toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

Benchmarks
by Joe Luchtenberg 20 Aug '01

20 Aug '01

SPEC pulled the benchmark (SPECsfs97) that NetApp has used for so long as the yardstick for their screaming performance (see http://www.spec.org/osg/sfs97/sfs97_notice.html). As far as I can tell, there is no replacement from SPEC. Curiosity question: Do any of you out there in toasterland use published benchmark statistics in order to at least narrow the field when considering future storage options? If so, how does this development effect you? Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. 757-858-0600 757-285-1223 (mobile) 757-858-0606 (fax) joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com www.data-line.com

1 0

VSCAN Timeouts
by Honeycutt, Michael 20 Aug '01

20 Aug '01

Does anyone know if you can change the time out for vscan requests? Come to think of it, does anyone know what the time out duration is? Michael Honeycutt MCSE/A+ Systems Engineer IBM Global Services

1 0

RE: ndmpcopy problem
by Fox, Adam 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

Hmm..I haven't seen my one with an attachement come through, maybe the list doesn't allow it so I'll just post it in text here..it's not really that big. Enjoy! -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com ## ## Copyright (c) 1999 Network Appliance, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ## ## Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining ## a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the ## "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including ## without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, ## distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to ## permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to ## the following conditions: ## ## The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included ## in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. ## ## THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS ## OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, ## FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL ## THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER ## LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING ## FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER ## DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. ## SUBDIRS= lib src TARGETS = all clean $(TARGETS):: for i in $(SUBDIRS); do cd $$i ; $(MAKE) $@ || exit 1; cd .. ;done > -----Original Message----- > From: Fox, Adam [mailto:Adam.Fox@netapp.com] > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:47 PM > To: 'Jim Davis'; neil lehrer > Cc: toasters > Subject: RE: ndmpcopy problem > > > That's basically what I did with the version I > attached on my last message. I hacked out that > version a month or two ago when a TSE had a call > with that issue so I wrote it up. It's a pretty > simple change. > > -- Adam Fox > NetApp Professional Services, NC > adamfox(a)netapp.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jim Davis [mailto:jdavis@cs.arizona.edu] > > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:07 PM > > To: neil lehrer > > Cc: toasters > > Subject: Re: ndmpcopy problem > > > > > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, neil lehrer wrote: > > > > > hi, > > > > > > i downloaded ndmpcopy 1.2 from ndmp.org > > > > > > when i first tried to make it on solaris 7 i got > > > > > > make: Fatal error: Unknown option `-C' > > > > Are you using Sun's make (/usr/ccs/bin/make)? I get a > > similar error on > > Solaris 7 with that, but it works with GNU make. > > > > The '-C' is basically just to cd to the lib and src > > subdirectories and run > > the Makefiles there, so you could modify the toplevel Makefile > > appropriately if you wanted to stick with Sun's make. > > >

1 0

ndmpcopy problem solved
by neil lehrer 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

got solaris binary. also, got sun compatible makefile. thanks to everyone. -- regards +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Neil Lehrer + + United States International Broadcasting Bureau + System Development Division + + voice 202 619-2524 + fax 202 619-3576 + nlehrer(a)ibb.gov + + " is this crisis an opportunity or just + another grab the fire extinguisher moment?" + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

RE: ndmpcopy problem
by Fox, Adam 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

That's basically what I did with the version I attached on my last message. I hacked out that version a month or two ago when a TSE had a call with that issue so I wrote it up. It's a pretty simple change. -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Davis [mailto:jdavis@cs.arizona.edu] > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:07 PM > To: neil lehrer > Cc: toasters > Subject: Re: ndmpcopy problem > > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, neil lehrer wrote: > > > hi, > > > > i downloaded ndmpcopy 1.2 from ndmp.org > > > > when i first tried to make it on solaris 7 i got > > > > make: Fatal error: Unknown option `-C' > > Are you using Sun's make (/usr/ccs/bin/make)? I get a > similar error on > Solaris 7 with that, but it works with GNU make. > > The '-C' is basically just to cd to the lib and src > subdirectories and run > the Makefiles there, so you could modify the toplevel Makefile > appropriately if you wanted to stick with Sun's make. >

1 0

ndmpcopy problem
by neil lehrer 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

hi, i downloaded ndmpcopy 1.2 from ndmp.org when i first tried to make it on solaris 7 i got make: Fatal error: Unknown option `-C' *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all' from the src: SUBDIRS= lib src TARGETS = all clean $(TARGETS):: for i in $(SUBDIRS); do $(MAKE) -C $$i $@ || exit 1; done removing the '-C' does not correct the problem. suggestions? -- regards

3 2

RE: ndmpcopy problem
by Manley, David 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

I believe -C is a gmake option, but wouldn't swear to it. Does your problem go away if you use gmake instead of make? -dave -----Original Message----- From: neil lehrer To: toasters Sent: 8/17/01 8:39 AM Subject: ndmpcopy problem hi, i downloaded ndmpcopy 1.2 from ndmp.org when i first tried to make it on solaris 7 i got make: Fatal error: Unknown option `-C' *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all' from the src: SUBDIRS= lib src TARGETS = all clean $(TARGETS):: for i in $(SUBDIRS); do $(MAKE) -C $$i $@ || exit 1; done removing the '-C' does not correct the problem. suggestions? -- regards <<Card for neil lehrer>>

1 0

None
by owner-toasters＠mathworks.com 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

1 0

RE: F880
by Joe Luchtenberg 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

Dual CPU F840. Same capacity, expansion slots, etc. The second processor is for performance, not fault tolerance, and they're advertising 50% performance increase (purportedly; haven't seen benchmark data). Also, PC card drive replaces floppy. Oh, and the bezel is UUUUUUUGLY! Supposed to be orderable, even though it hasn't been publicly announced. Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. 757-858-0600 757-285-1223 (mobile) 757-858-0606 (fax) joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com www.data-line.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Don Hickey [mailto:don.hickey@rebel.com] > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:40 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: F880 > > > I've seen an ad. for this... What is the 880 filer???? I > couldn't find > any product announcement on NOW or the regular netapp site. > > Thanks. >

1 0

F880
by Don Hickey 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

I've seen an ad. for this... What is the 880 filer???? I couldn't find any product announcement on NOW or the regular netapp site. Thanks.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters