toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13523 discussions

Looking for boot disks for an NetCache 4.1R6
by Constantin Bogomolnyi 05 Sep '03

05 Sep '03

Hello, I have just found an old C760 its in quite dead state , but i fixed it , it works now . (the mother board was broken :))))) But I have an problem i need the bootdisks of the same version that installed on it (4.1R6) too reset the password . This version is not supported anymore by netapp . So maybe somebody could send me his boot disks images ? I'm also looking for more recent boot disks if they can reset the pass (i tryed with my F760 disks but it crash after i try to reset the pass). Very best regards Cb

1 0

Anyone using trapnotify script for CIFS users?
by Sto Rage ! 05 Sep '03

05 Sep '03

Dear toasters, Is anyone using this script to notify CIFS users when they reach their soft quota thresholds or their quota limits? The stock script needs modifications to do this. Wondering if someone has already done this. thanks -G

1 0

RE: System Notification from mlswfsa (SHELF_FAULT!!!)
by Charles Roufay 03 Sep '03

03 Sep '03

Hello, if the installation manual was followed, you should normally have the following : emu 5 refers the the second shelf connected to 7a emu 4 will refer to the first shelf connected to 7a If you are standing at the back. The fan on the right is number 1 and the fan on the left is 2 Emu Alarms meaning Number of flashes meaning 1 Fan 1 failure (right hand side) 2 Fan 2 failure (left hand side) 5 Temperature condition exists Regards Charles Roufay -----Original Message----- From: Dan OBrien [mailto:dmobrien@lcsi.net] Sent: woensdag 3 september 2003 15:51 To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Cc: Terry Beckett Subject: System Notification from mlswfsa (SHELF_FAULT!!!) Help, I keep getting these, but they correct themselves. "emu 5 reports no right fan" "Fault reported on disk storage shelf attached to slot 7a" Questions: 1) Which of the two 7A shelfs is emu 5? How do I count them? Is there some kind of numbering scheme or switch setting for the emu chain? 2) From which direction is the right fan? Facing the front shelf panel or facing the rear of the shelf (i.e., looking at the fans themselves)? By the time I get a notice and get in to check it, it clears itself. If I can isolate the particular fan, I'll move it around and see if the fault follows the fan. I'm a self-maintainer, no maint contract ($$$$). > Mon Sep 1 14:35:50 EDT [emu_admin]: emu 5 reports no right fan. > Mon Sep 1 14:35:50 EDT [statd]: *** NOTICE *** > Fault reported on disk storage shelf attached to slot 7a. > Please check fans, power and temperature. > Mon Sep 1 14:35:51 EDT [asup_main]: System Notification mail sent > Mon Sep 1 15:00:00 EDT [statd]: 3:00pm up 1 day, 21:11 24158864 NFS ops, 0 CIFS ops, 0 HTTP ops > Mon Sep 1 15:00:00 EDT [statd]: *** NOTICE *** > Fault previously reported on disk storage shelf attached > to slot 7a has been corrected. > Mon Sep 1 16:00:00 EDT [statd]: 4:00pm up 1 day, 22:11 24158999 NFS ops, 0 CIFS ops, 0 HTTP ops > Mon Sep 1 16:23:40 EDT [emu_admin]: emu 5 reports no right fan. > Mon Sep 1 16:23:40 EDT [statd]: *** NOTICE *** > Fault reported on disk storage shelf attached to slot 7a. > Please check fans, power and temperature. Thanks in advance, Dan O'Brien, dmobrien(a)lcsi.net Cell: 614-783-4859 Work: 614-476-8473

1 0

System Notification from mlswfsa (SHELF_FAULT!!!)
by Dan OBrien 03 Sep '03

03 Sep '03

Help, I keep getting these, but they correct themselves. "emu 5 reports no right fan" "Fault reported on disk storage shelf attached to slot 7a" Questions: 1) Which of the two 7A shelfs is emu 5? How do I count them? Is there some kind of numbering scheme or switch setting for the emu chain? 2) From which direction is the right fan? Facing the front shelf panel or facing the rear of the shelf (i.e., looking at the fans themselves)? By the time I get a notice and get in to check it, it clears itself. If I can isolate the particular fan, I'll move it around and see if the fault follows the fan. I'm a self-maintainer, no maint contract ($$$$). > Mon Sep 1 14:35:50 EDT [emu_admin]: emu 5 reports no right fan. > Mon Sep 1 14:35:50 EDT [statd]: *** NOTICE *** > Fault reported on disk storage shelf attached to slot 7a. > Please check fans, power and temperature. > Mon Sep 1 14:35:51 EDT [asup_main]: System Notification mail sent > Mon Sep 1 15:00:00 EDT [statd]: 3:00pm up 1 day, 21:11 24158864 NFS ops, 0 CIFS ops, 0 HTTP ops > Mon Sep 1 15:00:00 EDT [statd]: *** NOTICE *** > Fault previously reported on disk storage shelf attached > to slot 7a has been corrected. > Mon Sep 1 16:00:00 EDT [statd]: 4:00pm up 1 day, 22:11 24158999 NFS ops, 0 CIFS ops, 0 HTTP ops > Mon Sep 1 16:23:40 EDT [emu_admin]: emu 5 reports no right fan. > Mon Sep 1 16:23:40 EDT [statd]: *** NOTICE *** > Fault reported on disk storage shelf attached to slot 7a. > Please check fans, power and temperature. Thanks in advance, Dan O'Brien, dmobrien(a)lcsi.net Cell: 614-783-4859 Work: 614-476-8473

1 0

Re: Wafliron/WAFL_check in read only mode/tell me if something is wrong, but don't fix mode
by Thorsten.Lemke＠computacenter.com 03 Sep '03

03 Sep '03

I fully agree that a 'check but don't fix' feature would be very helpful but we made the experience that wafliron do not touch any productive files. We recently had the problem that snapvault refused to run because of an inconsistent file system. It was a volume of about 270 GB and 10m files. As this volume hosted the internet presence of a big customer, we had little chance to take it offline and were understandably doubtful to use wafliron without knowing what we have to expect. So we made a test run on a less critical volume and it turned out to be a quite useful tool. It runs in the background with low priority but nervertheless I would recommend to run it over night. In our case it took about 4 hours to finish and it moved about 1500 files into the lost+found directory. Obviously all of them were already "invisible" as the internet presence was not affected. Afterwards our problem was solved. Of course I can only speak about our case and can not give you any guarantee... Perhaps you are able to do a volume snapmirror to backup your data before running wafliron (that is what we did), because volume snapmirror is working on block level whereas qtree snapmirror and snapvault are working on file level. Regards Thorsten Lemke "Garrett Burke" <garrett.burke(a)eircom.net>@mathworks.com on 02.09.2003 16:24:40 Please respond to <garrett.burke(a)eircom.net> Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com To: "Toasters $E-mail$" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> cc: "Philip Boyle $E-mail$" <philip.boyle(a)eircom.net>, "Sam McKenna $E-mail$" <sam.mckenna(a)eircom.net> Subject: Wafliron/WAFL_check in read only mode/tell me if something is wrong, but don't fix mode -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Due to a snapmirror failing issue, NetApp support have advised us to run wafliron (online) or WAFL_check (offline) on the source volume. They have advised us that there's no way to check a volume while online for errors - a 'tell me if I need to run WAFL_check in fix mode, but don't do anything now' (I realise that WAFL_check prompts before fixing) The issue is that we do not want to schedule offline maintenance with an unkown end time when we don't know if there's anything wrong with the filesystem. We expect that the check to take several hrs as we have 13.5m files & 340G in the volume. Have other run into this before? I see the lack of 'check while online, but don't fix' as a serious flaw with OnTap. Thanks, GB ---- Garrett Burke, Service Implementation & Support Manager, Eircomnet. http://www.eircom.net COMPUTACENTER (UK) LTD The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. Computacenter information is available from http://www.computacenter.com This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ***************************************************************************************************************************

1 0

RE: Veritas Netbackup Question
by Kumar, Rahul 03 Sep '03

03 Sep '03

Veritas 4.5 supports remote NDMP I think it requires a dedicated drive. Rahul -----Original Message----- From: Ziller, Frank [mailto:FZiller@IKON.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:06 AM To: 'Barry Lustig'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup Question There is a way to use NDMP over ethernet versus the SCSI\FCAL with Veritas NBU. Not sure if it requires a dedicated drive however. Possibly worth a look. I think it is called Remote NDMP. -----Original Message----- From: Barry Lustig [mailto:barry-keyword-toasters.2c06cb@lustig.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 7:46 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Veritas Netbackup Question As a number of people have pointed out, one option is to mount the filer onto the veritas media/master server via NFS or CIFS and then backup the volume. I figured on this as a fall-back option. I was hoping to find another mechanism, via NDMP on the server, to get past this. barry

1 0

RE: Veritas Netbackup Question
by Ziller, Frank 03 Sep '03

03 Sep '03

There is a way to use NDMP over ethernet versus the SCSI\FCAL with Veritas NBU. Not sure if it requires a dedicated drive however. Possibly worth a look. I think it is called Remote NDMP. -----Original Message----- From: Barry Lustig [mailto:barry-keyword-toasters.2c06cb@lustig.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 7:46 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Veritas Netbackup Question As a number of people have pointed out, one option is to mount the filer onto the veritas media/master server via NFS or CIFS and then backup the volume. I figured on this as a fall-back option. I was hoping to find another mechanism, via NDMP on the server, to get past this. barry

1 0

RE: Veritas Netbackup Question
by Charles Bartels 02 Sep '03

02 Sep '03

An easy, if not optimal solution, would be to NFS mount the filer onto your Netbackup master server and back that up w/o NDMP. -C. >-----Original Message----- >From: Barry Lustig [mailto:barry-dated-1062974911.42137a@lustig.com] >Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 3:48 PM >To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: Veritas Netbackup Question > > >I think that I'm in a bit of a quandary. I'm trying to implement >backups using Netbackup 4.5 for a single filer and a handful of unix >and windows clients. I have a single Overland library with a single >tape drive. As far as I can tell, I have to dedicate the single tape >drive to NDMP. This would preclude backing up other systems to that >tape drive. Is there anyone on the list that has run into >this type of >a problem with Netbackup? > >Thanks, > >barry >

2 1

Veritas Netbackup Question
by Barry Lustig 02 Sep '03

02 Sep '03

I think that I'm in a bit of a quandary. I'm trying to implement backups using Netbackup 4.5 for a single filer and a handful of unix and windows clients. I have a single Overland library with a single tape drive. As far as I can tell, I have to dedicate the single tape drive to NDMP. This would preclude backing up other systems to that tape drive. Is there anyone on the list that has run into this type of a problem with Netbackup? Thanks, barry

2 1

RE: qtree copy ?
by ilya.birman＠abnamro.com 02 Sep '03

02 Sep '03

Or Qtree snap mirror "Michel Geldenhuys" To: <devnull(a)adc.idt.com>, "'NetApp Toasters List'" <michel@geldenhuy <toasters(a)mathworks.com> s.com> cc: Sent by: Subject: RE: qtree copy ? owner-toasters@ma thworks.com 09/02/2003 04:14 PM Have you thinked about NDMPcopy ? > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > On Behalf Of devnull(a)adc.idt.com > Sent: mardi 2 septembre 2003 21:36 > To: NetApp Toasters List > Subject: qtree copy ? > > I just upgraded to 6.4.1 this weekend and added a disk shelf to my f810. > I had to move some of my projects from one volume to another and couldnt > find like a qtree copy to move a part of the volume. > > I had to use tar from a unix host. > > Would it not be a nice feature to have something that doesnt involve the > network and just goes with the disk shelves. > > Just a thought... > > /dev/null > > devnull(a)adc.idt.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters