toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

RE: disappearing CIFS permissions ...
by Waters, G Scott DSTI 24 Jan '03

24 Jan '03

Stacie ... The QTree is NTFS. The script runs on the domain controller and sets share permissions on the filer ... and the problem is *very* intermittent. - Scott W. -----Original Message----- From: sjmontoya [mailto:sjmontoya@micron.com] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:02 AM To: 'Waters, G Scott DSTI'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: disappearing CIFS permissions ... Scott, What type is assigned to the qtree that is being shared out as CIFS? Where is your script granting the user permissions? On the NetApp itself? Or from NT? I have recently been setting up CIFS shares from qtrees that are "mixed". What I have noticed is that permissions changes made on the UNIX side show up in the NT ACLs and vice versa. I've also noticed that "Special permissions" are given in the case where the user might not be in the NT group that has been given permissions, but is in the UNIX group that owns the file/directory. Stacie Montoya

1 0

RE: disappearing CIFS permissions ...
by Nail, Larry 24 Jan '03

24 Jan '03

Note this was a CIFS only filer in this case. -----Original Message----- From: Nail, Larry Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 10:01 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: disappearing CIFS permissions ... Scott, We had the same set of problems when we were running 5.3.7 on the filers... when we upgraded to 6.x, we stopped seeing those problems. The only problem we did resolve was we had a share name "L&I". When we renamed the share to LnI, it stopped dropping it's permissions. Larry -----Original Message----- From: Waters, G Scott DSTI [mailto:george.scott.waters@us.army.mil] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 9:32 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: disappearing CIFS permissions ... Has anyone had any problems with setting CIFS share permissions and then having them disappear?? We have a series of scripts that run at night that manage our users in our NT4 domain. Our users are created and then for each user a home share is created on our filer. Every once in a while we will get a complaint that one of our new users can not access their home share. I check the share and sure enough the permissions are not there. However, when I check the output from our scripts they show that the permissions were set successfully. The user is created in the script by using the NET USER command and the shares are manipulated by the RMTSHARE program from the NT Resource Kit. After the user is created Domain Admins are granted permissions to the SHARE (and those permissions are always there) then the user is granted permissions (and that is where the problem occasionally occurs). It's an annoyance that I can't explain ... and I don't like those. If anyone has any ideas / suggestions / etc, etc ... please let me know. Thanks. - Scott W.

1 0

RE: disappearing CIFS permissions ...
by sjmontoya 24 Jan '03

24 Jan '03

Scott, What type is assigned to the qtree that is being shared out as CIFS? Where is your script granting the user permissions? On the NetApp itself? Or from NT? I have recently been setting up CIFS shares from qtrees that are "mixed". What I have noticed is that permissions changes made on the UNIX side show up in the NT ACLs and vice versa. I've also noticed that "Special permissions" are given in the case where the user might not be in the NT group that has been given permissions, but is in the UNIX group that owns the file/directory. Stacie Montoya -----Original Message----- From: Waters, G Scott DSTI [mailto:george.scott.waters@us.army.mil] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 8:32 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: disappearing CIFS permissions ... Has anyone had any problems with setting CIFS share permissions and then having them disappear?? We have a series of scripts that run at night that manage our users in our NT4 domain. Our users are created and then for each user a home share is created on our filer. Every once in a while we will get a complaint that one of our new users can not access their home share. I check the share and sure enough the permissions are not there. However, when I check the output from our scripts they show that the permissions were set successfully. The user is created in the script by using the NET USER command and the shares are manipulated by the RMTSHARE program from the NT Resource Kit. After the user is created Domain Admins are granted permissions to the SHARE (and those permissions are always there) then the user is granted permissions (and that is where the problem occasionally occurs). It's an annoyance that I can't explain ... and I don't like those. If anyone has any ideas / suggestions / etc, etc ... please let me know. Thanks. - Scott W.

1 0

RE: disappearing CIFS permissions ...
by Nail, Larry 24 Jan '03

24 Jan '03

Scott, We had the same set of problems when we were running 5.3.7 on the filers... when we upgraded to 6.x, we stopped seeing those problems. The only problem we did resolve was we had a share name "L&I". When we renamed the share to LnI, it stopped dropping it's permissions. Larry -----Original Message----- From: Waters, G Scott DSTI [mailto:george.scott.waters@us.army.mil] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 9:32 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: disappearing CIFS permissions ... Has anyone had any problems with setting CIFS share permissions and then having them disappear?? We have a series of scripts that run at night that manage our users in our NT4 domain. Our users are created and then for each user a home share is created on our filer. Every once in a while we will get a complaint that one of our new users can not access their home share. I check the share and sure enough the permissions are not there. However, when I check the output from our scripts they show that the permissions were set successfully. The user is created in the script by using the NET USER command and the shares are manipulated by the RMTSHARE program from the NT Resource Kit. After the user is created Domain Admins are granted permissions to the SHARE (and those permissions are always there) then the user is granted permissions (and that is where the problem occasionally occurs). It's an annoyance that I can't explain ... and I don't like those. If anyone has any ideas / suggestions / etc, etc ... please let me know. Thanks. - Scott W.

1 0

disappearing CIFS permissions ...
by Waters, G Scott DSTI 24 Jan '03

24 Jan '03

Has anyone had any problems with setting CIFS share permissions and then having them disappear?? We have a series of scripts that run at night that manage our users in our NT4 domain. Our users are created and then for each user a home share is created on our filer. Every once in a while we will get a complaint that one of our new users can not access their home share. I check the share and sure enough the permissions are not there. However, when I check the output from our scripts they show that the permissions were set successfully. The user is created in the script by using the NET USER command and the shares are manipulated by the RMTSHARE program from the NT Resource Kit. After the user is created Domain Admins are granted permissions to the SHARE (and those permissions are always there) then the user is granted permissions (and that is where the problem occasionally occurs). It's an annoyance that I can't explain ... and I don't like those. If anyone has any ideas / suggestions / etc, etc ... please let me know. Thanks. - Scott W.

1 0

RE: Spare disks and SnapRestore
by Alan McLachlan 24 Jan '03

24 Jan '03

Actually, spares don't count as far as the software limits are concerned. Data Ontap will prevent you adding disks to a live volume if you are hitting the volume or total filer storage limits, but the number of hot spares is only limited by the available id's on the FCAL loop. Tested on Data OnTap 6.2.2 and Data Ontap 6.3 regards, Alan McLachlan Senior Systems Engineer Storage Management Solutions ASI Solutions www.asi.com.au Ph +61 2 6230 1566 Fax +61 2 6230 5343 Mobile +61 428 655644 e-mail amclachlan(a)asi.com.au . -----Original Message----- From: Jacek Nogala [mailto:jacek.nogala@solidex.com.pl] Sent: Thursday, 23 January 2003 9:16 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Cc: Charles Bartels Subject: ODP: Spare disks and SnapRestore > The first is regarding spare disks. I'm going to have a fully loaded F810 soon; > 2 shelves with a total of twenty-one 72GB drives. Since I will have spare slots > in the shelves I was wondering if I can setup the netapp with a 22nd drive as a > hot-spare instead of "wasting" one out of my 21 disk pool. The specs on the F810 > say it maxes out at 1.5 TB raw which I will be hitting with the 21 drives. AFAIK 1.5 TB storage limit includes all installed disks. It means that 22 disk configuration for F810 is definitely not supported by NetApp and it is probably not working (some limits are enforced with Data ONTAP - I am not sure if this as well). > And a much more general question; what does SnapRestore do? > I believe this is a separately licensed option and I haven't > really been able to glean too much from the Netapp website. SnapRestore enables you instant reversion to the selected snapshot state of the whole volume (all Data ONTAPs) or single file (Data ONTAP 6.2 or later). "Instant" means without copying data. Actually only necessary pointers are copied. You have to be aware of the following drawbacks: - It is one-way trip (you are loosing all SnapShot copies that were collected after the SnapShot that you selected for reversion). - SnapRestoring of single file has negative performance impact (this operation causes fragmentation of WAFL file system). I hope this helps. Best regards, Jacek Nogala --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jacek Nogala __________ Inzynier Konsultant /______/__/ Al. Jerozolimskie 65/79 NetApp Certified Professional (Filer) _\____\___/ 00-697 Warszawa, Poland jacek.nogala(a)solidex.com.pl /______/__/ Tel: +48 (22) 630 66 11 http://www.solidex.com.pl SOLIDEX S.A. Fax: +48 (22) 630 66 13 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- **** ASI Solutions Disclaimer **** The material transmitted may contain confidential and/or privileged material and is intended only for the addressee. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender and destroy any copies of the material immediately. ASI will protect your Privacy according to the 10 Privacy Principles outlined under the new Privacy Act, Dec 2001. This email is also subject to copyright. Any use of or reliance upon this material by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. E-mails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects. Under no circumstances do we accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message or any attachments. **** END OF MESSAGE ****

1 0

Spare disks and SnapRestore
by Charles Bartels 23 Jan '03

23 Jan '03

Hi, I have a couple of questions. The first is regarding spare disks. I'm going to have a fully loaded F810 soon; 2 shelves with a total of twenty-one 72GB drives. Since I will have spare slots in the shelves I was wondering if I can setup the netapp with a 22nd drive as a hot-spare instead of "wasting" one out of my 21 disk pool. The specs on the F810 say it maxes out at 1.5 TB raw which I will be hitting with the 21 drives. And a much more general question; what does SnapRestore do? I believe this is a separately licensed option and I haven't really been able to glean too much from the Netapp website. Thanks. -Charles Bartels

2 1

ASSIST ME PLEASE
by victor nnadi 23 Jan '03

23 Jan '03

VICTOR NNADI & CO BLOCK 804-LAW HOUSE BUILDING, LEGAL PRACTITIONERS/NOTARY PUBLIC) LAGOS-NIGERIA E-mail-victor.nnadi(a)caramail.com DEAR SIR, IT IS MY PLEASURE TO WRITE YOU THIS LETTER IRRESPECTIVE OF THE FACT THAT YOU DO NOT KNOW ME. HOWEVER, I GOT YOUR NAME THROUGH YOUR COUNTRY BUSSINESS ATTACHEE HERE IN MY SEARCH FOR A RELIABLE AND TRUST WORTHY PERSON THAT CAN HANDLE SUCH A CONFIDENTIAL TRANSACTION OF THIS NAURE. I AM BARRISTER VICTOR NNADI , A FAMILY LAWYER TO OUR LATE MILITARY RULER, GENERAL SANI ABACHA WHO DIED SUDDENLY IN POWER ON THE 8TH OF JUNE 1998. SINCE HIS UNTIMELY DEMISE THE FAMILY HAS SUFFERED A LOT OF HARRASSMENT FROM THE REGIME THAT SUCCEEDED HIM.THE REGIME AND THE CIVILIAN. RECENTLY, THE WIFE WAS BANNED FROM TRAVELLING OUTSIDE NIGERIA BEING A FALL OUT FROM THE SEIZURE OF 38 SUIT CASES CONTAINING CASH MONEY (800 eight hundred million USD) FROM HER AT THE MURTALA MOHAMMED INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ON HER WAY TO SAUDI ARABIA. ALSO HUGE AMOUNT OF MONEY HAS BEEN RECOVERED FROM HER SON WHO IS IN INCARCERATION NOW. THERE ARE STILL LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY IN HARD CURRENCY SAVED WITH SOME SECURITY COMPANIES OUTSIDE NIGERIA AND MRS ABACHA HAS SHOW ME DOCUMENTS OF WHERE THEY DEPOSITED USD 35.5MILLION IN A SECURITY VAULT FOR SAFE KEEPING. HOWEVER, THE FAMILY IS NOW BANKRUP FOLLOWING THE INCARCRATION OF MOHAMMED HER SON WHO WAS CHARGED FOR THE MURDER OF KUDIRAT ABIOLA THE WIFE OF LATE CHIEF MOSHOOD ABIOLA, RECENTLY THE FAMILY APPROACHED ME TO GET A RELIIABLE PERSON WHO WILL CLAIM THE MONEY ON OUR BEHALF IN THE SECURITY COMPANNY. THIS MONEY IS ALREADY IN (EUROPE) AND IT IS DEPOSITED IN DIPLOATIC BOXES, AS ARTIFACTS AND PERSONAL EFFECTS.IT IS ONLY BOTH OF US THAT KNOW IT CONTAINS CASH MONEY. IF YOUR CONDITIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE, WE WILL PREPARE YOU AS THE BENEFICIARY OF THE BOXES. WE HAVE ALL THE DOCUMENTSWITHS US.THE SECURITY COMPANY IN EUROPE HAVE CALLED US TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT CLAIMING THESE BOXES WHICH WE HAVE EXPLAINED TO THEM THAT WE SHALL GET IN TOUCH WITH THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLES.REMEMBER THAT WE ARE MAKING THIS CONTACT BECAUSE WE CANNOT LEAVE THE COUNTRY UNTILL AFTER THE COURT CASES. NOTE: THERE IS NO RISK INVOLVED BECAUSE I AM ALSO INVOLED AS THE ABACHAS ATTORNEY. THEREFORE, CONTACT ME ON MY DIRECT EMAIL ADDRESS AS STATED ABOVE. PLEASE, IF YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED JUST DESTROY THIS INFORMATION, AS THIS IS A TOP SECRET.WE SHALL BE PREPARED TO DO MORE BUSINESS WITH YOU AT THE END OF THIS TRANSACTION. I AWAIT YOUR URGENT RESPONSE. BEST REGARDS, BARR.VICTOR NNADI. _________________________________________________________ Gagne une PS2 ! Envoie un SMS avec le code PS au 61166 (0,35 Hors coût du SMS)

1 0

snapmirror priority?
by Joseph Bishop 22 Jan '03

22 Jan '03

Morning folks, Does anyone know how to set the priority of a snapmirror build? I am looking for an option like the RAID Reconstruct priority. Any ideas? Joe Joseph Bishop ICIS Data Access Services (DTA) joseph.bishop(a)jpl.nasa.gov voice (818) 354-9539 pager 8864354(a)skytel.com The personal and professional opinions expressed are mine alone, and do not represent JPL in any way.

1 0

Clearcase_abld user
by Clawson, Simon 22 Jan '03

22 Jan '03

Hello, A question for anyone running clearcase in a mixed environment... We have a PC domain and a UNIX domain. Each has users accessing clearcase. I have currently created the clearcase_abld user in the UNIX domain, and made him a member of a group. I have also created a clearcase_albd user in windows, and made a group with he same name as the UNIX group. However, I am told this is quite an unusual way of doing this, and a more normal approach is to create a user map in the Netapps usermap.cfg file which maps clearcase_albd to a user in the UNIX domain who will have right to the vobs etc. Any one have any suggestions on the best approach? Thanks Simon Simon Clawson Mentor Graphics HDL Designer Series R&D Rivergate Systems Administrator London Road Berkshire RG14 2QB TEL: 01635 811409

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters