toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

Web site
by Nguyen, Alan 02 Feb '00

02 Feb '00

Our "Software download" site has been fixed. The cause is unknown at this point. We will troubleshoot to prevent future problems. Alan. -----Original Message----- From: Dave Atkin [mailto:dla1@york.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 5:18 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Web site Well I'm pleased that Netapp have improved their website. The only slight downside is that attempting go into "software download" produces the message Content-type: text/html Software error: Can't tie /www/external/now-legacy.netapp.com//data//now.db//company2agreement.db: No such file or directory at /usr/local/lib/perl5.004_04/netapp/WebAdmin/NowToolFuncs.pm line 1019.<BR> Please send mail to this site's webmaster for help. I guess I'll have to wait a while for 5.3.4R3 ! Dave Atkin ------------------------------------------------------ Dave Atkin, Head of Technical Services Computing Service, University of York, YORK YO10 5DD Phone: +44-1904-433804 (ddi) Fax: +44-1904-433740 Email: D.Atkin(a)york.ac.uk ------------------------------------------------------

1 0

RE: Web site
by Bailey, Jourdan 02 Feb '00

02 Feb '00

I will alert our internal helpdesk, I have also noticed this problem. Jourdan Bailey Technical Support Engineer Telephone: 1-408-822-4792 Hotline: 1-888-4-NETAPP Get answers NOW! - NetAPP On the Web - http://now.netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Atkin [mailto:dla1@york.ac.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 5:18 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Web site > > > Well I'm pleased that Netapp have improved their website. The > only slight > downside is that attempting go into "software download" produces the > message > > Content-type: text/html > Software error: > Can't tie > /www/external/now-legacy.netapp.com//data//now.db//company2agr > eement.db: > No such file or directory at > /usr/local/lib/perl5.004_04/netapp/WebAdmin/NowToolFuncs.pm > line 1019.<BR> > Please send mail to this site's webmaster for help. > > I guess I'll have to wait a while for 5.3.4R3 ! > > Dave Atkin > ------------------------------------------------------ > Dave Atkin, Head of Technical Services > Computing Service, University of York, YORK YO10 5DD > Phone: +44-1904-433804 (ddi) Fax: +44-1904-433740 > Email: D.Atkin(a)york.ac.uk > ------------------------------------------------------ > >

1 0

RE: FTP uploads from the UK (fwd)
by Sam Schorr 02 Feb '00

02 Feb '00

Hip, Hip, Hooray!!!!! -----Original Message----- From: Nguyen, Alan [mailto:alan.nguyen@netapp.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 8:59 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: FTP uploads from the UK (fwd) After about a month and a half of testing with customers like yourself, Network Appliance has a new FTP site. The new FTP site will be available for all of our customer's use beginning tomorrow (2/2/2000) at 6PM PST. The transition from the current FTP site to the new will be transparent and the FTP site will not have any downtime. Please read below for more details regarding architecture. Again, thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please reply to me at anguyen(a)netapp.com <mailto:anguyen@netapp.com> Alan. Mgr., IT Server Ops Network Appliance -----Original Message----- From: Nguyen, Alan Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 10:49 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: FW: FTP uploads from the UK (fwd) To All, First, I must apologize for NetApp's poor FTP site performance. The responsibility for this in my group. The situation is our internet connection is highly-utilized and thus your access to our FTP site is affected by this. Actions have been taken to increase internet bandwidth in the next few weeks. However, despite this, it will be superseded by our new FTP implementation. We have designed a new FTP site to improve security, system management, increase internet bandwidth/presence (i.e. ISP hosted site), and system redundancy. Because our current infrastructure is very out-dated, we have taken the "big-bang" approach rather than making incremental improvements. In a little more detail, our new FTP site is at a web-hosted site with 100MB bandwidth capacity vs current T1, and is configured with two fail-over dual-processor Unix systems with cluster fail-over (F760) Filer pair for storage. In short, the new site is very robust and will scale to meet to our customers' needs. What has been done thus far? Contract has been signed with new web-hosting site. Networking infrastructure is in place. Programming is complete for account and directory management. The new systems are racked at the new web-hosted site. As I type this, we are plugging in the cables for the new systems. What's the schedule? In the next two days, we will perform internal/external FTP tests. On Monday (Dec 6th), we will start live tests with customers assuming everything goes well this week. After which, the new site will go live. I will announce to this list when we are live. If you have any questions, please direct them to me anguyen(a)netapp.com <mailto:anguyen@netapp.com> or reply to this list as I will be joining this list soon. Again, thank you for your patience. Alan Nguyen Network Appliance Mgr., IT Server Operations

1 0

console cable pinout
by Ronan Mullally 02 Feb '00

02 Feb '00

After almost two years without a toaster I've finally come out of the wilderness and am once again the proud "owner" (ok, admin) of a nice shiny new toaster. Pity they're not as shiny as they used to be in the Good Ol' Days :( I'm trying to connect this beastie to a console server. Specifically a Linux box with a Cyclades Ze multiport serial card. The Cyclades presents its ports using an expansion box with RJ45 female ports. I haven't been able to get this to talk to the toaster's console port :( I've tried various combinations of straight-through and null-modem adaptors with standard ethernet and roll-over drop cables with no joy. Can anybody point me in the direction of the pinouts I need in a RJ45 - DB-9 adaptor that will work with a roll-over drop cable? For reference, I've got the Cyclades ports talking to cisco kit (3600s) using a roll-over cable. I've also got them talking to Foundry switches using the same roll-over cable with an adaptor using the pinout below. RJ45 DB-9 Signal Pinout Pinout Signal TxD 3 --------------------- 2 RxD RxD 6 --------------------- 3 TxD Gnd 4 --------------------- 5 Gnd RTS 1 ----+ +----- 7 RTS CTS 5 ----+ +----- 8 CTS DTR 2 ----+ +----- 4 DTR DCD 7 ----| |----- 1 DCD DSR 8 ----+ +----- 6 DSR -Ronan

2 2

Web site
by Dave Atkin 02 Feb '00

02 Feb '00

Well I'm pleased that Netapp have improved their website. The only slight downside is that attempting go into "software download" produces the message Content-type: text/html Software error: Can't tie /www/external/now-legacy.netapp.com//data//now.db//company2agreement.db: No such file or directory at /usr/local/lib/perl5.004_04/netapp/WebAdmin/NowToolFuncs.pm line 1019.<BR> Please send mail to this site's webmaster for help. I guess I'll have to wait a while for 5.3.4R3 ! Dave Atkin ------------------------------------------------------ Dave Atkin, Head of Technical Services Computing Service, University of York, YORK YO10 5DD Phone: +44-1904-433804 (ddi) Fax: +44-1904-433740 Email: D.Atkin(a)york.ac.uk ------------------------------------------------------

1 0

RE: Toasters in Compaq Racks and Unicode Files
by Dani Tal 01 Feb '00

01 Feb '00

It looks like Hebrew has a bug. When you try to create a folder, the initial name is "new folder", then when I try to rename it to something in Hebrew , I get a message: \\filer\home_dir <\\filer\\home_dir> does not exist , do you want to create it ? If I answer yes I get " can not create or replace xxx. Can not create a file when that file already exists . So for me it is only English file name on the filer. Dani Tal Manager Information Systems Siemens Data Communication ltd. Tel. +972-4-9953200 X 0403 FAX. +972-4-9888097 Mobile +972-53797814 -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Sterling Woodcock [SMTP:sirbruce@ix.netcom.com] Sent: Mon, 31 January, 2000 16:41 To: Andrew-M.Webster(a)db.com; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Toasters in Compaq Racks and Unicode Files > Also, can anyone relay any experiences (good or bad) with using Non-English > files and directories for CIFS clients on Toasters. This isn't exactly what you're asking, but I know that Windows copying files over CIFS used to choke if it ran into a file with a space at the end of the name. I don't know if that was ever resolved. Bruce

1 0

RE: Toasters in Compaq Racks and Unicode Files
by Hawley, Rob 01 Feb '00

01 Feb '00

The product is intended to be used (and is certainly tested) in an environment where the filer is accessed by many different language systems. Any limitations described here are limitations of the clients and protocols and are not limitations introduced by the filer. The language setting is relevant in a cifs only environment since it controls how we generate 8.3 names, system, and domain names. For Win9x clients it will also be how we encode share names. >If setting the language is needed what impact does this have with multiple >language clients, ie one kanji, one US English and maybe a laptop user from >Korea? In such a mixed, cifs-only environment I would set the language to "C", and use only ASCII strings for system and domain names. System and domain names are transmitted using the OEM character set selected by the language setting on the system volume. If you are using NT, then you are not restricted in the share names, but bear in mind that an English client installed with the normal fonts will not be able to display a Japanese share name correctly. The filer supports non-ASCII system and domain names, but limitations on the clients effectively require that everyone agree on the language being used. For example if you use the name nihongo (in the correct Kanji) for your domain name, Japanese systems will correctly display the domain name. (We have such a domain in our development lab). English systems will see the name as a series of European characters since they cannot interpret the OEM character strings. As long as you are using an NT backup program running on NT you should not have a problem. Win9x does not implement a full version of UNICODE so I would not expect it to work correctly there. -----Original Message----- From: Alan R. White [mailto:arw@tipper.demon.co.uk] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 11:39 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Cc: Andrew-M.Webster(a)db.com Subject: Re: Toasters in Compaq Racks and Unicode Files Hi, Sorry 'bout the bunch more questions below - I'd like to understand what this means in more detail if there's knowledgable folks out there. Is unicode mode enabled automatically on the wafl fs? Is the language setting relevant in a CIFS only environment or is it only to allow translation between single-byte clients and wide charsets? If setting the language is needed what impact does this have with multiple language clients, ie one kanji, one US English and maybe a laptop user from Korea? Does it have any impact if the user consistently uses the same language/nt build on the client? How about backup/restore via CIFS - are we OK as long as the CIFS backup client understands unicode? Any idea on maximum filename lengths? The Win32 SDK says 32,000 unicode characters if prefixed with "\\?\" - anyone stress tested this? Hope I get it with answers to all these questions - talk about opening pandoras box Andrew ;-) TIA, Alan ----- Original Message ----- From: Joan Pearson <jpearson(a)netapp.com> To: <Andrew-M.Webster(a)db.com> Cc: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 5:11 PM Subject: Re: Toasters in Compaq Racks and Unicode Files > Hi, > Some requests from NT do not supply Unicode file names, but > instead use the PC character set. Setting the language indicates > which PC character set is in use, so that it can be properly translated > to Unicode. > > The volume's language should be set as soon as possible after > bringing up a 5.3 release. > > Joan Pearson > Network Appliance > > > At 10:47 PM 1/30/00 , you wrote: > >Hi There, > > > > Has anyone out there installed F 760es in Compaq racks? Any special tips, > >problems etc.... > > > > Also, can anyone relay any experiences (good or bad) with using Non-English > >files and directories for CIFS clients on Toasters. > > > > And finally, the System. Admin Guide talks about setting a language of a > >volume with the "vol lang volume langcode" command. Does this having any > >affect for Unicode clients, ie NT? > > > >Any help appreciated. > > > >-- > >Andrew Webster > >Windows NT Consultant > >Sanno Move Project > >Deutsche Securities Ltd. - Tokyo > >Tel. +81-3-5408-4787 > >Fax. +81-3-5401-6998 > >Andrew-M.Webster(a)db.com > > >

1 0

RE: win2k , WINS and serving CIFS
by Muhlestein, Mark 31 Jan '00

31 Jan '00

You shouln't have any problems with Win2k clients as long as you have the latest version of OnTap (5.3.4R3). Take a look at http://now.netapp.com/NOW/misc/head/win2000.shtml for a writeup on Windows 2000 and the filer. It's slightly out of date but you will get the basic idea. Mark Muhlestein -- mmm(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Farid Hamjavar [mailto:hamjavar@unm.edu] Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 2:40 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: win2k , WINS and serving CIFS Hello, This is not entirely related to netapp but it somewhat is. Being a primarily unix environment, we have these two windows-nt boxes that really don't do much but act as WINS server so our clients can access the netapp filers. And that's how we serve CIFS. Not being a windows person, I like to ask what do we need to do with win2k coming to picture. Will a win2k client be able to access files via CIFS the way we do it now? Is that true that WINS service is history and no longer available? If so, how would we keep on giving CIFS service to our windows clients? Thanks, Farid

1 0

RE: Toasters in Compaq Racks
by Benn, Paul 31 Jan '00

31 Jan '00

NetApp racks and Compaq racks are both made by Rittal. The mounting flanges on the Compaq version, however, are set nearly flush to the door jam of the cabinet whereas the NetApp version of the rack has the mounting flanges set a bit farther back (closer to the vertical support beams). Though I'm pretty familiar with both rack styles I've never tried this. In my, somewhat educated opinion, there are a few possible issues: 1) The filer will need to be supported in the front as well as the rear. While mounting the disk shelves directly to the flange should be okay, mounting the filer using the front support only probably isn't a good idea given the thickness (rather, thinness) of the flange. The horizontal support rails that ship with a filer *might* work in the Compaq version. Similarly, the horizontal support rails that ship with the Compaq also *might* work (you likely have a number of these laying around since Proliants typically ship with their own slide rails or horizontal support rails). 2) Now if the above turns out to be a non-issue, you may have a problem closing the cabinet door since the filer's bezel sticks out farther than your typical Compaq Proliant does. 3) Even if the door does close, the bezel might be set too close to the Plexiglas door panel which might cause ventilation problems (you wouldn't want to suffocate your poor filer, now would you?). I've seen some shops, however, where they opt not to install the front door on their Compaq racks. 4) I don't recall if the cabinets are available in the same height. If so, you might be able to get away with mounting a NetApp version next to a Compaq version using a coupling kit. Since the internal vertical bracing seems to be different, you may not be able to install the angle brackets for extra support. It probably seems like I'm pitching the NetApp solution as a stand-alone rack (okay, so I am) but Rittal (http://www.rittal.com/) may have a better answer for you. Meanwhile, I'll poke around over here to see if I can come up with some better news. Regards, Paul Benn Network Appliance -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Webster [mailto:Andrew-M.Webster@db.com] Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2000 10:47 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Toasters in Compaq Racks and Unicode Files Hi There, Has anyone out there installed F 760es in Compaq racks? Any special tips, problems etc....

1 0

Toasters in Compaq Racks and Unicode Files
by Andrew Webster 31 Jan '00

31 Jan '00

Hi There, Has anyone out there installed F 760es in Compaq racks? Any special tips, problems etc.... Also, can anyone relay any experiences (good or bad) with using Non-English files and directories for CIFS clients on Toasters. And finally, the System. Admin Guide talks about setting a language of a volume with the "vol lang volume langcode" command. Does this having any affect for Unicode clients, ie NT? Any help appreciated. -- Andrew Webster Windows NT Consultant Sanno Move Project Deutsche Securities Ltd. - Tokyo Tel. +81-3-5408-4787 Fax. +81-3-5401-6998 Andrew-M.Webster(a)db.com

4 4

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters