toasters May 2003

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

83 participants
92 discussions

SWEEPSTAKES WINNING NOTIFICATION
by Mr Jossip Welber 15 May '03

15 May '03

ATTN: EL GORDO SWEEPSTAKES N.L BURDENSTRAAT 22 1053 DS AMSTERDAM. THE NETHERLANDS. FROM THE DESK OF THE DIRECTOR INTERNATIONAL PROMOTION/PRIZE AWARD DEPT. REF:WR/2311786008/01 BATCH:14/011/IPD RE:WINNING NOTIFICATION/FINAL NOTICE. We are pleased to inform you of the release today the 14th of May 2003,of the El Gordo Netherlands Sweepstakes International program held on the 29th of december 2002. Your personal or company email address attached to ticket number 205-11465886-629 with serial number 3772-99 drew lucky numbers 7-14-17-23-31-44 which consequently won the lottery in the 2nd category. You have therefore been approved for a lump sum payout of $1,000,000.00(one million dollars) in cash credited to file Ref.No ELG/2311786008/01.This is from a total cash prize of U.S.$11million shared among several international lucky winners in this category. CONGRATULATIONS. Your fund is now deposited with our Security Department to your name and due to mix up of some numbers and names, we ask that you keep this winning private from public notice until your claim has been processed and your money remitted to your designated account.This is part of our security protocol to avoid double claim and unwarranted taking advantage of this programme by participants. All participants were selected through a computer ballot system drawn from over 500,000 company and individual email addresses from all over the world as part of our international promotions programme,which takes place every year. We hope, with part of your winning, you will take part in our end of year stake of U.S $5million international lottery. Remember,all winning must be claimed not later than June 29th 2003. After this date all unclaimed fund will be returned to the pool as unclaimed. NOTE:In order to avoid unnecessary delays and complications please remember to quote your refrence and batch numbers in all correspondence with your agent. Furthermore, should there be any change of address, do inform your agent as soon as possible. Any body under the age of 18 years is automatically disqualified. Congratulations once more from our members of staff and thank you for being part of our promotional programme. Forward your reply the payment officer Mr. Wietze Van Dijk email; (wietze_dijk(a)yahoo.com and fax +31-619-714-412 or telephone +31-617-856-756) Congratulations once again while we await your urgent respons with your full contact details. Sincerely, MR.JOSSIP WELBER (MEMBER OF STAFF)

1 0

network based console connection
by DFinn＠studentadvantage.com 15 May '03

15 May '03

I think it would be really nice to have something like this setup so that we could get console access to our netapps via the network. I'm curious as to what's available and what other people have setup to accomplish this. The cheaper the better. Thanks Dan

6 5

Re: remove .snapshot dir from unwanted top level directory
by collin66＠yahoo.com 15 May '03

15 May '03

1 0

remove .snapshot dir from unwanted top level directory
by Dan OBrien 15 May '03

15 May '03

I created a new top level directory in my volume group (/vol/vol0) some time ago and now want to remove it, but the .snapshot directory contained there in is preventing me from doing so. This is from my admin host system: rm -fr XYZ rm: Unable to remove directory XYZ/.snapshot/nightly.1/ABC: Read-only file system rm: Unable to remove directory XYZ/.snapshot/nightly.2/ABC: Read-only file system rm: Unable to remove directory XYZ/.snapshot/nightly.3/ABC: Read-only file system I was able to remove ABC from XYZ/ Will the snapshots eventually roll out? Do I need to turn something off? Regards, Dan O'Brien, dmobrien(a)lcsi.net Cell: 614-783-4859 Work: 614-476-8473 Home: 740-927-2178 Pataskala, OH

4 4

CIFS Errors
by Rascher, Raymond 15 May '03

15 May '03

We have been getting the message below in our logs for a few months now. It has not caused any issues except for the false alerts. Does anyone know what may cause this error? The Filer is joined to Active Directory, running 6.2.2.D15 logfile server1.gs.com [Watcher_A_nmtopsa13]: May 14 19:58:31 netapps1.gs.com Wed May 14 19:58:32 EDT [netapps1: CIFSAuthen:CRITICAL]: CIFS - Filer's security information differs from domain controller. Ray Rascher Core Windows Infrastructure Goldman, Sachs & Co. 180 Maiden Lane, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10004

1 0

Usage of quota vs. NFS performance ...
by Wilfried Gaensheimer 15 May '03

15 May '03

Hi, we are considering introducing quotas on our filer to prevent the "one user takes it all" situation, that happened several times and made the rest of the crew pretty unhappy. Anyway, before doing that, I would like to check: Is there any "massive" performance degradation to be expected? Could someone out there share their real-life experience? Would be great. Am I right that quotas should have an impact on write, only? And some extra CPU load? We use NFS, Clients are Solaris8. No qtree, just three appr. 400GByte Volumes? Any hint to documentation and common pitfalls is highly welcome. Bye, thanks wilfried -- # Wilfried.Gaensheimer(a)Bingo-ev.DE, +49 841 975181 # # Room to rent ........................................#

3 2

RE: Visual SourceSafe + Filer
by Nail, Larry 15 May '03

15 May '03

No sir, we've got several groups using VSS on CIFS shares -----Original Message----- From: Barry Lustig [mailto:barry-dated-1053387082.a96094@lustig.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 6:31 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Does anyone know if there are any problems with putting the VSS database onto a filer? Are there similar issues to exchange requiring iSCSI or VLD? Thanks, barry

1 0

Visual SourceSafe + Filer
by Barry Lustig 14 May '03

14 May '03

Does anyone know if there are any problems with putting the VSS database onto a filer? Are there similar issues to exchange requiring iSCSI or VLD? Thanks, barry

1 0

Building a working filer from parts [230/330]
by John Kiniston 14 May '03

14 May '03

Howdy! I know the hardware I'm asking about is a little dated but this is for my personal use filer that I'm building: I've got two filer heads, a F230 and a F330, and a StorageShelf2 full of 8 gig disks, My Goal is to make a working filer out of the parts of the F230 and the F330. The F330 powers up fine and came with two PCI SCSI cards, and what I belive is a PCI FDDI card. The F230 does not power on and came with one PCI SCSI card, and a Quad Fast Ethernet Card. Can the Quad Fast Ethernet work from the F230 in the F330? When I insert it and boot the F330 gives me a 'Unsupported Configuration' error with e5a and scsi. I ended up swapping the SCSI card from slot 9 in the 230 to slot 9 in the 330 to hook up the shelf of disks so the 330 now has both a Fast Wide and a Fast Narrow SCSI controller in it. What is the largest disk supported by the 330? Currently I have 7 8.6 gig disks. Does anyone need parts from the 230? Once I get the 330 working I will no longer need the 230 for parts.

1 0

RE: network based console connection
by DFinn＠studentadvantage.com 14 May '03

14 May '03

The only problem with that is you are limited to how many netapps you can connect to a PC. We have 4 netapps, so are there pieces of hardware out there that we could install in a cheap pc that would allow us more console connections? Also, what are the specifications on the cable and connection into the netapp? Is it just a standard console cable? Is it the same as Sun hardware? -----Original Message----- From: Steve Evans [mailto:sevans@foundation.sdsu.edu] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 12:51 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: network based console connection Console cable to Unix/Windows server. Telnet/"Terminal Server" to server. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation (619) 594-0653 -----Original Message----- From: DFinn(a)studentadvantage.com [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 9:22 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com I think it would be really nice to have something like this setup so that we could get console access to our netapps via the network. I'm curious as to what's available and what other people have setup to accomplish this. The cheaper the better. Thanks Dan

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters May 2003