toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13515 discussions

Start a nNew thread

unsubscribe
by Hunter 27 Aug '11

27 Aug '11

10 15

Misunderstanding Teaparty.Net: Click, read, learn.
by Jeff Mohler 27 Aug '11

27 Aug '11

Steve: Wanna know whats worse than that? Having -no idea- what teaparty.net is, because you haven't even clicked on it. Im not sure who that's more embarrassing to..you, us, the alpha-nerd hoster...Dynergy? Certainly not Netapp. ======================================================= Filer Content: Do YOU know what your CPRead-To-Write ratios are today? If its higher than .5:1...ask why. It's overhead you didnt pay for. :) On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Pazder, Steve B <Steve.B.Pazder(a)dynegy.com>wrote: > The Tea Party has some small value but I definitely don't want to give > those shrill, hypocritical MFs any traffic on their .net so they can use the > numbers to skew more facts. NetApp, I know you keep an eye on this forum. > Take note, because if you are associated with the "Me" Party (or any > political party!), you will lose customers The tea-baggers are just > especially offensive. > > > ________________________________________ > From: toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net [toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net] On > Behalf Of Acord, Steve [SAcord(a)pamida.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 5:51 AM > Cc: <Toasters(a)teaparty.net> > Subject: unsubscribe > > Sent from my smartphone > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Klise, Steve" <klises(a)sutterhealth.org> > To: "Jeff Mohler" <speedtoys.racing(a)gmail.com>, "David Minor" < > minord(a)swbell.net> > Cc: "Hunter" <hwylie(a)stpaultel.com>, "<Toasters(a)teaparty.net>" < > Toasters(a)teaparty.net> > Subject: unsubscribe > Date: Sat, Aug 27, 2011 12:57 am > > > > Maybe he went to EMC.. I like this new list.. Lots of traffic and great > info and I appreciate the teaparty.net taking this on as everyone else has > relayed. Keep the party going. > > > Regards > > Steve Klise > > Storage Engineer, NCDA > > __________________________ > > PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION > > SUTTER HEALTH INFORMATION SERVICES > > PENINSULA COASTAL REGION > > > > Office: 408-523-3163 · Fax: 408-328-1406 > > e-mail: klises(a)sutterhealth.org<mailto:abouelj@sutterhealth.org> > > > > > > > > WARNING: "All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received or > otherwise recorded by the Palo Alto Medical Foundation e-mail system and is > subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to, someone > other than the recipient." > > > ________________________________ > From: toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net [toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net] On > Behalf Of Jeff Mohler [speedtoys.racing(a)gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 9:33 PM > To: David Minor > Cc: Hunter; <Toasters(a)teaparty.net> > Subject: Re: unsubscribe > > David Minor <minord(a)swbell.net<mailto:minord@swbell.net>>, someday after > you graduate high school, a future employer will google ya up, and discover > how much fail you have with following directions. > > Maybe you saw this: http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > > > Click it. > > > And it may be difficult to see, but at the bottom it reads: > To unsubscribe from Toasters, get a password reminder, or change your > subscription options enter your subscription email address: > > Enter your forever glorified (and google'd with full name) Email address > into that box, and you'll be..well, gone. > > > Good luck with 12th grade, girls can be mean, but dont give up. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:35 PM, David Minor <minord(a)swbell.net<mailto: > minord(a)swbell.net>> wrote: > Please unsubscribe be from this bullshit as well!! I've been trying to > get off this crap for 3 years now. Fuckin unsubscribe me motha fuckas!!!!! > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 26, 2011, at 8:42 PM, "Hunter" <hwylie(a)stpaultel.com<mailto: > hwylie(a)stpaultel.com>> wrote: > > > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > Toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:Toasters@teaparty.net> > http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > Toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:Toasters@teaparty.net> > http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > > > > > -- > --- > Gustatus Similis Pullus > > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > Toasters(a)teaparty.net > http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > Toasters(a)teaparty.net > http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > -- --- Gustatus Similis Pullus

1 0

Recover deleted snapshot
by Carl Howell 26 Aug '11

26 Aug '11

Does anyone know if it's possible to recover a deleted snapshot? Thanks, Carl Howell Systems Engineer University of West Florida

3 3

Sources of unaligned IO other that Vmware? - pw.over_limit persists
by Fletcher Cocquyt 26 Aug '11

26 Aug '11

I originally tried posting this back on April 11 - now that the list is "fixed" I want to try again - thanks: Hi, we¹ve aligned all our Vmware vmdk¹s according to the Netapp best practices while tracking the pw.over_limit counter see: http://www.vmadmin.info/2010/07/quantifying-vmdk-misalignment.html Counters that indicate improper alignment ( ref: ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/isv/NS3593-0.pdf) ³There are various ways of determining if you do not have proper alignment. Using perfstat counters, under the wafl_susp section, ³wp.partial_writes³, ³pw.over_limit³, and ³pw.async_read,³ are indicators of improper alignment. The ³wp.partial write³ is the block counter of unaligned I/O. If more than a small number of partial writes happen, then IBM® System StorageTM N series with WAFL® (write anywhere file layout) will launch a background read. These are counted in ³pw.async_read³; ³pw.over_limit³ is the block counter of the writes waiting on disk reads.² -- So the pw.over_limit counter is still recording an 5 minute average of 14 with 7-10 peaks in the 50-100 range at certain times of the day. If I look at the clients talking to the Netapp those times its mostly Oracle RAC servers with storage for data and voting disks on NFS. This leads me to the question: What if any are the other possible sources for unaligned IO on Netapp? All references I find are vmware vmdk but are there others like Oracle which may be doing block IO over NFS? Many thanks -- Fletcher Cocquyt Principal Engineer Information Resources and Technology (IRT) Stanford University School of Medicine http://vmadmin.info

4 4

out of order/random delivery
by Kyle Oliver 26 Aug '11

26 Aug '11

Anyone else get messages from this mailing-list out of order? I find that I often see replies to a message and then get the original message hours later. The timestamps on the messages are correct, but they get to my inbox in a strange order? For the record, it happened when the list was hosted at Mathworks as well. I guess it just seems more pronounced here with the recent volume of messages. -Kyle

2 1

Anyone see this copy problem before...
by tmac 26 Aug '11

26 Aug '11

while doing a cp, I see the following: cp: skipping file `/a/b/c/d/e/file', as it was replaced while being copied. The file has a date of Sep 11, 2010, the ctime is May 19th, 13:53. The atime should not matter. (which is today). Some notes about the path: /a is an automount base /b is the actual automount /c/d/e is the rest of the path RHEL5.6 autofs: 5.0.1-0.rc2.143.el5_6.2 kernel: 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 nfs-utils: 1.0.9-50.el5 --tmac

3 3

Mixed San question
by Alon Zeltser 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

Hello toasters I'm trying to implement fas2040 in a new mixed fabric environment I have few IBM blade centers each contain 2 cisco mds 9100 switch All the blade centers mds switches connected to brocade 300 switch The brocade is configured with interopmod 3 The brocade is the principal switch with domain ID 100 while the other mds are connected with E-port downstream with domain ID from 90 to 110 without 100 I have two issue 1. I cannot create aliases / zones in the brocade the button is grated out and say this is disable in mcdata open fabric interopabilty Mode I can live with this issue and configure everything with cisco tools But even then alias or zones are not shown on the brocade even tough they work 2. The real issue is when I configure one blade server on each cage (one port on each mds ) everything is work fine but the minute I try to add a second blade server on the same switch the first blade disconnect from it's group and in "fcp show initiator" I can no longer see the first server wwn until I disconnect the second server Any ideas ? Sent from my iPhone

2 1

snapmirroring Exchange
by Jon Hill 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

Is it possible for a snapmirror update command (one not mediated by SnapDrive) to temporarily halt I/O on the source disk? More to the point, is it possible for a snapmirror update command to harm the source server if that server is an active Exchange 2003 box? We do own SnapDrive for Exchange, but installing it is not an option at this time. This snapmirror solution is being suggested as an emergency solution to replicate our Exchange database for the next few days, while our operations team tries to figure out why DoubleTake has failed for four days in a row. They understand that without SnapDrive's VSS goodness there is a good chance of data loss on the target end, but they'd like to give this a shot on the theory that it's better than nothing. But it's only better than nothing if it doesn't interfere with the production (source) server, hence my inquiry. If there is any chance of an I/O suspension that could take the production server offline, then obviously this is a nonstarter. Many thanks. This e-mail, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message, without written authorization from Jennison Associates LLC ("Jennison"). This e-mail may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. If you have requested Jennison to e-mail any account information to you or your designee, you are deemed to have consented to electronic delivery of information from Jennison. E-mail messages are not secure and may contain computer viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be intercepted, deleted or interfered with without the knowledge of the sender or the intended recipient.

5 4

two aix hosts, one works (rwx) one does not (ro)
by Chaim Rieger 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

two aix (same level) hosts, both can mount /vol/drv33 however the host go2l30s3 can not touch the mounted vol (ie no wx permissions) (even explicitly added the ip of this host to exports) the host iocuso01 can do rwx storage is gonfs01.domain.com (155.13.224.102) exports is /vol/drv33 -sec=sys,rw,root=iocuso01.domain.com:go2uso01.domain.com:155.13.20.54:go2l30p8.domain.com networking for both hosts is as follows go2l30s3:/> ifconfig -a en4: flags=1e080863,80<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,GROUPRT,64BIT,CHECKSUM_OFFLOAD(ACTIVE),CHAIN> inet 155.13.20.54 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 155.13.20.255 tcp_sendspace 262144 tcp_recvspace 262144 rfc1323 1 en5: flags=1e080863,80<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,GROUPRT,64BIT,CHECKSUM_OFFLOAD(ACTIVE),CHAIN> inet 155.13.17.41 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 155.13.17.255 tcp_sendspace 262144 tcp_recvspace 262144 rfc1323 1 lo0: flags=e08084b<UP,BROADCAST,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,GROUPRT,64BIT> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 127.255.255.255 inet6 ::1/0 tcp_sendspace 131072 tcp_recvspace 131072 rfc1323 1 go2l30s3:/> iocuso01:/> ifconfig -a en5: flags=5e080863,c0<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,GROUPRT,64BIT,CHECKSUM_OFFLOAD(ACTIVE),PSEG,LARGESEND,CHAIN> inet 163.236.88.185 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 163.236.88.191 tcp_sendspace 131072 tcp_recvspace 65536 rfc1323 0 lo0: flags=e08084b,c0<UP,BROADCAST,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,GROUPRT,64BIT,LARGESEND,CHAIN> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 127.255.255.255 inet6 ::1%1/0 tcp_sendspace 131072 tcp_recvspace 131072 rfc1323 1 iocuso01:/>

3 2

Test
by Marcus Reuter 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

1-2-3 test -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters