toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

ndmpcopy level i problems
by Leonard, Roger 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

I am having problems doing an imcremental ndmp copy from one filer to another. The first level i goes fine. The second one a few days later gives this error: filer1: CONNECT: Connection established. filer2: CONNECT: Connection established. filer1: LOG: DUMP: filer1: LOG: creating "/vol/vol0/../snapshot_for_backup.828" snapshot. filer2: LOG: RESTORE: filer2: LOG: Could not create /vol/volhome1/etc/tmp/restore.clrimap.184.time_996070293.pid_23341776 filer2: LOG: RESTORE: filer2: LOG: Cannot restart restore without a dumpmap. filer2: LOG: RESTORE: filer2: LOG: RESTORE IS ABORTED filer2: Connection halted: HALT: Internal error! It appears that in the etc/tmp dirs on the target filer volumes there should be files created after each ndmpcopy called dump.dirlist and dump.bitmap but on some of the target volumes they not there. some target volumes do have these files and those volumes will do incremental copies. All initial copies completed successfully with no errors. Does anyone have any ideas why these files were not created?? The command I am using for both is: ndmpcopy -level i filer1:/vol/vol0/ filer2:/vol/volhome1/users2/

2 1

RE: disk scrub time
by Fox, Adam 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

>From the looks of your syslog messages, it appears that you are running 6.x. The good news here is that when the time expires under 6.x, the disk scrub picks up at that point on the next disk scrub. So you may not be scrubbing every sector every week, but you will be scrubbing every sector every 2 or 3 weeks. Just some info to add to your options. Hope this helps. -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Hannes Herret [mailto:hh@bacher.at] > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 4:48 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Cc: its-storage(a)bacher.at > Subject: disk scrub time > > > hi all, > > normally the disk scrub starts on sunday 1 a.m. > cause of the running ndmp-backup, the filer counldn't finish the scrub > within the default deadline time of 6 h. > > there are 4 volumes on the filer and just 1 finished the scrub. the > other get stopped like following: > Sun Jul 8 01:00:00 CES [fsup02: raid_scrub_admin:notice]: Beginning > disk > scrubbing... > Sun Jul 8 07:00:01 CES [fsup02: consumer:notice]: Disk scrub stopped > because the > scrub time limit was exceeded. > Sun Jul 8 07:00:01 CES [fsup02: consumer:notice]: Scrub for volume > vol0, RAID group > 0 stopped at stripe 13435506. > Sun Jul 8 07:00:01 CES [fsup02: consumer:notice]: 0 new parity > inconsistencies > found, 0 to date. > Sun Jul 8 07:00:01 CES [fsup02: consumer:notice]: 0 new > checksum errors > found, 0 to > date. > > how to resolve this? > > a. disable automatic disk scrub and start it with cron via rsh > i don' like it, cause of the administration > b. set the day of the disk scrub to e.g. saturday > how to set on the filer? > c. lenghten the scrub time limit with raid.scrub.duration > i think the default is 0 and the setting works with minutes > 0 means unlimited time? > 480 means 8 hours? > d. optimize scrubbing with raid.scrubbers > default is 2 > is that the number of processes ontap should use for scrubbing? > > a or b or c or d, or all of them? > > any other suggestions or comments are welcome !! > > cu > hannes > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hannes Herret IT-Service / Storage > phone : +43 (1) 60 126-34 Bacher Systems EDV GmbH > fax : +43 (1) 60 126-555 Wienerbergstr. 11B > mailto:hh@bacher.at A-1101 Wien, Austria > www : http://www.bacher.at/ Europe >

3 6

Virus Scanning
by Honeycutt, Michael 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

Does anyone out there use Norton Carrier Scan Server for virus scanning with a filer? I am having some issues with it crashing with a generic RPC call error being logged in the message log on the filer. Thanks. Michael Honeycutt Systems Engineer IBM Global Services

1 0

RE: Secureadmin setup.
by Lam, Murphy 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

For Data ONTAP 6.0 and above, you'll need SecureAdmin 2.1.1. You can download SecureAdmin 2.1.1 from the NOW site. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Davis [mailto:jdavis@cs.arizona.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 3:19 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Secureadmin setup. > > > After jumping through the various web browser hoops to get > Secureadmin 1.0 > installed on a 740 running 6.1.1, I tried to run > > secureadmin setup ssh > > on the console, as the install.htm (and release.htm) file > said. But that > simply returns > > secureadmin not found. Type '?' for a list of commands > > What am I missing? The filer did log > > Tue Jul 24 14:53:26 MST [luiza: Java Thread:info]: > netapp.servlets.admin.Api: SecureAdmin 1.0 has been successfully > installed. >

2 1

RE: .nfsXXXX files cause ClearCase remove commands to fail ...
by Fox, Adam 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

It's not configurable, it's not even a filer-specific thing. Those .nfs files are being created because some other process out there is currently accessing the file that you asked to be deleted. That's what causes .nfs files. It's part of the NFS spec to do so. If they are still around after the client is no longer accessing the file, then the client did not delete them which again, according to the spec, it the client's responsibility. At that point, you can delete them manually. Check out the following NTAP Knowledge Base article for more details: http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=ntapcs1105&resource= Hope this helps. -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: John Sambrook [mailto:john_sambrook@yahoo.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 3:57 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: .nfsXXXX files cause ClearCase remove commands to fail ... > > > > We have a couple of Sun servers running ClearCase version 4.2, > patch level 3, with a NetApp F740 filer providing VOB and view > storage. We host VOB databases on the filer as well, not just > pools. > > When we attempt to delete a VOB, using the ClearCase "rmvob" > command, the command fails. Upon investigation, it appears > that the filer is creating .nfsXXXX files, corresponding to > files that were open at the time they were deleted. > > I'd like to know if others have encountered this problem, > and if so what they did to resolve it. Perhaps the creation > of these files is configurable? > > Thanks for any advice. > > John Sambrook > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with > Yahoo! Messenger > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ >

5 4

NetApp Data Protection web site
by Melvin, Grant 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

Hi, Last night we went LIVE! with a new set of web pages devoted to NetApp's Data Protection solutions. It can be found at: http://www.netapp.com/solutions/data_protection.html Hopefully, some of your backup, tape device support and other data protection questions can now be answered by this content. At least it should prevent you from having to hunt & peck your way through NOW, etc for this data. If you have any feedback/input on improving the DP site, please send me your comments. Cheers, Grant =========== grant(a)netapp.com ========== Grant Melvin === === Software Development Manager === === Data Availability & Management === |\ | __ ___ /\ __ __ === Network Appliance === | \ | |__ | /__\ |__| |__| === 475 East Java Drive === | \| |__ | / \ | | (R) === Sunnyvale === === California, 94089 === === Tel:(408)822-6761 =========== Network Appliance ========== Fax:(408)822-4578

1 0

domain controller authentication algorithm
by Todd C. Merrill 24 Jul '01

24 Jul '01

What causes a filer to terminate and then reconnect to a domain controller? For instance: Mon Jul 2 21:36:10 EDT [rc:info]: Connection with DC \\DC1 terminated Mon Jul 2 21:37:39 EDT [CIFSAdmin:info]: Connection with DC \\DC2 established In addition, the service reporting either a termination or establishment seems to vary. My current logs show both coming from: [CIFSAdmin:info]: [CIFSAdmin]: [CIFSAuthen:info]: [CIFSAuthen]: [GbE-II/e5:info]: [GbE-III/e4:info]: [GbE-e5]: [rc:info]: [rc]: What's the difference? What's the algorithm behind it? Until next time... The Mathworks, Inc. 508-647-7000 x7792 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098 508-647-7001 FAX tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com ---

1 0

.nfsXXXX files cause ClearCase remove commands to fail ...
by John Sambrook 24 Jul '01

24 Jul '01

We have a couple of Sun servers running ClearCase version 4.2, patch level 3, with a NetApp F740 filer providing VOB and view storage. We host VOB databases on the filer as well, not just pools. When we attempt to delete a VOB, using the ClearCase "rmvob" command, the command fails. Upon investigation, it appears that the filer is creating .nfsXXXX files, corresponding to files that were open at the time they were deleted. I'd like to know if others have encountered this problem, and if so what they did to resolve it. Perhaps the creation of these files is configurable? Thanks for any advice. John Sambrook __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

1 0

Setting up Quota's with SecureShare Quota Manager 2.0
by Grey, Michael 24 Jul '01

24 Jul '01

Has anyone had experience setting up quota's on a filer running 6.1R1 using SecureShare Quota Manager 2.0 What I would like to do is have 3 levels of quota's (High - 500Mb, Medium - 350Mb, Low - 200Mb) established. These would be established via a Global group in Windows NT. For example: you are a member of the Medium Global Group you would receive a home directory with a quota of 350Mb. We have approximately 2000 users and I would rather manage the quota system based on being a member of a Global Group if possible. The volumes will be configured as CIFS Has anyone had experience setting up quota's to work with NT Global Groups and if so, is there any thing special to look out for? Regards, Michael Grey Client / Server Technical Support Information Technology Services Toronto Transit Commission 416-393-6791 michael.grey(a)ttc.ca

1 0

Filer burn-in testing
by Joe Luchtenberg 24 Jul '01

24 Jul '01

Searching the filers archive for the thread on redundant FCALs from several months ago I stumbled across a post by Dave Hitz from 1997 touching on the pre-ship system burn-in process and QA program as they existed then (http://teaparty.mathworks.com:1999/toasters/0588.html). Sounded interesting, and I'm curious how things have progressed in the last four years. Anyone from NetApp able to comment on the current state of these programs? TIA. Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. 757-858-0600 757-285-1223 (mobile) 757-858-0606 (fax) joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com www.data-line.com

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters