toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

SecureAdmin
by fubar＠pir.net 12 Dec '01

12 Dec '01

SecureAdmin 2.1.1 ONTAP 6.1R1 New system, just slapped SecureAdmin on it... secure filer view works happily, ssh has ... issues. I can connect fine from a host running ssh v1.2.27, but connecting from OpenSSH hosts seems to fail. Said hosts are FreeBSD and Solaris running 2.3.0 and 2.5.1_p1 respectively. Initially, I thought it was a protocol 2 issue, but that's not it. Here's what happens: SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0 green(a)FreeBSD.org 20010321, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. Compiled with SSL (0x0090600f). debug: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug: Applying options for * debug: ssh_connect: getuid 0 geteuid 0 anon 0 debug: Connecting to (null) [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] port 22. debug: Allocated local port 1022. debug: Connection established. debug: Remote protocol version 1.5, remote software version 2.1.1 debug: match: 2.1.1 pat ^2\. debug: Local version string SSH-1.5-OpenSSH_2.3.0 green(a)FreeBSD.org 20010321 debug: Waiting for server public key. debug: Received server public key (512 bits) and host key (768 bits). debug: Host 'xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx' is known and matches the RSA host key. debug: Encryption type: 3des debug: Sent encrypted session key. debug: Installing crc compensation attack detector. debug: Received encrypted confirmation. debug: Doing password authentication. root(a)xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx's password: debug: Requesting pty. debug: Requesting X11 forwarding with authentication spoofing. Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding. debug: Requesting authentication agent forwarding. Warning: Remote host denied authentication agent forwarding. debug: Requesting shell. debug: Entering interactive session. Connection to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx closed. debug: Transferred: stdin 0, stdout 1, stderr 36 bytes in 0.5 seconds debug: Bytes per second: stdin 0.0, stdout 2.0, stderr 73.4 debug: Exit status 0 I can't imagine that everyone out there using ssh on the filer is also still using the old ssh versions, so it's gotta be me. Right? K.

3 2

Looking to buy 3 FC DB9M to DB9M cables and a loopback adapter today
by Ulf Zimmermann 12 Dec '01

12 Dec '01

Hello, I just got a F720 with 3 shelves, unfortunatly all the cables are missing. So I would like to buy if possible today those cables and a loopback adapter. I am sitting in Menlo Park right now. Any takers ? -- Regards, Ulf. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-865-0204

1 0

subst command
by neil lehrer 12 Dec '01

12 Dec '01

hi, our home dir structure does not match netapp's homedir options nor is net use viable because we currently use users\firstletterofuid\uid users\n\nlehrer so i am testing subst subst h: \\filer\users\n\nlehrer it works, but if i try to get permissions for a file or dir i get: no network provider accepted the given network path domain is nt4 client is nt4 filer is 6.1.1r2, cifs and nfs. anybody seen this? comments -- regards +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Neil Lehrer + + United States International Broadcasting Bureau + System Development Division + + voice 202 619-2524 + fax 202 619-3576 + nlehrer(a)ibb.gov + + " is this crisis an opportunity or just + another grab the fire extinguisher moment?" + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

RE: NDMP v4
by Manley, David 11 Dec '01

11 Dec '01

> I'm looking more from a backup >operator's point of view, so I'm also assuming that the backup vendors >are working on implementing this new version of NDMP in their software. Yes, the implication here is exactly right--v4 certainly buys you nothing if the backup vendor doesn't yet support v4. However, I believe most vendors are planning to release support for this fairly soon. (I'll avoid putting my foot further into my mouth with anything more specific.) Furthermore, besides the requirement of fixing some loopholes which caused troubles and cleaning up error reporting somewhat, alot of the new functionality is provided by extensions to the base protocol. And implementing any given extension is optional with v4. So I guess the short answer is: for now, there's probably no benefit to turning on ndmp v4. In the future, there will be some snazzy new things (for example snapshot management from the backup application). Cheers, dave -----Original Message----- From: Geoff Hardin To: toasters(a)mathworks.com; quickrestore(a)dalsemi.com Sent: 12/11/01 6:51 AM Subject: NDMP v4 I just got the product availabilty release from NetApp this morning for DOT 6.1.2 and it mentioned support for NDMP v4. Anyone know what this buys the average end-user? I'm looking more from a backup operator's point of view, so I'm also assuming that the backup vendors are working on implementing this new version of NDMP in their software. I tried reading the draft proposal for v4, but it's rather dry reading to the layman. I included the link in case anyone else is interested (or an insomniac). http://www.ndmp.org/download/sdk_v4/draft-skardal-ndmpv4-03.txt Thanks, Geoff Hardin geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com

1 0

NDMP v4
by Geoff Hardin 11 Dec '01

11 Dec '01

I just got the product availabilty release from NetApp this morning for DOT 6.1.2 and it mentioned support for NDMP v4. Anyone know what this buys the average end-user? I'm looking more from a backup operator's point of view, so I'm also assuming that the backup vendors are working on implementing this new version of NDMP in their software. I tried reading the draft proposal for v4, but it's rather dry reading to the layman. I included the link in case anyone else is interested (or an insomniac). http://www.ndmp.org/download/sdk_v4/draft-skardal-ndmpv4-03.txt Thanks, Geoff Hardin geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com

1 0

null user login accepted
by Steven Boyer 10 Dec '01

10 Dec '01

When I have cifs.trace_login set to on I see the user accepted by the DC and then by unix. Sometimes I get "Null user login accepted" does anyone know why that is. Thanks -- Steven N. Boyer UNIX/NT/NetApp Support HQUSCENTCOM General Dynamics --

1 0

Filers attached to sendmail clients
by JV 09 Dec '01

09 Dec '01

Dear Toasters, aka Netapp Filer admins: This is my first post, and my first F840. I have a problem with the ONTAP Autosupport email feature. My Filer is directly connected with a crossover cable, on a private network. The attached unix host (part of the larger corporate intranet) is a sendmail client, not a server. Q. How can I get the NetApp Filer, on a private network (and can only talk to this one unix host), to get it's email forwarded to the $MAILHUB which is a centrally-maintained and very reachable from the afforementioned unix host? Surely someone else on this list has a similar config? Or do y'all just have 100 sendmail servers in your organizations? Thx in advance -

3 2

RE: Upgrading F760 from Ontap 6.01R3 to 6.1.1R2
by Galimi, Grant 09 Dec '01

09 Dec '01

Mustafa, I ran through the upgrade without a problem on 3 filers 3 weeks ago. I upgraded 2 740s and one 720. I have one 720 and one 740 doing a Snapmirror to another 740 in a remote location. I had to turn off the snapmirror schedule first on the source filers (snapmirror off) and upgrade the destination filer first. Everything went very well. Grant Galimi Director, Technical Services The Thomson Corporation 1 Station Place Stamford, CT 06902 203-328-9413 203-977-8344 fax grant.galimi(a)thomson.com <mailto:grant.galimi@thomson.com> http://www.thomson.com <http://www.thomson.com> -----Original Message----- From: Sayla, Mustafa [mailto:MSAYLA@mesirowfinancial.com] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:17 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Upgrading F760 from Ontap 6.01R3 to 6.1.1R2 We are looking into upgrading our Data Ontap version to 6.1.1R2 and just wanted to find out whether there are issues with it or not. We have to upgrade it because I want to use the new DS14 shelf and it is not supported in 6.0.1R3. We have our Exchange, MS SQL and Sybase data on it. Has anybody done this upgrade and how did it went. Any input will be appreciated. Mustafa

4 3

creation of acls
by neil lehrer 07 Dec '01

07 Dec '01

hi, i did this on my 760 6.1.1r2 created unix style qtree. copied files from sun box into it. changed qtree to ntfs. set acl on qtree[only] using nt 4 windows explorer. touched existing files from mount on sun box - no acl created on files in qtree. touched a new file from from mount on sun box - acl created on files in qtree. touchd existing file from cifs session - no acl created on file. edited existing file from cifs session - no acl created on file. created new file from cifs session - acl created on file. question, why doesn't editing file cause acl creation? thanks. -- regards +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Neil Lehrer + + United States International Broadcasting Bureau + System Development Division + + voice 202 619-2524 + fax 202 619-3576 + nlehrer(a)ibb.gov + + " is this crisis an opportunity or just + another grab the fire extinguisher moment?" + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

RE: ndmpcopy
by Manley, David 07 Dec '01

07 Dec '01

Type: ftp://ftp.ndmp.org/pub/version.2/contrib/ndmpcopy.1.1/ into your browser. Download the file "jndmpcopy.tar.gz." Unzip and untar and install that. This whould have the -i option both in usage and use. If, for some reason, any of the above is false, let me know, but I followed the above steps previously and got a working jndmpcopy. -dave -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Kennedy To: NDMP List Sent: 12/7/01 6:59 AM Subject: ndmpcopy I ftp'd ndmpcopy (both version 1.1 and 1.2) from ndmp.org and compiled the binary. BTW, is it just me or are the install instructions incorrect? I had to run gnu make in lib before running make in ndmpcopy directory. Anyway... Now I have a 1.2 binary but when I look at the useage it doesn't mention an 'i' level anywhere. In the README it does but the binary useage does not. So I thought I'd give it a try anyway but it bombs with an error that 'i' is not a valid level. ??? -- ===================== Jeff Kennedy Unix Administrator AMCC jlkennedy(a)amcc.com

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters