toasters November 2001

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

89 participants
100 discussions

Re: UNC and username specification
by Don.Hickey＠alcatel.com 09 Nov '01

09 Nov '01

This looks like syntax for share level security. You should be able to do something similar as a Domain member with this syntax: NET USE \\servername\sharename password /USER:domain\username if password is missing you will be prompted. Don Andrew Smith <ajs(a)dca.net> Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com 2001-11-05 10:05 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com cc: Subject: UNC and username specification Hello, Is it possible to specify the username and password to connect to the filer's CIFS service in the UNC path? Several years ago when I was running SAMBA on a Linux box, I was able to connect from Windows to a share with this syntax: \\servername\sharename%username:password The ":password" was optional, if it was not specified then Lan Manager would come back and prompt for the password specified in "%username". Thanks! -Andrew Smith DCANet

2 1

RE: McAfee NetShield for NetApp
by Seth Moskowitz 09 Nov '01

09 Nov '01

I have been using Syamantec Carrier Scan Server since April when it was released and have just upgraded to 2.1.3. There were a few issues that needed to be addressed by both Symantec and NetApp but overall with a little tweking it has been pretty stable. Prior to this other then client side scanning our only other method was mounting volumes and scanning them. With the size of our volumes this could take up to a week and obviously isn't a very solid soltion. The implementation of CSS was definitely the way to go, it eased management and I have even enabled it for live updates of new definition files. >From: Stephen Johnston <stevej(a)univ-wea.com> >To: "'toasters(a)mathworks.com'" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> >Subject: RE: McAfee NetShield for NetApp >Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 06:12:08 -0600 > >Likewise, anyone able to answer the same questions concerning Norton >CarrierScan? Maybe a comparison/contrast of the pros and cons of each? > >Stephen Johnston > >-----Original Message----- >From: Wollermann, Brian [mailto:BWollermann@glhec.org] >Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:49 PM >To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' >Subject: McAfee NetShield for NetApp > > >Hello, we are looking at getting this for an on-access virus scanning >solution for our F740. Does anyone use this product? What is your opinion >about it? It seems to be very new. We have NetShield for our servers and >VirusScan for our workstations so we wanted to stick with an NAI solution >for our filer. Bad idea? How bad of a bottleneck is it with the >anti-virus >server as a middleman? > >Brian Wollermann _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

1 0

RE: McAfee NetShield for NetApp
by Stephen Johnston 09 Nov '01

09 Nov '01

Likewise, anyone able to answer the same questions concerning Norton CarrierScan? Maybe a comparison/contrast of the pros and cons of each? Stephen Johnston -----Original Message----- From: Wollermann, Brian [mailto:BWollermann@glhec.org] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:49 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: McAfee NetShield for NetApp Hello, we are looking at getting this for an on-access virus scanning solution for our F740. Does anyone use this product? What is your opinion about it? It seems to be very new. We have NetShield for our servers and VirusScan for our workstations so we wanted to stick with an NAI solution for our filer. Bad idea? How bad of a bottleneck is it with the anti-virus server as a middleman? Brian Wollermann

1 0

Non compliant MAC Address
by Lim, Weng Kiam 09 Nov '01

09 Nov '01

Got this message only once when power was out and the network is disconnected for a brief period of time (link down/up on the filer side). No further such message after that. Should this be a concern and any configuration that needs to be corrected? Any hints would be greatly appreciated. [pvif_monitor]: Ethernet e0: Non compliant MAC Address 00:20:fc:1e:2f:a4. Please contact Network Appliance. Regards, Weng-Kiam Lim Rand Technologies

1 0

Re: "unrecognized error 0xb" -- correct slot for tape scsi?
by Toal, Dave 08 Nov '01

08 Nov '01

The problem turned out to be the two scsi terminators on the DLT's -- one bad, one loose. Replaced them; the netapp dumps to tape ok, and veritas netbackup is working again. "Toal, Dave" wrote: > > > Ernie, > > Hmmm... the terminator was not changed between > the time the dlt was working, and when something broke. > > Both dlt's I tried returned the same error... > maybe the tape library (st9710) is having power or ground > problems? All other dlt's in it -- to sun boxes -- are > working though. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bokkelkamp Ernst SBS ITS ORS AHS 241 > To: Toal, Dave > Sent: 10/19/01 2:47 AM > Subject: RE: "unrecognized error 0xb" -- correct slot for tape scsi? > > Are you using a High Voltage Differential (HVD) interface on the DLT7 > with a > HVD terminator ? > If not, that's your problem. > > Bye > Ernie > > -----Original Message----- > From: Toal, Dave [mailto:dave.toal@t-t.com] > Sent: Freitag, 19. Oktober 2001 04:58 > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: "unrecognized error 0xb" -- correct slot for tape scsi? > > Folks, > > I've been trying to get an F740 filer > to recognize a dlt for several weeks. The > error it returns is below. This same error > also happens on another filer, also a 740. > DLT checks out ok, according to the StorageTek > tech's dignostics box. > > Have tried swapping cables, and using > different dlt's -- _always_ this "unrecognized > error". The filer has been rebooted many times > during this process. mt fsf, bsf, weof, &c all > work ok, according to mt status, but all tape > writes fail. > > -- > Dave Toal > unix person > T&T, nq, MA > > statler> dump u0f nrst0a /vol/spool > DUMP: Dumping tape file 1 on nrst0a > DUMP: creating "/vol/spool/../snapshot_for_backup.0" snapshot. > DUMP: Using Full Volume Dump > DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Oct 19 02:02:52 2001. > DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch. > DUMP: Dumping /vol/spool/ to nrst0a > DUMP: mapping (Pass I)[regular files] > DUMP: mapping (Pass II)[directories] > Fri Oct 19 02:03:10 GMT [isp_main]: Tape (1.0.0):cmdblk > 0xfffffc0000e020f8 op 0xa block 64512 aborted command (b 47, 0) > DUMP: Tape write failed. > Fri Oct 19 02:03:10 GMT [isp_main]: Tape (1.0) unrecognized error > 0xbunrecognized error 0xb. > DUMP: DUMP IS ABORTED > DUMP: Deleting "/vol/spool/../snapshot_for_backup.0" snapshot. > statler>

1 0

McAfee NetShield for NetApp
by Wollermann, Brian 08 Nov '01

08 Nov '01

Hello, we are looking at getting this for an on-access virus scanning solution for our F740. Does anyone use this product? What is your opinion about it? It seems to be very new. We have NetShield for our servers and VirusScan for our workstations so we wanted to stick with an NAI solution for our filer. Bad idea? How bad of a bottleneck is it with the anti-virus server as a middleman? Brian Wollermann

1 0

NFS version 3 using UDP or TCP
by Noll, Kevin 08 Nov '01

08 Nov '01

Hi All We are currently running over 140 Sun servers with 7 Netapp Filers. I have checked the Netapp filers and have found they are all running UDP with NFS version 3. TCP is disabled, however, I was under the impression that TCP would be a better prot to use. Could anyone tell me what they think with regards to the differences and pro's and cons of the 2 different protocols Thanks KEVIN ******************************************************************************************** " This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ". ********************************************************************************************

6 5

RE: LDAP auth ?
by Taylor, Bryant 08 Nov '01

08 Nov '01

Boy, No NT... aren't you lucky!! :) -----Original Message----- From: Frank Bonnet [mailto:bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:34 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: LDAP auth ? Hi Does any NetApp guru on this list knows when ONTAP will support LDAP authentication for UNIX/NFS and CIFS users ? I know actually it supports Active Directory but we don't want to use M$ stuff as we have only UNIX servers/workstations and some windows clients ( No NT servers at all ) TIA -- Frank Bonnet

1 0

LDAP auth ?
by Frank Bonnet 08 Nov '01

08 Nov '01

Hi Does any NetApp guru on this list knows when ONTAP will support LDAP authentication for UNIX/NFS and CIFS users ? I know actually it supports Active Directory but we don't want to use M$ stuff as we have only UNIX servers/workstations and some windows clients ( No NT servers at all ) TIA -- Frank Bonnet

1 0

RE: Cifs Auditing
by Watson, Dan 08 Nov '01

08 Nov '01

Hi, Just a note about CIFS auditing on the Network Appliance filer: In OnTap 6.0 and later releases, access audit events are logged into an internally-formatted file in order to provide better auditing performance. When the user issues the 'cifs audit save [-f]' command, the records are dumped, oldest record first, from the internal file into the Microsoft compatible .evt file. It is the .evt file (default is /etc/log/adtlog.evt) that can be read by the Microsoft Event Viewer application and other compatible apps. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/debug/even… <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/debug/even…> . Information about how to interpret specific EVENTLOGRECORDs is kept in the Windows Registry. Prior to Windows 2K, the Windows Event Viewer program retrieved this information from the client machine's Registry. The Windows 2K Event Viewer uses remote procedure calls to retrieve the Registry entries from the machine on which the .evt file is located. It is for that reason that the filer's .evt files must be moved to the client before they can be viewed by a W2K Event Viewer. I bring this up because other applications that view and interpret EVENTLOGRECORD entries from the .evt file may exhibit the same behavior. Best, Dan -----Original Message----- From: Drew O'Donnell [mailto:drew@cooperneff.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:45 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Cifs Auditing I think the original question was to convert the file to CSV format. The dumpel.exe requires RPC, which the filer does not support. Robert wants to convert the EVT file to a CSV (text file), so he can scan the txt file with something like Swatch. I have been working on the same issue, but have not been successful. I tried some shareware utilities, but they all work like dumpel. This is an important question if you want to audit CIFS security. I was working on a perl script to do this, but there has got to be an easier way. -----Original Message----- From: Carruthers, Paul A [mailto:Paul_Carruthers@AIMFUNDS.COM] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:34 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Cifs Auditing I wrote an script that RSH's to the filers, dumps the event log, copies it to a central location and renames it to the date that it was dumped. Set it up as scheduled task from an NT box and the auditiong dumps are take care of automatically - you just go to the central location to manipulate the evt files. As it is then a .evt file you should be able to use other tools that you currently use with event logs. Don't specifically know about csv file conversion... Cheers -- Paul. -----Original Message----- From: Palmer, Jason (London) [mailto:jason.palmer@wcom.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:19 AM To: 'Robert Lobban'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Cifs Auditing A long time since I figured out how to do this... >From memory, you need to run the command 'CIFS AUDIT SAVE -f' on the filer console, that saves the logs to disk in the location '/etc/log/adtlog.evt' Sorry its a bit vague, but should enable you to generate a Event Log, that can be read by Event Viewer. Regards, Jason Palmer WorldCom EMEA -----Original Message----- From: Robert Lobban [mailto:r_lobban@hotmail.com] Sent: 07 November 2001 14:02 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Cifs Auditing I am looking for some help Cifs auditing and hoped you may be able to help. I have managed to setup the auditing that I require but am looking for a way of dumping the security logs into a CSV file. Under NT we would use Dumpel from the reskit or some such util but does not will not work for the filer. Is there anyway of doing it or can any one offer some advice. Many Thanks, Rob _____ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com <http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp>

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters November 2001