toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13514 discussions

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Mike McBride 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

Mcafee has worked well for us - so far. We had to make sure "Domain Admins" had rights to the folders or we would get permission problems. ~mike -----Original Message----- From: Walsh, Warren (MN65) [mailto:warren.walsh@honeywell.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:47 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share I've had problems with the app crashing, with an error about the path being too long. -warren -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Maglinger, Paul 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

We use McAfee products here and have run scans against our filer with no problems. -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

MacOS X and CIFS on filer
by Steve Losen 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

MacOS X comes with a CIFS client that works with our filers running 6.0.1R3. To use it just get into the "Finder" and go to the "Go" menu and use "Connect to Server". At the "Address:" text entry type smb://filer.host.name/share And you are prompted for your CIFS loginid and password. I've run into two annoyances. 1) MacOS does not appear to reconnect if a session goes idle. Looks like it's still connected, but nothing works. From a Unix window, df indicates that the share is not mounted. So you have to disconnect by dragging and dropping the icon representing the CIFS share into the wastebasket and connect again. 2) If you drag and drop a file into your CIFS share, you get an annoying dialog box that says: Sorry, the operation could not be completed because an unexpected error occurred (Error Code -50). And in /etc/messages on the filer you see this: Thu Nov 1 16:03:03 EST [home1: FastEnet-10/100/e0:CRITICAL]: CIFS t2 request 6 not implemented debuginfo( 1 39 7a D-128-13-59) ^^^^^^^^^^^ hostname of my mac The file copies just fine, so you can just ignore the error. But you can't drag and drop entire folders because of this. Anyone have any idea what's up? Other stuff works fine, such as Unix commands from a Unix window. Looks like a viable solution for Mac users who want to use a filer. Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

2 2

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Nail, Larry 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

No, can't say that I've seen that. Are you scanning "compressed" files like zip or tar's? -----Original Message----- From: Mike Sphar [mailto:mike.sphar@peregrine.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:11 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share You haven't run into any problems with the scan "hanging"? The few times I've run scans against very larges shares, every so often the scan would just stop and sit at one file forever, and not the same file each time, it just seemed sort of random. Made automated scans pretty useless for me. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - R&D Support Peregrine Systems, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Nail, Larry [mailto:lnail@ti.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:41 PM To: 'Leonard, Roger'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share We use Norton AntiVirus 5 to scan shares without any problems... Just turn the snapshots off ahead scan time. -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Mike Sphar 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

You haven't run into any problems with the scan "hanging"? The few times I've run scans against very larges shares, every so often the scan would just stop and sit at one file forever, and not the same file each time, it just seemed sort of random. Made automated scans pretty useless for me. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - R&D Support Peregrine Systems, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Nail, Larry [mailto:lnail@ti.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:41 PM To: 'Leonard, Roger'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share We use Norton AntiVirus 5 to scan shares without any problems... Just turn the snapshots off ahead scan time. -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Nail, Larry 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

We use Norton AntiVirus 5 to scan shares without any problems... Just turn the snapshots off ahead scan time. -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Leonard, Roger 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

Snapmirror
by Neil Stichbury 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

Folks, I have a requirement to Snapmirror from a Filer using BCS disks to a Filer using ZCS disks. I understand that checksum reversion will take place during the initial sync and that with around 400GB to mirror this will add around two hours to the process. Question: Will the incremental mirroring that occurs, occur as per normal ?. Ie no issues other than the initial reversion ? After a few weeks the Snapmirror will be set in the other direction (ZCS to BCS). Will the reversion process occur again ?. Ontap is 6.01.R3 in both Filers. Regards, Neil Stichbury Client Services gen-i Limited Ph: +64-9-306-4717 FaX: +64-9-306-4543 Email:nhs@gen-i.co.nz This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal http://www.gen-i.co.nz

1 0

RE: Veritas NetBackup 3.4 NDMP backup failure
by Collie, Michael 31 Oct '01

31 Oct '01

Attached is a note from STK regarding tape cleaning options on the L700. >>>>>>><<<<<<<<< To let the backup app determine when to clean a drive Auto Clean is turned off in the library. STK libraries, with Auto Clean enabled, will present status to the backup application that a drive is being cleaned. The drives all present to the library that they need to be cleaned and the drive vendors like this because drives should only be cleaned when necessary - prevents excessive head wear. With Auto Clean enabled in a library a clean will occur when the drive tells the library that it needs to be cleaned. This means that a clean operation could occur in the middle of a multi-volume backup causing problems for the backup application. None of the backup applications make use of the status the library presents to say that a clean operation is occurring, they all have different methods of cleaning drives. Some base cleaning on number of mounts and some on hours of use - drive vendors don't like either method as they only want a drive to be cleaned when they determine that it is necessary. Because the backup apps don't make use of the library status notification we usually suggest that customer's let the backup app determine when to clean a device. This means that a clean will occur when the backup app wants to do one, this way you don't encounter cleanings during multi-volume backups. Veritas NetBackup put out a big patch recently that addressed this cleaning issue (and other issues), I think in patch 3.4.1 - you will have to check the Veritas site. NetBackup will now detect that a drive is being cleaned and 'wait' for this to end. In the case of a DLT drive this could take 20-30 minutes because the DLT drives never use the same area of a cleaning tape, they always space forward to a new area on the cleaning tape. -----Original Message----- From: ilya.birman(a)abnamro.com [mailto:ilya.birman@abnamro.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:55 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Veritas NetBackup 3.4 NDMP backup failure ----- Forwarded by Ilya Birman/US/ABNAMRO/NL on 10/31/2001 01:00 PM ----- Ilya Birman To: 'toasters <'toasters(a)mathworks.com'" 10/31/2001 <toasters(a)mathworks.com> 10:31 AM cc: support(a)veritas.com, support(a)storagtek.com Subject: Veritas NetBackup 3.4 NDMP backup failure We have a 760 NetApp Filer that we backup using NetBackup 3.4 via NDMP ( StorageTek L700) The volume of the backup job is large and spans across numerous tapes. Often StorageTek L700 detects that tape drive needs to be cleaned and in the middle of the backup job, while backup job switches tapes. This causes Veritas to DOWN the tape drive. Have anyone run into this problem. Is there a setting you can set ( turning off Auto Clean is not an option) TIA Ilya --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Veritas NetBackup 3.4 NDMP backup failure
by ilya.birman＠abnamro.com 31 Oct '01

31 Oct '01

----- Forwarded by Ilya Birman/US/ABNAMRO/NL on 10/31/2001 01:00 PM ----- Ilya Birman To: 'toasters <'toasters(a)mathworks.com'" 10/31/2001 <toasters(a)mathworks.com> 10:31 AM cc: support(a)veritas.com, support(a)storagtek.com Subject: Veritas NetBackup 3.4 NDMP backup failure We have a 760 NetApp Filer that we backup using NetBackup 3.4 via NDMP ( StorageTek L700) The volume of the backup job is large and spans across numerous tapes. Often StorageTek L700 detects that tape drive needs to be cleaned and in the middle of the backup job, while backup job switches tapes. This causes Veritas to DOWN the tape drive. Have anyone run into this problem. Is there a setting you can set ( turning off Auto Clean is not an option) TIA Ilya --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters