr.stack.openFail:warning]: Unable to open function name/address mapping file /etc/boot/mapfile_7.2.3.L: No such file or directory* -- LOhit

2 2

RE: HSM/ILM for Netapp
by Babar Haq 08 Jun '09

08 Jun '09

> > The F5 ARX (Acopia) does support managing NetApp Snapshots. What the customers means from snapshot support is that once a file moves to other storage it also clears the blocks which are being held by previous snapshots for that specific file. Is that what Acopia does? Appreciate your response. Regards, Babar Haq -- Be Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free Account at www.mail.com

3 2

RE: HSM/ILM for Netapp
by Funke, Stefan 08 Jun '09

08 Jun '09

Excuse me. Maybe that has changed since the last time I worked with a ARX box. -----Original Message----- From: Kirby Wadsworth [mailto:kirbyw@F5.com] Sent: 08 June 2009 09:53 To: Funke, Stefan; Babar Haq; Bob Blair; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: HSM/ILM for Netapp Patently incorrect, Stefan. ARX coordinates snapshots from multiple vendors including NTAP and creates a virtual snapshot across different arrays - a function that no other technology can provide. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Funke, Stefan Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 3:42 AM To: Babar Haq; Bob Blair; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: HSM/ILM for Netapp In a typical setup you will configure the ARX to ignore .snapshot directories. F5 doesn't know anything about NetApp snapshots nor does it manage any NetApp functionality like snapshots. Stefan Funke Systems Engineer NetApp Deutschland GmbH -----Original Message----- From: Babar Haq [mailto:babarhaq@email.com] Sent: 07 June 2009 07:52 To: Bob Blair; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: HSM/ILM for Netapp > > The F5 ARX (Acopia) does support managing NetApp Snapshots. What the customers means from snapshot support is that once a file moves to other storage it also clears the blocks which are being held by previous snapshots for that specific file. Is that what Acopia does? Appreciate your response. Regards, Babar Haq -- Be Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free Account at www.mail.com

1 0

Re: Use VTL shelfs with netapp head
by Mike 06 Jun '09

06 Jun '09

!!!!!!!! *Contact NetApp* before you do this!!! The VTL disks are handled a materially different way than regular ONTAP disks, and you could have serious problems: http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=278652 --- On Thu, 6/4/09, Joel.Cooper(a)lvvwd.com <Joel.Cooper(a)lvvwd.com> wrote: > From: Joel.Cooper(a)lvvwd.com <Joel.Cooper(a)lvvwd.com> > Subject: Use VTL shelfs with netapp head > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Date: Thursday, June 4, 2009, 6:31 PM > > Hello, we are retiring our VTL 600 head > and would like add the disk shelfs to our existing Netapp > 3140. > > > > Does anyone know if this is possible or has > maybe done something similar? > > > > > > Thanks > > > >

1 0

Other OPS?
by Page, Jeremy 05 Jun '09

05 Jun '09

What causes other ops? I understand that pretty much everything that hits the filer requires something but I am seeing what looks like a very high number of other ops when I do a stats show. Does this indicate a problem or is it just a busy box? It's a mixed mode volume. Just trying to figure out what's causing it to work so hard. Instance total_ops read_ops write_ops other_ops nfs_read_ops nfs_write_op nfs_other_op cifs_read_op cifs_write_o cifs_other_o /s /s /s /s /s /s /s /s /s /s shares 1633 984 139 509 0 1 34 984 137 473 shares 2085 1173 257 654 0 2 18 1173 255 634 shares 2593 1483 253 856 0 2 221 1483 251 634 shares 3268 2306 170 791 0 1 222 2305 168 569 Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or re-transmit this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone (call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance. In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment to this email.

1 0

Convert F825 to FAS940
by ifstat 05 Jun '09

05 Jun '09

Hi I have a F825, just lazying about, being absolutaley useless to me. I was wondering is there a way to reset it's bios or something along that line, so that it thinks it is a FAS940, the reason for this is my testing system is a FAS940 and i have data ontap 7.3.1 on it. The F825 only goes upto 7.2.x so i can't do snapmirror from test site "A" to test site "B". It has to be A to B because of A i have DS14MK4 and on site "B" I have DSFC9 storage. I know that this is not a supported or even midly recommended by Netapp but i just want to test the operations manager data protection, etc. Anyone done this or has any ideas, i'm keen to try. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Convert-F825-to-FAS940-tp23885543p23885543.html Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters