toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

SME 2000 bug
by Joe Luchtenberg 17 Dec '01

17 Dec '01

Can anybody clarify what Bug #53144 is about? (See http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=53144.) Pertains to MS Exchange 2000 and SnapManager for Exchange. NOW provides no further description but does suggest for a workaround to run eseutil /z. TIA. Joe

1 0

Re: shopping for refurb filers
by ScottUCE＠aol.com 17 Dec '01

17 Dec '01

In a message dated 12/14/2001 2:47:05 PM Central Standard Time, walt(a)dwkcb.com writes: > Are there any good places to get used/off-lease > refurbished filers at good prices? They have to have some > sort of warranty even if its only 90 days. We have all models of used NetApp F700 series filers and add-ons -- available at deep discounts, configured to suit, and fully warranted. Some have freely transferable NFS, CIFS and/or Cluster licenses; others are great for back-up systems and/or spares kits. Regards, Scott Fischmann Union Computer Exchange, Inc. 6233 Idylwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55436 Phone: 952 935 7282 FAX: 952 935 5056 scott(a)unioncomputer.com

1 0

RE: UCD SNMP and NetApp MIBs
by Stout, Noelette 16 Dec '01

16 Dec '01

You need to tell snmpwalk more specifically what you're looking for, or it will walk the entire tree for the filer. In the case of the raid tables, you're looking for enterprises.netapp.netapp1.raid.raidVTable.raidVEntry. With snmpget, you would also specify even further down to, say, raidVDiskId.0. The .0 on the end is the instance number for the disk, each disk would have its own instance number. This is a pretty brief overview of the way UCD-SNMP works. Feel free to contact me if you have other questions. Noelette Stout Unix System Administrator IKON Office Solutions, Inc Digital Express tel. (770)326-4140 fax (770)326-4139 email: nstout(a)ikon.com -----Original Message----- From: Ben Rockwood [mailto:BRockwood@homestead-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:47 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: UCD SNMP and NetApp MIBs Hello Toasters. I'm trying to write a simple dainty application to check for drive failures in our Filers. I'm going to implement this app in a PERL script which will use UCD SNMP to pull variables from the Filers. The problem is that when I walk the SNMP tree on a Filer I only get network statistics. I'm getting info in the following manner: # export MIBFILE="/usr/local/share/snmp/mibs/netapp_1_5.mib" # snmpwalk -v 1 bigfiler public I get about 2027 lines of output with IP, TCP, UDB, SNMP stats, plus address translation tables. But what I really want to see is the the RAID tables. Any idea what I need to do? I've found no help elsewhere on the net, including NetApp's NOW site. I DID find one page on NOW that listed several SNMP Groups found in the MIB, but I don't know how to access them. Any help is appreciated. Ben Rockwood brockwood(a)homestead-inc.com

2 1

freebsd-hackers: "Major NFS Bugs Found & Being Fixed"
by Brian Tao 16 Dec '01

16 Dec '01

Seems like it targets local and remote filesystems, affecting both the server and client sides. I'll have to try running fsx from a recent Solaris 8 or patched FreeBSD 4.4 client mounting a filer to see what happens (though I suspect Netapp's already done this ;-)). http://kerneltrap.org/article.php?sid=415 -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)risc.org) "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"

1 0

RE: Real vs Raw disk space
by Strange, Steve 15 Dec '01

15 Dec '01

> 73 GB disks "right sized" to 68000 MB (with zoned checksums.. anyone know if that's the same with block checksums?) For 73 GB drives, the "right-sized" size is indeed the same for both zone and block checksums. For 36 GB disks, there's a difference of 1GB between zone and block checksum right-sizings. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Tom Yergeau [mailto:yergeau@speakeasy.org] Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 10:59 AM To: Geoff Hardin; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Real vs Raw disk space 73 GB disks "right sized" to 68000 MB (with zoned checksums.. anyone know if that's the same with block checksums?) Since you can't use 14 disks and still have a spare, I'm doing this with one seven disk set and one six disk set. (68000 MB * 7) - 68000 MB (parity) = 408000 (68000 MB * 6) - 68000 MB (parity) = 340000 408000 MB + 340000 MB = 748000 MB 748000 MB * 0.9 = 673200 MB (lose 10% to WAFL) 673200 MB * (1 GB / 1024 MB) = 657.42 GB So... that would be 657.42 GB usable, assuming no snap reserve. However, I think if you're buying a DS14 you'll get block checksum disks, which might be right sized to a different size, in which case it would be a different answer. :) MD ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Hardin" < <mailto:geoff.hardin@dalsemi.com> geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com> To: "toasters" < <mailto:toasters@mathworks.com> toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:35 PM Subject: Real vs Raw disk space Toasters, We are looking at purchasing some new DS14 shelves with 72 GB disks. In order to properly forecast our disk space growth, I was wondering if anyone out there had taken a look at the difference between real and usable disk space realized with these new shelves and drives. Basically, our environment is as follows: DS14 Shelf with 14 72 GB disks (1 RAID group of 8 disks, 1 RAID group of 6 disks), attached to a filer running DOT 6.1R1P1. We will have 1 spare disk and no snap reserve. Geoff Hardin <mailto:geoff.hardin@dalsemi.com> geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com

1 0

Real vs Raw disk space
by Geoff Hardin 15 Dec '01

15 Dec '01

Toasters, We are looking at purchasing some new DS14 shelves with 72 GB disks. In order to properly forecast our disk space growth, I was wondering if anyone out there had taken a look at the difference between real and usable disk space realized with these new shelves and drives. Basically, our environment is as follows: DS14 Shelf with 14 72 GB disks (1 RAID group of 8 disks, 1 RAID group of 6 disks), attached to a filer running DOT 6.1R1P1. We will have 1 spare disk and no snap reserve. Geoff Hardin geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com

3 2

shopping for refurb files
by Walt Zapor 15 Dec '01

15 Dec '01

Are they're any good places to get used/off-lease refurbished filers at good prices? They have to have some sort of warrenty even if its only 90 days.

2 1

RE: UCD SNMP and NetApp MIBs
by Ben Rockwood 14 Dec '01

14 Dec '01

Okey, sorry for the second reply, but I understand traps much better now. I don't understand what you mean about "without killing it"? Do you mean running the script I wrote ala traps, thereby meaning "killing the script". Or instead are you insinulating that traps can have adverse effects on the Filer? I can't see how the latter can be true, so please elaborate if you would. For my purposes, error detection and reporting, traps seem to be the way to go, however I'm reluctant to use them for the following reasons: 1) Traps add a layer of complexity that is uncomfortable 2) Traps make any application very difficult to easily distribute. This is mostly due to the added necessity to run and configure a trap daemon. 3) It still doesn't replace the need for direct OID querries, in that traps are triggered when the netapp thinks they should... I don't yet trust OnTap that much. 4) In writing an application to report and notify on the traps you now have to write an application to parse the traps logs from trapd, rather than let an OID value set a variable directly. This considerably can add to complexity, since I don't want reporting to occur if it doesn't have to. Can anyone shed so light that might reassure me? Is anyone using traps in custom applications at their site with some pointers? I only really became interested in traps when I looked for them in the MIB and found all the traps to be fault related and mostly proactive which is a BIG plus. Helpful hints from experience are appreciated. Ben Rockwood UNIX Systems Admin Homestead Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Thomas.L.White(a)jpmorgan.com [mailto:Thomas.L.White@jpmorgan.com] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:11 AM To: Jose Celestino Cc: Ben Rockwood; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: UCD SNMP and NetApp MIBs Have you ever tried to get an SNMP out of one of those traps without killing it ?? tw Jose Celestino <japc(a)co.sapo.pt>@mathworks.com on 12/14/2001 08:39:44 AM Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com To: Ben Rockwood <BRockwood(a)homestead-inc.com> cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: UCD SNMP and NetApp MIBs Is there any reason not to use snmp traps ? Thus spake Ben Rockwood, on Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:47:21PM -0800: > Hello Toasters. > > I'm trying to write a simple dainty application to check for drive > failures in our Filers. I'm going to implement this app in a PERL > script which will use UCD SNMP to pull variables from the Filers. The > problem is that when I walk the SNMP tree on a Filer I only get network > statistics. I'm getting info in the following manner: > > # export MIBFILE="/usr/local/share/snmp/mibs/netapp_1_5.mib" > # snmpwalk -v 1 bigfiler public > > I get about 2027 lines of output with IP, TCP, UDB, SNMP stats, plus > address translation tables. But what I really want to see is the the > RAID tables. > Any idea what I need to do? I've found no help elsewhere on the net, > including NetApp's NOW site. I DID find one page on NOW that listed > several > SNMP Groups found in the MIB, but I don't know how to access them. > > Any help is appreciated. > > Ben Rockwood > brockwood(a)homestead-inc.com -- Jose Celestino <japc(a)co.sapo.pt> ---------------------------------

2 1

Re: mounting CIFS on Solaris
by JV 14 Dec '01

14 Dec '01

I'm not too familiar with the issue but Solaris PC NetLink is free and does some neat things: Solaris PC NetLink (based on AT&T Advanced Server for Unix) delivers native Windows NT network services--which include directory, authentication, and file-and-print services--on Solaris servers. Users continue to receive the full functionality of the services exactly as if they were running on a Windows NT server. This way users get more access to their files and data. Specifically, PC NetLink provides the following native NT networking services on Solaris servers: A complete implementation of Windows NT 4.0 Server Directory (PDC/BDC - NTDS) on Solaris Security and authentication (SAM/SID) NetBIOS and WINS Network browser File and print (NTFS) Service Pack compliant http://www.sun.com/interoperability/netlink/ -JV At 07:58 AM 12/13/01 -0600, you wrote: >I know that Linux can mount up a ntfs cifs share on a filer using smbmount - >is there anything out there that one can use for Solaris? looking for ways >to mount up our nt file shares on Solaris 8 boxes. sun had a product for >mounting up nt boxes (solstice nfs). this required the nfs client to be >running on the nt side. anyone aware of anything else?

2 1

RE: UCD SNMP and NetApp MIBs
by Ben Rockwood 14 Dec '01

14 Dec '01

No. I don't know how they work well enough yet. In my understanding thus far traps give you the ability To both poll and modify SNMP OID values. The reason I'm Liking SNMP is because I'm _not_ risking a value change... This means that an idiot can check the netapp status with SNMP with no danger of harming the system. That's why I like SNMP. Purhaps this afternoon I'll study traps a bit more...... Can you think of any reasons I might want to use traps? brockwood(a)homestead-inc.com -----Original Message----- From: Thomas.L.White(a)jpmorgan.com [mailto:Thomas.L.White@jpmorgan.com] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:11 AM To: Jose Celestino Cc: Ben Rockwood; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: UCD SNMP and NetApp MIBs Have you ever tried to get an SNMP out of one of those traps without killing it ?? tw Jose Celestino <japc(a)co.sapo.pt>@mathworks.com on 12/14/2001 08:39:44 AM Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com To: Ben Rockwood <BRockwood(a)homestead-inc.com> cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: UCD SNMP and NetApp MIBs Is there any reason not to use snmp traps ? Thus spake Ben Rockwood, on Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:47:21PM -0800: > Hello Toasters. > > I'm trying to write a simple dainty application to check for drive > failures in our Filers. I'm going to implement this app in a PERL > script which will use UCD SNMP to pull variables from the Filers. The > problem is that when I walk the SNMP tree on a Filer I only get network > statistics. I'm getting info in the following manner: > > # export MIBFILE="/usr/local/share/snmp/mibs/netapp_1_5.mib" > # snmpwalk -v 1 bigfiler public > > I get about 2027 lines of output with IP, TCP, UDB, SNMP stats, plus > address translation tables. But what I really want to see is the the > RAID tables. > Any idea what I need to do? I've found no help elsewhere on the net, > including NetApp's NOW site. I DID find one page on NOW that listed > several > SNMP Groups found in the MIB, but I don't know how to access them. > > Any help is appreciated. > > Ben Rockwood > brockwood(a)homestead-inc.com -- Jose Celestino <japc(a)co.sapo.pt> ---------------------------------

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters