toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

3 participants
13514 discussions

RE: Filer Serial Connectivity
by Klinkner, Steve 03 Apr '01

03 Apr '01

> -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Sphar [mailto:mikey@Remedy.COM] > Does FilerView really require a Windows box? I'd assumed that the web > interface would work in any java-compliant browser. No, FilerView does not require Windows. Through 5.x FilerView is applet based. It should, as you say, work on any java-compliant browser. In practice it displays somewhat more consistently on Windows boxes (relative to *nix say) due to font mapping issues. Starting in 6.x we've been phasing out some of the applets in favor of HTML and some Javascript. Recent IE and Netscape versions should work ok, though, if not please let us know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- steve klinkner klink(a)netapp.com

1 0

RE: Filer Serial Connectivity
by Mike Sphar 03 Apr '01

03 Apr '01

Does FilerView really require a Windows box? I'd assumed that the web interface would work in any java-compliant browser. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Engineering Support Services - Remedy Corporation BOFH, GWP, MCP, MCP+I, MCSE, BFD -----Original Message----- From: fubar(a)pir.net [mailto:fubar@pir.net] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 4:25 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Filer Serial Connectivity >>>>> "skeezics" == Chris Lamb <skeezics(a)measurecast.com> writes: >> Why would you want this type of solution instead of/in addition to >> FilerView? skeezics> Some of us old die-hard command-line guys have never used skeezics> FilerView. I personally think the whole GUI/WWW thing is a skeezics> fad. :-) Nevermind that FilerView isn't going to help much if 1) you're connecting through a dumb terminal over 9600baud modem or 2) need to get to the serial prompt or 3) don't have access to a windoze box. Despite the abundance of Microsoft product, not everyone uses them. skeezics> More importantly, if the network is hosed on a machine the skeezics> serial console is still a way to unwedge things. Upgrading skeezics> IPFilter or SSH or renumbering a machine without a reboot is skeezics> kinda cool - you can "ifconfig down" to your heart's content skeezics> without sawing off the branch you're sitting on. :-) That, too... taking down the interface you're connecting through can make for a long evening. ;-) K.

1 0

Re: Filer Serial Connectivity
by Darrell Fuhriman 03 Apr '01

03 Apr '01

chris(a)webtop.com (Chris Good) writes: > number of the async port. I would live to be able to do VIPs for each > port but AFAIK there isn't a way unless you know different. ATM we ip alias ADDR PORT Darrell

1 0

RE: Win2k and the Filer
by Yoder, Alan 03 Apr '01

03 Apr '01

Data ONTAP 6.1 supports Windows 2000 Authentication via Kerberos, plus the things, such as Share publication and Access Control, that worked under NT 4.0. Alan =============================================================== Alan G. Yoder agy.nospam(a)netapp.com =============================================================== -----Original Message----- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:JMorgan@nuvox.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 2:18 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Win2k and the Filer Any word on when the filer will support NTFS 5? Joshua Morgan

1 0

RE: Filer Serial Connectivity
by Mike Sphar 02 Apr '01

02 Apr '01

Well, most PC hardware vendors offer remote access cards of some type. Compaq offers something like that (Remote Insight, I think it's called), for example. I don't admin the windows stuff myself, but that's what our Windows admins use for that sort of thing. Also, it's not out yet, but Raritan's TeleReach box may become very handy for that sort of thing. We currently use Raritan's Paragon switches to get consoles for a large host of platforms: Sun, IBM, HP, SGI, PC, Netapp, etc. It's nice to have a single console switch that controls all of our devices, rather than one device for the UNIX consoles, another device for the PC consoles, etc. My goal is that when an engineer walks into one of our labs, he can sit at any console to control any machine. (It's also nice to access each platform through its native console. Figuring out the serial pinouts for each vendor can be quite the pain.) If the TeleReach service works as advertised, it would make everything on the Paragon switch available over IP. Unfortunately, it sounds like it will utilize a proprietary windows-based client. Also how good the performance is remains to be seen. It's a step in the right direction though, I think. As for FilerView, I use it a lot and like it, but in a serious downtime situation, you may a) have problems with the network in the first place which would make FilerView useless, and b) you're probably in a hurry and while I like Filerview it is a bit slow to load. Certain things are just much faster to do via the console. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Engineering Support Services - Remedy Corporation BOFH, GWP, MCP, MCP+I, MCSE, BFD -----Original Message----- From: Metzinger Zach [mailto:ZMetzinger@WhiteRockNetworks.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:24 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Filer Serial Connectivity On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:01:43PM -0700, Chris Lamb wrote: > Some of us old die-hard command-line guys have never used FilerView. I > personally think the whole GUI/WWW thing is a fad. :-) Hoo Rah. Gotta feel sorry for those Windows admins who actually have to show up in a machine room at 2am to fix something. :) Zach Metzinger UNIX System Administrator White Rock Networks

1 0

Win2k and the Filer
by Morgan, Joshua 02 Apr '01

02 Apr '01

Any word on when the filer will support NTFS 5? Joshua Morgan

1 0

What are these files in /etc/oldmaps?
by Chris Thompson 02 Apr '01

02 Apr '01

We upgraded one of our F740's from 5.3.7R1 to 6.0.1R3 a week ago. It went very smoothly, but there are a few things still puzzling me. Here is one of them... Every time a dump command is run, at completion a new file appears in the filer's /etc, with a name like /etc/oldmaps/bkp/A_home1/3abbe75d | | | \ This is the time(2) of the dump in hex | \ This is the "n" key from the dump command Peeking at /etc/tmp while dump is running, and comparing inode numbers, it seems that these files are what was /etc/tmp/dump_all.bitmap.[n]. (There are several other files in /etc/tmp, but this seems to be the only one that is saved.) Its size appears to be 1 bit per inode in the volume being dumped, plus a little. Are these files going to accumulate for ever? None have disappeared as yet, but maybe they will in due course... And what is their purpose in life? Chris Thompson University of Cambridge Computing Service, Email: cet1(a)ucs.cam.ac.uk New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG, Phone: +44 1223 334715 United Kingdom.

2 3

RE: Maximum number of inodes
by Nick Steel 02 Apr '01

02 Apr '01

So far, no problems, but I am not quite at the 200M mark. mailnfs1> maxfiles Volume vol1: maximum number of files is currently 150937460 (38104458 used). Volume vol0: maximum number of files is currently 150937460 (32242112 used). mailnfs1> - Nick Steel Sr Operations Engineer v. 805.418.2248 e. nsteel(a)corp.netzero.net -----Original Message----- From: Tom "Mad Dog" Yergeau [mailto:MadDog@fool.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 1:34 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Maximum number of inodes Hi, I know filers by default won't get a volume more than, say, 33 million inodes, and that the general formula for determining the number of inodes is (volume size in kilobytes) / 32 kb = #of inodes. But, does anyone know if there is a maximum number of inodes? Does anyone out there have volumes with over 200 million inodes and have you seen any issues with those types of volumes? We've got an application that's generating about 5-10 million inodes a month (don't ask) and I'm concerned about that. Will this be a problem? Thanks! Tom __________________________________________ NetZero - Defenders of the Free World Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

1 0

ndmp backup choices
by neil lehrer 02 Apr '01

02 Apr '01

hi, i am testing the current versions of quick restore[2.7.3] from workstation solutions and backup express[2.13c] from syncsort. my ndmp proxy server is a sun box running solaris 2.6 and i have a spectralogic treefrog directly attached to my f760. i would appreciate any comments from anyone who runs either quick restore or backup express on the good and/or bad parts. thanks --

1 0

Virus WARNING !!
by X X 02 Apr '01

02 Apr '01

Dont open this message !! ------------------------------------------------------------ ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s). Place = Sender = ivisales(a)the.net.ph Subject = <no subject> Delivery Time = April 02, 2001 (Monday) 04:08:57 Action on virus found: "TROJ_MTX.A" virus was found in attachment "MATRiX_Screen_Saver.SCR", ScanMail has deleted the attachment. Message from recipient's administrator: Warning to recipient. ScanMail detected a virus in an email attachment. ______________________________________________ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters