toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13514 discussions

NDMPcopy and fibre disk shelve file copy.
by Ngoh, Clarence 01 Aug '03

01 Aug '03

Hello good toaster folks We are planning to move a huge lot of data (> 3.0 T) from our 32 GB drives to 144 GB. I am carrying out some preliminary information about the quickest path to move the data across - the first option is to use ndmpcopy and the second is to copy it from shelf to shelf over fiber. Since this is a preliminary investigation, can someone please point me to relevant resources that may be helpful? I am after statistics of transfer rates between the two and perhaps other materials that others have found useful. I have googled and looked through past toaster archives, and most of it is either outdated or lack of relevant information. Thanks. Clarence. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. **************************************************

4 3

RE: Does anyone have experience with SQL 2000 on NetApp?
by lallin＠millermartin.com 01 Aug '03

01 Aug '03

Take a look at TR 3162 on http://now.netapp.com "Nicko Demeter" <nicko(a)rack.org> on 08/01/2003 03:23:19 PM To: Luther Allin/M&M@MMIS cc: Subject: RE: Does anyone have experience with SQL 2000 on NetApp? How were you able to get SQL to place the MDF files on a network share? Nicko -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of lallin(a)millermartin.com Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:07 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Does anyone have experience with SQL 2000 on NetApp? We currently have several SQL 2000 Servers accessing databases and logs on an F720 via CIFS. It works very well. We've not used the VLD option but do plan to implement it for Exchange by the end of the year. We'll probably use CIFS for as long as MS supports it for our SQL databases. As far as performance goes, we saw a small performance hit with our SQL databases primarily because of the way that our volume is layed out. We have a single 12 spindle volume that is shared with 3 SQL Servers, 3 Notes Servers, and user homes. As you can see this is not ideal, but in this configuration, our SQL Servers still perform remarkably well. By the way, we are going to separate our volumes eventually so that SQL has it's own set of disks. My recommendation would be to set your filer up with it's own SQL volume if at all possible. Feel free to contact me if you have any further quesitons. ----------------------------------------------- Luther L. Allin IV, MCSE, ICSA Network Systems Engineer Miller & Martin LLP 832 Georgia Avenue, Suite 1000 Chattanooga, TN 37402 lallin(a)millermartin.com http://www.millermartin.com/ Phone: 423-785-8381 Fax: 423-321-1678 ----------------------------------------------- Steven Keene <SKeene(a)creativesolutions.com> on 08/01/2003 08:30:15 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com cc: (bcc: Luther Allin/M&M) Subject: Does anyone have experience with SQL 2000 on NetApp? Hi, just wondering if anyone has had experience with either Windows 2003 and/or SQL 2000 on NetApp running with VLD. I am new to NetApp and being soon to install one, was wondering about different volume sizes and performance with SQL databases. Any input would be appreciated. Thanks, Steve

1 0

Multiple Ms Exchange 5.5 servers on filer 820
by Atchkov, Assen 01 Aug '03

01 Aug '03

Hello, I am a new user of NetApp technology. Our company plans to use four MS Exchange 5.5 server connected to a single 820 filer. Is anyone running a similar configuration? Your output will be appreciated. Thank you Assen The information contained in or attached to this email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. It may contain information, which is confidential and/or covered by legal professional or other privilege (or other rules or laws with similar effect in jurisdictions outside Canada). The views expressed in this email are not necessarily the views of Centrica Canada Limited, Centrica US Holdings Inc. or their affiliates, and the said companies, their directors, officers or employees make no representation or accept any liability for its accuracy or completeness unless expressly stated to the contrary.

1 0

RE: Does anyone have experience with SQL 2000 on NetApp?
by Reinoud Reynders 01 Aug '03

01 Aug '03

We use SQL and VLD just one year now. We are very happy with it. The performance is very high. We use a separate volume for our logs. So we have 1 volume for the data with several QTREE's (one for every database) and 1 volume for the logs. This is because there is a difference between write/read behaviour (logs = write; data = read). The performance is much better when you split logs and data. Of course, more disks in your raidgroup gives more performance (5 spindles of 72 GB disks for data). For the logs, we use just 2 spindles, but that is no problem. We use that volumes only for VLD. We have some other volumes on the same filer for other applications (file server, ...). When you want more details, please contact me. Reinoud _____ From: Steven Keene [mailto:SKeene@creativesolutions.com] Sent: vrijdag 1 augustus 2003 14:30 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Does anyone have experience with SQL 2000 on NetApp? Hi, just wondering if anyone has had experience with either Windows 2003 and/or SQL 2000 on NetApp running with VLD. I am new to NetApp and being soon to install one, was wondering about different volume sizes and performance with SQL databases. Any input would be appreciated. Thanks, Steve

1 0

Performance impact of 6.3 to 6.4 upgrade?
by Davin Milun 01 Aug '03

01 Aug '03

Does anyone have any concrete experience with what the performance impact of the WAFL reorg that upgrading from 6.3.x to 6.4.x causes is? I have some very loaded (almost disk bound) 960C's running 6.3.2, which I need to upgrade to 6.4.1 (because I'm told that the new DS14 Mk2 shelves that we're adding are not supported by 6.3.x). And I'm worried about the performance impact of the upgrade is: how much disk/CPU increase it uses while it runs, and how long the reorg typically takes. I've asked the same question of NetApp support, but I was wondering if anyone here has some personal experience. Thanks! Davin. -- Davin Milun E-mail: milun(a)cse.buffalo.edu

1 0

Re: Does anyone have experience with SQL 2000 on NetApp?
by lallin＠millermartin.com 01 Aug '03

01 Aug '03

We currently have several SQL 2000 Servers accessing databases and logs on an F720 via CIFS. It works very well. We've not used the VLD option but do plan to implement it for Exchange by the end of the year. We'll probably use CIFS for as long as MS supports it for our SQL databases. As far as performance goes, we saw a small performance hit with our SQL databases primarily because of the way that our volume is layed out. We have a single 12 spindle volume that is shared with 3 SQL Servers, 3 Notes Servers, and user homes. As you can see this is not ideal, but in this configuration, our SQL Servers still perform remarkably well. By the way, we are going to separate our volumes eventually so that SQL has it's own set of disks. My recommendation would be to set your filer up with it's own SQL volume if at all possible. Feel free to contact me if you have any further quesitons. ----------------------------------------------- Luther L. Allin IV, MCSE, ICSA Network Systems Engineer Miller & Martin LLP 832 Georgia Avenue, Suite 1000 Chattanooga, TN 37402 lallin(a)millermartin.com http://www.millermartin.com/ Phone: 423-785-8381 Fax: 423-321-1678 ----------------------------------------------- Steven Keene <SKeene(a)creativesolutions.com> on 08/01/2003 08:30:15 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com cc: (bcc: Luther Allin/M&M) Subject: Does anyone have experience with SQL 2000 on NetApp? Hi, just wondering if anyone has had experience with either Windows 2003 and/or SQL 2000 on NetApp running with VLD. I am new to NetApp and being soon to install one, was wondering about different volume sizes and performance with SQL databases. Any input would be appreciated. Thanks, Steve

1 0

Does anyone have experience with SQL 2000 on NetApp?
by Steven Keene 01 Aug '03

01 Aug '03

Hi, just wondering if anyone has had experience with either Windows 2003 and/or SQL 2000 on NetApp running with VLD. I am new to NetApp and being soon to install one, was wondering about different volume sizes and performance with SQL databases. Any input would be appreciated. Thanks, Steve

1 0

SNMP and VIFS
by paul.winchcombe＠ukgateway.net 01 Aug '03

01 Aug '03

Hi all, This is my first posting so apologies if I get syntax wrong. I have a 940c cluster and have setup 3 network card in a multi VIF and then a Single VIF. When I unplug a cable from the config I get a message on the console e11a down but the SNMP message sent to the Management Station was TRAP 4. The mib has been loaded and traps for machine being rebooted and Volume full are decoded correctly. What am i doing wrong ? Regards Paul

1 0

where to purchase replacement parts
by Dan Finn 31 Jul '03

31 Jul '03

Aside from Netapp themselves and ebay does anyone have any vendors they can recommend to purchase new replacement parts for my F740 and F760. All I really need is disks. Thanks Dan

4 3

**Half price tobacco**
by Tobacco Store 31 Jul '03

31 Jul '03

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters