toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

OnTap 6.3.1 and cifs setup problems.
by John Stoffel 05 Feb '03

05 Feb '03

Hi, I'm having a problem getting an F760 with NFS/CIFS running OnTap 6.3.1 to actually talk to our Win2K domain properly. I'm assuming it's a priv problem on the PDC side, but I don't know enough of how to fix it. Basically, whenever I try to run 'cifs setup', it fails at the end with the following message: Could not create Active Directory account for the filer: No such object CIFS could not create server machine account. But I'm supposed to have the privs with my account to add this machine into ActiveDirectory. Has anyone else run into stuff like this? And does anyone have any hints on what I need to do on the Windows PDC to give myself the privs I need to get this done? Thanks, John John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies stoffel(a)lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-399-0479

1 1

Re: XP refreshing
by Matt Miller 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

sorry for the delay, we have ~300 XP machines which map the same share. matt "Bui, Marcus" wrote: > Matt, > > How many XP clients are using the filer? Or connecting to the same share? > Does the filer experience any performance issue? > > thanks, > Marcus > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Miller [mailto:m.miller@duke.edu] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:40 AM > To: Bui, Marcus; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: Re: XP refreshing > > Let me take that back... the refresh does happen, but at our site it is only > every > 20 seconds. > > matt > > Matt Miller wrote: > > > We have XP clients in a mixed mode AD environment with an F820 running DOT > 6.3. > > > > I do not see the refresh traffic you refer to below; however, every time > you > > move the mouse in the active explorer window, explorer asks the filer for > > summary information for the directory/file. When I leave the mouse still, > no > > traffic is seen. Is this what you are experiencing? > > > > matt > > > > "Bui, Marcus" wrote: > > > > > Hello Toasters, > > > > > > I have an F740c running 6.1.2R1 in NT4 domain. Currently, the client PC > are > > > being migrated to XP into W2K AD (mixed mode). Came across a peculiar > > > problem and wondering if anyone else experience it. > > > > > > XP client with Windows Explorer open is continually refreshing when open > > > against a Filer > > > volume, share folder. Analysis has shown that it seems to be every two > > > seconds a refresh > > > occurs, and when using a network trace tool, it seems to average out at > > > around 50K per second. As soon as explorer's focus is placed elsewhere, > or > > > shut down, this network load stops. This 'refreshing' only appears if > the > > > share folder is highly utilize. Connecting to a share folder that is no > > > busy, the 'refreshing' does not exist. Notice this with W2K Pro client > as > > > well, but not as frequent as XP Client. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > Marcus Bui > > > > -- > > Matt Miller > > IT Infrastructure Team > > Duke University - Fuqua School of Business > > -- > Matt Miller > IT Infrastructure Team > Duke University - Fuqua School of Business -- Matt Miller IT Infrastructure Team Duke University - Fuqua School of Business

1 0

144GB Fiber Channel drives in the field
by kallen＠collab.net 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

hiya anyone using the 144GB drives? currently we have DS14s filled with 36GB drives. these are used in a production environment, so of course we need maximum uptime. we're considering getting more DS14s filled with either 72GB or 144GB drives. we want the most bang for the buck, but i have concerns about the 144GB drives. anyone out there have any experience with them? are the reconstruct times for a 144GB disk proportionally prohibitive when compared to 72GB and 36GB drives? how long does it take to reconstruct a failed 144GB drive on a hot spare compared to 72GB and 36GB disks, under consistent filer workload and raid reconstruct speed? are there performance issues to consider if we were to go with 144GB rather than 72GB? any other pros and cons? thanks in advance, kallen

3 2

RE: R100 Performance Problems
by Eisler, Alex 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

What was the speed you were expecting? And what did you get? When writing to all (9) R100 volumes concurrently, I got to a max of 30Mbytes/Sec. That got the R100 to 100% cpu constant. (The source filers weren't that busy). Alex. -----Original Message----- From: Frank Marxs [mailto:fmarxs@mail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 02:21 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: R100 Performance Problems I'm working with a customer who just got an R-100 and the performance is much less than we expected. I'm wondering what type of performance other people are experiencing with their R-100, or for that matter with other similar low-cost drive storage options. If anyone has actually had time to run a benchmark that would be great. Thanks Frank Marxs RHCE, CCNP, CCDP, CNA, "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." - Albert Einstein -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

2 1

RE: R100 Performance Problems
by Alan McLachlan 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

Hi Frank, The issue is possibly one of expectation... The R-100 is, after all, intended to be a "near-line" device. Certainly, the CPU, RAM and NVRAM figures are far below what would be normal for a production "on-line" Fibre Channel based filer of similar capacity. Having said that, the performance should be at least better than a tape array. There are several configuration issues that may affect networking performance to the box. Do you have any specific figures? At least, run a "sysstat 1" during a busy period, capture some of the output and post it. Unfortunately (and probably for marketing reasons), NetApp have chosen not to post SpecSFS figures for the R100, which setting expectations a little difficult. -----Original Message----- From: Frank Marxs [mailto:fmarxs@mail.com] Sent: Tue 4/02/2003 11:21 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Cc: Subject: R100 Performance Problems I'm working with a customer who just got an R-100 and the performance is much less than we expected. I'm wondering what type of performance other people are experiencing with their R-100, or for that matter with other similar low-cost drive storage options. If anyone has actually had time to run a benchmark that would be great. Thanks Frank Marxs RHCE, CCNP, CCDP, CNA, "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." - Albert Einstein -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup **** ASI Solutions Disclaimer **** The material transmitted may contain confidential and/or privileged material and is intended only for the addressee. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender and destroy any copies of the material immediately. ASI will protect your Privacy according to the 10 Privacy Principles outlined under the new Privacy Act, Dec 2001. This email is also subject to copyright. Any use of or reliance upon this material by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. E-mails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects. Under no circumstances do we accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message or any attachments. **** END OF MESSAGE ****

1 0

URGENT BUSINESS TRUSTEE
by NZANGA JOSEPH MOBUTU. 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

From: NZANGA JOSEPH MOBUTU Attn: Managing director/CEO DEAR Sir, I am the first son of the late Mobutu Sese Seko, the former President of the Congo Republic. I am presently under protective custody in South Africa as a political refugee. I got your contact during my search for a stranger that can cooperate with me in this mutual transaction. I want you to note that this business will benefit both of us. However, you must confirm your ability to handle this because it involves a large amount of money. The money (28 million US DOLLARS is my share of my father's estate. I boxed and shipped the money to a security company abroad at the peak of the war/political crisis that rocked my country few years ago. Now the crisis has ended and I need a trustworthy person like you to proceed to the place of the security company in order to clear the fund and invest on my behalf as I don�t want my name to be used for now. Note that I will send to you the relevant documents that will enable you take possession of the fund for onward investment for our mutual benefit. All I need from you is as follows: 1.A letter of commitment (dully signed) that you will keep the transaction strictly confidential. 2. Your confirmation of your ability to handle this. 3. Your international passport or driving license number for identification to the security company. 4. Your telephone and fax numbers for communication. 5. Your full permanent address. As soon as I get the above information from you, I will disclose to you the name and the country of the security company. I will forward your name and particulars to the security company to enable them contact you accordingly. I will also send to you a LETTER OF AUTHORITY to enable you clear the fund on my behalf. Note that this is a very safe transaction as this money is my share of my father's estate. i am waiting for your response to enable us proceed. Regards, NZANGA JOSEPH MOBUTU.

1 0

R100 Performance Problems
by Frank Marxs 04 Feb '03

04 Feb '03

I'm working with a customer who just got an R-100 and the performance is much less than we expected. I'm wondering what type of performance other people are experiencing with their R-100, or for that matter with other similar low-cost drive storage options. If anyone has actually had time to run a benchmark that would be great. Thanks Frank Marxs RHCE, CCNP, CCDP, CNA, "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." - Albert Einstein -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

1 0

RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date"
by Daniel Finn 03 Feb '03

03 Feb '03

I do not believe the volume was full, I believe it was around 90% usage. I have tried upgrading all of the disks firmware, it says they are all already up to date. How can I take the filer down to run HW diags? -----Original Message----- From: Simon Probert [mailto:Simon.Probert@gen-i.co.nz] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:13 PM To: 'Daniel Finn' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" OK. If the disk count in the sysconfig -d matches your physical number of disks you have installed, and it looks like it has, then you have a single volume failure. Ontap writes label information to each disk, hence the ability to plug the disks in anywhere and the filer will find the disks and form the volume. You are using an FC card in slot 4 (not the onboard FC) which if it can see all the disks is pointing to a volume corruption problem and not a hardware problem. To be sure you could take the filer down and run HW diagnostics?? Was the volume full?? Have you tried upgrading all the disk firmware?? I have found the following bug reports on the NOW site. Do you have access to NOW?? Take a look at these articles to see if ah apply?? -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Finn [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 12:02 p.m. To: 'Simon Probert'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" all the lights appear to be fine. slot 0: System Board (NetApp System Board V N4) Model Name: F760 Serial Number: 230349 Firmware release: 2.8_a2 Processors: 1 Memory Size: 1024 MB na3m-be> version NetApp Release 6.1.2R2: Thu Mar 21 02:30:01 PST 2002 na3m-be> sysconfig -d HA.ID HA SHELF BAY CHAN Disk Vital Product Information ----- ------------ ----- ------------------------------ 4.0 4 0 0 FC:A LKJ776580000101934DX 4.1 4 0 1 FC:A LKG5741100001018J2UA 4.2 4 0 2 FC:A LKJ762100000294605VU 4.3 4 0 3 FC:A LKJ777610000101937YA 4.4 4 0 4 FC:A LKJ76717000010160N6D 4.5 4 0 5 FC:A 3EL090FJ00007127KQXA 4.6 4 0 6 FC:A 3EL08X6K00007127KR2U 4.8 4 1 0 FC:A LKJ766660000101939NA 4.9 4 1 1 FC:A LR84217700007023HWY5 4.10 4 1 2 FC:A LKJ78361000010193802 4.11 4 1 3 FC:A LK779515000020060LVT 4.12 4 1 4 FC:A LK191771000020060SUJ 4.14 4 1 6 FC:A 3EL02WCJ0000V1060MRC 4.16 4 2 0 FC:A LR85728800007023J7Y8 4.17 4 2 1 FC:A LKJ778250000101934FW 4.18 4 2 2 FC:A LKJ783510000101803UW 4.19 4 2 3 FC:A LKJ781640000101937T4 4.20 4 2 4 FC:A LKJ78362000010180Y7L 4.21 4 2 5 FC:A LKJ7682600001017H3H8 4.22 4 2 6 FC:A LRF80892000070394QF7 4.24 4 3 0 FC:A LKJ7815800002943HF67 4.25 4 3 1 FC:A LKJ76648000010182BDA 4.26 4 3 2 FC:A LKJ76437000010163C85 4.27 4 3 3 FC:A LKJ76386000010182CHR 4.28 4 3 4 FC:A LKJ783090000101939QJ 4.29 4 3 5 FC:A LK1974720000101934D2 4.30 4 3 6 FC:A LKJ797290000101939UB 4.32 4 4 0 FC:A LKJ759310000601738J8 4.33 4 4 1 FC:A LKJ77604000010172SG5 4.34 4 4 2 FC:A 3EL02VMC0000V1050D1R 4.35 4 4 3 FC:A LR8068580000102132FB 4.36 4 4 4 FC:A LKJ781720000101939HC 4.37 4 4 5 FC:A LKJ776940000101937NK 4.38 4 4 6 FC:A LKJ779400000101807H2 4.40 4 5 0 FC:A LKJ772680000101807JS 4.41 4 5 1 FC:A LKJ77941000010180LUD 4.42 4 5 2 FC:A LKJ78257000010091VD9 4.43 4 5 3 FC:A LKJ766030000101937X7 4.44 4 5 4 FC:A LKJ79601000010200C27 4.45 4 5 5 FC:A LKJ778470000101937Q5 4.46 4 5 6 FC:A LKJ76768000010151624 4.48 4 6 0 FC:A LKJ77630000010180LUQ 4.49 4 6 1 FC:A LKJ78226000010180DFS 4.50 4 6 2 FC:A LKJ6753800001018HJBL 4.51 4 6 3 FC:A LKJ77933000010200249 4.52 4 6 4 FC:A LKJ76738000020070JN2 4.54 4 6 6 FC:A LKJ0904400002008HEW1 -----Original Message----- From: Simon Probert [mailto:Simon.Probert@gen-i.co.nz] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:02 PM To: 'Daniel Finn' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" Have you check you have power and lights on the PSU's and checked the status of the LED lights on the LRC's. What filer head? What shelf type? What disk type and size? What DOT Version. Send output sysconfig -d. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Finn [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:58 a.m. To: 'Simon Probert' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" there are 7 in a shelf though? I don't understand how I could have 5 disk missing, I only see one failure in the messages file. -----Original Message----- From: Simon Probert [mailto:Simon.Probert@gen-i.co.nz] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:58 PM To: 'Daniel Finn' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" You have got 5 disks missing. Are you sure you don't have a shelf powered off?? -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Finn [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:31 a.m. To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.net' Subject: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks are "o ut-of-date" Importance: High What does this mean? na3m-be> vol status Volume State Status Options vol0 online normal root vol1 offline partial na3m-be> vol status vol1 Volume State Status Options vol1 offline partial raid group 0: partial from the log file: Mon Feb 3 17:26:52 EST [kern.syslog.msg:CRITICAL]: Volume vol1 is missing 5 disks from RAID group 0 and is being taken offline for this boot. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [raid.assim.outofdateNdisks:ALERT]: More than one disk in RAID group 0 of volume vol1 has a valid label not consistent with all the others. These disks are assumed to be out of date; their contents cannot be restored. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.32 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.37 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.6 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.24 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.25 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.30 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.11 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.33 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.27 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.3 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.16 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.29 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.35 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.28 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.36 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.9 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.18 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.2 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.5 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.10 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.14 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.17 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.0 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.1 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.19 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.54 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.20 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.12 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.52 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.4 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.44 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.45 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.38 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks Dan ____________________________________________________________________ CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify Air New Zealand immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Air New Zealand. _____________________________________________________________________ For more information on the Air New Zealand Group, visit us online at http://www.airnewzealand.com _____________________________________________________________________ ================================================================ This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal at gen-i limited - http://www.gen-i.co.nz ================================================================ ================================================================ This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal at gen-i limited - http://www.gen-i.co.nz ================================================================ ================================================================ This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal at gen-i limited - http://www.gen-i.co.nz ================================================================

1 0

RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date"
by Daniel Finn 03 Feb '03

03 Feb '03

all the lights appear to be fine. slot 0: System Board (NetApp System Board V N4) Model Name: F760 Serial Number: 230349 Firmware release: 2.8_a2 Processors: 1 Memory Size: 1024 MB na3m-be> version NetApp Release 6.1.2R2: Thu Mar 21 02:30:01 PST 2002 na3m-be> sysconfig -d HA.ID HA SHELF BAY CHAN Disk Vital Product Information ----- ------------ ----- ------------------------------ 4.0 4 0 0 FC:A LKJ776580000101934DX 4.1 4 0 1 FC:A LKG5741100001018J2UA 4.2 4 0 2 FC:A LKJ762100000294605VU 4.3 4 0 3 FC:A LKJ777610000101937YA 4.4 4 0 4 FC:A LKJ76717000010160N6D 4.5 4 0 5 FC:A 3EL090FJ00007127KQXA 4.6 4 0 6 FC:A 3EL08X6K00007127KR2U 4.8 4 1 0 FC:A LKJ766660000101939NA 4.9 4 1 1 FC:A LR84217700007023HWY5 4.10 4 1 2 FC:A LKJ78361000010193802 4.11 4 1 3 FC:A LK779515000020060LVT 4.12 4 1 4 FC:A LK191771000020060SUJ 4.14 4 1 6 FC:A 3EL02WCJ0000V1060MRC 4.16 4 2 0 FC:A LR85728800007023J7Y8 4.17 4 2 1 FC:A LKJ778250000101934FW 4.18 4 2 2 FC:A LKJ783510000101803UW 4.19 4 2 3 FC:A LKJ781640000101937T4 4.20 4 2 4 FC:A LKJ78362000010180Y7L 4.21 4 2 5 FC:A LKJ7682600001017H3H8 4.22 4 2 6 FC:A LRF80892000070394QF7 4.24 4 3 0 FC:A LKJ7815800002943HF67 4.25 4 3 1 FC:A LKJ76648000010182BDA 4.26 4 3 2 FC:A LKJ76437000010163C85 4.27 4 3 3 FC:A LKJ76386000010182CHR 4.28 4 3 4 FC:A LKJ783090000101939QJ 4.29 4 3 5 FC:A LK1974720000101934D2 4.30 4 3 6 FC:A LKJ797290000101939UB 4.32 4 4 0 FC:A LKJ759310000601738J8 4.33 4 4 1 FC:A LKJ77604000010172SG5 4.34 4 4 2 FC:A 3EL02VMC0000V1050D1R 4.35 4 4 3 FC:A LR8068580000102132FB 4.36 4 4 4 FC:A LKJ781720000101939HC 4.37 4 4 5 FC:A LKJ776940000101937NK 4.38 4 4 6 FC:A LKJ779400000101807H2 4.40 4 5 0 FC:A LKJ772680000101807JS 4.41 4 5 1 FC:A LKJ77941000010180LUD 4.42 4 5 2 FC:A LKJ78257000010091VD9 4.43 4 5 3 FC:A LKJ766030000101937X7 4.44 4 5 4 FC:A LKJ79601000010200C27 4.45 4 5 5 FC:A LKJ778470000101937Q5 4.46 4 5 6 FC:A LKJ76768000010151624 4.48 4 6 0 FC:A LKJ77630000010180LUQ 4.49 4 6 1 FC:A LKJ78226000010180DFS 4.50 4 6 2 FC:A LKJ6753800001018HJBL 4.51 4 6 3 FC:A LKJ77933000010200249 4.52 4 6 4 FC:A LKJ76738000020070JN2 4.54 4 6 6 FC:A LKJ0904400002008HEW1 -----Original Message----- From: Simon Probert [mailto:Simon.Probert@gen-i.co.nz] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:02 PM To: 'Daniel Finn' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" Have you check you have power and lights on the PSU's and checked the status of the LED lights on the LRC's. What filer head? What shelf type? What disk type and size? What DOT Version. Send output sysconfig -d. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Finn [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:58 a.m. To: 'Simon Probert' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" there are 7 in a shelf though? I don't understand how I could have 5 disk missing, I only see one failure in the messages file. -----Original Message----- From: Simon Probert [mailto:Simon.Probert@gen-i.co.nz] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:58 PM To: 'Daniel Finn' Subject: RE: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks ar e "o ut-of-date" You have got 5 disks missing. Are you sure you don't have a shelf powered off?? -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Finn [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:31 a.m. To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.net' Subject: Netapp crashed, back up now but it thinks a bunch of disks are "o ut-of-date" Importance: High What does this mean? na3m-be> vol status Volume State Status Options vol0 online normal root vol1 offline partial na3m-be> vol status vol1 Volume State Status Options vol1 offline partial raid group 0: partial from the log file: Mon Feb 3 17:26:52 EST [kern.syslog.msg:CRITICAL]: Volume vol1 is missing 5 disks from RAID group 0 and is being taken offline for this boot. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [raid.assim.outofdateNdisks:ALERT]: More than one disk in RAID group 0 of volume vol1 has a valid label not consistent with all the others. These disks are assumed to be out of date; their contents cannot be restored. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.32 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.37 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.6 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.24 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.25 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.30 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.11 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.33 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.27 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.3 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.16 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.29 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.35 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.28 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.36 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.9 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.18 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.2 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.5 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.10 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.14 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.17 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.0 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.1 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.19 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.54 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.20 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.12 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.52 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.4 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.44 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.45 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.38 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks Dan ____________________________________________________________________ CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify Air New Zealand immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Air New Zealand. _____________________________________________________________________ For more information on the Air New Zealand Group, visit us online at http://www.airnewzealand.com _____________________________________________________________________ ================================================================ This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal at gen-i limited - http://www.gen-i.co.nz ================================================================ ================================================================ This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal at gen-i limited - http://www.gen-i.co.nz ================================================================

1 0

netapp crashed, won't bring data volume back online because "Ther e is an out-of-date disk"
by Daniel Finn 03 Feb '03

03 Feb '03

What does this mean? na3m-be> vol status Volume State Status Options vol0 online normal root vol1 offline partial na3m-be> vol status vol1 Volume State Status Options vol1 offline partial raid group 0: partial from the log file: Mon Feb 3 17:26:52 EST [kern.syslog.msg:CRITICAL]: Volume vol1 is missing 5 disks from RAID group 0 and is being taken offline for this boot. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [raid.assim.outofdateNdisks:ALERT]: More than one disk in RAID group 0 of volume vol1 has a valid label not consistent with all the others. These disks are assumed to be out of date; their contents cannot be restored. Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.32 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.37 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.6 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:53 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.24 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.25 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.30 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.11 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.33 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.27 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.3 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.16 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:54 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.29 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.35 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.28 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.36 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 2 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.9 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.18 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.2 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.5 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:55 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.10 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.14 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.17 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.0 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.1 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.19 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.54 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.20 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:56 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.12 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 1 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.52 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.4 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.44 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.45 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Mon Feb 3 17:26:57 EST [kern.syslog.msg:error]: There is an out-of-date disk 4.38 originally belonging to volume vol1, RAID group 0 Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks Dan

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters