toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

Start a nNew thread

cifs performance
by neil lehrer 21 Mar '02

21 Mar '02

is there a way to identify which how much resources a cifs session is using? thanks. ontap 6.1.1r2p1d17 -- regards

1 0

FW: archiving? SnapVault? Software Coupled with the NearStore? R100
by Shapiro, Skip 21 Mar '02

21 Mar '02

Network Appliance announced two archiving solutions yesterday with NearStore(TM) R100: - eEmail archiving solutions with IXOS Software' IXOS-eCONserver for Microsoft Exchange and Lotus Notes http://www.netapp.com/news/press/2002/news_rel_20020320f.html - Application-independent archiving with Enigma Data Systems SmartMove software http://www.netapp.com/news/press/2002/news_rel_20020320e.html For more information on these and other NearStore solutions, please check out the following web page: http://www.netapp.com/products/nearstore/ Skip Shapiro Manager, Storage Product Marketing Network Appliance® The evolution of storageTM. -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Kennedy [mailto:jlkennedy@amcc.com] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:13 AM To: neil lehrer Cc: toasters Subject: Re: archiving? SnapVault? Software Coupled with the NearStore? R100 You need to check out Enigma Data Systems for that ability. NetApp can setup demo's so you would contact your local Sales Rep. www.enigmadata.com ~JK neil lehrer wrote: > > i read the product announcement for SnapVault(tm) Software Coupled with the > NearStore(tm) R100. it seems like a good centralized backup for filers. however, > i was hoping to see archiving included - send files over x days with no use to > the r100. does anyone know if netapp is working on archiving? > -- > > regards -- ===================== Jeff Kennedy Unix Administrator AMCC jlkennedy(a)amcc.com

1 0

archiving? SnapVault Software Coupled with the NearStore R100
by neil lehrer 21 Mar '02

21 Mar '02

i read the product announcement for SnapVault Software Coupled with the NearStore R100. it seems like a good centralized backup for filers. however, i was hoping to see archiving included - send files over x days with no use to the r100. does anyone know if netapp is working on archiving? -- regards

2 1

mrtg and filers
by neil lehrer 21 Mar '02

21 Mar '02

hi, are there any docs around that discuss using mrtg with filers? i would like to monitor my filers, but am not snmp conversant. -- regards

1 0

RE: THE NEW REDHOOK Snapmirror using QTREE's
by Wurster, Richard M DSTI 21 Mar '02

21 Mar '02

Sounds great, but when can we get our hands on Data OnTap 6.2??????? -----Original Message----- From: Joe Luchtenberg [mailto:joe.luchtenberg@data-line.com] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:58 PM To: 'Noll, Kevin'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: THE NEW REDHOOK Snapmirror using QTREE's SnapMirror Qtree-level product enhancement was announced Monday. Product information is updated on the public website by now. To summarize: - Requires ONTAP 6.2 - Single destination volume can host mirrored data for multiple source filers' qtrees - Destination qtree is read-only, but it can reside in a read-write volume on the destination filer - Each destination volume supports up to 29 mirrored qtrees; cannot cascade - Works at a logical file level, so it does NOT transfer FILESYSTEM metadata ==> protection against file corruption at destination site, which previously would have been replicated with volume-level SnapMirror - Dramatically improves capacity management for destination filer with multiple sources - Can replicate smaller data sets, further reducing capacity requirements, while improving bandwidth and CPU overhead loads; however, if mirroring the entire volume it does take longer and use more capacity than volume-based SnapMirror (approximately 5% overhead compared to volume-level SnapMirror) - Changing between volume- and qtree-level (in either direction) requires a new level 0 HTH. Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. Email: joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com Phone: 757-457-0504 (direct line) 757-858-0600 (front desk) 757-285-1223 (mobile) Fax: 757-858-0606 Please visit us at www.data-line.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Noll, Kevin [mailto:kevin.noll@cgey.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:31 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: THE NEW REDHOOK Snapmirror using QTREE's > > > HI > > I would like to know if with the new Redhook, if it will be > possible to do > snap shots on a qtree basis. > > Thanks > KEVIN NOLL > > > ************************************************************** > ****************************** > " This message contains information that may be privileged or > confidential and > is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is > intended only for > the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the > intended recipient, you > are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, > distribute, or use > this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message > in error, please > notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ". > ************************************************************** > ****************************** >

1 0

RE: THE NEW REDHOOK Snapmirror using QTREE's
by Joe Luchtenberg 21 Mar '02

21 Mar '02

SnapMirror Qtree-level product enhancement was announced Monday. Product information is updated on the public website by now. To summarize: - Requires ONTAP 6.2 - Single destination volume can host mirrored data for multiple source filers' qtrees - Destination qtree is read-only, but it can reside in a read-write volume on the destination filer - Each destination volume supports up to 29 mirrored qtrees; cannot cascade - Works at a logical file level, so it does NOT transfer FILESYSTEM metadata ==> protection against file corruption at destination site, which previously would have been replicated with volume-level SnapMirror - Dramatically improves capacity management for destination filer with multiple sources - Can replicate smaller data sets, further reducing capacity requirements, while improving bandwidth and CPU overhead loads; however, if mirroring the entire volume it does take longer and use more capacity than volume-based SnapMirror (approximately 5% overhead compared to volume-level SnapMirror) - Changing between volume- and qtree-level (in either direction) requires a new level 0 HTH. Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. Email: joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com Phone: 757-457-0504 (direct line) 757-858-0600 (front desk) 757-285-1223 (mobile) Fax: 757-858-0606 Please visit us at www.data-line.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Noll, Kevin [mailto:kevin.noll@cgey.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:31 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: THE NEW REDHOOK Snapmirror using QTREE's > > > HI > > I would like to know if with the new Redhook, if it will be > possible to do > snap shots on a qtree basis. > > Thanks > KEVIN NOLL > > > ************************************************************** > ****************************** > " This message contains information that may be privileged or > confidential and > is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is > intended only for > the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the > intended recipient, you > are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, > distribute, or use > this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message > in error, please > notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ". > ************************************************************** > ****************************** >

1 0

THE NEW REDHOOK Snapmirror using QTREE's
by Noll, Kevin 21 Mar '02

21 Mar '02

HI I would like to know if with the new Redhook, if it will be possible to do snap shots on a qtree basis. Thanks KEVIN NOLL ******************************************************************************************** " This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ". ********************************************************************************************

1 0

RE: displaying number of active cifs sessions
by neil lehrer 21 Mar '02

21 Mar '02

thanks to everyone cifs sessions -summary will work fine. -- regards

1 0

M2 firmware and NDMP
by Stout, Noelette 21 Mar '02

21 Mar '02

We running F840c filers backing up over NDMP (using NetBackup) to an Exabyte X200 library with Mammoth2 tape drives. We recently received notification from Exabyte that a firmware upgrade is available. We would like to do this upgrade, but do not want to cause any problems with the NDMP backups from the filer. Has anyone done this upgrade or have any insights into this? Thanks, Noelette Stout Unix System Administrator IKON Office Solutions, Inc Digital Express tel. (770)326-4140 fax (770)326-4139 email: nstout(a)ikon.com

1 0

RE: displaying number of active cifs sessions
by Manny Ortega 21 Mar '02

21 Mar '02

That is correct ;) I have the OID on this page: http://redhook.univ-wea.com/mrtg/pikecifssessions.html -MannyO -----Original Message----- From: kevin graham [mailto:kgraham@dotnetdotcom.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:38 PM To: neil lehrer Cc: toasters Subject: Re: displaying number of active cifs sessions > if i want to know how many active sessions there are i do Just do an snmpget on: enterprises.netapp.netapp1.cifs.cifsInfo.cifsNSessions.0 (.1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.7.2.12.0 for the mib-impaired). ..kg..

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters