toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13523 discussions

subcribe
by McDonald, June 18 Dec '01

18 Dec '01

June McDonald Manager Strategic Alliances Network Appliance 495 E. Java Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Phone: 408-822-3238 Fax: 408-822-4611 email: junem(a)netapp.com <mailto:junem@netapp.com> Data Protection Solutions: http://www.netapp.com/solutions/data_protection.html <http://www.netapp.com/solutions/data_protection.html>

1 0

ownership changing under nfs and unix style qtree
by neil lehrer 18 Dec '01

18 Dec '01

hi, ontap 6.1.1r2 nfs and cifs, nt4 domain and nis. i have a user whose dirs and files keep getting their ownership changed to root and then he can't manipulate the files. he accesses his files from win nt 4 with an nfs client. is this happening because his id is in the nt domain admins group and administrator is mapped to root in usermap.cfg? if so, what is a good way to approach this? admins should always have two ids? thanks. -- regards +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Neil Lehrer + + United States International Broadcasting Bureau + System Development Division + + voice 202 619-2524 + fax 202 619-3576 + nlehrer(a)ibb.gov + + " is this crisis an opportunity or just + another grab the fire extinguisher moment?" + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

RE: Performance and vifs
by Drew O'Donnell 18 Dec '01

18 Dec '01

Yes I have, It only uses the additional ports when necessary, also you need to be careful how you set up your trunk groups, they are manufacturer defined. We use Foundry switches, and set them up as server based trunk groups. If the trunk is not defined properly on the switch you may also experience this problem. If you have the capability of switching to Gigabit II I recommend it, we had a lot of issues with our quad cards and the trunk groups on the switches. We implemented the Gigabit II cards on our 820 in a single vif with no issues. Drew -----Original Message----- From: Haber, David J. [mailto:David.Haber@vtmednet.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:49 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Performance and vifs I am still having some performance issues but they seem to be better after upgrading to v 6.1.1r2. My question is about vifs. I have a 4 port vif using a quad NIC in an 820 filer. I have ether channel set up on my Cisco 5500 switch. All seems to be ok except it looks like only the first port in the vif is doing any work. Has anyone seen something like this?

1 0

symlink.translations file for cifs
by neil lehrer 18 Dec '01

18 Dec '01

i read the info in the SAG and don't get the implication. when i set up the symlink for the cifs.home_dir option and did a cd to the symlink i ended up in the correct place and the net use * \\filer\uid worked okay. should i be doing something with the symlink.translations file? thanks. -- regards +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Neil Lehrer + + United States International Broadcasting Bureau + System Development Division + + voice 202 619-2524 + fax 202 619-3576 + nlehrer(a)ibb.gov + + " is this crisis an opportunity or just + another grab the fire extinguisher moment?" + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

2 3

RE: SME 2000 bug
by Mankovsky, Mike 18 Dec '01

18 Dec '01

Hi Joe, There was a formatting error in the online bug that caused part of the bug description information to be left out. This online bug has now been refreshed and is available for viewing. Thanks for pointing this issue out, Mike Mankovsky Network Appliance Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Joe Luchtenberg [mailto:joe.luchtenberg@data-line.com] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:07 AM To: Toasters discussion list (E-mail) Subject: SME 2000 bug Can anybody clarify what Bug #53144 is about? (See http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=53144.) Pertains to MS Exchange 2000 and SnapManager for Exchange. NOW provides no further description but does suggest for a workaround to run eseutil /z. TIA. Joe

1 0

Performance and vifs
by Haber, David J. 18 Dec '01

18 Dec '01

I am still having some performance issues but they seem to be better after upgrading to v 6.1.1r2. My question is about vifs. I have a 4 port vif using a quad NIC in an 820 filer. I have ether channel set up on my Cisco 5500 switch. All seems to be ok except it looks like only the first port in the vif is doing any work. Has anyone seen something like this?

1 0

Filer backup and BrightStore
by Alek M. Woronow 18 Dec '01

18 Dec '01

Hi everybody, We have problem as following: For NAS backups we used BrightStore software (v. 10.0, build 1170, SP1, by Computer Associates). There is streamer DLT8000 connected to filer (NetApp F-85, DOT 6.1.1R2). NDMP is enabled - switch ON. Bright Store agent is logging into NAS properly, but we get the 'Lost Connection' message after mark volume (vol/vol0). Can it be caused by lack of the streamer? Is it possible use BrightStore to manage backup on NAS? How is it possible to call NDMP commands from BrightStore? Anybody know how use BrightStore to backup filers? Thanks in advance, Aleksander M. Woronow amw(a)polbox.pl aworonow(a)softex.com.pl Softex Data, Poland, Warsaw

1 0

where do you usual sell a netapp ?
by Ulf Zimmermann 17 Dec '01

17 Dec '01

I was wonder where people usual post for sale for netapps. Probably going to sell this F720 in a few weeks after playing around with it to get more comfortable with its software and operation. -- Regards, Ulf. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-865-0204

2 3

accessing ntfs qtree from nt nfs client
by neil lehrer 17 Dec '01

17 Dec '01

hi, volume is unix style, qtrees are what ever i set them to, no mixed. i set up an ntfs qtree vol/vol0/smalltest2 full path to userdir is vol/vol0/smalltest2/k/kusr1 there is an export for vol/vol0/smalltest2. kusr1 is the owner of vol/vol0/smalltest2/k/kusr1 and has an acl with full control. for both /smalltest2/k and /smalltest2 everyone has an acl with full control, which should be overkill. RX should be enough. if kusr1 uses an nfs[we haven't moved over to cifs yet, migrating] connection from an nt 4.0 wkstation and tries to save a file into vol/vol0/smalltest2/k/kusr1 the application[word, notepad, etc.] says folder is read only. file name is entered into dir, but no data in file. from a mount on a sun box it looks like this: # ls -al drwxrwxrwx 4 root other 4096 Dec 17 12:47 smalltest2 # cd smalltest2 # ls -al drwxrwxrwx 3 root other 4096 Dec 13 15:43 k # cd k # ls -al drwxrwxrwx 2 kusr1 root 4096 Dec 17 12:08 kusr1 ~~~~~~~~~ "Account Domain not found" is a local grp on the filer that cacls does not understand. F:\>cacls smalltest2 F:\smalltest2 <Account Domain not found>(OI)(IO)F <Account Domain not found>(CI)F Everyone:(OI)(IO)F Everyone:(CI)F F:\>cacls smalltest2\k F:\smalltest2\k domain_name\nlehrer:(OI)(IO)F domain_name\nlehrer:(CI)F Everyone:(OI)(IO)F Everyone:(CI)F <Account Domain not found>(OI)(IO)F <Account Domain not found>(CI)F F:\>cacls smalltest2\k\kusr1 F:\smalltest2\k\kusr1 domain_name\kusr1:(CI)F domain_name\nlehrer:(CI)(special access:) READ_CONTROL SYNCHRONIZE FILE_GENERIC_READ FILE_GENERIC_WRITE FILE_GENERIC_EXECUTE FILE_READ_DATA FILE_WRITE_DATA FILE_APPEND_DATA FILE_READ_EA FILE_WRITE_EA FILE_EXECUTE FILE_DELETE_CHILD FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES <Account Domain not found>F domain_name\kusr1:(OI)(IO)F domain_name\nlehrer:(OI)(IO)(special access:) GENERIC_READ GENERIC_WRITE GENERIC_EXECUTE FILE_DELETE_CHILD <Account Domain not found>(OI)(CI)(IO)F ontap is 6.1.1r2 access by nt nfs client to our sun servers has always worked fine. anybody have any ideas? netapp has pktt traces, no response yet. -- regards +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Neil Lehrer + + United States International Broadcasting Bureau + System Development Division + + voice 202 619-2524 + fax 202 619-3576 + nlehrer(a)ibb.gov + + " is this crisis an opportunity or just + another grab the fire extinguisher moment?" + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

moving qtrees to new volume
by Leigh David Heyman 17 Dec '01

17 Dec '01

Does anyone have any advice/experiences/warnings on moving data from one volume to another. We're about to create a new volume on a new shelf, and we want to move about 10 qtrees on to the new volume, and I'm looking to see if anyone has any recommendations on how best to accomplish this quickly, and without altering the data, or metadata? Thanks -Leigh

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters