toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

R100 Performance Problems
by Frank Marxs 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

I'm working with a customer who just got an R-100 and the performance is much less than we expected. I'm wondering what type of performance other people are experiencing with their R-100, or for that matter with other similar low-cost drive storage options. If anyone has actually had time to run a benchmark that would be great. Thanks Frank Marxs RHCE, CCNP, CCDP, CNA, "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." - Albert Einstein -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

1 0

RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date"
by Daniel Finn 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

I do not believe the volume was full, I believe it was around 90% usage. I have tried upgrading all of the disks firmware, it says they are all already up to date. How can I take the filer down to run HW diags? -----Original Message----- From: Simon Probert [mailto:Simon.Probert@gen-i.co.nz] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:13 PM To: 'Daniel Finn' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" OK. If the disk count in the sysconfig -d matches your physical number of disks you have installed, and it looks like it has, then you have a single volume failure. Ontap writes label information to each disk, hence the ability to plug the disks in anywhere and the filer will find the disks and form the volume. You are using an FC card in slot 4 (not the onboard FC) which if it can see all the disks is pointing to a volume corruption problem and not a hardware problem. To be sure you could take the filer down and run HW diagnostics?? Was the volume full?? Have you tried upgrading all the disk firmware?? I have found the following bug reports on the NOW site. Do you have access to NOW?? Take a look at these articles to see if ah apply?? -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Finn [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 12:02 p.m. To: 'Simon Probert'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" all the lights appear to be fine. slot 0: System Board (NetApp System Board V N4) Model Name: F760 Serial Number: 230349 Firmware release: 2.8_a2 Processors: 1 Memory Size: 1024 MB na3m-be> version NetApp Release 6.1.2R2: Thu Mar 21 02:30:01 PST 2002 na3m-be> sysconfig -d HA.ID HA SHELF BAY CHAN Disk Vital Product Information ----- ------------ ----- ------------------------------ 4.0 4 0 0 FC:A LKJ776580000101934DX 4.1 4 0 1 FC:A LKG5741100001018J2UA 4.2 4 0 2 FC:A LKJ762100000294605VU 4.3 4 0 3 FC:A LKJ777610000101937YA 4.4 4 0 4 FC:A LKJ76717000010160N6D 4.5 4 0 5 FC:A 3EL090FJ00007127KQXA 4.6 4 0 6 FC:A 3EL08X6K00007127KR2U 4.8 4 1 0 FC:A LKJ766660000101939NA 4.9 4 1 1 FC:A LR84217700007023HWY5 4.10 4 1 2 FC:A LKJ78361000010193802 4.11 4 1 3 FC:A LK779515000020060LVT 4.12 4 1 4 FC:A LK191771000020060SUJ 4.14 4 1 6 FC:A 3EL02WCJ0000V1060MRC 4.16 4 2 0 FC:A LR85728800007023J7Y8 4.17 4 2 1 FC:A LKJ778250000101934FW 4.18 4 2 2 FC:A LKJ783510000101803UW 4.19 4 2 3 FC:A LKJ781640000101937T4 4.20 4 2 4 FC:A LKJ78362000010180Y7L 4.21 4 2 5 FC:A LKJ7682600001017H3H8 4.22 4 2 6 FC:A LRF80892000070394QF7 4.24 4 3 0 FC:A LKJ7815800002943HF67 4.25 4 3 1 FC:A LKJ76648000010182BDA 4.26 4 3 2 FC:A LKJ76437000010163C85 4.27 4 3 3 FC:A LKJ76386000010182CHR 4.28 4 3 4 FC:A LKJ783090000101939QJ 4.29 4 3 5 FC:A LK1974720000101934D2 4.30 4 3 6 FC:A LKJ797290000101939UB 4.32 4 4 0 FC:A LKJ759310000601738J8 4.33 4 4 1 FC:A LKJ77604000010172SG5 4.34 4 4 2 FC:A 3EL02VMC0000V1050D1R 4.35 4 4 3 FC:A LR8068580000102132FB 4.36 4 4 4 FC:A LKJ781720000101939HC 4.37 4 4 5 FC:A LKJ776940000101937NK 4.38 4 4 6 FC:A LKJ779400000101807H2 4.40 4 5 0 FC:A LKJ772680000101807JS 4.41 4 5 1 FC:A LKJ77941000010180LUD 4.42 4 5 2 FC:A LKJ78257000010091VD9 4.43 4 5 3 FC:A LKJ766030000101937X7 4.44 4 5 4 FC:A LKJ79601000010200C27 4.45 4 5 5 FC:A LKJ778470000101937Q5 4.46 4 5 6 FC:A LKJ76768000010151624 4.48 4 6 0 FC:A LKJ77630000010180LUQ 4.49 4 6 1 FC:A LKJ78226000010180DFS 4.50 4 6 2 FC:A LKJ6753800001018HJBL 4.51 4 6 3 FC:A LKJ77933000010200249 4.52 4 6 4 FC:A LKJ76738000020070JN2 4.54 4 6 6 FC:A LKJ0904400002008HEW1 -----Original Message----- From: Simon Probert [mailto:Simon.Probert@gen-i.co.nz] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:02 PM To: 'Daniel Finn' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" Have you check you have power and lights on the PSU's and checked the status of the LED lights on the LRC's. What filer head? What shelf type? What disk type and size? What DOT Version. Send output sysconfig -d. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Finn [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:58 a.m. To: 'Simon Probert' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" there are 7 in a shelf though? I don't understand how I could have 5 disk missing, I only see one failure in the messages file. -----Original Message----- From: Simon Probert [mailto:Simon.Probert@gen-i.co.nz] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:58 PM To: 'Daniel Finn' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" You have got 5 disks missing. Are you sure you don't have a shelf powered off?? -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Finn [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:31 a.m. To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.net' Subject: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks are "o ut-of-date" Importance: High What does this mean? na3m-be> vol status Volume State Status Options vol0 online normal root vol1 offline partial na3m-be> vol status vol1 Volume State Status Options vol1 offline partial raid group 0: partial from the log file: Mon Feb 3 17:26:52 EST [kern.syslog.msg:CRITICAL]: Volume vol1 is missing 5 disks from RAID group 0 and is being taken offline for this boot. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [raid.assim.outofdateNdisks:ALERT]: More than one disk in RAID group 0 of volume vol1 has a valid label not consistent with all the others. These disks are assumed to be out of date; their contents cannot be restored. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.32 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.37 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.6 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.24 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.25 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.30 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.11 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.33 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.27 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.3 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.16 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.29 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.35 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.28 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.36 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.9 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.18 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.2 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.5 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.10 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.14 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.17 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.0 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.1 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.19 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.54 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.20 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.12 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.52 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.4 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.44 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.45 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.38 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks Dan ____________________________________________________________________ CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify Air New Zealand immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Air New Zealand. _____________________________________________________________________ For more information on the Air New Zealand Group, visit us online at http://www.airnewzealand.com _____________________________________________________________________ ================================================================ This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal at gen-i limited - http://www.gen-i.co.nz ================================================================ ================================================================ This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal at gen-i limited - http://www.gen-i.co.nz ================================================================ ================================================================ This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal at gen-i limited - http://www.gen-i.co.nz ================================================================

1 0

RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date"
by Daniel Finn 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

all the lights appear to be fine. slot 0: System Board (NetApp System Board V N4) Model Name: F760 Serial Number: 230349 Firmware release: 2.8_a2 Processors: 1 Memory Size: 1024 MB na3m-be> version NetApp Release 6.1.2R2: Thu Mar 21 02:30:01 PST 2002 na3m-be> sysconfig -d HA.ID HA SHELF BAY CHAN Disk Vital Product Information ----- ------------ ----- ------------------------------ 4.0 4 0 0 FC:A LKJ776580000101934DX 4.1 4 0 1 FC:A LKG5741100001018J2UA 4.2 4 0 2 FC:A LKJ762100000294605VU 4.3 4 0 3 FC:A LKJ777610000101937YA 4.4 4 0 4 FC:A LKJ76717000010160N6D 4.5 4 0 5 FC:A 3EL090FJ00007127KQXA 4.6 4 0 6 FC:A 3EL08X6K00007127KR2U 4.8 4 1 0 FC:A LKJ766660000101939NA 4.9 4 1 1 FC:A LR84217700007023HWY5 4.10 4 1 2 FC:A LKJ78361000010193802 4.11 4 1 3 FC:A LK779515000020060LVT 4.12 4 1 4 FC:A LK191771000020060SUJ 4.14 4 1 6 FC:A 3EL02WCJ0000V1060MRC 4.16 4 2 0 FC:A LR85728800007023J7Y8 4.17 4 2 1 FC:A LKJ778250000101934FW 4.18 4 2 2 FC:A LKJ783510000101803UW 4.19 4 2 3 FC:A LKJ781640000101937T4 4.20 4 2 4 FC:A LKJ78362000010180Y7L 4.21 4 2 5 FC:A LKJ7682600001017H3H8 4.22 4 2 6 FC:A LRF80892000070394QF7 4.24 4 3 0 FC:A LKJ7815800002943HF67 4.25 4 3 1 FC:A LKJ76648000010182BDA 4.26 4 3 2 FC:A LKJ76437000010163C85 4.27 4 3 3 FC:A LKJ76386000010182CHR 4.28 4 3 4 FC:A LKJ783090000101939QJ 4.29 4 3 5 FC:A LK1974720000101934D2 4.30 4 3 6 FC:A LKJ797290000101939UB 4.32 4 4 0 FC:A LKJ759310000601738J8 4.33 4 4 1 FC:A LKJ77604000010172SG5 4.34 4 4 2 FC:A 3EL02VMC0000V1050D1R 4.35 4 4 3 FC:A LR8068580000102132FB 4.36 4 4 4 FC:A LKJ781720000101939HC 4.37 4 4 5 FC:A LKJ776940000101937NK 4.38 4 4 6 FC:A LKJ779400000101807H2 4.40 4 5 0 FC:A LKJ772680000101807JS 4.41 4 5 1 FC:A LKJ77941000010180LUD 4.42 4 5 2 FC:A LKJ78257000010091VD9 4.43 4 5 3 FC:A LKJ766030000101937X7 4.44 4 5 4 FC:A LKJ79601000010200C27 4.45 4 5 5 FC:A LKJ778470000101937Q5 4.46 4 5 6 FC:A LKJ76768000010151624 4.48 4 6 0 FC:A LKJ77630000010180LUQ 4.49 4 6 1 FC:A LKJ78226000010180DFS 4.50 4 6 2 FC:A LKJ6753800001018HJBL 4.51 4 6 3 FC:A LKJ77933000010200249 4.52 4 6 4 FC:A LKJ76738000020070JN2 4.54 4 6 6 FC:A LKJ0904400002008HEW1 -----Original Message----- From: Simon Probert [mailto:Simon.Probert@gen-i.co.nz] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:02 PM To: 'Daniel Finn' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" Have you check you have power and lights on the PSU's and checked the status of the LED lights on the LRC's. What filer head? What shelf type? What disk type and size? What DOT Version. Send output sysconfig -d. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Finn [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:58 a.m. To: 'Simon Probert' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" there are 7 in a shelf though? I don't understand how I could have 5 disk missing, I only see one failure in the messages file. -----Original Message----- From: Simon Probert [mailto:Simon.Probert@gen-i.co.nz] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:58 PM To: 'Daniel Finn' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" You have got 5 disks missing. Are you sure you don't have a shelf powered off?? -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Finn [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:31 a.m. To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.net' Subject: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks are "o ut-of-date" Importance: High What does this mean? na3m-be> vol status Volume State Status Options vol0 online normal root vol1 offline partial na3m-be> vol status vol1 Volume State Status Options vol1 offline partial raid group 0: partial from the log file: Mon Feb 3 17:26:52 EST [kern.syslog.msg:CRITICAL]: Volume vol1 is missing 5 disks from RAID group 0 and is being taken offline for this boot. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [raid.assim.outofdateNdisks:ALERT]: More than one disk in RAID group 0 of volume vol1 has a valid label not consistent with all the others. These disks are assumed to be out of date; their contents cannot be restored. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.32 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.37 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.6 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.24 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.25 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.30 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.11 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.33 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.27 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.3 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.16 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.29 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.35 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.28 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.36 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.9 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.18 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.2 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.5 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.10 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.14 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.17 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.0 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.1 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.19 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.54 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.20 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.12 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.52 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.4 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.44 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.45 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.38 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks Dan ____________________________________________________________________ CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify Air New Zealand immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Air New Zealand. _____________________________________________________________________ For more information on the Air New Zealand Group, visit us online at http://www.airnewzealand.com _____________________________________________________________________ ================================================================ This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal at gen-i limited - http://www.gen-i.co.nz ================================================================ ================================================================ This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal at gen-i limited - http://www.gen-i.co.nz ================================================================

1 0

netapp crashed, won't bring data volume back online because "Ther e is an out-of-date disk"
by Daniel Finn 03 Feb '03

03 Feb '03

What does this mean? na3m-be> vol status Volume State Status Options vol0 online normal root vol1 offline partial na3m-be> vol status vol1 Volume State Status Options vol1 offline partial raid group 0: partial from the log file: Mon Feb 3 17:26:52 EST [kern.syslog.msg:CRITICAL]: Volume vol1 is missing 5 disks from RAID group 0 and is being taken offline for this boot. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [raid.assim.outofdateNdisks:ALERT]: More than one disk in RAID group 0 of volume vol1 has a valid label not consistent with all the others. These disks are assumed to be out of date; their contents cannot be restored. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.32 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.37 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.6 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.24 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.25 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.30 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.11 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.33 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.27 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.3 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.16 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.29 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.35 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.28 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.36 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.9 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.18 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.2 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.5 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.10 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.14 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.17 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.0 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.1 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.19 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.54 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.20 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.12 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.52 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.4 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.44 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.45 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.38 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks Dan

1 0

Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks are "o ut-of-date"
by Daniel Finn 03 Feb '03

03 Feb '03

1 0

DataONTAP and Solaris 8 NIS Update
by Brent.Killion＠pinnaclewest.com 02 Feb '03

02 Feb '03

Toasters- A rather interesting update for everyone on the problem I posted yesterday with an 880c and FAS960c clusters that refused to bind to a Solaris 8 NIS server. Just to help us isolate the problem between OS and NIS, we initialized a Solaris 2.6 system, as a NIS slave to the Solaris 8 NIS server that we couldn't get the filers to bind to. Surprisingly, the FAS960c bound with no problems to the Solaris 2.6 NIS slave. To us, this rules out a configuration issue with the NIS domain itself and focuses the problem back to an apparent Solaris 8 NIS/DataONTAP incompatibility. I was somewhat surprised that no one replied that they are using Solaris 8 NIS with DataONTAP. I have updated the tech support case I have opened with both Sun and NetApp and I'll keep the list informed as the solution moves along. Thanks, Brent Killion

5 5

RE: OnTap 6.3.1 and cifs setup problems.
by Kumar, Rahul 01 Feb '03

01 Feb '03

Hi, Yes I agree to the problem you are facing. Try creating an account for the filer in the domain. wait for the replication to happen and thenm run cifs setup. You shd be fine. But i assume that the filer by running cifs setting even when the account is not precreated has the ability to create a computer account for itself. You can find that option in the gui mode of admin http://<name_of_filer>/na_admin. Also pl check with your admins if you are a member of account operators (just a guess). FYI, If the win2k domain is in native mode, then your best bet would be to downgrade to 6.3, run cifs setup, join the domain and reupgrade to 6.3.1. Actually there is a i feel so, a bug in version prior to 6.3 in which the filers cannot join to the native win2k domain using fqdn eg abc.rest.com. I doesnt just understand the native doman properly. It shd be a problem. We have done this on our couple of filers to make em properly talk to Win2k native domain. Hope this helps... I think netapp shd do something about it. Right ..! -----Original Message----- From: John Stoffel [mailto:stoffel@lucent.com] Sent: Fri 1/31/2003 8:36 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Cc: Subject: OnTap 6.3.1 and cifs setup problems. Hi, I'm having a problem getting an F760 with NFS/CIFS running OnTap 6.3.1 to actually talk to our Win2K domain properly. I'm assuming it's a priv problem on the PDC side, but I don't know enough of how to fix it. Basically, whenever I try to run 'cifs setup', it fails at the end with the following message: Could not create Active Directory account for the filer: No such object CIFS could not create server machine account. But I'm supposed to have the privs with my account to add this machine into ActiveDirectory. Has anyone else run into stuff like this? And does anyone have any hints on what I need to do on the Windows PDC to give myself the privs I need to get this done? Thanks, John John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies stoffel(a)lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-399-0479

1 0

URGENT BUSINESS TRUSTEE
by NZANGA JOSEPH MOBUTU. 01 Feb '03

01 Feb '03

From: NZANGA JOSEPH MOBUTU Attn: Managing director/CEO DEAR Sir, I am the first son of the late Mobutu Sese Seko, the former President of the Congo Republic. I am presently under protective custody in South Africa as a political refugee. I got your contact during my search for a stranger that can cooperate with me in this mutual transaction. I want you to note that this business will benefit both of us. However, you must confirm your ability to handle this because it involves a large amount of money. The money (28 million US DOLLARS is my share of my father's estate. I boxed and shipped the money to a security company abroad at the peak of the war/political crisis that rocked my country few years ago. Now the crisis has ended and I need a trustworthy person like you to proceed to the place of the security company in order to clear the fund and invest on my behalf as I don�t want my name to be used for now. Note that I will send to you the relevant documents that will enable you take possession of the fund for onward investment for our mutual benefit. All I need from you is as follows: 1.A letter of commitment (dully signed) that you will keep the transaction strictly confidential. 2. Your confirmation of your ability to handle this. 3. Your international passport or driving license number for identification to the security company. 4. Your telephone and fax numbers for communication. 5. Your full permanent address. As soon as I get the above information from you, I will disclose to you the name and the country of the security company. I will forward your name and particulars to the security company to enable them contact you accordingly. I will also send to you a LETTER OF AUTHORITY to enable you clear the fund on my behalf. Note that this is a very safe transaction as this money is my share of my father's estate. i am waiting for your response to enable us proceed. Regards, NZANGA JOSEPH MOBUTU.

1 0

F810 NFS and Redhat 7.3 NFS client
by devnull＠adc.idt.com 31 Jan '03

31 Jan '03

Hey Toasters, I have a F810 that has 14 36G hard drives and a fiber gige interface which goes to a gigabit switch. I have a PC with dual AMD 2400, with an Intel Pro/1000 card going to the switch. The PC runs RH 7.3(2.4.20-ac2) To test out the performance of the F810 and the Gige card on the pc i was copying some large files from the netapp to /tmp on the pc. This is sysstat 1 on the filer when copying 2 600 MB file at the same time. CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache in out read write read write age 7% 2957 0 0 578 456 432 0 0 0 0 7% 2998 0 0 584 379 420 0 0 0 0 6% 2515 0 0 501 292 428 0 0 0 0 7% 2718 0 0 508 313 416 0 0 0 0 7% 2683 0 0 585 521 548 0 0 0 1 7% 3000 0 0 595 335 416 0 0 0 1 7% 2996 0 0 602 332 388 0 0 0 1 -> Copy starts here. 37% 3612 0 0 1253 25639 31860 0 0 0 1 26% 3466 0 0 1262 24587 19844 0 0 0 1 38% 3340 0 0 1359 31793 33012 0 0 0 1 44% 3550 0 0 1528 37383 33416 3712 0 0 1 43% 3980 0 0 1639 38032 36032 0 0 0 1 42% 3987 0 0 1570 36681 34908 0 0 0 1 43% 4008 0 0 1666 39013 36772 0 0 0 1 43% 3045 0 0 1619 41176 37460 0 0 0 1 38% 3725 0 0 1625 36720 31900 0 0 0 1 43% 3971 0 0 1601 35833 36072 0 0 0 0 43% 3996 0 0 1756 40026 36128 0 0 0 0 38% 3755 0 0 1722 35324 31400 0 0 0 0 32% 3705 0 0 1406 24439 24572 0 0 0 0 CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache in out read write read write age 14% 2969 0 0 1027 13672 8648 0 0 0 0 35% 3354 0 0 1166 21786 23680 4156 0 0 0 37% 3639 0 0 1492 35612 32752 40 0 0 0 30% 3437 0 0 1428 30895 25240 0 0 0 0 22% 2936 0 0 1026 17779 15564 0 0 0 0 15% 2884 0 0 871 13407 10216 0 0 0 0 17% 3063 0 0 922 12456 11876 0 0 0 0 24% 3243 0 0 1106 17971 18944 0 0 0 0 29% 3388 0 0 1243 21611 23076 0 0 0 0 35% 3343 0 0 1440 30513 29988 0 0 0 0 24% 3235 0 0 1379 24765 18560 0 0 0 0 14% 2970 0 0 1035 12599 8724 0 0 0 0 26% 3331 0 0 1032 16208 20976 0 0 0 0 35% 3497 0 0 1378 30365 27676 1696 0 0 0 18% 2819 0 0 1088 20064 13260 0 0 0 0 29% 3408 0 0 1162 21594 23644 0 0 0 0 26% 3325 0 0 1155 23374 20692 0 0 0 0 19% 3116 0 0 1034 17871 14496 0 0 0 0 40% 3729 0 0 1478 32892 35180 0 0 0 0 35% 3585 0 0 1437 31921 29700 0 0 0 0 CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache in out read write read write age 25% 3296 0 0 1317 28307 19424 0 0 0 0 31% 3455 0 0 1167 22380 25776 0 0 0 0 -> ONE COPY DONE 7% 2802 0 0 736 6367 1596 0 0 0 0 21% 3226 0 0 1343 6780 14896 0 0 0 0 38% 3509 0 0 1918 30963 29880 2092 0 0 0 37% 3667 0 0 1536 35661 32572 0 0 0 0 38% 3648 0 0 1553 36857 33316 0 0 0 0 40% 3733 0 0 1573 38545 35332 0 0 0 0 17% 3064 0 0 1087 19765 11564 0 0 0 0 -> BOTH COMPLETED 5% 2452 0 0 474 215 0 0 0 0 0 5% 2456 0 0 491 215 0 0 0 0 0 5% 2510 0 0 549 235 0 0 0 0 0 This is systat 1 when copying 1 600MB file CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache in out read write read write age 6% 2714 0 0 537 242 0 0 0 0 6 5% 2457 0 0 556 241 0 0 0 0 6 5% 2243 0 0 379 174 0 0 0 0 6 8% 2715 0 0 538 242 276 736 0 0 6 6% 2718 0 0 544 236 0 0 0 0 6 6% 2781 0 0 551 234 8 0 0 0 6 -> COPY START 34% 3539 0 0 847 11658 29900 0 0 0 5 42% 3739 0 0 1625 41039 37608 0 0 0 3 43% 3819 0 0 1674 40651 37924 0 0 0 1 22% 3193 0 0 1560 38455 17424 0 0 0 1 5% 2450 0 0 557 240 0 0 0 0 -> COPY DONE 5% 2351 0 0 468 213 0 0 0 0 1 6% 2716 0 0 454 206 0 0 0 0 1 The load on the netapp otherwise is fairly constant when carrying out either runs. My question(finally) * The NetApp CPU % busy when copying 2 files doesnt seem to be as high when copying 1 file. The Net KB out dont seem to be as high either ? This seem contrary to intuition. I am not expecting to see double the CPU % and double the Net KB out...i would like to atleast see it higher. :) Thanks.

1 0

RE: On Board Fiber Channel performance
by Waters, G Scott DSTI 31 Jan '03

31 Jan '03

I know that both of my 760's came with PCI FCALs and terminators on the on-board (no orange stickers). And I remember my instructor at Admin telling us to not use them on any 7xx series filer. - Scott W. -----Original Message----- From: July @ Zerowait [mailto:july@zerowait.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:58 AM To: Brian Long; Walter Ellinthorpe Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com; David Lugo Subject: Re: On Board Fiber Channel performance To my knowledge the problem with onboard FCAL was only in F740's. Anyone else hear differently? July ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Long" <brilong(a)cisco.com> To: "Walter Ellinthorpe" <walter.ellinthorpe(a)unitedmessaging.com> Cc: <toasters(a)mathworks.com>; "David Lugo" <david.lugo(a)unitedmessaging.com> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:21 PM Subject: Re: On Board Fiber Channel performance > > I have Filers in several locations. My newest installation has a > > noticeable DECREASE in performance. > > > > Of all the possible factors (OS version, network hardware/software > > etc..) the only common denominator is that all of my previous > > installations have filers with two PCI Fiber Channel Cards and the > > filers in the new location use One PCI Fiber Channel card and one > > On-Board Fiber Channel adapter. > > > > Are there any known issues with using the on-board Fiber Channel > > adapter vs. PCI Fiber Channel adapters ?? > > Walter, > > I assume you're using a F7XX-series filer since the newer F8XX filers > do not have onboard FC-AL. > > Netapp's F7XX motherboard FC-AL has a known bug and Netapp ended up > shipping every F7XX with a free PCI FC-AL card after the bug was > found. They usually shipped the motherboard FC-AL with a terminator > and an orange sticker saying not to use that port :-) > > I would highly recommend moving off the onboard FC-AL to a PCI FC-AL > connection. > > /Brian/ > -- > Brian Long | | | > Americas IT Hosting Sys Admin | .|||. .|||. > Phone: (919) 392-7363 | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:.. > Pager: (888) 651-2015 | C i s c o S y s t e m s >

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters