toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

RE: BlueARC SI7500 NAS
by Davis, John 23 May '01

23 May '01

Can you please,sir, educate us all on how BlueARC has suceeded in making their disks spin faster than all of the other storage companies? Assuming most people can't afford 3 TBs of memory for their storage systems just how do they get around the mechanical latenices and rotational latencies of a rotating media device(which btw, is what WAFL is good at doing)? -----Original Message----- From: Dilbert Dickweed [mailto:blome840@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:02 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: BlueARC SI7500 NAS Obviously nobody here has really touched one from the statements made. I have and have done direct compare between IP4700 (EMC) and 840 as well as the BlueArc box and it is very refreshing. It is true that some of the feature set is not there yet but they do have NDMP and unlike Netcrap, back-ups online don't crash the server. I have done my own IOmeter tests with various settings using some FreeBSD clients and this thing blows away 840 and IP4700. IP4700 is a joke anyway. Those who are in doubt (as I was) need to check these guys out because they are really onto something huge here. We are talking about eliminating the bottlenecks that exist in ALL server architecture today and reaching the next level of speed. I am not talking out-my-ass here...check 'em out! See for yourslef and don't listen to the dinks from Netcrap or Evil Machine Corporation EMC! If you do manage to get a beta unit as some have, make sure you get the failover cluster because this works much better than anything I have seen yet.... Wish they had snapshot though... _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

3 2

RE: BlueARC SI7500 NAS
by Honeycutt, Michael 23 May '01

23 May '01

Dilbert, thanks. You made me realize that TrendMicro E-manager filter isnt working right on my exchange server. Kudos. -----Original Message----- From: David Carmean [mailto:dlc@halibut.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:15 PM To: Dilbert Dickweed Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: BlueARC SI7500 NAS Well, your choice of username/email address and anonymity certainly make /me/ take you more seriously than if I knew who you were, your history, and your relationship with all three companies. ( Yes, I work for Netapp, but I'm just a sysadmin for the engineering labs and not a heavy direct user. Standard disclaimers of unofficial opinions apply, as implied by using my personal email address. ) On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:01:36PM -0000, Dilbert Dickweed wrote: > Obviously nobody here has really touched one from the statements made. I > have and have done direct compare between IP4700 (EMC) and 840 as well as > the BlueArc box and it is very refreshing. > It is true that some of the feature set is not there yet but they do have > NDMP and unlike Netcrap, back-ups online don't crash the server. > I have done my own IOmeter tests with various settings using some FreeBSD > clients and this thing blows away 840 and IP4700. IP4700 is a joke anyway. > Those who are in doubt (as I was) need to check these guys out because they > are really onto something huge here. We are talking about eliminating the > bottlenecks that exist in ALL server architecture today and reaching the > next level of speed. I am not talking out-my-ass here...check 'em out! See > for yourslef and don't listen to the dinks from Netcrap or Evil Machine > Corporation EMC! > If you do manage to get a beta unit as some have, make sure you get the > failover cluster because this works much better than anything I have seen > yet.... > > Wish they had snapshot though...

1 0

RE: BlueARC SI7500 NAS
by Dilbert Dickweed 22 May '01

22 May '01

NDA _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

3 2

RE: 740 ndmp backups
by Traitel, Eyal 22 May '01

22 May '01

Roger, 1. What are your ontap versions on filers ? 2. Have you tested first local dump from 840 to local tape ? What's the speed there ? Eyal. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- eTraitel - I'm the new eBuzzword around !!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Filer Escalation Engineer CNA, MCSE, CSA, LCA, NetApp CA Network Appliance BV Hoofddorp, The Netherlands Office: +31 23 567 9685 Cellular: +31 6 5497 2568 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Get answers NOW! - NetApp On the Web - http://now.netapp.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Tue, May 22, 2001 19:21 To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: 740 ndmp backups I am backing up a 740 with veritas using the "3 way ndmp" config. i.e. the 740 is backing up via ndmp to an 840 with a dlt8000 directly attached to it. the network is ATM LANE with combo of 1.5mbps and 622mbps. my performance is real bad, like 1 mb/s for a backup. has anyone had any experience with this type of scenario and have any suggestions?? i am going to try the NFS type backup as an experiment but would like to get ndmp to work properly.

1 0

Bluearc
by ethancaftihs＠netscape.net 22 May '01

22 May '01

Dilbert, you are too funny and all you morons jumping on the band-wagon Bluearc customers are all under NDA which means Non Disclosure Agreement. It was very amusing for me to see all the Netapp employee's responses to D's mail...please, more:> __________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

1 0

RE: recovering data from user's snapshot directory?
by Fox, Adam 22 May '01

22 May '01

I think I understand your problem. Files and directories in the snapshot area are READ-ONLY. You cannot change them at all. You will have to copy the files out of the snapshot area to an active filesystem, then you can manipulate them. Hope this helps. -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: brad(a)ThoughtWorks.com [mailto:brad@ThoughtWorks.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:23 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: recovering data from user's snapshot directory? > > > We have a few employees that have left the company and I need > to get their > data back from their snapshot directories (the original files > and folders > were deleted as well as the usernames). > > The volume is a CIFS homedrive setup and if I try to take > ownership of the > folders under the snapshot directory, I cannot. I also > cannot give myself > read access to the folder. > > Has anyone else has this problem? > > I'm logging in via the administrator account and it still > does not work. > > Thanks in advance for your help. >

1 0

RE: BlueARC SI7500 NAS
by Ehrhart, Rick 22 May '01

22 May '01

Please post your IOMeter numbers so we can all see how great the BlueArc box is. Thank-you, Rick > -----Original Message----- > From: Dilbert Dickweed [mailto:blome840@hotmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 2:02 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: BlueARC SI7500 NAS > > > Obviously nobody here has really touched one from the > statements made. I > have and have done direct compare between IP4700 (EMC) and > 840 as well as > the BlueArc box and it is very refreshing. > It is true that some of the feature set is not there yet but > they do have > NDMP and unlike Netcrap, back-ups online don't crash the server. > I have done my own IOmeter tests with various settings using > some FreeBSD > clients and this thing blows away 840 and IP4700. IP4700 is > a joke anyway. > Those who are in doubt (as I was) need to check these guys > out because they > are really onto something huge here. We are talking about > eliminating the > bottlenecks that exist in ALL server architecture today and > reaching the > next level of speed. I am not talking out-my-ass > here...check 'em out! See > for yourslef and don't listen to the dinks from Netcrap or > Evil Machine > Corporation EMC! > If you do manage to get a beta unit as some have, make sure > you get the > failover cluster because this works much better than anything > I have seen > yet.... > > Wish they had snapshot though... > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com >

1 0

REMOVE
by Steve Archer 22 May '01

22 May '01

REMOVE

1 0

REMOVE
by Steve Archer 22 May '01

22 May '01

REMOVE Steven Archer Network Systems Administrator Department of Information Technology Douglas County Government Phone: 303-660-7499 E-Mail: sarcher(a)douglas.co.us >>> David Carmean <dlc(a)halibut.com> 05/22/01 03:15PM >>> Well, your choice of username/email address and anonymity certainly make /me/ take you more seriously than if I knew who you were, your history, and your relationship with all three companies. ( Yes, I work for Netapp, but I'm just a sysadmin for the engineering labs and not a heavy direct user. Standard disclaimers of unofficial opinions apply, as implied by using my personal email address. ) On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:01:36PM -0000, Dilbert Dickweed wrote: > Obviously nobody here has really touched one from the statements made. I > have and have done direct compare between IP4700 (EMC) and 840 as well as > the BlueArc box and it is very refreshing. > It is true that some of the feature set is not there yet but they do have > NDMP and unlike Netcrap, back-ups online don't crash the server. > I have done my own IOmeter tests with various settings using some FreeBSD > clients and this thing blows away 840 and IP4700. IP4700 is a joke anyway. > Those who are in doubt (as I was) need to check these guys out because they > are really onto something huge here. We are talking about eliminating the > bottlenecks that exist in ALL server architecture today and reaching the > next level of speed. I am not talking out-my-ass here...check 'em out! See > for yourslef and don't listen to the dinks from Netcrap or Evil Machine > Corporation EMC! > If you do manage to get a beta unit as some have, make sure you get the > failover cluster because this works much better than anything I have seen > yet.... > > Wish they had snapshot though...

1 0

BlueARC SI7500 NAS
by Dilbert Dickweed 22 May '01

22 May '01

Obviously nobody here has really touched one from the statements made. I have and have done direct compare between IP4700 (EMC) and 840 as well as the BlueArc box and it is very refreshing. It is true that some of the feature set is not there yet but they do have NDMP and unlike Netcrap, back-ups online don't crash the server. I have done my own IOmeter tests with various settings using some FreeBSD clients and this thing blows away 840 and IP4700. IP4700 is a joke anyway. Those who are in doubt (as I was) need to check these guys out because they are really onto something huge here. We are talking about eliminating the bottlenecks that exist in ALL server architecture today and reaching the next level of speed. I am not talking out-my-ass here...check 'em out! See for yourslef and don't listen to the dinks from Netcrap or Evil Machine Corporation EMC! If you do manage to get a beta unit as some have, make sure you get the failover cluster because this works much better than anything I have seen yet.... Wish they had snapshot though... _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

3 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters