toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

Hoi cho(Quang Tay) thuong mai va hop tac kinh te Trung Quoc�CViet Nam lan thu II
by xttm＠china-vn.com 08 Feb '03

08 Feb '03

www.china-vn.com Hoi cho(Quang Tay) thuong mai va hop tac kinh te Trung Quoc�CViet Nam lan thu II Giay Moi Hoi cho(Quang Tay) thuong mai va hop tac kinh te Trung Quoc��Viet Nam lan thu II se to chuc vao ngay 27 �C 30 thang 03 nam 2003 tai Dai Hoi Duong Nhan Dan tinh Quang Tay thanh pho Nam Ninh.Tinh Quang Tay TQ la mot hanh lang chinh cho cac doanh nghiep cac tinh noi dia Trung Quoc nhat la cac tinh ven bien Dong Nam Bo va cac tinh mien Bac TQ di vao thi truong cac nuoc ASEAN qua Viet Nam, tinh Quang Tay TQ cung da tro thanh dau cau cua Trung Quoc tien vao thi truong Dong Nam A. Sau khi gia nhap WTO va di doi voi su khoi dong cua mo hinh khu mau dich tu do Trung Quoc �C ASEAN(10+1),khien cho vi the uu viet cua Quang Tay cang noi bat len. Cuoc hoi cho lan nay se to chuc voi ton chi la de phat huy day du vi the va uu viet ve tai yen cua Quang Tay, that chat hon nua moi quan he mau dich va hop tac kinh te giua hai nuoc Trung �C Viet. Chung toi se het suc phuc vu tot cho cac vi quy khach Trung Quoc va Viet Nam den du hoi cho nay va cung cap dich vu toan dien nhu hoi dam thuong mai, quang cao hoac dai ly san pham, dau tu du an, tu van chinh sach��, Va moi cung nhau xay dung mot bac thang cho su hop tac va giao luu thuong mai giua hai nuoc Trung Quoc va Viet Nam. gian: 27/03��30/03/2003 Dia diem: Dai Le Duong Nhan Dan tinh Quang Tay��Trung Quoc Du kien quy mo trien lam:250 gian hang Don vi to chuc: Phan ban Quang Tay��Uy ban xuc tien thuong mai quoc te Trung Quoc Uy ban nhan dan tinh Quang Tay��Trung Quoc Cong ty co phan thuong mai & xuat nhap khau Quang Tay Cong ty trien lam kinh te thuong mai Hoan Cau Don vi ho tro: Uy ban xuc tien thuong mai quoc te Trung Quoc. Noi dung trien lam: Cong nghiep: Thiet bi in an va dong goi, nguyen lieu va san pham cao su, giay, chat deo��, xe may & phu tung, cong cu gia dung, do dien gia dung��, Cac san pham cong nghe cao��. Nong nghiep: Nong lam dac san, giong cay trong, thiet bi co gioi nong nghiep, che bien & dong goi thuc pham va nong san; thuc an gia suc, phan bon hoa hoc, thuoc tru sau, thuc pham�� Y te: Thiet bi y te, duoc pham va hoa chat�� Che bien thuy hai san: Cong nghe va thiet bi che bien thuy hai san�� Tieu thu cong nghiep: Cac mat hang thu cong my nghe, qua tang, do choi, cac san pham tong hop khac�� Gioi thieu cac du an dau tu, giao luu thuong mai va hop tac kinh te Trung-Viet Moi chi tiet xin lien he: www.china-vn.com Ban to chuc Hoi cho: Dia chi:18 ngo Nam Nhat Ly, duong Tinh Ho, T.P Nam Ninh Tel:0086-771-2615157 Fax:0086-771-2630917 E-mail: xttm(a)china-vn.com Website: www.china-vn.net Nguoi lien he: Mr. Hai Mr. Luc Dai dien Ban to chuc tai Viet Nam: Phong thuong mai va cong nghiep Viet Nam Trung tam giao dich quoc te TSC Dia chi:33 Ba Trieu Hoan Kiem Ha Noi Viet Nam Tel:04.9360134 Fax:04.9360103 E-mail: vcciglobexpo(a)hn.vnn.vn Nguoi lien he: Mr:Hung Mobi:0913367082 Van phong dai dien Cong ty TM & DL Kim Lna TQ tai Ha Noi DC:203 A Ba Trieu�CHa Noi Tel: 04-9741591 Fax: 04-9741591 E-mail: kimlanhanoi(a)fpt.vn Nguoi lien he: Mr.Bach �C Mobi: 0912118616 Moi noi dung chi tiet xin moi vao Web chung toi: www.china-vn.com

1 0

FINANCIAL TRANSACTION (Urgent reply)
by REMI ANDREWS. 07 Feb '03

07 Feb '03

DEAR SIR, MY NAME IS REMI ANDREWS, THE CHIEF FINANCIAL/LEGAL ADVISER TO LATE HEAD OF STATE OF NIGERIA, GENERAL SANI ABACHA. I GOT YOUR ADDRESS FROM A FRIEND AND WISH TO USE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO NOTIFY YOU OF AN EXISTING AMOUNT OF MONEY WE WILL LIKE TO TRANSFER OVERSEAS FOR THE PURPOSE OF INVESTMENT IN YOUR COUNTRY. AS YOU MUST HAVE KNOWN, THE FAMILY OF THE LATE HEAD OF STATE IS CURRENTLY GOING THROUGH ALL SORTS OF PROBES UNDER THE CURRENT HEAD OF STATE, GENERAL OLUSEGUN OBASANJO, AND THEY HAVE BEEN MADE TO REFUND TO THE GOVERNMENT THE SUM OF $625,263.187.00 (SIX HUNDRED AND TWENTY FIVE MILLION, TWO HUNDRED AND SIXTY THREE THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY SEVEN UNITED STATES DOLLARS AND £75,306,884.00 (SEVENTY FIVE MILLION, THREE HUNDRED AND SIX THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED AND EIGHTY FOUR POUNDS STERLING) AND ALSO MILLIONS OF MONEY IN OUR LOCAL CURRENCY AND PROPERTIES TOO, OF WHICH YOU CAN READ FROM THE NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION THAT I WILL SEND TO YOU AS SOON AS I HEAR FROM YOU. BASED ON THIS AMOUNT RECOVERED FROM THEM, THEY HAVE MANDATED ME TO FIND A FOREIGNER WHO CAN HELP THEM MOVE THE MONEY THEY SECURED WITH A SECURITY COMPANY IN NIGERIA TO OVERSEAS. A CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT AND CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN AND OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS WILL BE GIVEN TO YOU TO PROVE THE REALITY OF THE TRANSACTION. IF YOU THEREFORE AGREE TO ASSIST US NOTE THAT YOU WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO SIGN ANY MONEY TRANSFER DOCUMENTS AS OUR APPOINTED ATTORNEY WILL DO ALL THAT. ALSO YOU WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO VISIT NIGERIA BUT WOULD SIMPLY BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH THE ATTORNEY AT THE RIGHT TIME, YOUR BANK DETAILS, WHERE YOU WANT THE MONEY TO BE TRANSFERRED. ONCE I HEAR FROM YOU, I WILL INITIATE THE PROCESSING OF THE TRANSFER, AND IN ABOUT TEN WORKING DAYS THE FUND WILL BE IN YOUR NOMINATED ACCOUNT, FOR US TO SHARE IN THE RATIO OF 75% FOR US AND 25% FOR YOU OF WHICH YOU WILL HELP US INVEST OUR OWN SHARE IN YOUR COUNTRY. ALSO I WILL TELL YOU HOW MUCH WE INTEND TO TRANSFER FIRST AS SOON AS I HEAR FROM YOU. I WILL NEED YOUR PRIVATE PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS FOR EASY COMMUNICATION. I LOOK FORWARD FOR YOUR URGENT REPLY, ALL REPLIES SHOULD BE THROUGH MY EMAil ADDRESS : andremmy022(a)excite.com BEST REGARDS, REMI ANDREWS.

1 0

RE: [SUMMARY] OnTap 6.3.1 and cifs setup problems.
by Ed Sanborn 05 Feb '03

05 Feb '03

I had similar problems. I upgraded to 6.3.1_D4 and that fixed my Active Directory issues... -Ed -----Original Message----- From: John Stoffel [mailto:stoffel@lucent.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:33 AM To: John Stoffel Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: [SUMMARY] OnTap 6.3.1 and cifs setup problems. Here's a summary of what I had to do to fix this problem: John> I'm having a problem getting an F760 with NFS/CIFS running John> OnTap 6.3.1 to actually talk to our Win2K domain properly. John> I'm assuming it's a priv problem on the PDC side, but I don't John> know enough of how to fix it. John> Basically, whenever I try to run 'cifs setup', it fails at the John> end with the following message: John> Could not create Active Directory account for the filer: No John> such object CIFS could not create server machine account. John> But I'm supposed to have the privs with my account to add this John> machine into ActiveDirectory. John> Has anyone else run into stuff like this? And does anyone John> have any hints on what I need to do on the Windows PDC to give John> myself the privs I need to get this done? Basically I tried dropping back to 6.2R2 and doing 'cifs setup' and it still didn't work. I then dropped all the way back to 5.3.7, though I had to disconnect my DS14 shelf for this to work. Luckily, I had an FC8/9 shelf on there for the root volume already. Anyway, once I was running 5.3.7, I was able to do the 'cifs setup' and join the NT/Win2k domain without any problems. I then upgraded back to 6.3.1 and I'm still part of the domain. As far as I know, I have the full privs needed to add a host into the ActiveDirectory stuff, and I would authenticate properly as myself when I tried to run cifs setup under 6.3.1, but it would fail with permission denied errors. Since we were in a bit of a rush to get this system setup and deployed, I don't have access to it again to try some other suggestions from NetApp, which mostly involve turning on logging and access tracing so I can see what's causing the access denied problems. Thanks for all the suggestions people had, I wish some of them had worked. John John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies stoffel(a)lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-399-0479

1 0

RE: [SUMMARY] OnTap 6.3.1 and cifs setup problems.
by Nail, Larry 05 Feb '03

05 Feb '03

John, We added the "Computer Object" into the domain prior to running CIFS Setup (waited a few minutes for replication). No problems.... -----Original Message----- From: John Stoffel [mailto:stoffel@lucent.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:33 AM To: John Stoffel Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: [SUMMARY] OnTap 6.3.1 and cifs setup problems. Here's a summary of what I had to do to fix this problem: John> I'm having a problem getting an F760 with NFS/CIFS running John> OnTap 6.3.1 to actually talk to our Win2K domain properly. John> I'm assuming it's a priv problem on the PDC side, but I don't John> know enough of how to fix it. John> Basically, whenever I try to run 'cifs setup', it fails at the John> end with the following message: John> Could not create Active Directory account for the filer: No John> such object CIFS could not create server machine account. John> But I'm supposed to have the privs with my account to add this John> machine into ActiveDirectory. John> Has anyone else run into stuff like this? And does anyone John> have any hints on what I need to do on the Windows PDC to give John> myself the privs I need to get this done? Basically I tried dropping back to 6.2R2 and doing 'cifs setup' and it still didn't work. I then dropped all the way back to 5.3.7, though I had to disconnect my DS14 shelf for this to work. Luckily, I had an FC8/9 shelf on there for the root volume already. Anyway, once I was running 5.3.7, I was able to do the 'cifs setup' and join the NT/Win2k domain without any problems. I then upgraded back to 6.3.1 and I'm still part of the domain. As far as I know, I have the full privs needed to add a host into the ActiveDirectory stuff, and I would authenticate properly as myself when I tried to run cifs setup under 6.3.1, but it would fail with permission denied errors. Since we were in a bit of a rush to get this system setup and deployed, I don't have access to it again to try some other suggestions from NetApp, which mostly involve turning on logging and access tracing so I can see what's causing the access denied problems. Thanks for all the suggestions people had, I wish some of them had worked. John John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies stoffel(a)lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-399-0479

1 0

OnTap 6.3.1 and cifs setup problems.
by John Stoffel 05 Feb '03

05 Feb '03

Hi, I'm having a problem getting an F760 with NFS/CIFS running OnTap 6.3.1 to actually talk to our Win2K domain properly. I'm assuming it's a priv problem on the PDC side, but I don't know enough of how to fix it. Basically, whenever I try to run 'cifs setup', it fails at the end with the following message: Could not create Active Directory account for the filer: No such object CIFS could not create server machine account. But I'm supposed to have the privs with my account to add this machine into ActiveDirectory. Has anyone else run into stuff like this? And does anyone have any hints on what I need to do on the Windows PDC to give myself the privs I need to get this done? Thanks, John John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies stoffel(a)lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-399-0479

1 1

Re: XP refreshing
by Matt Miller 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

sorry for the delay, we have ~300 XP machines which map the same share. matt "Bui, Marcus" wrote: > Matt, > > How many XP clients are using the filer? Or connecting to the same share? > Does the filer experience any performance issue? > > thanks, > Marcus > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Miller [mailto:m.miller@duke.edu] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:40 AM > To: Bui, Marcus; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: Re: XP refreshing > > Let me take that back... the refresh does happen, but at our site it is only > every > 20 seconds. > > matt > > Matt Miller wrote: > > > We have XP clients in a mixed mode AD environment with an F820 running DOT > 6.3. > > > > I do not see the refresh traffic you refer to below; however, every time > you > > move the mouse in the active explorer window, explorer asks the filer for > > summary information for the directory/file. When I leave the mouse still, > no > > traffic is seen. Is this what you are experiencing? > > > > matt > > > > "Bui, Marcus" wrote: > > > > > Hello Toasters, > > > > > > I have an F740c running 6.1.2R1 in NT4 domain. Currently, the client PC > are > > > being migrated to XP into W2K AD (mixed mode). Came across a peculiar > > > problem and wondering if anyone else experience it. > > > > > > XP client with Windows Explorer open is continually refreshing when open > > > against a Filer > > > volume, share folder. Analysis has shown that it seems to be every two > > > seconds a refresh > > > occurs, and when using a network trace tool, it seems to average out at > > > around 50K per second. As soon as explorer's focus is placed elsewhere, > or > > > shut down, this network load stops. This 'refreshing' only appears if > the > > > share folder is highly utilize. Connecting to a share folder that is no > > > busy, the 'refreshing' does not exist. Notice this with W2K Pro client > as > > > well, but not as frequent as XP Client. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > Marcus Bui > > > > -- > > Matt Miller > > IT Infrastructure Team > > Duke University - Fuqua School of Business > > -- > Matt Miller > IT Infrastructure Team > Duke University - Fuqua School of Business -- Matt Miller IT Infrastructure Team Duke University - Fuqua School of Business

1 0

144GB Fiber Channel drives in the field
by kallen＠collab.net 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

hiya anyone using the 144GB drives? currently we have DS14s filled with 36GB drives. these are used in a production environment, so of course we need maximum uptime. we're considering getting more DS14s filled with either 72GB or 144GB drives. we want the most bang for the buck, but i have concerns about the 144GB drives. anyone out there have any experience with them? are the reconstruct times for a 144GB disk proportionally prohibitive when compared to 72GB and 36GB drives? how long does it take to reconstruct a failed 144GB drive on a hot spare compared to 72GB and 36GB disks, under consistent filer workload and raid reconstruct speed? are there performance issues to consider if we were to go with 144GB rather than 72GB? any other pros and cons? thanks in advance, kallen

3 2

RE: R100 Performance Problems
by Eisler, Alex 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

What was the speed you were expecting? And what did you get? When writing to all (9) R100 volumes concurrently, I got to a max of 30Mbytes/Sec. That got the R100 to 100% cpu constant. (The source filers weren't that busy). Alex. -----Original Message----- From: Frank Marxs [mailto:fmarxs@mail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 02:21 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: R100 Performance Problems I'm working with a customer who just got an R-100 and the performance is much less than we expected. I'm wondering what type of performance other people are experiencing with their R-100, or for that matter with other similar low-cost drive storage options. If anyone has actually had time to run a benchmark that would be great. Thanks Frank Marxs RHCE, CCNP, CCDP, CNA, "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." - Albert Einstein -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

2 1

RE: R100 Performance Problems
by Alan McLachlan 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

Hi Frank, The issue is possibly one of expectation... The R-100 is, after all, intended to be a "near-line" device. Certainly, the CPU, RAM and NVRAM figures are far below what would be normal for a production "on-line" Fibre Channel based filer of similar capacity. Having said that, the performance should be at least better than a tape array. There are several configuration issues that may affect networking performance to the box. Do you have any specific figures? At least, run a "sysstat 1" during a busy period, capture some of the output and post it. Unfortunately (and probably for marketing reasons), NetApp have chosen not to post SpecSFS figures for the R100, which setting expectations a little difficult. -----Original Message----- From: Frank Marxs [mailto:fmarxs@mail.com] Sent: Tue 4/02/2003 11:21 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Cc: Subject: R100 Performance Problems I'm working with a customer who just got an R-100 and the performance is much less than we expected. I'm wondering what type of performance other people are experiencing with their R-100, or for that matter with other similar low-cost drive storage options. If anyone has actually had time to run a benchmark that would be great. Thanks Frank Marxs RHCE, CCNP, CCDP, CNA, "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." - Albert Einstein -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup **** ASI Solutions Disclaimer **** The material transmitted may contain confidential and/or privileged material and is intended only for the addressee. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender and destroy any copies of the material immediately. ASI will protect your Privacy according to the 10 Privacy Principles outlined under the new Privacy Act, Dec 2001. This email is also subject to copyright. Any use of or reliance upon this material by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. E-mails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects. Under no circumstances do we accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message or any attachments. **** END OF MESSAGE ****

1 0

URGENT BUSINESS TRUSTEE
by NZANGA JOSEPH MOBUTU. 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

From: NZANGA JOSEPH MOBUTU Attn: Managing director/CEO DEAR Sir, I am the first son of the late Mobutu Sese Seko, the former President of the Congo Republic. I am presently under protective custody in South Africa as a political refugee. I got your contact during my search for a stranger that can cooperate with me in this mutual transaction. I want you to note that this business will benefit both of us. However, you must confirm your ability to handle this because it involves a large amount of money. The money (28 million US DOLLARS is my share of my father's estate. I boxed and shipped the money to a security company abroad at the peak of the war/political crisis that rocked my country few years ago. Now the crisis has ended and I need a trustworthy person like you to proceed to the place of the security company in order to clear the fund and invest on my behalf as I don�t want my name to be used for now. Note that I will send to you the relevant documents that will enable you take possession of the fund for onward investment for our mutual benefit. All I need from you is as follows: 1.A letter of commitment (dully signed) that you will keep the transaction strictly confidential. 2. Your confirmation of your ability to handle this. 3. Your international passport or driving license number for identification to the security company. 4. Your telephone and fax numbers for communication. 5. Your full permanent address. As soon as I get the above information from you, I will disclose to you the name and the country of the security company. I will forward your name and particulars to the security company to enable them contact you accordingly. I will also send to you a LETTER OF AUTHORITY to enable you clear the fund on my behalf. Note that this is a very safe transaction as this money is my share of my father's estate. i am waiting for your response to enable us proceed. Regards, NZANGA JOSEPH MOBUTU.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters